Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit
the main index
.
You can also
download the archives in mbox format
.
libtool (date)
[
Thread Index
][
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Prev Period
]
Last Modified: Sat Mar 31 2007 05:30:36 -0400
Messages in reverse chronological order
[
Next Period
]
March 31, 2007
Simultaneous pic and non-pic convenience libs [Was: [RFC] New library "type" needed?]
,
Charles Wilson
,
05:30
March 30, 2007
Link error for blahS.c when used in multiple GCC environment.
,
Brendon Costa
,
21:56
March 29, 2007
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?
,
Charles Wilson
,
02:07
March 27, 2007
Re: mingw and dlls
,
Simon Josefsson
,
11:24
RE: Support for VC++ toolchain (was Re: Absolute pathsgeneratedbylibtool.)
,
Duft Markus
,
02:06
March 26, 2007
Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35
,
Charles Wilson
,
23:43
Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35
,
libtool
,
18:34
Re: Support for VC++ toolchain (was Re: Absolute paths generatedbylibtool.)
,
Olly Betts
,
17:40
Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
14:41
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
14:37
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?
,
Charles Wilson
,
09:51
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?
,
Bernd Jendrissek
,
06:36
Re: library versioning problem
,
Gary V. Vaughan
,
04:10
library versioning problem
,
Lucien GENTIS
,
03:23
March 25, 2007
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?
,
Brian Dessent
,
18:45
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?
,
Charles Wilson
,
15:44
[RFC] New library "type" needed?
,
Charles Wilson
,
15:37
March 24, 2007
[cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35
,
Charles Wilson
,
13:37
March 21, 2007
Re: Compiler checks in AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
,
Olly Betts
,
20:56
March 20, 2007
Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?
,
Bruce Korb
,
16:24
Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?
,
Benoit Sigoure
,
15:32
Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
14:32
Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?
,
Bruce Korb
,
11:36
March 19, 2007
Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?
,
Benoit Sigoure
,
17:43
March 18, 2007
Re: Support for Interix 5.2 and 6.0?
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
14:12
March 16, 2007
Re: Support for Interix 5.2 and 6.0?
,
Martin Koeppe
,
06:30
March 15, 2007
Support for Interix 5.2 and 6.0
,
Martin Koeppe
,
07:17
Re: Support for Interix 5.2 and 6.0?
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
06:15
Support for Interix 5.2 and 6.0?
,
Martin Koeppe
,
06:02
March 09, 2007
Re: Question about libtool.m4
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
03:35
March 08, 2007
Question about libtool.m4
,
Steve Ellcey
,
20:12
Re: Compiler checks in AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
11:54
Re: Compiler checks in AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
,
Fredrik Tolf
,
10:32
March 05, 2007
Re: program fails if built in source tree (was: GNU Libtool 1.5.23b released (alpha release).)
,
haibin zhang
,
21:40
program fails if built in source tree (was: GNU Libtool 1.5.23b released (alpha release).)
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
17:23
Re: Compiler checks in AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
,
Peter O'Gorman
,
07:20
Re: Compiler checks in AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
,
Ralf Wildenhues
,
04:04
Re: Compiler checks in AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
,
03:55
Compiler checks in AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
,
Fredrik Tolf
,
03:10
[
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc