[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy po/why-free.translist po/why-fre...
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/philosophy po/why-free.translist po/why-fre... |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:59:07 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 17/09/24 08:59:07
Modified files:
philosophy/po : why-free.translist why-free.zh-cn.po
Added files:
philosophy : why-free.zh-cn.html
philosophy/po : why-free.zh-cn-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-free.zh-cn.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-free.translist?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-free.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-free.zh-cn-en.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: po/why-free.translist
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-free.translist,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- po/why-free.translist 12 Apr 2016 15:42:10 -0000 1.15
+++ po/why-free.translist 24 Sep 2017 12:59:06 -0000 1.16
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="ta" hreflang="ta"
href="/philosophy/why-free.ta.html">தமிழà¯</a> [ta]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="tr" hreflang="tr"
href="/philosophy/why-free.tr.html">Türkçe</a> [tr]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="uk" hreflang="uk"
href="/philosophy/why-free.uk.html">ÑкÑаÑнÑÑка</a> [uk]</span>
+<span dir="ltr"><a lang="zh-cn" hreflang="zh-cn"
href="/philosophy/why-free.zh-cn.html">ç®ä½ä¸æ</a> [zh-cn]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="zh-tw" hreflang="zh-tw"
href="/philosophy/why-free.zh-tw.html">ç¹é«ä¸æ</a> [zh-tw]</span>
</p>
</div>' -->
@@ -64,5 +65,6 @@
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="ta" hreflang="ta"
href="/philosophy/why-free.ta.html" title="தமிழà¯" />
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="tr" hreflang="tr"
href="/philosophy/why-free.tr.html" title="Türkçe" />
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="uk" hreflang="uk"
href="/philosophy/why-free.uk.html" title="ÑкÑаÑнÑÑка" />
+<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="zh-cn" hreflang="zh-cn"
href="/philosophy/why-free.zh-cn.html" title="ç®ä½ä¸æ" />
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="zh-tw" hreflang="zh-tw"
href="/philosophy/why-free.zh-tw.html" title="ç¹é«ä¸æ" />
<!-- end translist file -->
Index: po/why-free.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-free.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/why-free.zh-cn.po 24 Sep 2017 12:48:47 -0000 1.1
+++ po/why-free.zh-cn.po 24 Sep 2017 12:59:06 -0000 1.2
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
"Language: zh_CN\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
-"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit"
+"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
Index: why-free.zh-cn.html
===================================================================
RCS file: why-free.zh-cn.html
diff -N why-free.zh-cn.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ why-free.zh-cn.html 24 Sep 2017 12:59:05 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-free.en.html" -->
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.zh-cn.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+
+<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
+<title>为ä»ä¹è½¯ä»¶ä¸åºè¯¥æææè
- GNUå·¥ç¨ -
èªç±è½¯ä»¶åºéä¼</title>
+
+<meta name="Keywords"
content="GNUãGNUå·¥ç¨ãFSFãèªç±è½¯ä»¶ãèªç±è½¯ä»¶åºéä¼ã为ä»ä¹è½¯ä»¶ä¸åºè¯¥æææè
" />
+
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-free.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.zh-cn.html" -->
+<h2>为ä»ä¹è½¯ä»¶ä¸åºè¯¥æææè
</h2>
+
+<p><a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard Stallman</strong></a>
è</p>
+
+<p>
+æ°åä¿¡æ¯ææ¯å¯¹ç¤¾ä¼çè´¡ç®å¨äºå®ä½¿ä¿¡æ¯çå¤å¶åä¿®æ¹åå¾æ´å
容æã计ç®æºè½å¤ä½¿æ¯ä¸ªäººé½å¯ä»¥æ´å®¹æå°å¤å¶åä¿®æ¹ä¿¡æ¯ã</p>
+
+<p>
+并éæ¯ä¸ªäººé½å¸æå®æ´å®¹æãçæä½ç³»èµäºäºè½¯ä»¶“ææè
”ï¼è大å¤æ°è½¯ä»¶ææè
çç®æ
æ¯æå¶è½¯ä»¶å¸¦ç»å¤§ä¼çæ½å¨å©çãä»ä»¬è¦æ为å¯ä¸è½å¤å¤å¶åä¿®æ¹è½¯ä»¶ç人ã</p>
+
+<p>
+çæä½ç³»å
´èµ·äºå°å·æ¯—ä¸é¡¹å¤§è§æ¨¡å¤å¶çææ¯ãå
为çæä»
ä»
éå¶å¤§è§æ¨¡å¤å¶ï¼æ以å®å¾éç¨äºè¯¥é¡¹ææ¯ãå®å¹¶æ²¡æå¥å¤ºè¯»è
çèªç±ãä¸ä¸ªæ®é读è
ï¼æ²¡æå°å·è®¾å¤ï¼åªè½ç¨çº¸ç¬å墨水å¤å¶ä¹¦ç±ï¼å¾å°æ读è
ä¼å æ¤è¢«åä¸æ³åºã</p>
+
+<p>
+æ°åææ¯æ¯å°å·è®¾å¤æ´çµæ´»ï¼ä½
å¯ä»¥è½»æå°å¤å¶æ°ååçä¿¡æ¯ï¼å¹¶ä¸ä»äººå享ãæ£æ¯è¿ç§çµæ´»æ§ä½¿ä¹å¾é¾éç¨äºè±¡çæè¿æ
·çä½ç³»ãè¿å°±æ¯ä¸ºä»ä¹ç°å¨å
强软件çæçæ段è¶æ¥è¶æ¶å£å严èã请æéä¸ä¸è½¯ä»¶åå¸è
åä¼ï¼SPAï¼çå个å®è·µï¼</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>大éå®£ä¼ èåææè
å»å¸®å©æåæ¯é误çã</li>
+
+<li>诱使线人举æ¥å
¶å·¥åååäºã</li>
+
+<li>çªè¢ï¼é è¦å¯å¸®å©ï¼åå
¬åºæåå¦æ ¡ï¼åè¯äººä»¬å¿
é¡»èªè¯æ²¡æä»äºéæ³å¤å¶ã</li>
+
+<li>èµ·è¯ï¼å¨SPAçè¦æ±ä¸ï¼ç±ç¾å½æ¿åºæä½ï¼è¯¸å¦<acronym
title="Massachusetts Institute of
+Technologyï¼éº»ççå·¥å¦é¢">MIT</acronym>çDavid
+LaMacchiaè¿æ ·ç人士ï¼ä¸æ¯å
为å¤å¶è½¯ä»¶ï¼ä»å¹¶æ²¡æ被ææ§å¤å¶è½¯ä»¶ï¼ï¼èä»
ä»
æ¯å
为没æç管å¤å¶è®¾å¤å没æç管设å¤ç¨éã<a
+href="#footnote1">[1]</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+è¿å项å®è·µé½ç±»ä¼¼äºåèè使ç¨çæ段ï¼æ¯ä¸ªå¤å°æºé½æä¸ä¸ªè¦å«ï¼ä»¥é²æ¢éæ³å¤å¶ï¼è个人åªè½ç§å¯å¤å¶ä¿¡æ¯ï¼ç¶å象å°ä¸åºçç©ä¼¼ç人ä¼
人ãå½ç¶ä¹æä¸åä¹å¤ï¼èèä¿¡æ¯æ§å¶çå¨æºæ¯æ¿æ²»ï¼èç¾å½çæ¯å©æ¶¦ãç¶èï¼å½±åæ们çæ¯è¡å¨ï¼èéå¨æºãä»»ä½é»æ¢ä¿¡æ¯å享çä¼å¾ï¼æ
论为ä»ä¹ï¼é½ä¼ä½¿ç¨åæ ·çæ段å导è´åæ ·ä¸¥é
·çæ°å´ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ææè
为äºè·å¾æ§å¶æ们å¦ä½ä½¿ç¨ä¿¡æ¯çæåï¼éåäºå¦ä¸å
ç§ç¡è¾©ï¼</p>
+
+
+<ul>
+<li id="name-calling">æ£å¸½åã
+
+<p>
+ææè
使ç¨è¯½è°¤æ§åç¼ï¼å¦“çç”å“å·çª”ï¼è¿ä½¿ç¨ä¸ä¸æ¯è¯ï¼å¦“ç¥è¯äº§æ”å“伤害”ï¼æ¥å大ä¼æ¨ä»ä¸ç§æèæ¹å¼—æç¨åºåå®ç©ç®åç±»æ¯ã</p>
