www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/proprietary malware-google.ru.html propriet...

From: GNUN
Subject: www/proprietary malware-google.ru.html propriet...
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:59:27 -0500 (EST) 
CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     17/03/08 10:59:27

Modified files:
        proprietary    : malware-google.ru.html 
                         proprietary-censorship.fr.html 
        proprietary/po : malware-google.ru-en.html malware-google.ru.po 
                         malware-google.translist 
Added files:
        proprietary    : malware-google.fr.html 
        proprietary/po : malware-google.fr-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-google.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-censorship.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-google.fr.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.translist?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1

Patches:
Index: malware-google.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-google.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- malware-google.ru.html      8 Mar 2017 09:30:17 -0000       1.1
+++ malware-google.ru.html      8 Mar 2017 15:59:27 -0000       1.2
@@ -39,16 +39,13 @@
     <ul>
       <li><a href="#back-doors"> Лазейки</a></li>
       <li><a href="#censorship"> Цензура</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#insecurity"> Уязвимость</a></li>
 
-<!--<li>
-<a href="#insecurity">Insecurity</a></li>-->
-<!--<li>
+      <!--<li>
 <a href="#pressuring">Pressuring</a></li>-->
 <li><a href="#sabotage">Саботаж</a></li>
-      
-      <!--<li>
-<a href="#surveillance">Surveillance</a></li>-->
-<li><a href="#drm">Цифровое управление 
ограничениями</a>, или &ldquo;DRM&rdquo;
+      <li><a href="#surveillance">Слежка</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#drm">Цифровое управление 
ограничениями</a>, или &ldquo;DRM&rdquo;
 означает функции, спроектированные для 
ограничения того, что пользователи
 могут делать с данными на своих 
компьютерах.</li>
       
@@ -69,22 +66,6 @@
 
href="https://consumerist.com/2017/01/18/why-is-google-blocking-this-ad-blocker-on-chrome/";>лазейка
 для удаленного стирания дополнений</a>.</p>
   </li>
-  <li>
-    <p>В несвободной библиотеке Baidu, Moplus, есть 
лазейка, с помощью которой <a
-href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/11/millions-android-devices-vulnerable-remote-hijacking-baidu-wrote-code-google-made";>можно
-&ldquo;высылать файлы на сервер&rdquo;, а также 
принудительно устанавливать
-приложения</a>.</p>
-    <p>Она применяется в 14000 приложениях 
Android.</p>
-  </li>
-<li>
-<p><a
-href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/18/chinese-android-phones-coolpad-hacker-backdoor";>
-В китайской версии Android есть универсальный 
черный ход</a>. Почти во всех
-моделях мобильных телефонов есть 
универсальный черный ход в модеме. Для чего
-же компании Coolpad понадобилось вводить еще 
один? Потому что этот черный
-ход контролируется компанией Coolpad.
-</p>
-</li>
   <li><p>В Android <a
 
href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2506557/security0/google-throws--kill-switch--on-android-phones.html";>
 у Google есть черный ход для удаления 
программ по сети</a> (в программе под
@@ -104,12 +85,6 @@
 <em>удаления</em> программ оправдать нельзя, и 
у вас должно быть право
 решать, кому доверять таким образом (и 
доверять ли кому-нибудь вообще).</p></li>
   
-  <li><p><a id="samsung"
-href="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/replicant-developers-find-and-close-samsung-galaxy-backdoor";>
-Устройства Samsung Galaxy под управлением 
несвободных версий Android
-поставляются с лазейкой</a>, которая 
предоставляет удаленный доступ к
-файлам, хранящимся на устройстве.</p></li>
-  
 </ul>
 <h3 id="censorship">Цензура</h3>
 <ul>
@@ -133,13 +108,26 @@
 способами. Свободные программы можно 
устанавливать из f-droid.org.</p></li>
 </ul>
 
+<h3 id="insecurity">Уязвимость</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p><a
+href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/privacy-scandal-nsa-can-spy-on-smart-phone-data-a-920971.html";>
+АНБ может заглядывать в данные на 
смартфонах, в том числе на iPhone, Android
+и BlackBerry</a>. Хотя подробности здесь не 
приводятся, похоже, это работает
+не как универсальный черный ход, который, 
как мы знаем, есть почти во всех
+мобильных телефонах. Это может быть 
связано с эксплуатацией различных
+ошибок. <a
+href="http://www.osnews.com/story/27416/The_second_operating_system_hiding_in_every_mobile_phone";>
+В программах радиоаппаратуры телефонов 
есть множество ошибок</a>.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
 <h3 id="sabotage">Саботаж</h3>
 
 <p>Несправедливости из этого раздела, 
строго говоря, не вредоносные программы,
 поскольку они не подразумевают 
изготовление программы, которая работает 
так,
 что это вредит пользователю. Но это очень 
сходно с вредоносными программами,
-поскольку это технические действия Apple, 
которые вредят пользователям
-конкретных программ Apple.</p>
+поскольку это технические действия Google, 
которые вредят пользователям
+конкретных программ Google.</p>
 
