www/licenses license-compatibility.html

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 18/09/14 08:50:46

Modified files:
        licenses       : license-compatibility.html 

Log message:
        Validation fixes.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-compatibility.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7

Patches:
Index: license-compatibility.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/licenses/license-compatibility.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- license-compatibility.html  14 Sep 2018 11:56:16 -0000      1.6
+++ license-compatibility.html  14 Sep 2018 12:50:46 -0000      1.7
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
 <p id="f1"><b>*</b> It is not inconceivable that other legal issues
 might arise about a specific combination of programs, issues not
 related to the copyright licenses of the programs to be combined.  We
-discuss only the implications of the licenses themselves.</a>
+discuss only the implications of the licenses themselves.</p>
 
 <p id="f2"><b>**</b> The main license in actual use that isn't
 reasonably behaved is the license of TeX: if two programs are licensed
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
 <p id="f4"><b>****</b> In addition, GPL version 2 still allows
 binaries to be made nonfree by hardware that rejects all but special
 signed binaries, and still does not allow distribution of binaries by
-torrent.  <A href="/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html">We fixed those
+torrent.  <a href="/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html">We fixed those
 problems, and others, in version 3</a>, but we can't change version 2.</p>
 
 <p id="f5"><b>*****</b> Some use the term &ldquo;dual licensing&rdquo;
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/09/14 11:56:16 $
+$Date: 2018/09/14 12:50:46 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>