+
+<p>
+æ们对å®ç©æææçç念åç´è§æ¯é对<em>æ¿èµ°å«äººçä¸è¥¿</em>æ¯å¦åéè¿ä»¶äºãå®ä»¬ä¸è½ç´æ¥åºç¨äº<em>å¤å¶</em>è¿ä»¶äºãä½æ¯ï¼ææè
å°±æ¯è®©æ们è¿æ ·ç¨ã</p></li>
+
+<li id="exaggeration">夸大å
¶è¯ã
+
+<p>
+ææè
声称å½ç¨æ·èªå·±å¤å¶ç¨åºæ¶ï¼ä»ä»¬åå°äº“伤害”æè
èå亓ç»æµæ失”ãä½æ¯å¤å¶å¯¹ææè
并æ
ç´æ¥å½±åï¼ä¹æ²¡æ伤害任ä½äººãå¦æå¤å¶ç人åªè½åææè
è´ä¹°æ·è´çè¯ï¼å¤å¶æä¼æ¯ææè
çæ失ã</p>
+
+<p>
+è¿ä¸æ¥æèçç»ææ¯è¿äºäººä¸ç大å¤æ°ä¸ä¼å»è´ä¹°æ·è´ãå¯æ¯ï¼ææè
ä»ç¶æç
§æ¯ä¸ªäººé½ä¼ä¹°æ·è´æ¥è®¡ç®èªå·±ç“æ失”ãè¿å°±æ¯å¤¸å¤§å
¶è¯—说å¾å®¢æ°ç¹ã</p></li>
+
+<li id="law">è¯ä¹æ³å¾ã
+
+<p>
+ææè
ç»å¸¸è®²è¿°ç°è¡æ³å¾åå
¶ç¨æ¥å¨èæ们ç严åæ©ç½æªæ½ã该举æªæ示å½ä»æ³å¾åæ
çæ¯æ
å¯è¾©é©³çéå¾·åå—èä¸æ¤åæ¶ï¼æ们强ç建议è§è¿äºå¤ç½ä¸ºèªç¶äºå®ï¼å®ä»¬ä¸è½å½åäºä»»ä½äººã</p>
+
+<p>
+æ¤å¤çæ¨ç并ä¸æ¯ç¨æ¥ç»åæ¹å¤æ§æèï¼å®æå¨å 强ä¹
æ¯æ§çå¿çéè·¯ã<sup><a href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>
+æ³å¾å¹¶ä¸å³å®æ£ç¡®æè
é误ï¼è¿æ¯åºç¡ãæ¯ä¸ä¸ªç¾å½äººé½åºè¯¥ç¥éï¼å¨50年代ï¼é»äººåå¨å
¬äº¤è½¦çåæå¨è®¸å¤å·æ¯éæ³çï¼ä½æ¯åªæç§æ主ä¹è
æä¼è¯´åå¨é£éæ¯é误çã</p></li>
+
+<li id="natural-rights">èªç¶æå©ã
+
+<p>
+èä½è
们ç»å¸¸å£°ç§°å¯¹å
¶è½¯ä»¶å
·æç¹æ®å
³èï¼å¹¶æ®æ¤æè¨ï¼ä»ä»¬å¯¹è½¯ä»¶çææåå
´è¶£å°±ä¼è¶
è¶å
¶ä»äºº—ä¹è³è¶
è¶æ´ä¸ªä¸ççææå
¶ä»äººãï¼å
¸åçæ
åµæ¯ï¼å
¬å¸èé个人æ¥æ软件çæï¼ä½æ¯æ们å¨æ¤å¿½ç¥è¿ä¸ªå·®å¼ãï¼</p>
+
+<p>
+对é£äºå»ºè®®ä»¥—ä½è
æ¯ä½ æ´é覗为å
¬çç人ï¼æåªè½è¯´ï¼æï¼ä½ä¸ºä¸ä¸ªè½¯ä»¶èä½è
ï¼ç§°ä¹ä¸ºè¡è¯´ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä½æ¯ä¸è¬äººä»¬åªä¼å 为两个åå
æå¯è½èµå对èªç¶æå©çç³æã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä¸ä¸ªåå
æ¯å¯¹å®ç©ç±»æ¯çè¿åº¦æ¨å¹¿ãå½æåæ大å©é¢æ¡æ¶ï¼æä¼å对å«äººåå®ï¼å
为é£æ
·æ就没çåäºã对æ¹è·å©çå¤å°å对æç伤害æ£å¥½ç¸å½ï¼æ们两个åªæä¸ä¸ªäººå¯ä»¥åå°é¢æ¡ï¼æ以é®é¢æ¯ï¼åªä¸ªäººæ¯è°ï¼æ们ä¹é´æå°çå·®å¼é½è¶³ä»¥æç
´éå¾·ç平衡ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä½æ¯ä½ æ¯å¦è¿è¡æä¿®æ¹æåçç¨åºç´æ¥å½±åçæ¯ä½
ï¼å¯¹æçå½±ååªæ¯é´æ¥çãä½ æ¯å¦ç»äºæåä¸ä»½æ·è´å¯¹ä½
åä½ æåçå½±åè¿å¤§äºå¯¹æçå½±åãæä¸åºè¯¥ææååç¥ä½
ä¸è¦è¿ä¹åãä»»ä½äººé½ä¸è¯¥æ¥æè¿ä¸ªæåã</p>
+
+<p>
+å¦ä¸ä¸ªåå æ¯äººä»¬è¢«åç¥ä½è
çèªç¶æå©æ¯è¢«è®¤å¯çãæ
å¯è¾©é©³ç社ä¼ä¼ ç»ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä»åå²æ¥çï¼æ£å¥½ç¸åãèµ·èç¾å½å®ªæ³æ¶ï¼ä½è
çèªç¶æå©å°±å·²è¢«æåºå¹¶ä¸è¢«ä¸è´å¦å³ãè¿å°±æ¯ä¸ºä»ä¹å®ªæ³ä»
<em>å
许</em>èä¸æ¯<em>è¦æ±</em>æä¸ä¸ªçæç³»ç»ï¼è¿å°±æ¯ä¸ºä»ä¹å®ªæ³è¯´çæå¿
é¡»æ¯ææ¶éçã宪æ³è¿éè¿°äºçæçç®çæ¯ä¿è¿åå±—èä¸æ¯å¥å±ä½è
ãçæç¡®å®åæ¥äºä½è
äºè®¸ï¼åæ¥åºçåæ´å¤ï¼ä½ä½ä¸ºæ段ï¼åæ¥æå¨æ¹åä»ä»¬çè¡ä¸ºã</p>
+
+<p>
+æ们社ä¼å»ºç«ççæ£ä¼ ç»æ¯çææ¶åäºå
¬ä¼çèªç¶æå©—èå®åªè½æç
§å
¬ä¼çå©çæ¥è¯å¤ã</p></li>
+
+<li id="economics">ç»æµå ç´ ã
+
+<p>
+æåä¸ä¸ªè®ºè¯è½¯ä»¶åºè¯¥æææè
ç论ç¹æ¯è¿æ
·å¯ä»¥äº§åºæ´å¤ç软件ã</p>
+
+<p>
+åå
¶ä»å
个论ç¹ä¸åï¼è¯¥è®ºç¹è³å°å¯¹æ¤é®é¢éåäºä¸ç§åçç解æ³ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä½æ¯è¿ä¸ªç»æµå¦ç论ç¹æä¸ä¸ªæ¼æ´ï¼å®çåºç¡å设æ¯å·®å«ä»
å¨äºæ们ä»å¤å°é±ãå®å设æ们è¦çæ¯<em>软件产å</em>ï¼æ
论软件æ¯å¦æææè
ã</p>
+
+<p>
+å
