[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:41:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> 2016-09-17 18:14 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>:
> Did you take a look to the file you sent?
Usually I do, but since I had so many problems with that format, it
might have escaped that check.
> [...]
> diff --git a/export.patch b/export.patch
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/export.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
> [...]
> diff --git a/export2.patch b/export2.patch
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/export2.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> [...]
oops
> It's not a matter of workflow, or git, or hg-git, you committed two
> patches files lying in your workspace. That would be an error even
> with hg ;-)
Ok point taken,[1] but what is with the issue of sending patches with
correspond to my private branches but might include (for you) unwanted
revsets? That is not acceptable? I should collapse them?
> I have to read two or more threads to discover where the latest
> version of patch is and of which patch. If you don't open a new
> thread for each patch or to tell to ignore another patch I can just
> read your latest message with an attachment in order to review a
> specific patch. A thread named "patch with improved commit message"
> doesn't really tell me what the patch is about, and I have to read the
> thread to find whether it's the latest version of the patch for
> style/bidi.el (and discover that it is not). Please stick with one
> thread per patch.
ok
> Bye,
> Mosè
Footnotes:
[1] I see hg facing the same fate as Xemacs, beautiful but not preferred
by most users....
- [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Uwe Brauer, 2016/09/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Mosè Giordano, 2016/09/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Uwe Brauer, 2016/09/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Mosè Giordano, 2016/09/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Mosè Giordano, 2016/09/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Uwe Brauer, 2016/09/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Mosè Giordano, 2016/09/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Uwe Brauer, 2016/09/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Tassilo Horn, 2016/09/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Uwe Brauer, 2016/09/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Tassilo Horn, 2016/09/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Uwe Brauer, 2016/09/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Uwe Brauer, 2016/09/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch, Mosè Giordano, 2016/09/18