 <ul>
   <li><p>У Google долго была <a
@@ -147,34 +135,10 @@
 лазейка для удаленного отпирания 
устройства на базе Android</a>, если только
 его диск не зашифрован (это возможно 
начиная с Android 5.0 Lollipop, но
 отнюдь не по умолчанию.)</p></li>
+</ul>
 
-  <li><p>Более 73% самых популярных приложений 
Android <a
-href="http://jots.pub/a/2015103001/index.php";> предоставляют 
личную,
-поведенческую и местоопределительную 
информацию</a> своих пользователей
-третьим сторонам.
-  </p></li>
-  
-  <li><p>&ldquo;Скрытные сообщения&rdquo;, не 
связанные с функциональностью
-приложения, <a
-href="http://news.mit.edu/2015/data-transferred-android-apps-hiding-1119";>
-найдены в 500 самых популярных бесплатных 
приложениях Android</a>.</p>
-    
-    <p>В статье не следовало описывать эти 
приложения как &ldquo;<span lang="en"
-xml:lang="en">free</span>) (свободные)&rdquo;, они не 
свободны. Ясное слово
-для выражения нулевой цены&nbsp;&mdash; 
&ldquo;бесплатный&rdquo;.</p>
-    
-    <p>В статье принимается как само собой 
разумеющееся, что обычный аналитический
-инструментарий правомерен, но верно ли 
это? У разработчиков программ нет
-права анализировать, что и как делают
-пользователи. &ldquo;Аналитические&rdquo; 
инструменты, которые подглядывают,
-ничем не лучше любого другого 
подглядывания.</p></li>
-  
-  <li><p>Бесплатные (но не <a
-href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">свободные</a>)приложения 
Android <a
-href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/06/free-android-apps-connect-tracking-advertising-websites";>подключаются
-к 100 URL слежки и рекламы</a> (в среднем).</p>
-  </li>
-  
+<h3 id="surveillance">Слежка</h3>
+<ul>
   <li><p>Программы-шпионы присутствуют на 
некоторых устройствах Android, когда они
 продаются. В некоторых телефонах Motorola 
система Android изменена для <a
 href="http://www.beneaththewaves.net/Projects/Motorola_Is_Listening.html";>
@@ -230,16 +194,6 @@
 предусматривает функции, предназначенные 
для поддержки цифрового управления
 ограничениями</a>.</p>
 </li>
-  
-  <li><p><a
-href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/privacy-scandal-nsa-can-spy-on-smart-phone-data-a-920971.html";>
-АНБ может заглядывать в данные на 
смартфонах, в том числе на iPhone, Android
-и BlackBerry</a>. Хотя подробности здесь не 
приводятся, похоже, это работает
-не как универсальный черный ход, который, 
как мы знаем, есть почти во всех
-мобильных телефонах. Это может быть 
связано с эксплуатацией различных
-ошибок. <a
-href="http://www.osnews.com/story/27416/The_second_operating_system_hiding_in_every_mobile_phone";>
-В программах радиоаппаратуры телефонов 
есть множество ошибок</a>.</p></li>
 </ul>
 
 <h3 id="tyrants">Тираны</h3>
@@ -331,7 +285,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Обновлено:
 
-$Date: 2017/03/08 09:30:17 $
+$Date: 2017/03/08 15:59:27 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary-censorship.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-censorship.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- proprietary-censorship.fr.html      1 Feb 2017 12:01:16 -0000       1.15
+++ proprietary-censorship.fr.html      8 Mar 2017 15:59:27 -0000       1.16
@@ -97,13 +97,14 @@
 (et s'en servent pour surveiller les utilisateurs).</p>
 
 <p>Le bloqueur de pubs est un logiciel propriétaire, tout comme le programme
-(Google Play) que Google utilisait pour en refuser l'accès en vue d'une
-installation. Utiliser un programme non libre donne à son propriétaire du
+(Google Play) dont Google se servait pour vous empêcher de
+l'installer. Utiliser un programme non libre donne à son propriétaire du
 pouvoir sur vous ; c'est ce pouvoir qu'a exercé Google </p>
 
 <p>La censure de Google, contrairement à celle d'Apple ou Microsoft, n'est pas
 complète. Android permet aux utiliateurs d'installer des applis
-autrement. Vous pouvez installer des programmes libres sur f-droid.org.</p>
+autrement. Vous pouvez installer des programmes libres provenant de
+f-droid.org.</p>
 </li>
 
