www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy basic-freedoms.es.html microsoft...

From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy basic-freedoms.es.html microsoft...
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:09:19 +0000 
CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     16/05/03 11:09:19

Modified files:
        philosophy     : basic-freedoms.es.html 
                         microsoft-new-monopoly.es.html 
                         open-source-misses-the-point.es.html 
                         surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html ucita.es.html 
        philosophy/po  : basic-freedoms.es-en.html 
                         microsoft-new-monopoly.es-en.html 
                         open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html 
                         surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html 
                         ucita.es-en.html ucita.es.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/basic-freedoms.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.77&r2=1.78
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/ucita.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.50&r2=1.51
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/basic-freedoms.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.39&r2=1.40
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ucita.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ucita.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36

Patches:
Index: basic-freedoms.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/basic-freedoms.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- basic-freedoms.es.html      5 Jun 2015 12:06:40 -0000       1.47
+++ basic-freedoms.es.html      3 May 2016 11:09:15 -0000       1.48
@@ -17,23 +17,24 @@
 </p>
 
 <ul>
-  <li>
-    La <a href="http://www.ciec.org/";><cite>Citizens internet Empowerment
-Coalition</cite> (Coalición para el empoderamiento de los ciudadanos en
-Internet)</a> aunó esfuerzos para oponerse al primer intento por parte del
+  <li>La <a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/19990424100121/http://www.ciec.org/";><cite>Citizens
+internet Empowerment Coalition</cite> (Coalición para el empoderamiento de
+los ciudadanos en Internet)</a> (en la Wayback Machine, archivado el 24 de
+abril de 1999) aunó esfuerzos para oponerse al primer intento por parte del
 congreso [de los EE. UU.] de regular lo que se publica en Internet, la
 <cite>Communications Decency Act</cite> (Ley de Decencia en las
 Comunicaciones), que había sido declarada inconstitucional por la Corte
 Suprema de los EE. UU. el 26 de junio de 1997. Su sitio se conserva como
-recurso informativo sobre el caso emblemático de la citada ley.
-  </li>
+recurso informativo sobre el caso emblemático de la citada ley.</li>
+
+  <li>
+    <!-- activating this link… site is archived as of July 09, 1998 -->
+<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/19980709161803/http://vtw.org/";>Voters
+Telecommunications Watch</a> en la Wayback Machine (archivado el 9 de julio
+de 1998) y su excelente lista de correo de anuncios.</li>
 
-<!-- removing this link.. site is dead as of June 07 2004
   <li>
-The <a href="http://www.vtw.org/";>Voters Telecommunications Watch</a>
-       and their excellent announcement electronic mailing list.</li>
-    -->
-<li>
     El artículo <a href="/philosophy/censoring-emacs.html">Censurando Emacs de
 GNU</a> describe de qué manera la Ley de Decencia en las Comunicaciones
 exigía al proyecto GNU censurar Emacs de GNU y cómo, paradójicamente, tuvo
@@ -54,15 +55,17 @@
 de prensa y de asociación en la red.
   </li>
 
-<!-- removing this link.. site is dead as of June 07 2004
   <li>
-You can read <a href="http://www.vtw.org/speech/index.html#decision";>the
-       June 1996 appeals court decision</a>
-       rejecting censorship of the Internet.  But remember, this decision
-       is <em>not</em> final!  First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree;
-       then Congress gets a chance to look for another method of 
censorship.</li>
-    -->
-<li><a href="/philosophy/savingeurope.html">Salvemos a Europa de las patentes 
de
+    <!-- activating this link… site is archived as of December 01, 2001 -->
+Puede leer <a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20011201050533/http://www.vtw.org/speech/";>la
+decisión del tribunal de apelación, de junio de 1996</a> en la Wayback
+Machine (archivado el 1 de dciembre de 2001) rechazando la censura de
+internet. Pero recuerde que ¡esta <em>not</em> es una decisión definitiva!
+En primer lugar la Corte Suprema mostrará su acuerdo o desacuerdo, y luego
+el Congreso tiene la posibilidad de buscar otro método de censura.</li>
+
+  <li><a href="/philosophy/savingeurope.html">Salvemos a Europa de las 
patentes de
 software</a>.</li>
 
