[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_LN_S limitation
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_LN_S limitation |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:02:35 +0100 |
HI Paul.
On 12/26/2011 11:27 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/26/11 13:21, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> * NEWS:
>>>>
>> Forgotten a trailing "Update" here? And ditto in the ChangeLog entry.
>
> The style I was using was:
>
> * foo:
> * bar (baz): log message
>
> where the log message applies to both lines.
>
Oh, OK. I wasn't aware such a format was allowed by the GCS.
> I suppose one can write it this way:
>
> * foo, bar (baz): log message
>
> but I prefer to use the latter form only
> when both FOO and BAR have a BAZ,
> which isn't the case here.
>
Honestly, I'd have written it like this:
* foo: <log message>.
* bar (baz): Likewise.
but this is just a cosmetic issue, so no big deal.
Regards,
Stefano