www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/licenses why-not-lgpl.ca.html why-not-lgpl....


From: GNUN
Subject: www/licenses why-not-lgpl.ca.html why-not-lgpl....
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 01:01:04 -0500 (EST)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     17/01/12 01:01:03

Modified files:
        licenses       : why-not-lgpl.ca.html why-not-lgpl.nl.html 
                         why-not-lgpl.pl.html 
        licenses/po    : why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html 
                         why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html 
                         why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.52&r2=1.53
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Patches:
Index: why-not-lgpl.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- why-not-lgpl.ca.html        11 Jul 2016 08:08:20 -0000      1.27
+++ why-not-lgpl.ca.html        12 Jan 2017 06:01:02 -0000      1.28
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-11-13" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
 <h2>Per què no hauríeu d'utilitzar la Llicència Pública General Reduïda 
per a la
 vostra pròxima biblioteca</h2>
 
@@ -159,7 +165,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Updated:
 
-$Date: 2016/07/11 08:08:20 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:02 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: why-not-lgpl.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- why-not-lgpl.nl.html        21 Sep 2016 18:29:18 -0000      1.17
+++ why-not-lgpl.nl.html        12 Jan 2017 06:01:02 -0000      1.18
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-11-13" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
 <h2>Waarom je voor je volgende programmabibliotheek niet de Lesser GPL zou
 moeten gebruiken</h2>
 
@@ -154,7 +160,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Bijgewerkt:
 
-$Date: 2016/09/21 18:29:18 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:02 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: why-not-lgpl.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -b -r1.52 -r1.53
--- why-not-lgpl.pl.html        29 Feb 2016 13:18:31 -0000      1.52
+++ why-not-lgpl.pl.html        12 Jan 2017 06:01:02 -0000      1.53
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-11-13" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
 <h2>Czemu nie należy stosować Lesser GPL dla kolejnej biblioteki</h2>
 
 <blockquote><p>
@@ -170,7 +176,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Aktualizowane:
 
-$Date: 2016/02/29 13:18:31 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:02 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html        18 Feb 2016 10:47:18 -0000      1.2
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html        12 Jan 2017 06:01:03 -0000      1.3
@@ -11,18 +11,18 @@
 </style></head>
 <body><pre>
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
-&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> --&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" --&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
 &lt;h2&gt;Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library&lt;/h2&gt;
 
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
 See &lt;a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"&gt;&ldquo;How to
 choose a license for your own work&rdquo;&lt;/a&gt; for general
 recommendations about choosing a license for your work.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;/blockquote&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;
 The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries.  One
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library.  There
 are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
 cases.  The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>alternative</strong></del></span>
 libraries.  In that case, the library cannot give free software any
 particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
 library.&lt;/p&gt;
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
 much more if we stand together.  We free software developers should
 support one another.  By releasing libraries that are limited to free
 software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives.  The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>alternatives.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>counterparts.</em></ins></span>  The whole free 
software movement will
 have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
 better against the competition.&lt;/p&gt;
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
 
 &lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -139,18 +139,17 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2015</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
-<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
-<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
-Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
 
 &lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:18 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:03 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;

Index: po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html        18 Feb 2016 10:47:39 -0000      1.5
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html        12 Jan 2017 06:01:03 -0000      1.6
@@ -11,18 +11,18 @@
 </style></head>
 <body><pre>
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
-&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> --&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" --&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
 &lt;h2&gt;Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library&lt;/h2&gt;
 
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
 See &lt;a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"&gt;&ldquo;How to
 choose a license for your own work&rdquo;&lt;/a&gt; for general
 recommendations about choosing a license for your work.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;/blockquote&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;
 The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries.  One
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library.  There
 are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
 cases.  The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>alternative</strong></del></span>
 libraries.  In that case, the library cannot give free software any
 particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
 library.&lt;/p&gt;
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
 much more if we stand together.  We free software developers should
 support one another.  By releasing libraries that are limited to free
 software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives.  The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>alternatives.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>counterparts.</em></ins></span>  The whole free 
software movement will
 have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
 better against the competition.&lt;/p&gt;
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
 
 &lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -139,18 +139,17 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2015</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
-<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
-<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
-Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
 
 &lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:39 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:03 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;

Index: po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html        18 Feb 2016 10:47:43 -0000      1.1
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html        12 Jan 2017 06:01:03 -0000      1.2
@@ -11,18 +11,18 @@
 </style></head>
 <body><pre>
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
-&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> --&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" --&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
 &lt;h2&gt;Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library&lt;/h2&gt;
 
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
 See &lt;a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"&gt;&ldquo;How to
 choose a license for your own work&rdquo;&lt;/a&gt; for general
 recommendations about choosing a license for your work.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;/blockquote&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;
 The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries.  One
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library.  There
 are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
 cases.  The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>alternative</strong></del></span>
 libraries.  In that case, the library cannot give free software any
 particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
 library.&lt;/p&gt;
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
 much more if we stand together.  We free software developers should
 support one another.  By releasing libraries that are limited to free
 software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives.  The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>alternatives.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>counterparts.</em></ins></span>  The whole free 
software movement will
 have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
 better against the competition.&lt;/p&gt;
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
 
 &lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -139,18 +139,17 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2015</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
-<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
-<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
-Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
 
 &lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:43 $
+$Date: 2017/01/12 06:01:03 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]