[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses why-not-lgpl.ca.html why-not-lgpl....
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/licenses why-not-lgpl.ca.html why-not-lgpl.... |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2017 01:01:04 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 17/01/12 01:01:03
Modified files:
licenses : why-not-lgpl.ca.html why-not-lgpl.nl.html
why-not-lgpl.pl.html
licenses/po : why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html
why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html
why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.52&r2=1.53
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
Patches:
Index: why-not-lgpl.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- why-not-lgpl.ca.html 11 Jul 2016 08:08:20 -0000 1.27
+++ why-not-lgpl.ca.html 12 Jan 2017 06:01:02 -0000 1.28
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-11-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
<h2>Per què no haurÃeu d'utilitzar la Llicència Pública General Reduïda
per a la
vostra pròxima biblioteca</h2>
@@ -159,7 +165,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2016/07/11 08:08:20 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:02 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- why-not-lgpl.nl.html 21 Sep 2016 18:29:18 -0000 1.17
+++ why-not-lgpl.nl.html 12 Jan 2017 06:01:02 -0000 1.18
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-11-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>Waarom je voor je volgende programmabibliotheek niet de Lesser GPL zou
moeten gebruiken</h2>
@@ -154,7 +160,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2016/09/21 18:29:18 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:02 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -b -r1.52 -r1.53
--- why-not-lgpl.pl.html 29 Feb 2016 13:18:31 -0000 1.52
+++ why-not-lgpl.pl.html 12 Jan 2017 06:01:02 -0000 1.53
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-11-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Czemu nie należy stosowaÄ Lesser GPL dla kolejnej biblioteki</h2>
<blockquote><p>
@@ -170,7 +176,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2016/02/29 13:18:31 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:02 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:18 -0000 1.2
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html 12 Jan 2017 06:01:03 -0000 1.3
@@ -11,18 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+<blockquote><p>
See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
-</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+</blockquote>
<p>
The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other <span
class="removed"><del><strong>alternative</strong></del></span>
libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
library.</p>
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary <span
class="removed"><del><strong>alternatives.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>counterparts.</em></ins></span> The whole free
software movement will
have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
better against the competition.</p>
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -139,18 +139,17 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2015</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
-<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
-Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:18 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:03 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:39 -0000 1.5
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html 12 Jan 2017 06:01:03 -0000 1.6
@@ -11,18 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+<blockquote><p>
See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
-</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+</blockquote>
<p>
The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other <span
class="removed"><del><strong>alternative</strong></del></span>
libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
library.</p>
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary <span
class="removed"><del><strong>alternatives.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>counterparts.</em></ins></span> The whole free
software movement will
have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
better against the competition.</p>
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -139,18 +139,17 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2015</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
-<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
-Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:39 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:03 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:43 -0000 1.1
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html 12 Jan 2017 06:01:03 -0000 1.2
@@ -11,18 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+<blockquote><p>
See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
-</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+</blockquote>
<p>
The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other <span
class="removed"><del><strong>alternative</strong></del></span>
libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
library.</p>
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary <span
class="removed"><del><strong>alternatives.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>counterparts.</em></ins></span> The whole free
software movement will
have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
better against the competition.</p>
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -139,18 +139,17 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2015</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
-<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
-Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:43 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:03 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses why-not-lgpl.ca.html why-not-lgpl....,
GNUN <=