[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possibly undefined macro: dnl (Was: Autoconf 2.50 is released)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: possibly undefined macro: dnl (Was: Autoconf 2.50 is released) |
Date: |
21 May 2001 21:06:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> It means that somewhere you were relying on the broken quotation
Akim> of 2.13, or maybe that it is 2.50, trying to fix these issues,
Akim> that broke your sources.
It can very well be a real bug in 2.50, your feedback is essential.
I've just found one such bug:
/tmp % cat configure.in nostromo 21:00
define([active], [ACTIVE])
AC_INIT
AC_EGREP_CPP([active], [active [active]])
/tmp % autoconf nostromo 21:01
/tmp % grep -i active configure nostromo 21:01
active [active]
egrep "ACTIVE" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
/tmp % ace nostromo 21:01
/tmp % grep -i active configure nostromo 21:01
active [active]
egrep "active" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
The real good output should be
ACTIVE active
egrep "ACTIVE" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
but in order to keep backward compatibility, 2.50 should probably just
stick to what 2.13 said.
Pavel, Alexandre, what shall we do?