axiom-developer archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ aldor: 2189 ]

Total 2189 documents matching your query.

1. [Axiom-developer] 20071216.01.tpd.patch, 20071216.02.tpd.patch (7045) (score: 158)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:29:22 -0600
This patch adds -lXpm to the loader flags for gentoo systems. To use this on gentoo builds set your Axiom variable with a basename of gentoo thus: cd (whereever) export AXIOM=`pwd`/mnt/gentoo export
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-12/msg00069.html (89,010 bytes)

2. [Axiom-developer] RE: Aldor and Axiom (score: 89)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:19:42 -0500
I don't know what is happening with the aldor.org server. Some days I can access it and other days not. Is this a good omen or a bad one? Is it further motivation to proceed with distributing Aldor a
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-02/msg00151.html (18,693 bytes)

3. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 87)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:14:54 -0400
Yes, I think that is clear. I wanted to understand how FOAM could be used in Axiom as implied by Gaby's email. As an abstraction layer this makes very good sense. I believe that Aldor also provides a
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00019.html (8,945 bytes)

4. [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 86)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:12:56 -0400
Dear Aldorados, (:- "Aldorado" = heterographic homophone of Eldorado i.e. "the Golden One" :-) During the recent Aldor workshop the subject of the relationship between Aldor and Axiom was discussed.
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00012.html (9,183 bytes)

5. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 85)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:26:53 -0500 (CDT)
I believe the Aldor compiler can re-load FOAM files and work with them. `All' OpenAxiom needs to do is to generate FOAMs for linking with the Aldor object files. [...] As I said, it is not clear to m
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00020.html (7,778 bytes)

6. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 84)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:48:35 -0400
Bill Page wrote: This reminds me to mention that the issue of FOAM and other Aldor documentation was also raised at the recent Aldor Workshop. One thing that came to light was some additional and mor
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00030.html (7,584 bytes)

7. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 84)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:45:05 -0500 (CDT)
At the moment, I don't know. But, the existing compiler can already generates Lisp FOAM for some codes. I suspect that was the work of Peter Broadbery -- anyone to concur? -- Gaby
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00024.html (7,406 bytes)

8. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 84)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:39:35 -0400
Having Spad generate FOAM code seems like a rather radical (and interesting!) idea. How practical do you think it might be to make such deep changes to Spad? Regards, Bill Page.
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00023.html (7,154 bytes)

9. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 84)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:34:08 -0400
This reminds me to mention that the issue of FOAM and other Aldor documentation was also raised at the recent Aldor Workshop. One thing that came to light was some additional and more recent document
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00022.html (7,890 bytes)

10. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 83)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:18:04 -0400
Excellent. Thanks, Laurentiu. Regards, Bill Page.
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00031.html (6,952 bytes)

11. Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 83)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 23:39:10 -0400
In case it is not clear: FOAM is the compilation target for Aldor, and this is used to generate low-level Lisp. FOAM is designed to have only operations that are efficient both in Lisp and in a machi
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00016.html (6,850 bytes)

12. [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] Aldor source code release! (score: 77)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:36:02 +0200
Many thanks. Greg Le samedi 01 septembre 2007 à 14:39 -0400, Bill Page a écrit :
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00001.html (6,258 bytes)

13. Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? (score: 75)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 03 Sep 2007 21:43:53 -0500
Bill -- Thanks for the report! [...] There is a little snag. Axiom currently uses GCL, which by its licensing -- if I understand correctly -- makes the end product GPL, for the components BFD and UNE
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-09/msg00013.html (8,105 bytes)

14. [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] Distributing Aldor (score: 73)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 02:24:36 -0400
My opinion of NAG's business decision is purely based on how much it has inconvenienced me. I'm sure they made the appropriate decision to achieve their goals. I have the highest regard for the peop
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2008-09/msg00021.html (5,988 bytes)

15. [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] Using Aldor or SPAD (score: 73)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 19 Aug 2006 15:58:13 +0200
I never touched/saw Aldor compiler source code. I'm not trying to rewrite the existing compiler. I'm only interested in a new compiler for the *Aldor language*. If the *Aldor language* is defined to
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00426.html (7,884 bytes)

16. [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] Coming Soon: * Aldor open source release (score: 72)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:34:25 +0100
Hello, Does anyone have any idea exactly what "v. 1.1-rc" refers? Note: The current version of the Aldor compiler is: v1.0.3. Where can we find v. 1.1-rc? maybe you just caught the aldor webpage in a
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-03/msg00025.html (5,592 bytes)

17. [Axiom-developer] RE: Aldor and Axiom (score: 72)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:55:15 -0800 (PST)
<legal issue responses moved to axiom-legal> Well, at least a mirror would be good - it's a bit hard to test Aldor+Axiom without downloading Aldor ;-). Ah, Windows hadn't occured to me. Ugh. Great! T
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-02/msg00152.html (16,800 bytes)

18. [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] License for FriCAS-Aldor interface files (score: 71)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:45:47 -0500
may I ask you again to consider the attached request. Thank you Ralf as you might know, I have built some scripts in FriCAS (a fork of Axiom) (http://fricas.sourceforge.net/) in order to build libaxi
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2009-12/msg00000.html (8,304 bytes)

19. [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] Using Aldor or SPAD (score: 71)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:11:09 +0200
[...] when you get a handful of motivated people, yes. Maybe we should open up a Wiki and call for people on the FrontPage similar to the FreeAldor link. That is an important factor I guess. I.e. wha
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00405.html (9,034 bytes)

20. [Axiom-developer] RE: Aldor and Axiom (score: 71)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Heh. No worries - I have a very bad habit of voicing opinions on things I'm not really qualified to discuss, so I invite the occasional strong response ;-). Certainly true. However, based on your com
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-02/msg00150.html (18,449 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu