www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www education/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html...


From: GNUN
Subject: www education/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html...
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:57:37 +0000 (UTC)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     16/11/02 12:57:37

Modified files:
        education      : edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html 
        education/po   : edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es-en.html 
        licenses       : copyleft.es.html 
        licenses/po    : copyleft.es-en.html 
        philosophy     : surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html 
        philosophy/po  : surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/education/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/education/po/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/copyleft.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/copyleft.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.32&r2=1.33
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28

Patches:
Index: education/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/education/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- education/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html 13 Sep 2016 16:03:05 -0000      
1.33
+++ education/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es.html 2 Nov 2016 12:57:36 -0000       
1.34
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@
 software «<em>Swathanthra</em>» <a href="#swathanthra">(1)</a> se produjo
 fundamentalmente como resultado de lo que aprendimos durante las reuniones
 organizadas por el grupo indio de usuarios de software libre <a
-href="http://www.ilug-cochin.org/";><em>Libre User Group
-(ILUG-Cochin)</em></a>, en la vecina ciudad de Cochín.</p>
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160621163732/http://www.ilug-cochin.org/";><em>Libre
+User Group (ILUG-Cochin)</em></a>, en la vecina ciudad de Cochín.</p>
 
 <h3>Cómo lo hicimos</h3>
 
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2016/09/13 16:03:05 $
+$Date: 2016/11/02 12:57:36 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: education/po/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/education/po/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- education/po/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es-en.html   13 Sep 2016 16:03:11 
-0000      1.26
+++ education/po/edu-cases-india-irimpanam.es-en.html   2 Nov 2016 12:57:37 
-0000       1.27
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 contributing improvements to computer programs. This awareness about 
 Swathanthra Software <a href="#swathanthra">(1)</a> was largely the 
 result of what we learned at the meetings organized by the 
-<a href="http://www.ilug-cochin.org/";> Indian Libre User Group 
+<a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160621163732/http://www.ilug-cochin.org/";> 
Indian Libre User Group 
 (ILUG-Cochin)</a> in the nearby city of Kochi. Attending those meetings 
 also helped us to work in close connection with the Free Software 
 community.</p>
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/09/13 16:03:11 $
+$Date: 2016/11/02 12:57:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: licenses/copyleft.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/copyleft.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- licenses/copyleft.es.html   4 Oct 2015 09:27:48 -0000       1.2
+++ licenses/copyleft.es.html   2 Nov 2016 12:57:37 -0000       1.3
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/copyleft.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.es.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
 
 <!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
 <title>¿Qué es el copyleft? - Proyecto GNU - Free Software Foundation 
</title>
@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@
 <p>
 El objetivo del <a href="/gnu/thegnuproject.es.html">Proyecto GNU</a> es dar
 a <em>todos</em> los usuarios la libertad de redistribuir y cambiar software
-GNU. Si los intermediarios pudiesen quitar la libertad, tendríamos muchos
-usuarios, pero no tendrían las anteriores libertades. Por eso, en lugar de
-poner el  software GNU bajo dominio público, lo protegemos con
+GNU. Si los intermediarios pudiesen quitar la libertad, nuestro código
+podría tener muchos usuarios, pero no les proporcionaría libertad. Por eso,
+en lugar de poner el  software GNU bajo dominio público, lo protegemos con
 &ldquo;Copyleft&rdquo;. Con copyleft cualquiera que redistribuya el
 software, con o sin cambios, deberá de otorgar al usuario la libertad de
 copiarlo y modificarlo, garantizando que se mantendrán estas libertades para
@@ -82,7 +82,9 @@
 <p>
 El copyleft es una forma de usar los derechos de autor en un programa. No
 implica abandonar los derechos de autor, ya que, si se abandonasen, el uso
-del copyleft sería imposible. </p>
+del copyleft sería imposible. El <cite>left</cite> de «copyleft» no es una
+referencia al verbo <cite>to leave</cite> (dejar, abandonar), sino solo la
+dirección que es la imagen especular de <cite>right</cite> (derecha).</p>
 
 <p>
 El copyleft es un concepto general y, por lo tanto, no puede usarse de forma
@@ -239,7 +241,7 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
-2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
@@ -258,7 +260,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/10/04 09:27:48 $
+$Date: 2016/11/02 12:57:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: licenses/po/copyleft.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/copyleft.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- licenses/po/copyleft.es-en.html     4 Oct 2015 09:27:49 -0000       1.2
+++ licenses/po/copyleft.es-en.html     2 Nov 2016 12:57:37 -0000       1.3
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
 <title>What is Copyleft? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <meta http-equiv="Keywords" content="GNU, FSF, Free Software Foundation, 
Linux, Copyleft" />
 
@@ -9,9 +9,10 @@
 <h2>What is Copyleft?</h2>
 
 <p>
-Copyleft is a general method for making a program (or
-other work) free, and requiring all modified and extended versions of the
-program to be free as well.</p>
+Copyleft is a general method for making a program (or other work) free
+(<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">in the sense of freedom, not
+&ldquo;zero price&rdquo;</a>), and requiring all modified and extended 
versions of
+the program to be free as well.</p>
 
