[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FHS
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: FHS |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jan 2002 00:19:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.7 (Y.Dþzaki) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) (i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.8) |
Russ says:
> Harlan Stenn <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > One problem is that config.site is kinda lame - we really need nested or
> > hierarchical config.site support.
>
> > I haven't see the case where a single config.site will really be of much
> > use.
>
> You can set CONFIG_SITE to point to the appropriate one, which means that
> one config.site file is sufficient; you just may have to have a large
> collection of them.
Yes, my point exactly.
We need a much friendlier way to handle config.site, or a functional
equivalent.
There is a chance that <http://ark.sourceforge.net> could be useful in this
regard, too, and also <http://www.openpackages.org>. But this is perhaps a
bit afield of the current discussion.
H
- Re: FHS, (continued)
- Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Bruce Korb, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Harlan Stenn, 2002/01/06
- Re: FHS, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/07
- Re: FHS,
Harlan Stenn <=
Re: FHS, Bruce Korb, 2002/01/05
Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05
Re: FHS, Guido Draheim, 2002/01/05
- Re: FHS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05