[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses gpl-violation.it.html gpl-violatio...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/licenses gpl-violation.it.html gpl-violatio... |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:59:14 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 18/11/13 06:59:14
Modified files:
licenses : gpl-violation.it.html gpl-violation.uk.html
Added files:
licenses/po : gpl-violation.it-diff.html
gpl-violation.uk-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-violation.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-violation.uk.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-violation.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-violation.uk-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: gpl-violation.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-violation.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- gpl-violation.it.html 20 Jan 2018 19:31:07 -0000 1.25
+++ gpl-violation.it.html 13 Nov 2018 11:59:12 -0000 1.26
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.it.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/gpl-violation.it.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/gpl-violation.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.it-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2018-09-14" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.it.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.it.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.it.html" -->
<h2>Violazioni delle licenze GNU</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.it.html" -->
@@ -174,7 +180,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ultimo aggiornamento:
-$Date: 2018/01/20 19:31:07 $
+$Date: 2018/11/13 11:59:12 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: gpl-violation.uk.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-violation.uk.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- gpl-violation.uk.html 3 Feb 2018 10:36:19 -0000 1.1
+++ gpl-violation.uk.html 13 Nov 2018 11:59:12 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.uk.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/gpl-violation.uk.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/gpl-violation.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.uk-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2018-09-14" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.uk.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.uk.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.uk.html" -->
<h2>ÐоÑÑÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð»ÑÑензÑй GNU</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.uk.html" -->
@@ -166,7 +172,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ðновлено:
-$Date: 2018/02/03 10:36:19 $
+$Date: 2018/11/13 11:59:12 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/gpl-violation.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/gpl-violation.it-diff.html
diff -N po/gpl-violation.it-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/gpl-violation.it-diff.html 13 Nov 2018 11:59:14 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/licenses/gpl-violation.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.84</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.85</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Violations of the GNU Licenses
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Violations of the GNU Licenses</h2>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" -->
+
+<p>
+If you think you see a violation of the GNU
+<a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>,
+<a href="/licenses/lgpl.html">LGPL</a>,
+<a href="/licenses/agpl.html">AGPL</a>, or
+<a href="/licenses/fdl.html">FDL</a>,
+the first thing you
+should do is double-check the facts:</p>
+<ul>
+ <li>Does the distribution contain a copy of the License?</li>
+ <li>Does it clearly state which software is covered by the License?
+ Does it say anything misleading, perhaps giving the impression
+ that something is covered by the License when in fact it is
not?</li>
+ <li>Is source code included in the distribution?</li>
+ <li>Is a written offer for source code included with a distribution of
+ just binaries?</li>
+ <li>Is the available source code complete, or is it designed for
+ linking in other non-free modules?</li>
+</ul>
+<p>
+If there seems to be a real violation, the next thing you need to do
+is record the details carefully:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>the precise name of the product</li>
+<li>the name of the person or organization distributing it</li>
+
+<li>email addresses, postal addresses and phone numbers for how to
+contact the distributor(s)</li>
+
+<li>the exact name of the package whose license is violated</li>
+
+<li>how the license was violated:
+<ul>
+ <li>Is the copyright notice of the copyright holder
included?</li>
+ <li>Is the source code completely missing?</li>
+
+ <li>Is there a written offer for source that's incomplete in some
+ way? This could happen if it provides a contact address or
+ network URL that's somehow incorrect.</li>
+
+ <li>Is there a copy of the license included in the
distribution?</li>
+
+ <li>Is some of the source available, but not all? If so, what parts
+ are missing?</li>
+</ul>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+The more of these details that you have, the easier it is for the
+copyright holder to pursue the matter.</p>
+
+<p>
+Once you have collected the details, you should send a precise report
+to the copyright <span
class="removed"><del><strong>holder</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>holders</em></ins></span> of the packages that are
