[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:48:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 06:44:37AM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote:
: --- "Lars J. Aas" <address@hidden> wrote:
: >
: > BTW, in the EXEEXT test, you need to separate the ls into three ls-commands,
: > because
: > `ls conftest.exe conftest' will swap the results as you saw from Ralf's
: > example.
: >
:
: How portable is `ls -U conftest.exe conftest'?
-U do not sort; list entries in directory order
"directory order" isn't what we're after - it's command line argument order.
Lars J
--
Innovation is one percent inspiration and ninetynine percent perspiration,
and in my case; twice that... -- Norville Barnes, `The Hudsucker Proxy'
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, (continued)
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Ralf Corsepius, 2000/12/19
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Lars J. Aas, 2000/12/19
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/19
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/20
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/20
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/20
- Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/12/20
Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Lars J. Aas, 2000/12/19
Re: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Earnie Boyd, 2000/12/19
RE: AC_OBJEXT revisited, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/12/19