 <li><p>
@@ -192,7 +193,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2017/02/01 12:01:16 $
+$Date: 2017/03/08 15:59:27 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/malware-google.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/malware-google.ru-en.html        8 Mar 2017 09:30:17 -0000       1.1
+++ po/malware-google.ru-en.html        8 Mar 2017 15:59:27 -0000       1.2
@@ -34,10 +34,10 @@
     <ul>
       <li><a href="#back-doors">Back doors</a></li>
       <li><a href="#censorship">Censorship</a></li>
-      <!--<li><a href="#insecurity">Insecurity</a></li>-->
+      <li><a href="#insecurity">Insecurity</a></li>
       <!--<li><a href="#pressuring">Pressuring</a></li>-->
       <li><a href="#sabotage">Sabotage</a></li>
-      <!--<li><a href="#surveillance">Surveillance</a></li>-->
+      <li><a href="#surveillance">Surveillance</a></li>
       <li><a href="#drm">Digital restrictions
          management</a> or &ldquo;DRM&rdquo; means functionalities designed
        to restrict what users can do with the data in their computers.</li>
@@ -55,21 +55,6 @@
   <li><p>Chrome has a back door <a 
href="https://consumerist.com/2017/01/18/why-is-google-blocking-this-ad-blocker-on-chrome/";>for
     remote erasure of add-ons</a>.</p>
   </li>
-  <li>
-    <p>Baidu's proprietary Android library, Moplus, has a back door
-      that <a 
href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/11/millions-android-devices-vulnerable-remote-hijacking-baidu-wrote-code-google-made";>can
-      &ldquo;upload files&rdquo; as well as forcibly install
-      apps</a>.</p>
-    <p>It is used by 14,000 Android applications.</p>
-  </li>
-<li>
-<p><a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/18/chinese-android-phones-coolpad-hacker-backdoor";>
-A Chinese version of Android has a universal back door</a>. Nearly all
-models of mobile phones have a universal back door in the modem chip. So
-why did Coolpad bother to introduce another? Because this one is controlled
-by Coolpad.
-</p>
-</li>
   <li><p>In Android, <a 
href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2506557/security0/google-throws--kill-switch--on-android-phones.html";>
        Google has a back door to remotely delete apps.</a>  (It is in a program
       called GTalkService).</p>
@@ -89,10 +74,6 @@
       to <em>delete</em> the programs, and you should have the right to
       decide who (if anyone) to trust in this way.</p></li>
   
-  <li><p><a id="samsung" 
href="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/replicant-developers-find-and-close-samsung-galaxy-backdoor";>
-       Samsung Galaxy devices running proprietary Android versions come with a 
back
-       door</a> that provides remote access to the files stored on the 
device.</p></li>
-  
 </ul>
 <h3 id="censorship">Google Censorship</h3>
 <ul>
@@ -113,12 +94,23 @@
       free programs from f-droid.org.</p></li>
 </ul>
 
+<h3 id="insecurity">Google Insecurity</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p><a 
href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/privacy-scandal-nsa-can-spy-on-smart-phone-data-a-920971.html";>
+      The NSA can tap data in smart phones, including iPhones, Android, and
+      BlackBerry</a>.  While there is not much detail here, it seems that
+      this does not operate via the universal back door that we know nearly
+      all portable phones have.  It may involve exploiting various bugs.
+      There are <a 
href="http://www.osnews.com/story/27416/The_second_operating_system_hiding_in_every_mobile_phone";>
+      lots of bugs in the phones' radio software</a>.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
 <h3 id="sabotage">Google Sabotage</h3>
 
 <p>The wrongs in this section are not precisely malware, since they do
 not involve making the program that runs in a way that hurts the user.
-But they are a lot like malware, since they are technical Apple
-actions that harm to the users of specific Apple software.</p>
+But they are a lot like malware, since they are technical Google
+actions that harm to the users of specific Google software.</p>
 
 <ul>
   <li><p>Google has long had <a
@@ -126,30 +118,10 @@
       back door to remotely unlock an Android device</a>, unless its
       disk is encrypted (possible since Android 5.0 Lollipop, but
       still not quite the default).</p></li>
+</ul>
 
