qemu-discuss archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ slow: 291 ]

Total 291 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [Qemu-discuss] USE QEMU + KVM TO RUN CUSTOM KERNEL (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 09:53:40 +0200
The code reported below with KVM needs 60 minutes to complete aganist 4 minutes without. I just wondering if with KVM enabled is possible to match the performance of simple Qemu. #include "lib/lib.h"
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2016-05/msg00019.html (14,030 bytes)

102. [Qemu-discuss] 回覆: USE QEMU + KVM TO RUN CUSTOM KERNEL (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 07:40:33 +0000
What is your expecting performance? Vga of stdvga and cirrus are all software renderer, and their IO addresses were all emulated by virtual memory (i.e. mmap). The doubled R/W access time seems be re
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2016-05/msg00018.html (12,506 bytes)

103. Re: [Qemu-discuss] USE QEMU + KVM TO RUN CUSTOM KERNEL (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 22:47:25 +0200
I tried to launch Qemu with Vga set to cirrus,std and vmware. Same bad numbers. Is my only option to patch Qemu + KVM? I also noted some slowdown in my ata custom driver. The driver currently support
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2016-05/msg00016.html (11,713 bytes)

104. Re: [Qemu-discuss] USE QEMU + KVM TO RUN CUSTOM KERNEL (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 22:44:16 +0200
I tried to launch Qemu with Vga set to cirrus,std and vmware. Same bad numbers. Is my only option to patch Qemu + KVM? I also noted some slowdown in my ata custom driver. The driver currently support
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2016-05/msg00015.html (10,646 bytes)

105. Re: [Qemu-discuss] USE QEMU + KVM TO RUN CUSTOM KERNEL (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 22:39:07 +0200
I tried to launch Qemu with Vga set to cirrus,std and vmware. Same bad numbers. Is my only option to patch Qemu + KVM? I also noted some slowdown in my ata custom driver. The driver currently support
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2016-05/msg00014.html (10,852 bytes)

106. Re: [Qemu-discuss] USE QEMU + KVM TO RUN CUSTOM KERNEL (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 11:23:35 +0200
On 04/05/2016 10:50, giuseppe maugeri wrote: Hi, i'm developing a custom kernel for x86 platform.So Far i used as virtual environment Simics. Recently i decided to move to Qemu. Running my kernel on
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2016-05/msg00010.html (10,206 bytes)

107. [Qemu-discuss] USE QEMU + KVM TO RUN CUSTOM KERNEL (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:50:47 +0200
Hi, i'm developing a custom kernel for x86 platform.So Far i used as virtual environment Simics. Recently i decided to move to Qemu. Running my kernel on Qemu I found it tremendously slow even with K
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2016-05/msg00008.html (6,782 bytes)

108. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Multiple Guest performance issue (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:06:23 -0500
Found it... ARP routing problem that just made the machines feel slow. Each guest was using an identical internal mac address on its tap device. I override each in the network started file and all is
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2012-10/msg00032.html (7,821 bytes)

109. Re: Technical support (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:34:07 +0400
On 3/25/24 09:19, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: On 3/24/24 22:45, Luca Vajen wrote: Hello, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask for help. I guess in the worst case you might get a laugh out of th
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-03/msg00038.html (6,126 bytes)

110. Re: Technical support (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:19:29 +0400
On 3/24/24 22:45, Luca Vajen wrote: Hello, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask for help. I guess in the worst case you might get a laugh out of this. There's an old game I would like to pl
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-03/msg00037.html (5,272 bytes)

111. Technical support (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:45:39 +0100
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask for help. I guess in the worst case you might get a laugh out of this. There's an old game I would like to play again and someone made a ready-to
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-03/msg00036.html (4,112 bytes)

112. Re: Accelerator in ARM-based macOS (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:43:08 +0100
Hi Serdar, I'm a newbie in QEMU and I'm using it on an Apple Silicon macOS (ARM-based). I use the default accelerator tcg to run a virtual machine with Ubuntu but it is quite slow. I tried commands l
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-02/msg00047.html (5,247 bytes)

113. Re: Accelerator in ARM-based macOS (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:42:14 +0100
Am 26.02.24 um 11:33 schrieb Serdar Bahar: Hello, I'm a newbie in QEMU and I'm using it on an Apple Silicon macOS (ARM-based). I use the default accelerator tcg to run a virtual machine with Ubuntu b
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-02/msg00046.html (5,980 bytes)

114. Accelerator in ARM-based macOS (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:33:04 +0300
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-02/msg00045.html (5,146 bytes)

115. Sharing guest VPN resources to host (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:18:07 +0100
Hi, I am new to QEMU/KVM and would like to have some info before trying to switch from VirtualBox, for a particular use case. Currently, I have a VirtualBox image running Windows 10 with a custom VP
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-02/msg00018.html (4,856 bytes)

116. Dump question on qemu migration (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 17:09:49 -0800
Hello All,  This is my first post on qemu, recently starting troubleshooting one of vm migration slowness, having below question unanswered for myself 1) will qemu uses host main memory for migratio
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-02/msg00011.html (5,018 bytes)

117. Re: how to disable(not ignore) disk discard feature (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:48:46 +0100
... Oh I see. You're saying that -drive ...,discard=ignore Does not prevent Windows (guest OS) from trying the discard=trim=unmap on the virtio disk device, merely those operations get ignored by QEM
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-01/msg00013.html (6,658 bytes)

118. Re: how to disable(not ignore) disk discard feature (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 00:20:50 +0800
Frantisek Rysanek <Frantisek.Rysanek@post.cz> Hi D, I'm not sure what exactly your goal is. Prevent the guest OS from realizing, that the HDD is of type "virtio"? In that case I'd look at how the har
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2024-01/msg00009.html (6,982 bytes)

119. web (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:30:50 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
The loading speed is very slow when opening the official website. If it is a website problem, please optimize it as soon as possible, thank you
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2023-09/msg00003.html (3,421 bytes)

120. Re: How can I compile just the TCG plugins? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 15:32:42 +0100
This will only display at translation time, so when the code is first encountered. That would be weird. However CPU will "miss" code that doesn't return to the main loop due to TB patching. -d nochai
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2023-08/msg00073.html (5,875 bytes)

121. How can I compile just the TCG plugins? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:03:50 +0200
Hi all! I need to simulate some code for a bare metal ARM application, and get a trace of every machine instruction that gets executed. Attaching GDB to the qemu-system-arm works, but of course it is
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2023-06/msg00019.html (4,968 bytes)

122. Re: dropping 32-bit host support (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 09:53:51 +0300
We don't do that. The pipeline is run on each pull request which can be anything from a few patches to a few hundred. And the reason is obvious because we are guarding against introducing regression
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2023-03/msg00063.html (10,092 bytes)

123. Regarding Qemu tool performance (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:39:29 +0530
Hi Sir/Madam, Myself is Mallikarjuna, i am new to Qemu environment, i installed Qemu in my Ubuntu system. Once after the installation i am facing very slow, is ther any additional configuration to be
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2023-01/msg00044.html (3,858 bytes)

124. QEMU and Spice via MacPorts on Apple M1 (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:38:53 -0500
I have QEMU built via MacPorts working.  But, I don't have window resizing and cut-and-paste.  I think the way to get that working is via Spice. I had spice running on Windows x86, but I am having
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2023-01/msg00028.html (5,580 bytes)

125. Scalability / lock contention in HVF support? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:18:52 -0500
Hi all, I've been investigating slow guest boot times for VMs running on (amd64) macOS hosts, using accel=hvf. What I've found is that boot time scales poorly with guest CPU count. Approximate boot t
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2023-01/msg00022.html (4,885 bytes)

126. vhost user virtio gpu cannot work (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 16:33:32 +0800
hi all, I'm trying to use vhost user gpu, but the guest(ubuntu 22.04) is very slow, and nearly no response, First, i run './vhost-user-gpu -s vgpu.sock -v virgl' then, i start qemu with 'x86_64-softm
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2022-09/msg00010.html (4,178 bytes)

127. EXT4-fs error (device mmcblk0p2) (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 11:53:58 +0200
hi, I play to emulate the Raspberry Pi and, to avoid having to wait for the (re)start of my slow VM, I recorded a snapshot at the end of the first boot. but when I reload this snapshot, I have a lot
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2022-06/msg00000.html (5,079 bytes)

128. Re: Unpredictable performance degradation in QEMU KVMs (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:12:07 +0200
A couple more points: How many CPU's (sockets) does your motherboard have? Multi-socket machines are more or less in the NUMA territory. Suboptimal process scheduling / memory allocation "decisions"
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-10/msg00013.html (9,687 bytes)