为符åæ们对å®ç©çç»éªï¼äººä»¬å°±è½»æå°æ¥åäºè¿ä¸ªå设ã举个ä¾åï¼æ¿ä¸ææ²»æ¥è¯´å§ãå设ä½
å¯ä»¥å
è´¹æä»è´¹è·å¾åæ ·çä¸ä¸ªä¸ææ²»ãè¿æ ·ï¼ä½
æä»çé±å°±æ¯å¯ä¸çå·®å«ãæ 论ä½
æ¯å¦è±é±ä¹°ï¼è¿ä¸ªä¸ææ²»çå£å³ä¸æ ·ãè¥å
»ä»·å¼ä¹ä¸æ ·ï¼ä½
ä¹åªè½åä¸æ¬¡ãä½ æ¯å¦ä»å
¶ææè
æ¥è´ä¹°é¤äºå½±åä½
ä»é±çå¤å°ï¼ä¹ä¸ä¼åå½±åå«çä»ä¹ã</p>
+
+<p>
+è¿ä¸ªéç对å
¶ä»å®ç©ä¹ä¸æ ·æç«—æ 论å®æ¯å¦æææè
并ä¸ç´æ¥å½±åå®<em>æ¯</em>ä»ä¹ï¼ä¹ä¸å½±åä½
è·å¾å®ä¹åä¼æä¹å¯¹å¾
å®ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä½æ¯å¦æ软件æææè
ï¼å®æ¯ä»ä¹å°±åå°å¾å¤§çå½±åï¼ä¹ä¼å½±åè´ä¹°å®ä¹åä½ å¯¹å
¶æ·è´çæä½æ为ãå·®å«å°±ä¸åªæ¯è±é±å¤å°ã软件ææè
ç³»ç»ä¼é¼å±è½¯ä»¶ææè
å¶ä½è½¯ä»¶—ä½ä¸æ¯ç¤¾ä¼çæ£çéæ±ãå®é
æäºå½±åæ们大家çé¾ä»¥å½¢å®¹çé德污æã</p></li>
+
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+社ä¼çéæ±æ¯ä»ä¹ï¼å®éè¦æ¯ä¸ªç¤¾ä¼å
¬æ°é½è½çæ£äº«æç信毗ä¾å¦ï¼äººä»¬å¯ä»¥ç
读ãä¿®æ£ãæ¹é
åæé«çç¨åºï¼èä¸åªæ¯æä½è¿è¡ãç¶è软件ææè
å
¸åç交ä»æ¯ä¸ä¸ªæ们æ æ³å¦ä¹ æä¿®æ¹çé»çã</p>
+
+<p>
+社ä¼è¿éè¦èªç±ãå¦æ软件æææè
ï¼è½¯ä»¶ç¨æ·å°±å¤±å»äºæ§å¶ä»ä»¬çæ´»çé¨åèªç±ã</p>
+
+<p>
+æéè¦çæ¯ï¼ç¤¾ä¼éè¦é¼å±å
¶å
¬æ°å¿æ¿äºå©çç²¾ç¥ãå½è½¯ä»¶ææè
åè¯æ们以èªç¶çæ¹å¼å¸®å©é»å±
毓çç”ï¼ä»ä»¬å°±æ¯å¨æ±¡æ社ä¼çææç²¾ç¥ã</p>
+
+<p>
+è¿å°±æ¯ä¸ºä»ä¹æ们说<a
href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">èªç±è½¯ä»¶ï¼free
+softwareï¼</a>å
³ä¹èªç±ï¼æ å
³ä»·æ ¼ã</p>
+
+<p>
+尽管ææè
çç»æµå¦è®ºç¹æ¯é误çï¼ä½æ¯ç»æµå¦çé®é¢æ¯ç°å®çãæäºäººä¸ºäºå¿«ä¹èç¼åæç¨ç软件ï¼æäºäººä¸ºäºèµç¾åç±æ
èç¼åæç¨ç软件ï¼ä½æ¯å¦ææ们è¦ç¼åè¶
è¶è¿äºäººçæ´å¤è½¯ä»¶ï¼æ们éè¦èµéã</p>
+
+<p>
+èªä»19ä¸çºª80年代以æ¥ï¼èªç±è½¯ä»¶çå¼åè
ä¸ç´å°è¯ç¨åç§æ¹æ³è·å¾èµéï¼æäºè·å¾äºæåã并ä¸éè¦è®©ä»»ä½äººåå¾å¯æï¼ä¸ä¸ªæ£å¸¸çæ¶å
¥å°±ä¼æ¯äººä»¬ä»äºè®¸å¤å·¥ä½ç足å¤æ¿å±ï¼èè¿äºå·¥ä½è¿ä¸è±¡ç¼ç¨è¿æ
·ææå°±æã</p>
+
+<p>
+æ许å¤å¹´æ¥ï¼æä¸ç´é
为客æ·å®å¶æç¼åçèªç±è½¯ä»¶æ¥è°çï¼ç´å°åºå®èµå©<sup><a
+href="#TransNote2">2</a></sup>让æä¸å¿
åé£æ
·åãæçæ¯ä¸ªå®å¶é½æ·»å å°äºæ
ååå¸çä¸ï¼ä»èæç»ä¸ºå¤§ä¼æç¨ã客æ·ä»é±ç»æï¼æå°±ä¼å¼åä»ä»¬éè¦çåè½èä¸æ¯æ认为æä¼å
çåè½ã</p>
+
+<p>
+æäºèªç±è½¯ä»¶å¼åè
éè¿éå®ææ¯æå¡è·å¾æ¶å
¥ãå¨1994å¹´ï¼Cygnus
+Supportå
¬å¸ï¼å¤§æ¦æ50个åå·¥ï¼ä¼°è®¡å
¶åå·¥15%çå·¥ä½æ¯è¿è¡èªç±è½¯ä»¶çå¼å—对ä¸ä¸ªè½¯ä»¶å
¬å¸æ¥è¯´è¿æ¯ä¸ä¸ªå¼å¾å°æ¬çæ¯ä¾ã</p>
+
+<p>
+å¨19ä¸çºª90年代ï¼å
æ¬IntelãMotorolaãTexas InstrumentsåAnalog
Deviceså¨å
çå¤å®¶å
¬å¸èåèµå©GNU
+Cç¼è¯å¨ç继ç»å¼åãGCCç主è¦å¼åä»ç¶æ¯ç±ä»è´¹å¼åè
ååºçãé对Adaè¯è¨çGNUç¼è¯å¨æ¯å¨90年代ç±ç¾å½ç©ºåèµå©çï¼ä¹åç±å
æ¤èæç«çä¸å®¶å
¬å¸ç»§ç»å¼åã</p>
+
+<p>
+èªç±è½¯ä»¶çè§æ¨¡è¿ä¸å¤§ï¼ä½æ¯ç¾å½ç±å¬ä¼æ¯æççµå°ä½ä¸ºä¾åå·²ç»è¡¨æï¼å®å¯ä»¥æ¯æ大è§æ¨¡çæ´»å¨èæ
é强迫æ¯ä¸ªç¨æ·é½ä»è´¹ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä½ä¸ºå½ä»ç计ç®æºç¨æ·ï¼ä½ å¯è½æ£å¨ä½¿ç¨<a
+href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">ä¸å±</a>ç¨åºãå¦æä½
çæåæ¥è¦ä¸ä»½æ·è´ï¼æç»å¯è½æ¯ä¸å¯¹çãåä½æ¯çææ´éè¦ãä½æ¯å°ä¸çãé®æ©çåä½ä¸æ¯ä¸ä¸ªå¥½ç¤¾ä¼åºæçã人们åºè¯¥èªè±ªå°å
¬å¼è¿½æ±æ£ç´ççæ´»ï¼è¿å°±æå³çè¦å¯¹ä¸å±è½¯ä»¶è¯´ä¸ã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä½ ææå
¬å¼åèªç±å°ä¸å
¶ä»è½¯ä»¶ç¨æ·åä½ãä½ ææå¦ä¹