being <span class="removed"><del><strong>misused.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>wrongly
+distributed.</em></ins></span> The <span class="inserted"><ins><em>GNU
licenses are</em></ins></span> copyright <span
class="removed"><del><strong>holder is</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses; free licenses
+in general are based on copyright. In most countries only</em></ins></span>
the <span class="removed"><del><strong>one who is</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>copyright holders are</em></ins></span>
legally <span class="removed"><del><strong>authorized to take
action</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>empowered</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>enforce the
license.</p></strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>act
against violations.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>The Free Software Foundation acts on GPL
violations reported on
+FSF-copyrighted code. Thus,
+<strong>if</strong></em></ins></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>program includes code that is</em></ins></span>
copyright <span class="removed"><del><strong>holder
<strong>is</strong> the</strong></del></span> Free
+Software Foundation, please send <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>your</em></ins></span> report
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>It's</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em></p>
+
+<p>It's</em></ins></span> important that we be able to write back to you
to get more
+information about the violation <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and the</em></ins></span> product. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>So,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Thus,</em></ins></span> if you use an
+anonymous remailer, please provide a return path of some sort. If
+you'd like to encrypt your correspondence, just send a brief mail
+saying so, and we'll make appropriate arrangements. Because the FSF
+endorsed <a
href="https://www.fsf.org/licensing/enforcement-principles">the
+Principles of Community-Oriented GPL Enforcement</a>, you can rest
+assured that your report will <span
class="removed"><del><strong>help</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>not lead</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>educate the violator rather than
+punish them</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>punishing
anyone</em></ins></span> for <span class="removed"><del><strong>their
mistake.</p>
+
+<p>
+Note that the GPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses.
+This means that only the copyright holders are empowered</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>an
+innocent mistake who is willing</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>act against
+violations.</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>correct
it.</p>
+
+<p></em></ins></span>
+The FSF <span class="removed"><del><strong>acts on all GPL violations reported
on FSF
+copyrighted code, and we offer</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>offers</em></ins></span> assistance <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and advice</em></ins></span> to any other copyright
holder who
+wishes to <span class="removed"><del><strong>do the same.</p>
+
+<p>
+But,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>enforce GNU
licenses. But</em></ins></span> we cannot act on our own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>if</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>where</em></ins></span> we
+do not hold copyright. Thus, be sure to find out who <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are</em></ins></span> the
+copyright holders of the <span class="removed"><del><strong>software are
before reporting</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>software, and report the violation to
+them.</p>
+
+<p>
+Our colleagues at the Software Freedom Conservancy do GPL enforcement
+for many free programs, through their own copyrights and with
+coalitions of copyright holders in those programs. The programs
+include Linux, Git, Samba, QEMU, and others. If you
encounter</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>violation.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>GPL
+violation on those programs, we suggest you
+visit <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/"> the
+Conservancy's copyleft compliance page</a> for the up-to-date list
+of programs it handles, and how to report
violations.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/11/13 11:59:14 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/gpl-violation.uk-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/gpl-violation.uk-diff.html
diff -N po/gpl-violation.uk-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/gpl-violation.uk-diff.html 13 Nov 2018 11:59:14 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/licenses/gpl-violation.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.84</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.85</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Violations of the GNU Licenses
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Violations of the GNU Licenses</h2>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" -->
+
+<p>
+If you think you see a violation of the GNU
+<a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>,
+<a href="/licenses/lgpl.html">LGPL</a>,
+<a href="/licenses/agpl.html">AGPL</a>, or
+<a href="/licenses/fdl.html">FDL</a>,
+the first thing you
+should do is double-check the facts:</p>
+<ul>
+ <li>Does the distribution contain a copy of the License?</li>
+ <li>Does it clearly state which software is covered by the License?