129. RE: "Your network is probably not using DHCP protocol" during ubuntu install on qemu virtual machine (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 15:22:55 +0900
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-10/msg00000.html (8,493 bytes)

130. "Your network is probably not using DHCP protocol" during ubuntu install on qemu virtual machine (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:10:09 +0900
Hello, all I&#8217;m install ubuntu 20.04 on an arm64 virtual machine using qemu-5.1.0. (host is also ubuntu 20.04, am64 machine) The final command is below. (the LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting was needed f
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00122.html (6,412 bytes)

131. Re: high cpu usage in idle state (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 20:46:18 +0200
In the "infinite loop exception" case, '-d int' might be sufficient, before using 'exec/cpu', since you'll see the exception raise over and over.
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00090.html (6,869 bytes)

132. Re: high cpu usage in idle state (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:06:35 +0100
The lack of further in_asm logging does not mean that guest instructions are not running. in_asm logging happens at *translate* time, which is to say the first time QEMU encounters any particular ins
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00088.html (5,983 bytes)

133. Re: high cpu usage in idle state (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:41:57 +0430
Hi Philippe, Thank for your email I investigated your advice,  first checked the CPU's programmer's reference manual and it has wait for interrupt instruction. then to check what instructions are e
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00083.html (6,085 bytes)

134. Re: Virtual FAT disk images (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:05:54 +0200
Your question is reaching the list, but this mail ought to be informative: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-09/msg02463.html In short, the fact that you are seeing performance pena
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00031.html (8,294 bytes)

135. Re: Virtual FAT disk images (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:23:12 -0500
Your question is reaching the list, but this mail ought to be informative: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-09/msg02463.html In short, the fact that you are seeing performance penal
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00030.html (6,893 bytes)

136. Re: Virtual FAT disk images (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:54:54 +0200
Yes, as i know this ist the qemu list, but as i see from the response (i am on this list since 5 month), its more or less developement and only if you get "luck" a answer for "simple" user questions
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00027.html (6,256 bytes)

137. Re: Virtual FAT disk images (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:32:48 +0200
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-09/msg00026.html (5,502 bytes)

138. Re: Virtual FAT disk images (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:24:56 +0200
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-08/msg00097.html (5,192 bytes)

139. Virtual FAT disk images (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 11:11:04 +0200
hello everybody, virtual FAT disk image - which is a convenient way to transfer files to the guest without having to activate its network - seems to work very poorly with Windows : do you have the sa
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-08/msg00074.html (4,363 bytes)

140. QEMU Issue (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 22:23:58 +0000
Hi, I have an issue with QEMU. When I run VMs, I lock my cursor, but when I move it to the very edge of the QEMU window, my cursor shows again. This is very annoying because when I boot OSs, there ar
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-08/msg00049.html (4,236 bytes)

141. Re: how to improve qcow performance? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 12:34:25 +0300
I guess you mean how to improve "qcow2" performance. If you use "qcow" format the best way is to switch to "qcow2". 'directsync' is using direct I/O, but calls fsync() for every write. This is the sl
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-07/msg00105.html (7,677 bytes)

142. Issue about QEMU multi-core in TCG mode (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 04:27:39 -0400
Hi, I am using QEMU 5.05 and I keep getting some issues when running QEMU under multi-core configuration. I used a qcow2 ubuntu 18.04 image and launched the VM in QEMU TCG mode, having the multicore
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-06/msg00051.html (13,578 bytes)

143. Re: Need Help with starting the qemu Emulator (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:27:25 +0300
2021-04-09 18:05, Jagannadha Bhamidipati rašė: I have raspberry pi 400 Installed OS - Ubuntu (Release 20.10 (Groovy Gorilla) 64-bit) Mate (MATE 1.24.1) Kernel Linux - Kernel Linux 5.8.0-1019-raspi
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-04/msg00016.html (5,029 bytes)

144. RE: weird translation block execution trace (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:04:53 +0000
Thanks for your response. Different runs lead to different results. So not easy to reproduce. Thank you for mentioning rr-project. Maybe, I can have a try. GDB has its own record & replay function.
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2021-04/msg00012.html (5,017 bytes)

145. Re: Sound error: Could not initialize DirectSoundCapture (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:20:24 +0100
I appreciate your kindness. After all, I could hear the nostalgic startup sound by sb16 emulation. I'm relieved to hear the error is harmless. There still remains another problem. Sometimes I can hea
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-12/msg00034.html (7,553 bytes)

