www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.html

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 19/02/20 05:13:34

Modified files:
        philosophy     : open-source-misses-the-point.html 

Log message:
        Add a summary (per rms, www-discuss 2019-02-20); minor restyling.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.85&r2=1.86

Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html,v
retrieving revision 1.85
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -b -r1.85 -r1.86
--- open-source-misses-the-point.html   18 Nov 2016 06:31:39 -0000      1.85
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.html   20 Feb 2019 10:13:34 -0000      1.86
@@ -6,7 +6,20 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
 <h2>Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software</h2>
 
-<p>by <strong>Richard Stallman</strong></p>
+<p class="byline">by Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<div class="article">
+
+<blockquote class="comment"><p>
+The terms &ldquo;free software&rdquo; and &ldquo;open
+source&rdquo; stand for nearly the same range of software.  However,
+they say deeply different things about that software, based on
+different values.  The free software movement campaigns for freedom
+for the users of computing; it is a matter of freedom, principle and
+justice.  &ldquo;Open source&rdquo; values mainly practical
+advantage and does not campaign for principles.  Therefore, we do not
+advocate &ldquo;open source&rdquo; and do not use that term.
+</p></blockquote>
 
 <p>When we call software &ldquo;free,&rdquo; we mean that it respects
 the <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">users' essential freedoms</a>:
@@ -215,7 +228,7 @@
 has <a 
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/opinion/sunday/morozov-open-and-closed.html";>
 become a vacuous buzzword</a>.</p>
 
-<h3>Different Values Can Lead to Similar Conclusions&hellip;but Not Always</h3>
+<h3>Different Values Can Lead to Similar Conclusions&mdash;but Not Always</h3>
 
 <p>Radical groups in the 1960s had a reputation for factionalism: some
 organizations split because of disagreements on details of strategy,
@@ -399,7 +412,9 @@
 than ever.  Every time you say &ldquo;free software&rdquo; rather than
 &ldquo;open source,&rdquo; you help our cause.</p>
 
-<h4>Notes</h4>
+</div>
+
+<h4>Note</h4>
 
 <!-- The article is incomplete (#793776) as of 21st January 2013.
 <p>
@@ -459,7 +474,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/11/18 06:31:39 $
+$Date: 2019/02/20 10:13:34 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>