[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release |
Date: |
Wed, 31 May 2006 17:58:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, May 31 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> [...]
>> Should be something like $Name: release_11_83$ when one checks out a
>> copy with cvs co -r release_11_83
>
> Ah, you had in mind to add "$Name: ...$" in the spec file and
> construct the "Release:" from this, right?
Right. And this would have to be by macro manipulation in the spec
file, I guess.
>>> The patch below seems[1] to allow the inclusion of the date from the
>>> command line (or from the Makefile).
> [...]
>>> $ rpmbuild -ba --define "micro_version _20060531" auctex.spec
>>> $ rpmbuild -ba auctex.spec
> [...]
>> This wouldn't work for
>>
>> rpmbuild -ta auctex-11.83.tgz
>>
>> right? I was trying to come up with a scheme that would "do the right
>> thing(TM)" if a user built straight from release or snapshot tarball.
>
> I know that "rpmbuild --rebuild --define ... *.src.rpm" works so I
> expect it to work for rpmbuild -ta *.tgz as well.
Well, the idea was to get along without --define. The whole stuff is
pretty pointless if it requires manual intervention to get the version
right.
> But unless I commit my patch I can't tell for sure. Should I? (I'd
> rename "micro_version" to "rpm_release" or something similar).
I am not sure what the patch is supposed to accomplish. If one still
has to specify the version manually, one might as well do so in the
spec file, I guess.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog, (continued)
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog, David Kastrup, 2006/05/25
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog, David Kastrup, 2006/05/26
- [AUCTeX-devel] Upcoming 11.83 release (was: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog), Reiner Steib, 2006/05/27
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Upcoming 11.83 release, David Kastrup, 2006/05/27
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/30
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, David Kastrup, 2006/05/31
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, David Kastrup, 2006/05/31
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release,
David Kastrup <=
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, David Kastrup, 2006/05/31
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Upcoming 11.83 release, David Kastrup, 2006/05/31