   <li>
@@ -116,12 +119,11 @@
 </div>
 
 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007,
-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2014, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.
-</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -136,7 +138,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/06/05 12:06:40 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:15 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft-new-monopoly.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- microsoft-new-monopoly.es.html      17 Oct 2015 09:28:46 -0000      1.16
+++ microsoft-new-monopoly.es.html      3 May 2016 11:09:16 -0000       1.17
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
 licencia de su patente exenta de regalías para ciertos usos limitados, pero
 las limitaciones son tantas que no autoriza el software libre. Puede ver la
 licencia aquí: <a
-href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpspatentlic.mspx";>
-http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpspatentlic.mspx</a>.</p>
+href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463420.aspx";>
+https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463420.aspx</a>.</p>
 
 <p>El software libre se define como aquel que respeta cuatro libertades
 fundamentales: (0) libertad de ejecutar el programa como desee, (1) libertad
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2005, 2009, 2015 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2005, 2009, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/10/17 09:28:46 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.77
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -b -r1.77 -r1.78
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.html        6 Feb 2016 21:30:22 -0000       
1.77
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.html        3 May 2016 11:09:16 -0000       
1.78
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@
 para «software libre» tienen algún tipo de problema semántico, incluso
 «software de código abierto».</p>
 
-<p>La <a href="http://opensource.org/docs/osd";>definición oficial de 
«software
-de código abierto»</a> (publicada por la <cite>Open Source Initiative</cite>
-y demasiado larga como para citarla aquí)­ se derivó indirectamente de
-nuestros criterios para el software libre. No es la misma, es un poco más
-amplia en algunos aspectos. No obstante, dicha  definición concuerda con la
-nuestra en la mayoría de los casos.</p>
+<p>La <a href="https://opensource.org/definition/";>definición oficial de
+«software de código abierto»</a> (publicada por la <cite>Open Source
+Initiative</cite> y demasiado larga como para citarla aquí)­ se derivó
+indirectamente de nuestros criterios para el software libre. No es la misma,
+es un poco más amplia en algunos aspectos. No obstante, dicha  definición
+concuerda con la nuestra en la mayoría de los casos.</p>
 
 <p>Sin embargo, el significado obvio de la expresión «software de código
 abierto» es «puede mirar el código fuente», y pareciera que muchos opinan
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
 intención haya sido rechazar o cuestionar deliberadamente la definición
 oficial. Pienso que simplemente aplicó las convenciones del idioma inglés
 para obtener el significado de la expresión. El <a
-href="https://web.archive.org/web/@*20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf";>estado
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf";>estado
 de Kansas</a> publicó una definición similar: «Utilicen software de código
 abierto (<abbr title="Open Source Software">OSS</abbr>). OSS es el software
 cuyo código fuente está  disponible pública y libremente, aunque los
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2016/02/06 21:30:22 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html   29 Mar 2016 08:58:24 -0000      1.27
+++ surveillance-vs-democracy.es.html   3 May 2016 11:09:16 -0000       1.28
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
 
