www/philosophy luispo-rms-interview.html

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 19/05/25 06:40:32

Modified files:
        philosophy     : luispo-rms-interview.html 

Log message:
        Cosmetic changes.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37

Patches:
Index: luispo-rms-interview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- luispo-rms-interview.html   25 May 2019 10:35:51 -0000      1.36
+++ luispo-rms-interview.html   25 May 2019 10:40:31 -0000      1.37
@@ -2,14 +2,21 @@
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
 <title>Interview: Richard M. Stallman
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<style type="text/css" media="screen"><!--
+blockquote {
+   font-style: italic;
+   margin-top: 2em;
+}
+--></style>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
 <h2>Interview: Richard M. Stallman</h2>
 
 <p>
-<i>[ This is an interview between Louis Suarez-Potts and Richard
-M. Stallman. ]</i>
+<i>This is an interview between Louis Suarez-Potts and Richard
+M. Stallman.</i>
 </p>
+<hr class="thin">
 
 <p>
 Richard M. Stallman is the most forceful and famous
@@ -70,9 +77,8 @@
        like to live in. Your focus now&mdash;and for at least the
        last seventeen years&mdash;has been on working to make the
        social arrangements for using software more ethical.
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        But, [briefly,] what do you mean by the notion of a what I call here
        a more ethical society?
 </p></blockquote>
@@ -94,9 +100,8 @@
        problems. Of the two, free software is a term that implies an
        ethic of living and holds out the promise of a more just
        society; the other, &ldquo;open source,&rdquo; does not.
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        Is that a fair statement? Would you address that issue, and clarify
        the distinctions for our readers?
 </p></blockquote>
@@ -224,9 +229,8 @@
 think that Microsoft is to be ignored, just as the WTO should not be
 ignored. But: my question was to suggest a rebuttal this self-evident
 FUD, not to credit the errors of others.
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        So, I'll rephrase my question: Microsoft has attacked the GPL
        as business foolishness that is also bad for
        &ldquo;America&rdquo; (whatever that means). They don't care
@@ -234,19 +238,18 @@
        for that matter, the FUD of those who share Microsoft's views?
 </p></blockquote>
 
-<blockquote><p>
+<p>
        Stallman did not respond to this query for clarification, but as it
        happened, a <a href="/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt">speech</a>
        he recently presented at New York University responded to
        Microsoft's propaganda. The Free Software Foundation has presented a
        <a href="/press/2001-05-04-GPL.html">defense</a>, of free software,
        as well.
-</p></blockquote>
+</p>
 
-<blockquote><p>
+<p>
     [To return to the interview&hellip;]
-</p></blockquote>
-
+</p>
 <blockquote><p>
        On a more individual level, how would you address the criticism of
        person who would like to follow your ethical standards but feels she
@@ -435,7 +438,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/05/25 10:35:51 $
+$Date: 2019/05/25 10:40:31 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>