146. Re: Sound error: Could not initialize DirectSoundCapture (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:46:43 +0900 (JST)
Dear all! I appreciate your kindness. After all, I could hear the nostalgic startup sound by sb16 emulation. I'm relieved to hear the error is harmless. There still remains another problem. Sometimes
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-12/msg00026.html (6,183 bytes)

147. Re: Problem with creating a root device (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:03:20 +0100
Peter, Thank you for your prompt response. It does look like the failure in the scsi driver is what is causing the root device not to be created. I can see that there has been an issue raised on this
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-09/msg00027.html (9,250 bytes)

148. Re: Problem with creating a root device (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:14:49 +0100
This is your problem, I think -- the new kernel fails to correctly init the SCSI adaptor, and so it never sees the disk, and then later the kernel panics becasue you told it to use a disk that's not
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-09/msg00025.html (5,890 bytes)

149. Re: How does QEMU in TCG mode handle interrupts ? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:23:16 +0530
You can't. QEMU will only ever check for and take interrupts at the end of a TB. The best you can do is that you can use the '-singlestep' command line option to force QEMU to put exactly 1 instruct
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-08/msg00036.html (6,126 bytes)

150. Re: How does QEMU in TCG mode handle interrupts ? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:31:31 +0100
You can't. QEMU will only ever check for and take interrupts at the end of a TB. The best you can do is that you can use the '-singlestep' command line option to force QEMU to put exactly 1 instructi
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-08/msg00030.html (4,710 bytes)

151. Re: [EXTERNAL] QEMU plugin system (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:47:47 +0100
Yeah this is the mechanism I was about to suggest. If you can guarantee your library function is called before any of the code you want to instrument then this can be used as a "trigger". -- Alex Ben
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-07/msg00086.html (6,656 bytes)

152. Re: [EXTERNAL] QEMU plugin system (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:32:12 +0000
Our approach to this problem was to make the plugin sensitive to the execution of well-chosen instructions to turn on/turn off the actions of the plugin. The plugin will still be called (don't unregi
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-07/msg00083.html (6,915 bytes)

153. Increase speed of qemu (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:15:35 +0200
Hi! I installed qemu on a Windows 10 pc (using Powershell and Scoop). I do not have administrator password and I can't change boot order (first usb, second internal hd, etc). I tried to install a lin
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-06/msg00038.html (3,837 bytes)

154. Re: basic qemu question (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 21:14:22 +0100
It will depend if QEMU models the device you are after. For m3 there are mps2, stellaris and netduino2 models. Yes - both normal serial ports and semihosting output can be re-directed to a file using
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-06/msg00034.html (6,601 bytes)

155. Re: basic qemu question (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:07:06 -0700
The analysis library runs on the Cortex-M3? There is a fairly big performance penalty for softmmu emulation but given the speed of most modern PCs compared to microcontrollers you would possibly be
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-06/msg00033.html (6,006 bytes)

156. Re: basic qemu question (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:28:06 +0100
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.comp.emulators.qemu.user as well. The analysis library runs on the Cortex-M3? There is a fairly big performance pe
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-06/msg00030.html (4,888 bytes)

157. basic qemu question (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:02:19 -0700
I have a pretty basic question about how qemu works... I have an analysis library (no source) for ARM Cortex M3 processor that I'd like to run on many files. My hardware would be very slow doing this
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-06/msg00018.html (4,101 bytes)

158. basic qemu question (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:04:21 -0700
I have a pretty basic question about how qemu works... I have an analysis library (no source) for ARM Cortex M3 processor that I'd like to run on many files. My hardware would be very slow doing this
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-06/msg00017.html (3,885 bytes)

159. Re: 5.0.0-rc3 : Opcode 1f 12 0f 00 (7ce003e4) leaked temporaries (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:00:43 +0200
Booting a pseries machine (kernel/initrd) with --enable-debug is about 2.5 x slower. C.
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-04/msg00085.html (7,685 bytes)

160. Re: 5.0.0-rc3 : Opcode 1f 12 0f 00 (7ce003e4) leaked temporaries (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:14:29 +0100
It's not supposed to disable TB caching, and in my experience it does not (no TB caching at all is incredibly slow). If it's doing that on PPC that would be worth investigating. I do almost all of my
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-04/msg00080.html (6,975 bytes)

161. Re: Qemu plugin vs. valgrind (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 08:51:09 +0100
<snip> You can - the emulation is all in-order. The only real effect of accessing some sort of HW device is the real wall-clock time of the instruction will be longer (as QEMU has more to do). For mu
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-04/msg00001.html (6,047 bytes)

162. Re: Qemu plugin vs. valgrind (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:18:36 +0200
Le 31/03/2020 à 16:38, Alex Bennée a écrit : Le 31/03/2020 à 02:28, Benjamin a écrit : Perhaps you're looking for something like this? https://wiki.qemu.org/Internships/ProjectIdeas/CacheModell
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-03/msg00047.html (11,542 bytes)

163. Re: serial console, no graphic card (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:39:47 +0000
Except in the special case where you tell QEMU to map a guest serial port directly through to a physical host serial port, it doesn't matter, because QEMU doesn't emulate serial ports at a level of d
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-12/msg00029.html (6,508 bytes)

164. Re: Creating image of OS to run with qemu. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 23:33:39 +0100
On 31/10/2019 09:12, bilsch01 wrote: I have executable code for my simple OS in a binary file (jsec2.bin) created using nasm assembler. I have been running it from a flash drive with a boot sector th
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-10/msg00048.html (7,743 bytes)

165. Creating image of OS to run with qemu. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 01:12:49 -0700
I have executable code for my simple OS in a binary file (jsec2.bin) created using nasm assembler. I have been running it from a flash drive with a boot sector that loads the executable to memory and
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-10/msg00047.html (5,177 bytes)

166. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Very poor compilation performance in armhf chroot vs native (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:39:52 -0400
I think I understand the nuances of your last note on performance comparison, indeed my approach there was not correct. The only real ARM hardware I have is an rpi3b+ which isnt powerful enough for t
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-09/msg00043.html (7,586 bytes)

167. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Very poor compilation performance in armhf chroot vs native (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:25:42 +0100
Emulation isn't fast, generally speaking. It is possible to just drop an x86 binary of a cross-compiler (x86-to-arm) into your chroot as its 'gcc' binary, and then you'll get native performance of th
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-09/msg00041.html (6,535 bytes)

168. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Very poor compilation performance in armhf chroot vs native (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:01:09 -0400
Thank you for your reply. I am though stumped by that large of degradation using that simple test and when I attempted to compile my actual project (chromium) in the chroot, it was insanely slow. May
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-09/msg00039.html (6,408 bytes)

169. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Difference between commit and rebase (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:02:30 +0200
Generally, rebase is going to be slower because it reads some clusters and compares the old with the new backing file to see whether they are the same. commit will not do that. (OTOH, if there are ma
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-08/msg00041.html (6,316 bytes)

170. [Qemu-discuss] QEMU 4.0 built on Solaris 10 Sparc host (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:42:04 -0400
I can announce that I have successfully built QEMU 4.0.0 in Solaris 10 on a Sun M3000 Sparc VII using gcc 7.3.0 and OpenCSW tools: PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/opt
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-06/msg00017.html (6,835 bytes)

171. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Qemu-COLO bug report (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:39:48 +0800
I give the wrong ifname in -netdev which not attached to the bridge on SVM host. Sorry for slow reply. Can you share the detail of the wrong parameters? In case other people have the same issue. Why
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-04/msg00056.html (7,788 bytes)

172. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Qemu-COLO bug report (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 03:16:46 +0000
Sorry for slow reply. Can you share the detail of the wrong parameters? In case other people have the same issue. Why you dump the secondary_in and find out pri_rs.buf? pri_rs.buf should used by pri
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-04/msg00055.html (7,707 bytes)

173. [Qemu-discuss] 答复: Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:11:52 +0800
I dump the net packet: ARP: 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 be00 d175 0000010 fcf1 5452 1200 5634 0608 0100 0008 0406 0000020 0100 5452 1200 5634 790a 70db 0000 0000 0000030 0000 790a fedb IP:
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-03/msg00022.html (22,340 bytes)

174. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 05:52:50 +0000
Sure, If it is convenient, you can try to debug under your environment and send a patch to Qemu community. I am very happy to review it. Thanks Zhang Chen Your answer make sense to me. Different netw
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-03/msg00020.html (21,892 bytes)

175. [Qemu-discuss] 答复: Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:48:57 +0800
Your answer make sense to me. Different network environment may result in that status. I think more attention should be paid on the compatibility of COLO Proxy. 发件人: Zhang, Chen <address@hidden
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-03/msg00019.html (21,931 bytes)

176. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 03:48:45 +0000
I have tested Proxy with QMP: "{'execute': 'trace-event-set-state', 'arguments': {'name': 'colo*', 'enable': true} }" I got this nothing except this logs on PVM side: address@hidden:colo_compare_main
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-03/msg00018.html (17,477 bytes)

177. [Qemu-discuss] 答复: Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:27:57 +0800
I have tested Proxy with QMP: "{'execute': 'trace-event-set-state', 'arguments': {'name': 'colo*', 'enable': true} }" I got this nothing except this logs on PVM side: address@hidden:colo_compare_main
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-03/msg00013.html (14,316 bytes)

178. [Qemu-discuss] 答复: Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 09:48:22 +0800
Thank you very much ! Zhengtao Wen 发件人: Zhang, Chen <address@hidden> 发送时间: 2019年3月5日 23:32 收件人: wenzt <address@hidden> 抄送: 'qemu-discuss' <address@hidden> 主题: RE: La
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-03/msg00011.html (13,436 bytes)

179. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:31:39 +0000
This version: https://github.com/coloft/qemu/tree/colo-v4.1-periodic-mode This is old version from 3 years ago, please drop it, use qemu upstream codes. Another question: What is the relationship bet
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-03/msg00008.html (12,038 bytes)

180. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 01:34:28 +0000
Which version? COLO project always said the PVM and SVM execute in parallel. Thanks Zhang Chen But in earlier version, I noticed that SVM always inmigration status even doing checkpoint. No operation
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-02/msg00034.html (10,673 bytes)

181. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:44:44 +0000
Thanks for help ! I don’t know why we keep switching SVM between Run and Stop ? Why we don’t keep SVM inmigration status ? Because we need do checkpoint to sync all status between PVM and SVM. We
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-02/msg00033.html (9,228 bytes)

182. [Qemu-discuss] 答复: Latest Qemu-COLO Problems (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:04:25 +0800
Thanks for help ! I don’t know why we keep switching SVM between Run and Stop ? Why we don’t keep SVM inmigration status ? Thanks, Zhengtao 发件人: Zhang, Chen <address@hidden> 发送时间: 2
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-02/msg00032.html (8,543 bytes)

183. [Qemu-discuss] Fwd: Possible Qemu inconsistency when emulating TLB for rpi3 machine (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 19:18:36 +0100
I don't rely on the entries to be cached; I configured the systems registers to perform a table walk on TLB miss, so if the entry is discarded the MMU happily loads another one. The problem seems to
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-02/msg00004.html (13,157 bytes)

184. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Possible Qemu inconsistency when emulating TLB for rpi3 machine (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:40:46 +0000
If your guest code is relying on entries staying in the TLB then it is not correct -- there is no architectural guarantee that an entry is ever kept in the TLB. An implementation is free to throw out
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-02/msg00003.html (9,311 bytes)

185. Re: [Qemu-discuss] [Qemu-devel] Incremental drive-backup with dirty bitmaps (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:09:41 -0600
You have various knobs to control what happens on write failures, both on the source and on the destination (on-source-error and on-target-error) as well as how synchronized the image will be (Mirror
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-01/msg00048.html (16,879 bytes)

186. Re: [Qemu-discuss] [Qemu-devel] Incremental drive-backup with dirty bitmaps (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:38:12 +0530
Replied inline. Eric, I watched your kvm forum video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQK5ANionpU. Which cleared out somethings for me. Lets say you have a disk of size 10GB, I had assumed that, if dr
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-01/msg00047.html (16,601 bytes)

187. Re: [Qemu-discuss] How to boot the ARM server ISO on QEMU? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:51:00 +0000
OK, I've pinged awesome Ubuntu people and they gave me the answer: I had to use the cdrom through SCSI rather than the default virtio, because the installer doesn't have the virtio drivers currently:
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2019-01/msg00019.html (6,709 bytes)

188. [Qemu-discuss] 3.1.0 throws *** stack smashing detected *** or SIGSEGV (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 02:17:51 -0500
Somewhat a baffling situation here. I have Debian buster x86_64 running just fine and also the default qemu packages from the Debian folks. However those are 2.12.0 whereas my own local builds from t
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-12/msg00023.html (6,288 bytes)