 <p>
 The simplest way to make a program free software is to put it in the
@@ -28,8 +29,8 @@
 <p>
 In the <a href="/gnu/thegnuproject.html">GNU project</a>, our aim is
 to give <em>all</em> users the freedom to redistribute and change GNU
-software.  If middlemen could strip off the freedom, we might have
-many users, but those users would not have freedom.  So instead of
+software.  If middlemen could strip off the freedom, our code might &ldquo;have
+many users,&rdquo; but it would not give them freedom.  So instead of
 putting GNU software in the public domain, we &ldquo;copyleft&rdquo;
 it.  Copyleft says that anyone who redistributes the software, with or
 without changes, must pass along the freedom to further copy and
@@ -75,7 +76,7 @@
 doesn't mean abandoning the copyright; in fact, doing so would make
 copyleft impossible.  The &ldquo;left&rdquo; in
 &ldquo;copyleft&rdquo; is not a reference to the verb &ldquo;to
-leave&rdquo;&mdash;only to the direction which is the inverse of
+leave&rdquo;&mdash;only to the direction which is the mirror image of
 &ldquo;right&rdquo;.</p>
 
 <p>
@@ -216,7 +217,7 @@
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -226,7 +227,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/10/04 09:27:49 $
+$Date: 2016/11/02 12:57:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -b -r1.32 -r1.33
--- philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html        20 Oct 2016 11:28:32 
-0000      1.32
+++ philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html        2 Nov 2016 12:57:37 
-0000       1.33
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 vida digital, y eso incluye la prevención de la vigilancia. No podemos
 confiar en el software que no es libre. La <abbr title="National Security
 Agency">NSA</abbr> (Agencia de Seguridad Nacional) <a
-href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again-3569376/";>usa</a>
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130622044225/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2013/06/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again/index.htm";>usa</a>
 e incluso <a
 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security";>crea</a>
 vulnerabilidades de seguridad en el software que no es libre para poder
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
 los periodistas</a>, aunque Snowden nos ha demostrado que, de hecho,
 constantemente se ordena la entrega de todos los registros de las llamadas
 telefónicas de todos los ciudadanos de los Estados  Unidos, a <a
-href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order";>Verizon</a>
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131226044537/http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order";>Verizon</a>
 y a <a
 
href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nsa-data-mining-digs-into-networks-beyond-verizon-2013-06-07";>otras
 empresas</a>.</p>
@@ -127,8 +127,8 @@
 incidentes en algunas ocasiones, pero no sabemos cuántas veces que no los ha
 descubierto.  Pero estos hechos no deberían sorprendernos, porque la policía
 lleva tiempo haciendo uso de su <a
-href="http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/privacy/lein1.htm";>acceso a los
-registros de las licencias de conducir para localizar a alguna persona
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160401102120/http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/privacy/lein1.htm#.V_mKlYbb69I";>acceso
+a los registros de las licencias de conducir para localizar a alguna persona
 atractiva</a>, práctica conocida como «pasar una placa por una cita». Esta
 práctica ha aumentado con los <a
 
href="https://theyarewatching.org/issues/risks-increase-once-data-shared";>nuevos
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2016/10/20 11:28:32 $
+$Date: 2016/11/02 12:57:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html  20 Oct 2016 11:28:33 
-0000      1.27
+++ philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html  2 Nov 2016 12:57:37 
-0000       1.28
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 I've advocated for 30 years</a>, is the first step in taking control
 of our digital lives, and that includes preventing surveillance.  We
 can't trust nonfree software; the NSA
-<a 
href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again-3569376/";>uses</a>
+<a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130622044225/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2013/06/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again/index.htm";>uses</a>
 and
 even <a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security";>creates</a>
 security weaknesses in nonfree software to invade our own computers
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
 phone call records are subpoenaed</a> to find this out, but Snowden
 has shown us that in effect they subpoena all the phone call records
 of everyone in the U.S., all the
-time, <a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order";>from
+time, <a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131226044537/http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order";>from
 Verizon</a>
 and <a 
href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nsa-data-mining-digs-into-networks-beyond-verizon-2013-06-07";>from
 other companies too</a>.</p>
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
 &ldquo;LOVEINT.&rdquo; The NSA says it has caught and punished this a
 few times; we don't know how many other times it wasn't caught.  But
 these events shouldn't surprise us, because police have
-long <a href="http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/privacy/lein1.htm";>used
+long <a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160401102120/http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/privacy/lein1.htm#.V_mKlYbb69I";>used
 their access to driver's license records to track down someone
 attractive</a>, a practice known as &ldquo;running a plate for a
 date.&rdquo;  This practice has expanded with <a 
href="https://theyarewatching.org/issues/risks-increase-once-data-shared";>new 
digital systems</a>.
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/10/20 11:28:33 $
+$Date: 2016/11/02 12:57:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]