[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT
|
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT |
|
Date: |
Sun, 2 Feb 2003 06:50:23 -0500 (EST) |
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Mike Castle wrote:
> I see that a lot of packages (bison, for example) use AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT.
tsk, tsk. if you read the changelog it's obvious how that came about.
> Yet, this isn't documented anywhere.
>
> Should maintainers be using AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT? If so, should they be
probably not: "undocumented" (and some documented) features of autoconf
are subject to change w/o notice.
(recently annoyed at noticing another undocumented/incompatible change)
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net