软件å¦ä½å·¥ä½ï¼å¹¶æä¼ä½ çå¦çãä½ ææéä½£ä½
å欢çç¨åºåä¸ºä½ ä¿®å¤ç¨åºã</p>
+
+<p>
+ä½ æææ¥æèªç±è½¯ä»¶ã</p>
+
+<h3>è注</h3>
+<ol>
+<li id="footnote1">è¿äºææ§é½å
å被驳åäºã</li>
+</ol>
+
+<hr />
+<blockquote id="fsfs"><p class="big">æ¬æå表äº<a
+href="http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"><cite>èªç±è½¯ä»¶ãèªç±ç¤¾ä¼ï¼çæ¥å¾·.M.æ¯ææ¼
+éé</cite></a>ã</p></blockquote>
+
+<div class="translators-notes">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
+<h3>è¯æ³¨</h3>
+<ol>
+<li id="TransNote1">mental
pathwayï¼ææ³å¸¸å¸¸å¾ªç常è§è¿è¡ï¼è¿ç§è¶å¿ï¼
+å¿çå¦ä¸ç§°ä¹ä¸º“å¿ççéè·¯”ã</li>
+<li
id="TransNote2">åææ¯fellowshipï¼ä¸ä¸ªèèï¼æ类似å¥å¦éçæ¶å
¥ã</li>
+</ol></div>
+</div>
+
+<!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.zh-cn.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>请å°æå
³èªç±è½¯ä»¶åºéä¼(FSF) & GNU
çä¸è¬æ§é®é¢åéå°<a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>ãä¹å¯ä»¥éè¿ <a
+href="/contact/">å
¶ä»èç³»æ¹æ³</a>
èç³»èªç±è½¯ä»¶åºéä¼(FSF)ãæå
³å¤±æé¾æ¥æå
¶ä»é误å建议ï¼è¯·åéé®ä»¶å°<a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>ã</p>
+
+<p>
+<!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+è¥æ¨æ³ç¿»è¯æ¬æï¼è¯·åç<a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">ç¿»è¯é¡»ç¥</a>è·åæå
³åè°åæ交翻è¯çç¸å
³äºé¡¹ã</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+<p>Copyright © 1994, 2009 Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>æ¬é¡µé¢ä½¿ç¨<a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons
+Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>ææã</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.zh-cn.html" -->
+<div class="translators-credits">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
+<b>ç¿»è¯å¢é</b>ï¼<a rel="team"
+href="https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/www-zh-cn/"><CTT></a>ï¼2017ã</div>
+
+<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
+æåæ´æ°ï¼
+
+$Date: 2017/09/24 12:59:05 $
+
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
Index: po/why-free.zh-cn-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-free.zh-cn-en.html
diff -N po/why-free.zh-cn-en.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-free.zh-cn-en.html 24 Sep 2017 12:59:06 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,375 @@
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Why Software Should Not Have Owners
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+
+<meta name="Keywords" content="GNU, GNU Project, FSF, Free Software, Free
Software Foundation, Why Software Should Not Have Owners" />
+
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-free.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+
+<h2>Why Software Should Not Have Owners</h2>
+
+<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard
+Stallman</strong></a></p>
+
+<p>
+Digital information technology contributes to the world by making it
+easier to copy and modify information. Computers promise to make this
+easier for all of us.</p>
+
+<p>
+Not everyone wants it to be easier. The system of copyright gives
+software programs “owners”, most of whom aim to withhold
+software's potential benefit from the rest of the public. They would
+like to be the only ones who can copy and modify the software that we
+use.</p>
+
+<p>
+The copyright system grew up with printing—a technology for
+mass-production copying. Copyright fit in well with this technology
+because it restricted only the mass producers of copies. It did not
+take freedom away from readers of books. An ordinary reader, who did
+not own a printing press, could copy books only with pen and ink, and
+few readers were sued for that.</p>
+
+<p>
+Digital technology is more flexible than the printing press: when
+information has digital form, you can easily copy it to share it with
+others. This very flexibility makes a bad fit with a system like
+copyright. That's the reason for the increasingly nasty and draconian
+measures now used to enforce software copyright. Consider these four
+practices of the Software Publishers Association (SPA):</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Massive propaganda saying it is wrong to disobey the owners to
+help your friend.</li>
+
+<li>Solicitation for stool pigeons to inform on their coworkers and
+colleagues.</li>
+
+<li>Raids (with police help) on offices and schools, in which people
+are told they must prove they are innocent of illegal copying.</li>
+
+<li>Prosecution (by the US government, at the SPA's request) of people
+such as
+<acronym title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</acronym>'s
+David LaMacchia, not for copying software (he is not accused of
+copying any), but merely for leaving copying facilities unguarded and
+failing to censor their use.<a href="#footnote1">[1]</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+All four practices resemble those used in the former Soviet Union,
+where every copying machine had a guard to prevent forbidden copying,
+and where individuals had to copy information secretly and pass it
+from hand to hand as samizdat. There is of course a difference: the
+motive for information control in the Soviet Union was political; in
+the US the motive is profit. But it is the actions that affect us,
+not the motive. Any attempt to block the sharing of information, no
+matter why, leads to the same methods and the same harshness.</p>
+
+<p>
+Owners make several kinds of arguments for giving them the power
+to control how we use information:</p>
+
+
+<ul>
+<li id="name-calling">Name calling.
