www/philosophy surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.htm...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     16/10/24 08:58:32

Modified files:
        philosophy     : surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.html 
        philosophy/po  : surveillance-vs-democracy.uk-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Patches:
Index: surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.html   9 Jul 2016 07:31:25 -0000       1.16
+++ surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.html   24 Oct 2016 08:58:31 -0000      1.17
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" 
value="/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-08-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.uk.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.uk.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.uk.html" -->
 <h2>Скільки стежень може витримати 
демократія?</h2>
 
 <p><a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Річард Столмен</a></p>
@@ -551,7 +557,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Оновлено:
 
-$Date: 2016/07/09 07:31:25 $
+$Date: 2016/10/24 08:58:31 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk-diff.html   1 Jul 2016 12:29:26 -0000       
1.1
+++ po/surveillance-vs-democracy.uk-diff.html   24 Oct 2016 08:58:32 -0000      
1.2
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 &lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;How Much Surveillance Can Democracy Withstand?
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;!-- GNUN: localize URL 
/graphics/dog.small.jpg --&gt;</em></ins></span>
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.translist" 
--&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
 &lt;h2&gt;How Much Surveillance Can Democracy Withstand?&lt;/h2&gt;
@@ -25,6 +26,12 @@
 &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A version of this article was first published in 
Wired
 in October 2013.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;div class="pict medium"&gt;
+&lt;a href="/graphics/dog.html"&gt;
+&lt;img src="/graphics/dog.small.jpg" alt="Cartoon of a dog, wondering at the 
three ads that popped up on his computer screen..." /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;&ldquo;How did they find out I'm a dog?&rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
 &lt;p&gt;Thanks to Edward Snowden's disclosures, we know that the current
 level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human
 rights.  The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents,
@@ -49,7 +56,7 @@
 I've advocated for 30 years&lt;/a&gt;, is the first step in taking control
 of our digital lives, and that includes preventing surveillance.  We
 can't trust nonfree software; the NSA
-&lt;a 
href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again-3569376/"&gt;uses&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again-3569376/"&gt;uses&lt;/a&gt;</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130622044225/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2013/06/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again/index.htm"&gt;uses&lt;/a&gt;</em></ins></span>
 and
 even &lt;a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security"&gt;creates&lt;/a&gt;
 security weaknesses in nonfree software to invade our own computers
@@ -83,7 +90,7 @@
 phone call records are subpoenaed&lt;/a&gt; to find this out, but Snowden
 has shown us that in effect they subpoena all the phone call records
 of everyone in the U.S., all the
-time, &lt;a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order"&gt;from
+time, &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order"&gt;from</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131226044537/http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order"&gt;from</em></ins></span>
 Verizon&lt;/a&gt;
 and &lt;a 
href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nsa-data-mining-digs-into-networks-beyond-verizon-2013-06-07"&gt;from
 other companies too&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
@@ -118,7 +125,7 @@
 &ldquo;LOVEINT.&rdquo; The NSA says it has caught and punished this a
 few times; we don't know how many other times it wasn't caught.  But
 these events shouldn't surprise us, because police have
-long &lt;a href="http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/privacy/lein1.htm"&gt;used
+long &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/privacy/lein1.htm"&gt;used</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160401102120/http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/privacy/lein1.htm#.V_mKlYbb69I"&gt;used</em></ins></span>
 their access to driver's license records to track down someone
 attractive&lt;/a&gt;, a practice known as &ldquo;running a plate for a
 date.&rdquo;  This practice has expanded with &lt;a 
href="https://theyarewatching.org/issues/risks-increase-once-data-shared"&gt;new
 digital systems&lt;/a&gt;.
@@ -258,13 +265,11 @@
 who they talk with.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;Internet-connected cameras often have lousy digital security
-themselves,
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>so</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>which
-means</em></ins></span> &lt;a 
href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/cia-wants-spy-you-through-your-appliances"&gt;anyone
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>could</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>can</em></ins></span> watch what <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>the camera sees&lt;/a&gt;.  To restore 
privacy,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>those cameras 
see&lt;/a&gt;.  This makes internet-connected
+themselves, which
+means &lt;a 
href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/cia-wants-spy-you-through-your-appliances"&gt;anyone
+can watch what those cameras see&lt;/a&gt;.  This makes internet-connected
 cameras a major threat to security as well as privacy.  For privacy's
-sake,</em></ins></span> we should ban the use of Internet-connected cameras 
aimed where
+sake, we should ban the use of Internet-connected cameras aimed where
 and when the public is admitted, except when carried by people.
 Everyone must be free to post photos and video recordings
 occasionally, but the systematic accumulation of such data on the
@@ -322,8 +327,10 @@
 is not anonymous&lt;/a&gt;, though there are efforts to develop ways to pay
 anonymously with Bitcoin.  However, technology
 for &lt;a 
href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/emoney_pr.html"&gt;digital
-cash was first developed in the 1980s&lt;/a&gt;; we need only suitable
-business arrangements, and for the state not to obstruct them.&lt;/p&gt;
+cash was first developed in the 1980s&lt;/a&gt;; <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>the GNU software for doing
+this is called &lt;a href="http://taler.net/"&gt;GNU Taler&lt;/a&gt;.  
Now</em></ins></span> we need
+only suitable business arrangements, and for the state not to obstruct
+them.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;A further threat from sites' collection of personal data is that
 security breakers might get in, take it, and misuse it.  This includes
@@ -468,16 +475,16 @@
 
 &lt;p&gt;Digital technology has brought about a tremendous increase in the
 level of surveillance of our movements, actions, and communications.
-It is far more than we experienced in the 1990s, and &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/06/your_iphone_works_for_the_secret_police.html"&gt;far</strong></del></span>
-<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://hbr.org/2013/06/your-iphone-works-for-the-secret-police"&gt;far</em></ins></span>
+It is far more than we experienced in the 1990s, and &lt;a
+href="https://hbr.org/2013/06/your-iphone-works-for-the-secret-police"&gt;far
 more than people behind the Iron Curtain experienced&lt;/a&gt; in the 1980s,
 and proposed legal limits on state use of the accumulated data would
 not alter that.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;Companies are designing even more intrusive surveillance.  Some
 project that pervasive surveillance, hooked to companies such as
-Facebook, could have deep effects on &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/10/internet-of-things-predictable-people"&gt;how</strong></del></span>
-<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/10/internet-of-things-predictable-people"&gt;how</em></ins></span>
+Facebook, could have deep effects on &lt;a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/10/internet-of-things-predictable-people"&gt;how
 people think&lt;/a&gt;.  Such possibilities are imponderable; but the threat
 to democracy is not speculation.  It exists and is visible today.&lt;/p&gt;
 
@@ -543,7 +550,7 @@
 
 &lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2016/07/01 12:29:26 $
+$Date: 2016/10/24 08:58:32 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;