-  <li><p>More than 73% of the most popular Android apps   <a 
href="http://jots.pub/a/2015103001/index.php";>share personal,
-       behavioral and location information</a> of their users with third 
parties.
-  </p></li>
-  
-  <li><p>&ldquo;Cryptic communication,&rdquo; unrelated to the app's 
functionality,
-  was <a 
href="http://news.mit.edu/2015/data-transferred-android-apps-hiding-1119";>
-  found in the 500 most popular gratis Android apps</a>.</p>
-    
-    <p>The article should not have described these apps as
-      &ldquo;free&rdquo;&mdash;they are not free software.  The clear way to 
say
-      &ldquo;zero price&rdquo; is &ldquo;gratis.&rdquo;</p>
-    
-    <p>The article takes for granted that the usual analytics tools are
-      legitimate, but is that valid?  Software developers have no right to
-      analyze what users are doing or how.  &ldquo;Analytics&rdquo; tools that 
snoop are
-      just as wrong as any other snooping.</p></li>
-  
-  <li><p>Gratis Android apps (but not <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free 
software</a>)
-      connect to 100
-      <a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/06/free-android-apps-connect-tracking-advertising-websites";>tracking
 and advertising</a> URLs,
-      on the average.</p>
-  </li>
-  
+<h3 id="surveillance">Google Surveillance</h3>
+<ul>
   <li><p>Spyware is present in some Android devices when they are sold.
       Some Motorola phones modify Android to
       <a 
href="http://www.beneaththewaves.net/Projects/Motorola_Is_Listening.html";>
@@ -199,14 +171,6 @@
 <li><p>Android <a 
href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/drm/package-summary.html";>contains
 facilities specifically to support DRM.</a></p>
 </li>
-  
-  <li><p><a 
href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/privacy-scandal-nsa-can-spy-on-smart-phone-data-a-920971.html";>
-       The NSA can tap data in smart phones, including iPhones, Android, and
-       BlackBerry</a>.  While there is not much detail here, it seems that
-      this does not operate via the universal back door that we know nearly
-      all portable phones have.  It may involve exploiting various bugs.
-      There are <a 
href="http://www.osnews.com/story/27416/The_second_operating_system_hiding_in_every_mobile_phone";>
-       lots of bugs in the phones' radio software</a>.</p></li>
 </ul>
 
 <h3 id="tyrants">Google Tyrants</h3>
@@ -276,7 +240,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/03/08 09:30:17 $
+$Date: 2017/03/08 15:59:27 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/malware-google.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- po/malware-google.ru.po     8 Mar 2017 15:38:23 -0000       1.6
+++ po/malware-google.ru.po     8 Mar 2017 15:59:27 -0000       1.7
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-03-08 10:26+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid "Google's Software Is Malware - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -80,9 +79,6 @@
 msgstr "<a href=\"#censorship\"> Цензура</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
-# | <a [-href=\"#censorship\">Censorship</a>-]
-# | {+href=\"#insecurity\">Insecurity</a>+}
-#| msgid "<a href=\"#censorship\">Censorship</a>"
 msgid "<a href=\"#insecurity\">Insecurity</a>"
 msgstr "<a href=\"#insecurity\"> Уязвимость</a>"
 
@@ -91,9 +87,6 @@
 msgstr "<a href=\"#sabotage\">Саботаж</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
-# | <a [-href=\"#sabotage\">Sabotage</a>-]
-# | {+href=\"#surveillance\">Surveillance</a>+}
-#| msgid "<a href=\"#sabotage\">Sabotage</a>"
 msgid "<a href=\"#surveillance\">Surveillance</a>"
 msgstr "<a href=\"#surveillance\">Слежка</a>"
 
@@ -219,8 +212,6 @@
 "Свободные программы можно устанавливать 
из f-droid.org."
 
 #. type: Content of: <h3>
-# | Google [-Censorship-] {+Insecurity+}
-#| msgid "Google Censorship"
 msgid "Google Insecurity"
 msgstr "Уязвимость"
 
@@ -250,15 +241,6 @@
 msgstr "Саботаж"
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-# | The wrongs in this section are not precisely malware, since they do not
-# | involve making the program that runs in a way that hurts the user.  But
-# | they are a lot like malware, since they are technical [-Apple-] {+Google+}
-# | actions that harm to the users of specific [-Apple-] {+Google+} software.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The wrongs in this section are not precisely malware, since they do not "
-#| "involve making the program that runs in a way that hurts the user.  But "
-#| "they are a lot like malware, since they are technical Apple actions that "
-#| "harm to the users of specific Apple software."
 msgid ""
 "The wrongs in this section are not precisely malware, since they do not "
 "involve making the program that runs in a way that hurts the user.  But they "
@@ -286,8 +268,6 @@
 "отнюдь не по умолчанию.)"
 
 #. type: Content of: <h3>
-# | Google [-Tyrants-] {+Surveillance+}
-#| msgid "Google Tyrants"
 msgid "Google Surveillance"
 msgstr "Слежка"
 

Index: po/malware-google.translist
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.translist,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/malware-google.translist 8 Mar 2017 09:30:17 -0000       1.2
+++ po/malware-google.translist 8 Mar 2017 15:59:27 -0000       1.3
@@ -3,10 +3,12 @@
 value='<div id="translations">
 <p>
 <span dir="ltr" class="original"><a lang="en" hreflang="en" 
href="/proprietary/malware-google.en.html">English</a>&nbsp;[en]</span> &nbsp;
+<span dir="ltr"><a lang="fr" hreflang="fr" 
href="/proprietary/malware-google.fr.html">français</a>&nbsp;[fr]</span> &nbsp;
 <span dir="ltr"><a lang="ru" hreflang="ru" 
href="/proprietary/malware-google.ru.html">русский</a>&nbsp;[ru]</span> 
&nbsp;
 </p>
 </div>' -->
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/proprietary/malware-google.html" 
hreflang="x-default" />
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="en" hreflang="en" 
href="/proprietary/malware-google.en.html" title="English" />
+<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="fr" hreflang="fr" 
href="/proprietary/malware-google.fr.html" title="français" />
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" lang="ru" hreflang="ru" 
href="/proprietary/malware-google.ru.html" title="русский" />
 <!-- end translist file -->

