[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:42:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Richard <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Nicolas,
>> address@hidden writes:
>>> | ! Undefined control sequence.
>>> | address@hidden@Output address@hidden@Shipout
>>> | \box address@hidden
>>> | l.5 \end{document}
>>> |
>
>> I can reproduce that but I don't know how to fix it. :-(
>
> I stumbled accross the very same problem today, when updating to TL2014
> (I was still with TL2012 before that).
>
> It seems that pgf is at fault, see :
> http://pgf-and-tikz.10981.n7.nabble.com/TikZ-3-0-amp-preview-td4770.html
> for a workaround.
>
> Now this raises a question : why would pgf try to fix a compatibility
> problem between preview and everyshi... I have no idea. They claim (in
> my pgfutil-latex.def file) :
> % Preview hack: preview.sty hacks into \shipout (which is ok), but
> % does not honour everyshi.sty (which is not ok). This causes everyshi
> % material to get lost.
>
> Perhaps preview-latex needs fixing in this area ? I don't know.
Me neither. Maybe David can have a look at this issue.
Bye,
Tassilo