[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim
From: |
cirrus |
Subject: |
Re: AW: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Mar 2002 20:11:49 +0000 |
walther-franks wrote:
>
> > I think we should have an absolute maximum height for normal characters
> > - 80px seems sensible coz it's exactly 2 squares but I'm also happy to
> > make it, say 85px if you'd all prefer that. I don't think we should go
> > beyond that though because, as Alex pointed out the gfx would just get
> > too big. As for width it seems everyone's happy with 40px (save the odd
> > hair or sword tip) - of course if doorways are 40px wide you'd get a bit
> > off clipping but I think it looks fine at the sides - it's at the top
> > that it can look weird, coz you'd expect your character to hit his head
> > if he's taller than the entrance! :P
> >
> > If we adopt this that means a character must fit into a 40px by 80px (or
> > 85px, whichever) box. Would that be good?
>
> Yeah, I think that's what we more or less agreed on. How about we say 80 px
> average and 85 px maximum height? For humans, that is. Elves could be 85px
> average and dwarves maybe 60px. Then your normal door would measure 80-90px
> height. Maybe we could have humans&elves bending over when walking through a
> dwarf door? (just an idea... :)
>
> I just think we shouldn't bother about +-5px.
>
> I had also suggested 1m=40px on the y-axis and 1m=60px on the x-axis as a
> measurement guideline. Can you all live with that?
>
alrighty then - if there's no objections we'll fix it at that. Yes?
-James
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/ / /__/ /__/ / / /__ Reg. Linux User #148821
/___ / / \ / \ /__/ ___/@linuxgames.com www.twiddles.com
adonthell.linuxgames.com
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, (continued)
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/05
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/05
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, walther-franks, 2002/03/05
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, walther-franks, 2002/03/05
- Re: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Kai Sterker, 2002/03/05
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/06
- Re: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Kai Sterker, 2002/03/06
- Re: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/06
- Re: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, cirrus, 2002/03/06
- AW: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, walther-franks, 2002/03/07
- Re: AW: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim,
cirrus <=
- Re: AW: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/08
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim & east anim, walther-franks, 2002/03/05
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim & east anim, walther-franks, 2002/03/05
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim & east anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/06
- Re: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim & east anim, cirrus, 2002/03/06
- AW: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim & east anim, walther-franks, 2002/03/07
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/05
- Re: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Kai Sterker, 2002/03/05
- Re: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/03/05
- RE: [Adonthell-artwork] first new res anim, walther-franks, 2002/03/05