Index: malware-google.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: malware-google.fr.html
diff -N malware-google.fr.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ malware-google.fr.html      8 Mar 2017 15:59:26 -0000       1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/proprietary/malware-google.en.html" -->
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.fr.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.83 -->
+
+<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
+<title>Malveillance des logiciels de Google - Projet GNU - Free Software 
Foundation</title>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/proprietary/po/malware-google.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.fr.html" -->
+<h2>Malveillance des logiciels de Google</h2>
+
+<p><a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">Autres exemples de malveillance dans
+le logiciel privateur</a></p>
+
+<div class="highlight-para">
+<p>
+Un logiciel est dit « malveillant » lorsque son fonctionnement a été 
conçu
+pour traiter l'utilisateur de manière inéquitable ou lui faire du tort
+(erreurs accidentelles mises à part). Cette page explique ce qui rend
+malveillants les logiciels de Google.
+</p>
+
+<p>Logiciel malveillant et logiciel non libre sont deux notions différentes. 
La
+différence entre <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">logiciel libre</a> et
+logiciel non libre réside dans le fait que <a
+href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">les utilisateurs
+ont, ou non, le contrôle du programme</a>. Cela n'a rien à voir avec ce que
+<em>fait</em> le programme en cours de fonctionnement. Cependant, en
+pratique, un logiciel non libre est souvent malveillant parce que le
+développeur, conscient que les utilisateurs seraient incapables de corriger
+une éventuelle fonctionnalité malveillante, est tenté de leur en imposer
+quelques-unes.
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="summary" style="margin-top: 2em">
+    <h3><strong>Type de malveillance</strong></h3>
+    <ul>
+      <li><a href="#back-doors">Portes dérobées</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#censorship">Censure</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#insecurity">Insécurité</a></li>
+      
+      <!--<li>
+<a href="#pressuring">Pressuring</a></li>-->
+<li><a href="#sabotage">Sabotage</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#surveillance">Surveillance</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#drm">Gestion numérique des restrictions</a>, ou <abbr
+title="Digital Restrictions Management">DRM</abbr> — fonctionnalités 
conçues
+pour restreindre ce que les utilisateurs peuvent faire avec les données
+présentes sur leur ordinateur.</li>
+      
+      <!--<li>
+<a href="#jails">Jails</a>&mdash;systems
+         that impose censorship on application programs.</li>-->
+<li><a href="#tyrants">Tyrans</a> – systèmes qui rejettent tout système
+d'exploitation non « autorisé » par le fabricant.</li>
+      
+    <!--<li>
+<a href="#deception">Deception</a></li>-->
+</ul>
+</div>
+
+<h3 id="back-doors">Portes dérobées</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p>Chrome a une porte dérobée <a
+href="https://consumerist.com/2017/01/18/why-is-google-blocking-this-ad-blocker-on-chrome/";>pour
+l'effacement à distance des modules complémentaires</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><p>Dans Android, <a
+href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2506557/security0/google-throws--kill-switch--on-android-phones.html";>Google
+a une porte dérobée qui lui permet de supprimer des applications à
+distance</a> (elle est dans un programme appelé GTalkService).</p>
+    
+    <p>Via GTalkService, Google peut aussi <a
+href="https://jon.oberheide.org/blog/2010/06/25/remote-kill-and-install-on-google-android/";>installer
+des applis, de force et à distance</a> (ce service semble avoir fusionné
+avec Google Play depuis la parution de cet article).  Ce n'est pas
+l'équivalent d'une porte dérobée universelle, mais cela rend possibles
+divers mauvais coups.</p>
+    
+    <p>Bien que <em>l'exercice</em> de ce pouvoir par Google n'ait pas été
+malfaisant jusqu'à présent, le fait est que personne ne doit posséder un tel
+pouvoir, car il pourrait aussi être utilisé de manière malfaisante. Vous
+pourriez parfaitement décider de laisser un service de sécurité
+<em>désactiver</em> à distance les programmes qu'il considère comme
+malveillants. Mais il n'y a aucune excuse pour les <em>supprimer</em>, et
+vous devez avoir le droit de décider à qui accorder une telle confiance (à
+supposer que vous l'accordiez à quelqu'un).</p></li>
+  
+</ul>
+<h3 id="censorship">Censure</h3>
+<ul>
+  
+  <li><p>Google <a
+href="https://consumerist.com/2017/01/18/why-is-google-blocking-this-ad-blocker-on-chrome/";>censure
+les modules complémentaires de Chrome</a>.</p></li>
+  <li><p><a
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/feb/03/google-pulls-ad-blocking-app-for-samsung-phones";>Google