189. Re: [Qemu-discuss] [Qemu-devel] virtio-console downgrade the virtio-pci-blk performance (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:26:08 +0800
Hi Amit, Thanks for your response. See inline comments. Amit Shah <address@hidden> 于2018年10月16日呺 上午2:51写道: Yes. We just register the virtio-serial, and not use it, it brings the
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-10/msg00013.html (12,812 bytes)

190. Re: [Qemu-discuss] [Qemu-devel] virtio-console downgrade the virtio-pci-blk performance (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 20:51:15 +0200
If you use multiple virtio-net (or blk) devices -- just register, not necessarily use -- does that also bring the performance down? I suspect it's the number of interrupts that get allocated for the
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-10/msg00012.html (9,920 bytes)

191. Re: [Qemu-discuss] [Qemu-devel] virtio-console downgrade the virtio-pci-blk performance (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:15:41 +0800
Add Amit Shah. After some tests, we found: - the virtio serial port number is inversely proportional to the iSCSI virtio-blk-pci performance. If we set the virio-serial ports to 2("<controller type='
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-10/msg00011.html (8,411 bytes)

192. Re: [Qemu-discuss] [Qemu-devel] virtio-console downgrade the virtio-pci-blk performance (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:58:24 +0800
Hi Dave, My comments are in-line. Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden> 于2018年10月1日呸 下午7:41写道: I'm using fio, the config is: [global] ioengine=libaio iodepth=128 runtime=120 ti
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-10/msg00001.html (6,800 bytes)

193. Re: [Qemu-discuss] PCI error running qemu to emulate sparc64 (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 05:51:38 +0200
first: i've followed (years ago) this blog to install debian wheezy on sparc64, works with Debian 7.11 (newer debians removed sparc support) - beware: its awfully slow, but it works/runs then i tried
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-09/msg00039.html (6,700 bytes)

194. Re: [Qemu-discuss] -accel hax works only in Window not in full screen (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:29:06 +0200
Dear Mr. Maydell,. Na piatok, 14. septembra 2018 16:35:13 CEST Peter Maydell napísali: Thank you.. I seems graphics is only problem when using HAX and quemeu for us. We would like to be informed abo
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-09/msg00029.html (5,539 bytes)

195. Re: [Qemu-discuss] -accel hax works only in Window not in full screen (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:35:13 +0100
That's weird. The HAX support should be entirely orthogonal to whether the display is being viewed fullscreen or not. (I guess it's possible that we're not getting the "hax needs to tell us about dir
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-09/msg00014.html (4,972 bytes)

196. [Qemu-discuss] -accel hax works only in Window not in full screen (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:10:10 +0200
Dear Qemu experts, We need to run DOS based CAD/CAM program via disk image as system in Windows7 or more recent I works but it is too slow for large CAM -NC programs therefore we tried to use HAX via
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-09/msg00009.html (4,115 bytes)

197. Re: [Qemu-discuss] problems achieving "fullspeed" system emulation (TCG, icount, sleep off, rtc is vm) (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:03:48 +0600
Update: I've also checked I/O and memory usage on my host when running emulation. I/O is zero, memory swapping turned off, a lot of free memory. So I didn't observe any host bottlenecks which would c
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-08/msg00105.html (5,260 bytes)

198. Re: [Qemu-discuss] [Qemu-devel] Handling signal of Qemu thread (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:22:50 +0200
Also, recent kernel versions do not need to "eat" the SIG_IPI anymore. More precisely, on older versions, SIG_IPI was temporarily unblocked during the KVM_RUN ioctl but never delivered to the CPU thr
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-08/msg00078.html (5,941 bytes)

199. Re: [Qemu-discuss] Best networking mode when using Wi-Fi (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:18:15 +0300
I have bridge on my Linux PC: bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br1 8000.001b210e62eb no enp4s1 wlan0 But I run hostapd on wlan0, I don't know if it works as a client, but I suspect it doe
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-08/msg00070.html (4,851 bytes)

200. [Qemu-discuss] Best networking mode when using Wi-Fi (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:00:06 +0200
Here's what I want to do: use Qemu on my Windows host while on Wi-Fi. Currently, I can only use SLIRP with Wi-Fi, but since it's quite slow I would like to know what other options do I have. When the
/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2018-08/msg00069.html (4,669 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu