[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) |
Date: |
14 Dec 2000 10:45:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <address@hidden> writes:
Mo> Well, what if we did this? It kind of puts the hack back in but it
Mo> does it without keeping the AC_CYGWIN macros and without compiling
Mo> anything.
The problem is that you require AC_CANONICAL_HOST, hence you require
config.guess and config.sub. This is what we are trying to avoid.
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, (continued)
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, akim, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/13
- AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again),
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/15
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/15
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/15