+
+<p>
+Owners use smear words such as “piracy” and
+“theft”, as well as expert terminology such as
+“intellectual property” and “damage”, to
+suggest a certain line of thinking to the public—a simplistic
+analogy between programs and physical objects.</p>
+
+<p>
+Our ideas and intuitions about property for material objects are about
+whether it is right to <em>take an object away</em> from someone else. They
+don't directly apply to <em>making a copy</em> of something. But the owners
+ask us to apply them anyway.</p></li>
+
+<li id="exaggeration">Exaggeration.
+
+<p>
+Owners say that they suffer “harm” or “economic
+loss” when users copy programs themselves. But the copying has
+no direct effect on the owner, and it harms no one. The owner can
+lose only if the person who made the copy would otherwise have paid
+for one from the owner.</p>
+
+<p>
+A little thought shows that most such people would not have bought
+copies. Yet the owners compute their “losses” as if each
+and every one would have bought a copy. That is exaggeration—to
+put it kindly.</p></li>
+
+<li id="law">The law.
+
+<p>
+Owners often describe the current state of the law, and the harsh
+penalties they can threaten us with. Implicit in this approach is the
+suggestion that today's law reflects an unquestionable view of
+morality—yet at the same time, we are urged to regard these
+penalties as facts of nature that can't be blamed on anyone.</p>
+
+<p>
+This line of persuasion isn't designed to stand up to critical
+thinking; it's intended to reinforce a habitual mental pathway.</p>
+
+<p>
+It's elementary that laws don't decide right and wrong. Every American
+should know that, in the 1950s, it was against the law in many
+states for a black person to sit in the front of a bus; but only
+racists would say sitting there was wrong.</p></li>
+
+<li id="natural-rights">Natural rights.
+
+<p>
+Authors often claim a special connection with programs they have
+written, and go on to assert that, as a result, their desires and
+interests concerning the program simply outweigh those of anyone
+else—or even those of the whole rest of the world. (Typically
+companies, not authors, hold the copyrights on software, but we are
+expected to ignore this discrepancy.)</p>
+
+<p>
+To those who propose this as an ethical axiom—the author is more
+important than you—I can only say that I, a notable software
+author myself, call it bunk.</p>
+
+<p>
+But people in general are only likely to feel any sympathy with the
+natural rights claims for two reasons.</p>
+
+<p>
+One reason is an overstretched analogy with material objects. When I
+cook spaghetti, I do object if someone else eats it, because then I
+cannot eat it. His action hurts me exactly as much as it benefits
+him; only one of us can eat the spaghetti, so the question is, which one?
+The smallest distinction between us is enough to tip the ethical
+balance.</p>
+
+<p>
+But whether you run or change a program I wrote affects you directly
+and me only indirectly. Whether you give a copy to your friend
+affects you and your friend much more than it affects me. I shouldn't
+have the power to tell you not to do these things. No one should.</p>
+
+<p>
+The second reason is that people have been told that natural rights
+for authors is the accepted and unquestioned tradition of our society.</p>
+
+<p>
+As a matter of history, the opposite is true. The idea of natural
+rights of authors was proposed and decisively rejected when the US
+Constitution was drawn up. That's why the Constitution only
+<em>permits</em> a system of copyright and does not <em>require</em>
+one; that's why it says that copyright must be temporary. It also
+states that the purpose of copyright is to promote progress—not
+to reward authors. Copyright does reward authors somewhat, and
+publishers more, but that is intended as a means of modifying their
+behavior.</p>
+
+<p>
+The real established tradition of our society is that copyright cuts
+into the natural rights of the public—and that this can only be
+justified for the public's sake.</p></li>
+
+<li id="economics">Economics.
