[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rename atomicity
|
From: |
Mike Castle |
|
Subject: |
Re: Rename atomicity |
|
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 14:12:24 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.6i |
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 06:32:25AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Do you know of a system on which such a use of rename is _not_ atomic?
NT. (NT will happily rename() across disks, hardly an atomic operation).
Some earlier implementations of Linux.
I believe some implementations of Solaris (for performance reasons, rename
was not made atomic).
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
address@hidden and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
- Rename atomicity, Derek R. Price, 2001/03/02
- Re: Rename atomicity, Jim Meyering, 2001/03/04
- Re: Rename atomicity, Assar Westerlund, 2001/03/04
- Re: Rename atomicity,
Mike Castle <=
- Re: Rename atomicity, Assar Westerlund, 2001/03/06
- Re: Rename atomicity, Thomas E. Dickey, 2001/03/06
- Re: Rename atomicity, Paul Eggert, 2001/03/06
- Re: Rename atomicity, Mike Castle, 2001/03/07
- Re: Rename atomicity, Earnie Boyd, 2001/03/08
- Re: Rename atomicity, Derek R. Price, 2001/03/22