Re: [Acl-devel] libattr 2.4.48 change in syscalls.c breaks fakechroot

[Andreas Grünbacher]

Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 18:49 Uhr schrieb Andreas Grünbacher <address@hidden>:
> Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 03:22 Uhr schrieb Filipe Brandenburger
> <address@hidden>:
> > Having said that, I really think it wouldn't hurt for libattr to
> > continue providing these compatibility symbols having them implemented
> > to do the syscalls themselves, using essentially the same code as
> > pre-commit v2.4.48~17. There's really no downside to that, since the
> > symbols are just there for compatibility anyways... That would prevent
> > all these issues with LD_PRELOAD and it doesn't seem to me like that
> > would be painful to maintain on libattr itself... Would you consider
> > going back to using syscalls?
>
> Yes, I think that would be okay.

Okay, I've pushed a fix. Could you guys please verify?

Thanks,
Anreas