+
+<p>
+The final argument made for having owners of software is that this
+leads to production of more software.</p>
+
+<p>
+Unlike the others, this argument at least takes a legitimate approach
+to the subject. It is based on a valid goal—satisfying the
+users of software. And it is empirically clear that people will
+produce more of something if they are well paid for doing so.</p>
+
+<p>
+But the economic argument has a flaw: it is based on the assumption
+that the difference is only a matter of how much money we have to pay.
+It assumes that <em>production of software</em> is what we want,
+whether the software has owners or not.</p>
+
+<p>
+People readily accept this assumption because it accords with our
+experiences with material objects. Consider a sandwich, for instance.
+You might well be able to get an equivalent sandwich either gratis or
+for a price. If so, the amount you pay is the only difference.
+Whether or not you have to buy it, the sandwich has the same taste,
+the same nutritional value, and in either case you can only eat it
+once. Whether you get the sandwich from an owner or not cannot
+directly affect anything but the amount of money you have afterwards.</p>
+
+<p>
+This is true for any kind of material object—whether or not it
+has an owner does not directly affect what it <em>is</em>, or what you
+can do with it if you acquire it.</p>
+
+<p>
+But if a program has an owner, this very much affects what it is, and
+what you can do with a copy if you buy one. The difference is not
+just a matter of money. The system of owners of software encourages
+software owners to produce something—but not what society really
+needs. And it causes intangible ethical pollution that affects us
+all.</p></li>
+
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+What does society need? It needs information that is truly available
+to its citizens—for example, programs that people can read, fix,
+adapt, and improve, not just operate. But what software owners
+typically deliver is a black box that we can't study or change.</p>
+
+<p>
+Society also needs freedom. When a program has an owner, the users
+lose freedom to control part of their own lives.</p>
+
+<p>
+And, above all, society needs to encourage the spirit of voluntary
+cooperation in its citizens. When software owners tell us that
+helping our neighbors in a natural way is “piracy”, they
+pollute our society's civic spirit.</p>
+
+<p>
+This is why we say that
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>
+is a matter of freedom, not price.</p>
+
+<p>
+The economic argument for owners is erroneous, but the economic issue
+is real. Some people write useful software for the pleasure of
+writing it or for admiration and love; but if we want more software
+than those people write, we need to raise funds.</p>
+
+<p>
+Since the 1980s, free software developers have tried various methods
+of finding funds, with some success. There's no need to make anyone
+rich; a typical income is plenty of incentive to do many jobs that are
+less satisfying than programming.</p>
+
+<p>
+For years, until a fellowship made it unnecessary, I made a living
+from custom enhancements of the free software I had written. Each
+enhancement was added to the standard released version and thus
+eventually became available to the general public. Clients paid me so
+that I would work on the enhancements they wanted, rather than on the
+features I would otherwise have considered highest priority.</p>
+
+<p>
+Some free software developers make money by selling support services.
+In 1994, Cygnus Support, with around 50 employees, estimated that
+about 15 percent of its staff activity was free software
+development—a respectable percentage for a software company.</p>
+
+<p>
+In the early 1990s, companies including Intel, Motorola, Texas
+Instruments and Analog Devices combined to fund the continued
+development of the GNU C compiler. Most GCC development is still done
+by paid developers. The GNU compiler for the Ada language was funded
+in the 90s by the US Air Force, and continued since then by a company
+formed specifically for the purpose.</p>
+
+<p>
+The free software movement is still small, but the example of
+listener-supported radio in the US shows it's possible to support a
+large activity without forcing each user to pay.</p>
+
+<p>
+As a computer user today, you may find yourself using a
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary</a>
+program. If your friend asks to make a copy, it would be wrong to
+refuse. Cooperation is more important than copyright. But
+underground, closet cooperation does not make for a good society. A
+person should aspire to live an upright life openly with pride, and
+this means saying no to proprietary software.</p>
+
+<p>
+You deserve to be able to cooperate openly and freely with other
+people who use software. You deserve to be able to learn how the
+software works, and to teach your students with it. You deserve to be
+able to hire your favorite programmer to fix it when it breaks.</p>
+
+<p>
+You deserve free software.</p>
+
+<h3>Footnotes</h3>
+<ol>
+<li id="footnote1">The charges were subsequently dismissed.</li>
+</ol>
+
+<hr />
+<blockquote id="fsfs"><p class="big">This essay is published
+in <a href="http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"><cite>Free
+Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays of Richard
+M. Stallman</cite></a>.</p></blockquote>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1994, 2009 Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2017/09/24 12:59:06 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy po/why-free.translist po/why-fre...,
GNUN <=