[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: m4_wrap behavior

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: m4_wrap behavior
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:35:20 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403

Hello Paul,

* Paul Eggert wrote on Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:22:00AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
> > Last but not least m4parw is a really ugly name.  ;-)
> Well, I suggested 'm4parw' because I didn't want people to use it.  :-)

OK, that explains it a bit.

> > I propose this documentation along with it, and, given absence of
> > comments, will apply both patches together in a day or two.
> I like this idea.  However, the documentation could stand a bit more
> improvement.  I installed the following patch to handle the
> documentation part, and will let you install Stepan's patch at your
> convenience.

Done now.

> Just to double check, I assume you're talking about installing this patch
> (there have been so many flying around lately that I lost context at first):

Yes, that's the one I applied now.

> 2006-06-19  Paul Eggert  <address@hidden>
>       and Ralf Wildenhues  <address@hidden>
>       * NEWS: Document that m4wrap/m4_wrap might not be LIFO.
>       * doc/autoconf.texi (): Likewise.

I added 'Redefined M4 Macros' here.  Thanks for the improved patch.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]