[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updated win32 macro
|
From: |
Robert Collins |
|
Subject: |
Re: updated win32 macro |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:12:58 +1100 |
I just went and looked at the AC_LANG stuff properly - to support that
properly it seems like I need to choose
_which_ variables get altered on the basis of the current stack value,
or go with language specific functions.
Whats better? Is it worth supporting the AC_LANG for this essentially
non-unix feature? I'm happy to put the time in if it is..
Rob
- Re: -mwin32 test macro, (continued)
- Re: -mwin32 test macro, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/14
- updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/14
- Re: updated win32 macro, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- win32 macro version 3, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, edward, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15