[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool 1.4.3
From: |
Sascha Schumann |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool 1.4.3 |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:49:57 +0200 (CEST) |
> You want autoconf -f then.
-f, --force consider all files obsolete
We do a ./cvsclean right now for autoconf +2.50 which purges
all generated data. I guess that is basically the same.
> You know, you are typically the kind of people who has valid grieves
> against Autoconf, but using things that were never documented.
You have lost me. Why should autoconf document any valid m4
command?
> esyscmd is definitely excluded from our framework.
Then you need to document that. Neither 2.13's nor 2.54's
autoconf.info says anything to that effect.
> But you kept developping your Autoconf instead of coming and
> deciding for a solution.
I cannot parse that sentence.
> How do I know? Did you send a bug report? Do you have a test case?
I'm sorry, it was noticed by so many people, I supposed it
would make its way to you.
> And BTW, do PHP's extensions finally produce valid HTML code?
PHP's output, where applicable, conforms to XHTML-1.0-STRICT
as defined by the W3C.
- Sascha
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, (continued)
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Stephan Kulow, 2002/10/09
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Earnie Boyd, 2002/10/08
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Sascha Schumann, 2002/10/08
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/09
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Sascha Schumann, 2002/10/09
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/09
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3,
Sascha Schumann <=
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/09
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/10
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/10/08
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Bernd Jendrissek, 2002/10/08
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Pavel Roskin, 2002/10/08
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Sascha Schumann, 2002/10/08
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Robert Boehne, 2002/10/08
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/09
- Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Paolo Bonzini, 2002/10/09
Re: Libtool 1.4.3, Paolo Bonzini, 2002/10/09