+a censuré l'installation du bloqueur de pubs de Samsung</a> en disant que
+bloquer les pubs revenait à « interférer » avec les sites qui en 
affichent
+(et s'en servent pour surveiller les utilisateurs).</p>
+    
+    <p>Le bloqueur de pubs est un logiciel propriétaire, tout comme le 
programme
+(Google Play) dont Google se servait pour vous empêcher de
+l'installer. Utiliser un programme non libre donne à son propriétaire du
+pouvoir sur vous ; c'est ce pouvoir qu'a exercé Google </p>
+    
+    <p>La censure de Google, contrairement à celle d'Apple ou Microsoft, 
n'est pas
+complète. Android permet aux utiliateurs d'installer des applis
+autrement. Vous pouvez installer des programmes libres provenant de
+f-droid.org.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="insecurity">Insécurité</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p><a
+href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/privacy-scandal-nsa-can-spy-on-smart-phone-data-a-920971.html";>La
+NSA peut aller chercher des données dans les smartphones, que ce soit les
+iPhones, les Android ou les Blackberry</a>. Bien que l'article soit peu
+détaillé, il semble que cette opération n'utilise pas la porte dérobée
+universelle qui, on le sait, se trouve dans presque tous les téléphones
+portables. Il est possible qu'elle exploite différentes bogues. Il y a de
+plus <a
+href="http://www.osnews.com/story/27416/The_second_operating_system_hiding_in_every_mobile_phone";>une
+multitude de bogues dans le logiciel de radio des téléphones</a>.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="sabotage">Sabotage</h3>
+
+<p>Les injustices décrites dans cette section ne sont pas précisément de la
+malveillance car elles ne sous-entendent pas que le programme en
+fonctionnement soit conçu pour nuire à l'utilisateur. Mais elles y
+ressemblent beaucoup puisqu'il s'agit d'actions techniques de Google qui
+font du tort aux utilisateurs de certains programmes de Google.</p>
+
+<ul>
+  <li><p>Google a depuis longtemps <a
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/nov/24/google-can-unlock-android-devices-remotely-if-phone-unencrypted";>une
+porte dérobée qui sert à déverrouiller les appareils Android à 
distance</a>,
+à moins que leur disque ne soit chiffré (le chiffrement est possible depuis
+Android Lollipop, mais n'est pas encore activé par défaut).</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="surveillance">Surveillance</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p>Des logiciels espions sont présents dans certains appareils sous 
Android au
+moment de l'achat. Dans certains téléphones Motorola, Android a été 
modifié
+<a
+href="http://www.beneaththewaves.net/Projects/Motorola_Is_Listening.html";>de
+manière à communiquer des données personnelles au fabricant</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>Des logiciels espions dans les téléphones Android et les ordinateurs
+portables (sous Windows ?) : le <cite>Wall Street Journal</cite> (dans un
+article pourvu d'une barrière à péage) rapporte que <a
+href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/1/4580718/fbi-can-remotely-activate-android-and-laptop-microphones-reports-wsj";>le
+FBI peut activer à distance le GPS et le micro des téléphones Android et des
+ordinateurs portables</a> (je soupçonne qu'ils parlent des ordinateurs sous
+Windows) ; voici des <a
+href="http://cryptome.org/2013/08/fbi-hackers.htm";>informations
+complémentaires</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>La nouvelle appli de messagerie vocale de Google <a
+href="http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/21/12994362/allo-privacy-message-logs-google";>enregistre
+toutes les conversations</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><p>Les thermomètres de Nest envoient au serveur <a
+href="http://bgr.com/2014/07/17/google-nest-jailbreak-hack";>beaucoup de
+données concernant l'utilisateur</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>De nombreux sites envoient à Google un rapport sur chacun de leurs 
visiteurs
+par le biais de Google Analytics, rapport qui contient <a
+href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/434164/google_analytics_breaks_norwegian_privacy_laws_local_agency_said/";>son
+adresse IP et la page visitée</a>. </p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>Dans Google Chrome, les extensions ont toute facilité pour <a
+href="https://labs.detectify.com/2015/07/28/how-i-disabled-your-chrome-security-extensions/";>espionner
+en détail la navigation de l'utilisateur</a>, et beaucoup ne s'en privent
+pas.</p>
+  </li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="drm">DRM</h3>
+<ul>
+<li>
+  <p>Chrome <a
+href="http://boingboing.net/2017/01/30/google-quietly-makes-optiona.html";>met
+en œuvre la gestion numérique des restrictions</a>, de même que Chromium, à
+l'aide d'un logiciel non libre intégré.</p>
+                                                                               
         
