Re: [AUCTeX] First try at the Biber support merge

[Tassilo Horn]

Ken Brown <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Ken,

>> My main problem when compiling that patch was that there were a lot
>> of differences between Philips files and the AUCTeX CVS version that
>> didn't look Biber-related.  Maybe that were general improvements and
>> fixes of the AUCTeX code, or maybe it was just an older AUCTeX
>> version he worked on.  Since I couldn't judge that, I preferred the
>> stock AUCTeX versions in those cases.
>
> My impression is that Philip's files were based on auctex-11.86, but
> he could confirm.  Based on that assumption, I did a 3-way merge
> (using diff3) of Philip's files and CVS head, using auctex-11.86 as
> common ancestor.  My patches are different from yours in a few places.

Awesome, I guess your results will probably be more accurate than mine.

> I don't want to waste everyone's time, so I'll do a little testing
> before sending my patches to the list.

Sure.

Bye,
Tassilo