[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Adonthell-devel] Re: CMake finalization?
From: |
Joël Vennin |
Subject: |
Re: [Adonthell-devel] Re: CMake finalization? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Oct 2006 02:11:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
Le dimanche 1 octobre 2006 01:49, Kai Sterker a écrit :
> On 9/30/06, Alexandre Courbot <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Found another issue: the SWIG wrapper .cxx files are not rebuild when
> dependend headers change.
The swig macro is bit dirty, we have to rewrite some parts ...
>
> However, I've got it working on OS X. Still have to look into the
> Win32 linking issue.
>
> Joel, I don't think we need that __declspec crap, as gcc/ld should be
> able to figure this out by themselves. I'm no expert though, so I
> might be wrong.
I'm not convinced, if you follow the information from
http://www.belgeler.org/autobook/autobook-DLLs-with-Libtool.html
you could see that even if you use gcc on mingw/cygwin we should play
with __delcspec.
Jol
> Have to have a look at that later, for now I'd like to get the XML
> stuff working.
>
> I also figured out that the endianess conversion didn't take place in
> all cases, so I'd like to fix that too. And there is another problem
> with that: when writing XML files, we actually don't want any
> endianess conversion, as an int32 converted to ASCII looks the same on
> big and little endian machines.
>
> Kai
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adonthell-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-devel