[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer
From: |
Nicolas Richard |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:05:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Hello Tassilo,
Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden writes:
>> | ! Undefined control sequence.
>> | address@hidden@Output address@hidden@Shipout
>> | \box address@hidden
>> | l.5 \end{document}
>> |
> I can reproduce that but I don't know how to fix it. :-(
I stumbled accross the very same problem today, when updating to TL2014
(I was still with TL2012 before that).
It seems that pgf is at fault, see :
http://pgf-and-tikz.10981.n7.nabble.com/TikZ-3-0-amp-preview-td4770.html
for a workaround.
Now this raises a question : why would pgf try to fix a compatibility
problem between preview and everyshi... I have no idea. They claim (in
my pgfutil-latex.def file) :
% Preview hack: preview.sty hacks into \shipout (which is ok), but
% does not honour everyshi.sty (which is not ok). This causes everyshi
% material to get lost.
Perhaps preview-latex needs fixing in this area ? I don't know.
--
Nicolas Richard
- Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer,
Nicolas Richard <=