autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gcc -nologo?


From: Tobias Hunger
Subject: gcc -nologo?
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 18:56:53 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi!

I'm new to this list, so please bear with me if I make a fool out of myself:-)

We have some configure files in our CVS that are broken. Taking a closer look 
I discovered that the libraries don't get found since configure tries to 
'compile' its test applets with 'gcc -nologo -E'. I have autoconf 2.13 (from 
the autoconf-2.13-27 deb) installed.

Here is the config.log:

This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
 
configure:722: checking whether make sets ${MAKE}
configure:770: checking for gcc
configure:883: checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works
configure:899: gcc -o conftest    conftest.c  1>&5
configure:925: checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler
configure:930: checking whether we are using GNU C
configure:958: checking whether gcc accepts -g
configure:994: checking for c++
configure:1026: checking whether the C++ compiler (c++  ) works
configure:1042: c++ -o conftest    conftest.C  1>&5
configure:1068: checking whether the C++ compiler (c++  ) is a cross-compiler
configure:1073: checking whether we are using GNU C++
configure:1101: checking whether c++ accepts -g
configure:1270: checking for freetype-config
configure:1305: checking for freetype - version >= 6:1:0
configure:1392: c++ -o conftest  -pipe -I/usr/include/freetype2   conftest.C  
- -L/usr/lib -lfreetype 1>&5
configure:1477: checking how to run the C++ preprocessor
configure:1520: checking how to run the C preprocessor
configure:2189: checking for GL/glut.h
configure:2199: gcc -nologo -E   conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out
gcc: unrecognized option `-nologo'
configure: failed program was:
#line 2194 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#include <GL/glut.h>

We don't have -nologo anywhere, so I assume this is a bug in autoconf. Is 
this a known bug (I can't access your GNATS right now). What can I do to get 
around this problem?

- -- 
Gruss,
Tobias

- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Tobias Hunger                  The box said: 'Windows 95 or better'
address@hidden                  So I installed Linux.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6xgxVVND+cGpk748RAga/AKCITLPTCd1LoKhECQ+TRIpQ2N4epwCdFnbv
D8HQCJOfgoScwcCqlQuG7pA=
=rv5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]