+ Does it say anything misleading, perhaps giving the impression
+ that something is covered by the License when in fact it is
not?</li>
+ <li>Is source code included in the distribution?</li>
+ <li>Is a written offer for source code included with a distribution of
+ just binaries?</li>
+ <li>Is the available source code complete, or is it designed for
+ linking in other non-free modules?</li>
+</ul>
+<p>
+If there seems to be a real violation, the next thing you need to do
+is record the details carefully:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>the precise name of the product</li>
+<li>the name of the person or organization distributing it</li>
+
+<li>email addresses, postal addresses and phone numbers for how to
+contact the distributor(s)</li>
+
+<li>the exact name of the package whose license is violated</li>
+
+<li>how the license was violated:
+<ul>
+ <li>Is the copyright notice of the copyright holder
included?</li>
+ <li>Is the source code completely missing?</li>
+
+ <li>Is there a written offer for source that's incomplete in some
+ way? This could happen if it provides a contact address or
+ network URL that's somehow incorrect.</li>
+
+ <li>Is there a copy of the license included in the
distribution?</li>
+
+ <li>Is some of the source available, but not all? If so, what parts
+ are missing?</li>
+</ul>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+The more of these details that you have, the easier it is for the
+copyright holder to pursue the matter.</p>
+
+<p>
+Once you have collected the details, you should send a precise report
+to the copyright <span
class="removed"><del><strong>holder</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>holders</em></ins></span> of the packages that are
being <span class="removed"><del><strong>misused.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>wrongly
+distributed.</em></ins></span> The <span class="inserted"><ins><em>GNU
licenses are</em></ins></span> copyright <span
class="removed"><del><strong>holder is</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses; free licenses
+in general are based on copyright. In most countries only</em></ins></span>
the <span class="removed"><del><strong>one who is</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>copyright holders are</em></ins></span>
legally <span class="removed"><del><strong>authorized to take
action</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>empowered</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>enforce the
license.</p></strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>act
against violations.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>The Free Software Foundation acts on GPL
violations reported on
+FSF-copyrighted code. Thus,
+<strong>if</strong></em></ins></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>program includes code that is</em></ins></span>
copyright <span class="removed"><del><strong>holder
<strong>is</strong> the</strong></del></span> Free
+Software Foundation, please send <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>your</em></ins></span> report
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>It's</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em></p>
+
+<p>It's</em></ins></span> important that we be able to write back to you
to get more
+information about the violation <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and the</em></ins></span> product. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>So,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Thus,</em></ins></span> if you use an
+anonymous remailer, please provide a return path of some sort. If
+you'd like to encrypt your correspondence, just send a brief mail
+saying so, and we'll make appropriate arrangements. Because the FSF
+endorsed <a
href="https://www.fsf.org/licensing/enforcement-principles">the
+Principles of Community-Oriented GPL Enforcement</a>, you can rest
+assured that your report will <span
class="removed"><del><strong>help</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>not lead</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>educate the violator rather than
+punish them</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>punishing
anyone</em></ins></span> for <span class="removed"><del><strong>their
mistake.</p>
+
+<p>
+Note that the GPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses.
+This means that only the copyright holders are empowered</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>an
+innocent mistake who is willing</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>act against
+violations.</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>correct
it.</p>
+
+<p></em></ins></span>
+The FSF <span class="removed"><del><strong>acts on all GPL violations reported
on FSF
+copyrighted code, and we offer</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>offers</em></ins></span> assistance <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and advice</em></ins></span> to any other copyright
holder who
+wishes to <span class="removed"><del><strong>do the same.</p>
+
+<p>
+But,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>enforce GNU
licenses. But</em></ins></span> we cannot act on our own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>if</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>where</em></ins></span> we
+do not hold copyright. Thus, be sure to find out who <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are</em></ins></span> the
+copyright holders of the <span class="removed"><del><strong>software are
before reporting</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>software, and report the violation to
+them.</p>
+
+<p>
+Our colleagues at the Software Freedom Conservancy do GPL enforcement
+for many free programs, through their own copyrights and with
+coalitions of copyright holders in those programs. The programs
+include Linux, Git, Samba, QEMU, and others. If you
encounter</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>violation.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>GPL
+violation on those programs, we suggest you
+visit <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/"> the
+Conservancy's copyleft compliance page</a> for the up-to-date list
+of programs it handles, and how to report
violations.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/11/13 11:59:14 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses gpl-violation.it.html gpl-violatio...,
GNUN <=