[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Changing AC_DEFINE
From: |
Tim Van Holder |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Changing AC_DEFINE |
Date: |
18 Jun 2001 10:24:52 +0200 |
On 17 Jun 2001 19:11:05 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2001, "Tim Van Holder" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I'm afraid not even -E is a complete solution. Try, for example:
>
> echo -E -e '\a'
>
> and note that `-e' isn't echoed, and you get a beep, not a literal
> `\a'.
Hmm - and annoyingly,
echo -E -- -e '\a'
prints '-- -e \a' instead of dropping the '--' altogether (I'd consider
that a bash bug though).
> That's why libtool always uses:
>
> $echo "X$whatever" | $Xsed
>
> where Xsed is:
>
> sed -e '1s/^X//'
and $echo is set to 'echo -E' when needed? Otherwise, $whatever would
still end up being expanded, wouldn't it?
> But this is another problem of portable echoing. It's amazing that
> something as simple as plain echoing can't be done easily :-(
I'm sure there's some axiom related to Murphy's law that states:
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
And if there isn't, let it henceforth be known as 'The Oliva Axiom'.
--
Tim Van Holder - Anubex N.V.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message was posted using plain text. I do not endorse any
products or services that may be hyperlinked to this message.
- Re: RFC: Changing AC_DEFINE, (continued)