[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?
From: |
Mosè Giordano |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:29:49 +0100 |
Hi David,
how about having only the opening braces as default value, ie ? This
keeps formulae in a single line, and somewhat preserves an acceptable
filling as well.
Bye,
Mosè
2015-11-04 21:05 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> So the "if they do not fit into one line" condition obviously broke
>>> for some reason, and rather than even try figuring out what happened,
>>> the functionality just gets squashed?
>>
>> Let me guess.
>>
>> commit 1f116b8499a0bd6081a473fb53dbf49ba49514cb
>> Author: Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri Oct 9 07:54:51 2015 +0200
>>
>> Fill $...$ like \(...\) (bug#21645)
>>
>> * latex.el (LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point): Fill $...$ like
>> \(...\) (bug#21645)
>
> I think what has happened is that somehow the correct filling for
> \(...\) and \[...\] broke at some point in time but no one noticed, and
> I myself thought that this strange filling where there's a line break
> after every inline math construct was intensional. Therefore I made
> $...$ be filled consistently with \(...\) in the above commit.
>
> Because it seems many people seem to still use $...$ instead of \(...\)
> now this "comb-style" filling attracted attention and users complained
> which resulted in the change of defaults.
>
> Now I see that $...$ was probably filled correctly and \(...\) (and
> likely alse \[...\]) was filled wrongly, so my commit fixed on the wrong
> end. So feel free to revert that commit and the change of the default
> value.
>
> Unfortunately, I can't estimate when I have time to look into this and
> fix the right end of the breakage. This is my first week on a new job
> [1], and on the weekend I have to do some work on our house which must
> be finished before the wet and cold season starts.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
>
> [1] ... and sadly I can't work on auctex during pauses there ...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> auctex mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
>
- [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Mosè Giordano, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Uwe Siart, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Mosè Giordano, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, David Kastrup, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Mosè Giordano, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, David Kastrup, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, David Kastrup, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?,
Mosè Giordano <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Mosè Giordano, 2015/11/06
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Mosè Giordano, 2015/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, Mosè Giordano, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, David Kastrup, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, gojjoe, 2015/11/04
- Re: [AUCTeX] New release on Friday?, David Kastrup, 2015/11/04