[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automake 1.6d available (beta for Automake 1.7)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Automake 1.6d available (beta for Automake 1.7) |
Date: |
24 Sep 2002 13:38:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) |
| Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
| > Bruce> My preference would be this:
| >
| > Could you send this to the list?
|
| Alright:
|
| I would really like to see the auto* tools packages (autoconf,
| automake and libtool) each adopt several of their worst
| clients' packages for regression testing.
It's already the case, as you just proved.
I appreciate very much your suggestions, but I have another: run the
betas. Once there will be enough people running the betas, there will
probably be less bugs released. As of today, I run CVS Autoconf
etc. on a large set of packages, including the very demanding
Coreutils. Plus I send announcements for betas. After this, I feel
in peace with myself when I release.
- Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh, (continued)
- Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/24
- Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh, Paul Eggert, 2002/09/24
- Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/25
- Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh, Paul Eggert, 2002/09/26
- Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh, Roger Leigh, 2002/09/23
- Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/24
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Automake 1.6d available (beta for Automake 1.7), Bruce Korb, 2002/09/22
- Re: Automake 1.6d available (beta for Automake 1.7),
Akim Demaille <=