autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: shouldn't it error?


From: Bob Lockie
Subject: Re: shouldn't it error?
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:24:31 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210

On 12/12/03 17:38 Ben Pfaff spoke thusly<br>
Bob Lockie <address@hidden> writes:


Shouldn't the following give an error about an unknown option
"./configure --enable-debu=full"?


Actually this is explained in the Autoconf manual:

       `configure' scripts do not complain about
    `--enable-FEATURE' options that they do not support.  This
    behavior permits configuring a source tree containing
    multiple packages with a top-level `configure' script when
    the packages support different options, without spurious
    error messages about options that some of the packages
    support.  An unfortunate side effect is that option spelling
    errors are not diagnosed.  No better approach to this problem
    has been suggested so far.

Thanks.
I thought I remembered something else that was similar to a feature that errored with a spelling mistake.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]