+  <p><a 
href="https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=686430";>Pour
+en savoir plus</a>.</p>
+</li>
+  
+<li><p>Android <a
+href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/drm/package-summary.html";>a
+des fonctionnalités spéciales pour gérer les DRM.</a></p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="tyrants">Tyrans</h3>
+<ul>
+ <li>
+<p><a
+href="http://blog.azimuthsecurity.com/2013/04/unlocking-motorola-bootloader.html";>Certains
+téléphones portables Android sont des tyrans</a> (bien que quelqu'un ait
+trouvé moyen de briser ces restrictions). Fort heureusement, la plupart des
+appareils Android ne sont pas des tyrans.
+</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<div class="translators-notes">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
+ </div>
+</div>
+
+<!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.fr.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Veuillez envoyer les requêtes concernant la FSF et GNU à <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>. Il existe aussi <a
+href="/contact/">d'autres moyens de contacter</a> la FSF. Les liens
+orphelins et autres corrections ou suggestions peuvent être signalés à <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+<!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see <a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+        README</a>. -->
+Nous faisons le maximum pour proposer des traductions fidèles et de bonne
+qualité, mais nous ne sommes pas parfaits. Merci d'adresser vos commentaires
+sur cette page, ainsi que vos suggestions d'ordre général sur les
+traductions, à <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+<p>Pour tout renseignement sur la coordination et la soumission des
+traductions de nos pages web, reportez-vous au <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">guide de traduction</a>.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>Cette page peut être utilisée suivant les conditions de la licence <a
+rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.fr";>Creative
+Commons attribution, pas de modification, 4.0 internationale (CC BY-ND
+4.0)</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.fr.html" -->
+<div class="translators-credits">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
+Traduction et révision : <a
+href="mailto:trad-gnu&#64;april.org";>trad-gnu&#64;april.org</a></div>
+
+<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
+Dernière mise à jour :
+
+$Date: 2017/03/08 15:59:26 $
+
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>

Index: po/malware-google.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/malware-google.fr-en.html
diff -N po/malware-google.fr-en.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/malware-google.fr-en.html        8 Mar 2017 15:59:27 -0000       1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.83 -->
+<title>Google's Software Is Malware
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+ <!--#include virtual="/proprietary/po/malware-google.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+
+<h2>Google's Software is Malware</h2>
+
+<p><a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">Other examples of proprietary
+malware</a></p>
+
+<div class="highlight-para">
+<p>
+<em>Malware</em> means software designed to function in ways that
+mistreat or harm the user.  (This does not include accidental errors.)
+This page explains how Google software is malware.
+</p>
+
+<p>Malware and nonfree software are two different issues.  The
+difference between <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free
+software</a> and nonfree software is in
+<a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">
+whether the users have control of the program or vice versa</a>.  It's
+not directly a question of what the program <em>does</em> when it
+runs.  However, in practice nonfree software is often malware,
+because the developer's awareness that the users would be powerless to fix
+any malicious functionalities tempts the developer to impose some.
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="summary" style="margin-top: 2em">
+    <h3><strong>Type&nbsp;of malware</strong></h3>
+    <ul>
+      <li><a href="#back-doors">Back doors</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#censorship">Censorship</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#insecurity">Insecurity</a></li>
+      <!--<li><a href="#pressuring">Pressuring</a></li>-->
+      <li><a href="#sabotage">Sabotage</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#surveillance">Surveillance</a></li>
+      <li><a href="#drm">Digital restrictions
+         management</a> or &ldquo;DRM&rdquo; means functionalities designed
+       to restrict what users can do with the data in their computers.</li>
+      <!--<li><a href="#jails">Jails</a>&mdash;systems
+         that impose censorship on application programs.</li>-->
+      <li><a href="#tyrants">Tyrants</a>&mdash;systems
+       that reject any operating system not &ldquo;authorized&rdquo; by the
+       manufacturer.</li>
+      <!--<li><a href="#deception">Deception</a></li>-->
+    </ul>
+</div>
+
+<h3 id="back-doors">Google Back Doors</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p>Chrome has a back door <a 
href="https://consumerist.com/2017/01/18/why-is-google-blocking-this-ad-blocker-on-chrome/";>for
+    remote erasure of add-ons</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><p>In Android, <a 
href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2506557/security0/google-throws--kill-switch--on-android-phones.html";>
+       Google has a back door to remotely delete apps.</a>  (It is in a program
+      called GTalkService).</p>
+    
+    <p>Google can also
+      <a 
href="https://jon.oberheide.org/blog/2010/06/25/remote-kill-and-install-on-google-android/";>
+       forcibly and remotely install apps</a> through GTalkService (which
+      seems, since that article, to have been merged into Google Play).
+      This is not equivalent to a universal back door, but permits various
+      dirty tricks.</p>
+    
+    <p>Although Google's <em>exercise</em> of this power has not been
+      malicious so far, the point is that nobody should have such power,
+      which could also be used maliciously.  You might well decide to let a
+      security service remotely <em>deactivate</em> programs that it
+      considers malicious.  But there is no excuse for allowing it
+      to <em>delete</em> the programs, and you should have the right to
+      decide who (if anyone) to trust in this way.</p></li>
+  
+</ul>
+<h3 id="censorship">Google Censorship</h3>
+<ul>
+  
+  <li><p>Google <a 
href="https://consumerist.com/2017/01/18/why-is-google-blocking-this-ad-blocker-on-chrome/";>censors
+       add-ons for Chrome</a>.</p></li>
+  <li><p><a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/feb/03/google-pulls-ad-blocking-app-for-samsung-phones";>Google
+       censored installation of Samsung's ad-blocker,</a> saying that
+      blocking ads is &ldquo;interference&rdquo; with the sites that
+      advertise (and surveil users through ads).</p>
+    
+    <p>The ad-blocker is proprietary software, just like the program (Google
+      Play) that Google used to deny access to install it. Using a nonfree 
program
+      gives the owner power over you, and Google has exercised that power.</p>
+    
+    <p>Google's censorship, unlike that of Apple and Microsoft, is not total:
+      Android allows users to install apps in other ways. You can install
+      free programs from f-droid.org.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="insecurity">Google Insecurity</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p><a 
href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/privacy-scandal-nsa-can-spy-on-smart-phone-data-a-920971.html";>
+      The NSA can tap data in smart phones, including iPhones, Android, and
+      BlackBerry</a>.  While there is not much detail here, it seems that
+      this does not operate via the universal back door that we know nearly
+      all portable phones have.  It may involve exploiting various bugs.
+      There are <a 
href="http://www.osnews.com/story/27416/The_second_operating_system_hiding_in_every_mobile_phone";>
+      lots of bugs in the phones' radio software</a>.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="sabotage">Google Sabotage</h3>
+
+<p>The wrongs in this section are not precisely malware, since they do
+not involve making the program that runs in a way that hurts the user.
+But they are a lot like malware, since they are technical Google
+actions that harm to the users of specific Google software.</p>
+
+<ul>
+  <li><p>Google has long had <a
+      
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/nov/24/google-can-unlock-android-devices-remotely-if-phone-unencrypted";>a
+      back door to remotely unlock an Android device</a>, unless its
+      disk is encrypted (possible since Android 5.0 Lollipop, but
+      still not quite the default).</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="surveillance">Google Surveillance</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li><p>Spyware is present in some Android devices when they are sold.
+      Some Motorola phones modify Android to
+      <a 
href="http://www.beneaththewaves.net/Projects/Motorola_Is_Listening.html";>
+      send personal data to Motorola</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>Spyware in Android phones (and Windows? laptops): The Wall
+      Street Journal (in an article blocked from us by a paywall)
+      reports that
+      <a 
href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/1/4580718/fbi-can-remotely-activate-android-and-laptop-microphones-reports-wsj";>
+      the FBI can remotely activate the GPS and microphone in Android
+      phones and laptops</a>.
+      (I suspect this means Windows laptops.)  Here is
+      <a href="http://cryptome.org/2013/08/fbi-hackers.htm";>more info</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>Google's new voice messaging app <a 
href="http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/21/12994362/allo-privacy-message-logs-google";>logs
+      all conversations</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><p>Nest thermometers
+  send <a href="http://bgr.com/2014/07/17/google-nest-jailbreak-hack";>a
+  lot of data about the user</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>Many web sites report all their visitors to Google by using
+      the Google Analytics service, which
+      <a 
href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/434164/google_analytics_breaks_norwegian_privacy_laws_local_agency_said/";>
+      tells Google the IP address and the page that was visited.</a></p>
+  </li>
+  
+  <li><p>Google Chrome makes it easy for an extension to do <a
+    
href="https://labs.detectify.com/2015/07/28/how-i-disabled-your-chrome-security-extensions/";>total
+    snooping on the user's browsing</a>, and many of them do so.</p>
+  </li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="drm">Google DRM</h3>
+<ul>
+<li>
+  <p>Chrome <a 
href="http://boingboing.net/2017/01/30/google-quietly-makes-optiona.html";>implements
+  DRM</a>. So does Chromium, through nonfree software that is
+  effectively part of it.</p>
+                                                                               
         
+  <p><a 
href="https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=686430";>More 
information</a>.</p>
+</li>
+  
+<li><p>Android <a 
href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/drm/package-summary.html";>contains
+facilities specifically to support DRM.</a></p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="tyrants">Google Tyrants</h3>
+<ul>
+ <li>
+<p><a 
href="http://blog.azimuthsecurity.com/2013/04/unlocking-motorola-bootloader.html";>
+Some Android phones are tyrants</a> (though someone found a way to
+crack the restriction).  Fortunately, most Android devices are not tyrants.
+</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see <a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+        README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2017/03/08 15:59:27 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]