 <p>Las cámaras conectadas a Internet a menudo tienen una pésima seguridad
 digital, así que <a
-href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/cia-wants-spy-you-through-your-appliances";>cualquiera
+href="http://www.networkworld.com/article/2221934/microsoft-subnet/cia-wants-to-spy-on-you-through-your-appliances.html";>cualquiera
 podría observar lo que la cámara ve</a>. Para restaurar la privacidad,
 deberíamos prohibir el uso de cámaras que estén conectadas a Internet y
 situadas en los lugares y horarios en que el público entra y sale, excepto
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@
 <p>La tecnología digital ha ocasionado un inmenso incremento de los niveles de
 vigilancia sobre nuestros movimientos, acciones y comunicaciones. Ha ido
 mucho más allá de lo que experimentamos en la década de los noventa, y <a
-href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/06/your_iphone_works_for_the_secret_police.html";>mucho
+href="https://hbr.org/2013/06/your-iphone-works-for-the-secret-police";>mucho
 más allá de lo que experimentó la población detrás de la Cortina de
 Hierro</a> en los años ochenta, y los límites legales que se proponen sobre
 el uso de los datos acumulados por parte del Estado no modificarán la
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@
 <p>Las empresas están diseñando medios de vigilancia cada vez más
 invasivos. Hay quienes predicen que la vigilancia invasiva, ligada a
 empresas tales como Facebook, podría afectar profundamente el <a
-href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/10/internet-of-things-predictable-people";>modo
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/10/internet-of-things-predictable-people";>modo
 de pensar de las personas</a>.  Tales posibilidades son imprevisibles, pero
 el peligro para la democracia está fuera de discusión. Existe y es tangible
 hoy.</p>
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2016/03/29 08:58:24 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: ucita.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/ucita.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -b -r1.50 -r1.51
--- ucita.es.html       22 Mar 2016 11:06:26 -0000      1.50
+++ ucita.es.html       3 May 2016 11:09:16 -0000       1.51
@@ -169,16 +169,8 @@
 
 <hr />
 <p style="text-align:center">
-<!-- Link broken as of 21 October 2012
-  and
-  to <a 
href="http://archive.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?/features/990531ucita_home.htm";>
-
-   
http://archive.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?/features/990531ucita_home.htm</a>!
-  -->
 Si usted apoya la campaña en contra de UCITA, <em>por favor enlace de forma
-prominente esta página: <a
-href="http://web.archive.org/web/20001009121702/http://www.4cite.org/";>http://www.4cite.org
-[página archivada]</a></em>.
+destacada esta página: http://www.4cite.org [cerrada].</em>
 </p>
 
 <hr />
@@ -188,7 +180,7 @@
 movimiento de oposición a UCITA</a> (en inglés).</li>
 
  <li><a
-href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/41623/CIOs_join_fight_to_kill_Ucita";>Los
+href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2593115/app-development/cios-join-fight-to-kill-ucita.html";>Los
 Directores de Informática se unen en la lucha para derrotar UCITA</a> (en
 inglés).</li>
 
@@ -248,7 +240,7 @@
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -262,11 +254,11 @@
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2000, 2008, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2000, 2008, 2013, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -277,7 +269,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2016/03/22 11:06:26 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/basic-freedoms.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/basic-freedoms.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- po/basic-freedoms.es-en.html        12 Apr 2014 13:58:27 -0000      1.28
+++ po/basic-freedoms.es-en.html        3 May 2016 11:09:18 -0000       1.29
@@ -12,19 +12,19 @@
 </p>
 
 <ul>
-  <li>
-    The <a href="http://www.ciec.org/";> Citizens Internet Empowerment
-    Coalition</a> came together to oppose Congress' first attempt to
-    regulate material published on the Internet, the Communications
-    Decency Act, which the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional
-    on June 26, 1997.  Their site is being preserved as a resource on
-    the landmark CDA case.
-  </li>
-
-  <!-- removing this link.. site is dead as of June 07 2004
-  <li>The <a href="http://www.vtw.org/";>Voters Telecommunications Watch</a>
-       and their excellent announcement electronic mailing list.</li>
-    -->
+  <li>The <a
+    
href="https://web.archive.org/web/19990424100121/http://www.ciec.org/";>Citizens
+    Internet Empowerment Coalition</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived April
+    24, 1999) came together to oppose Congress' first attempt to regulate
+    material published on the Internet, the Communications Decency Act, which
+    the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional on June 26, 1997. Their site
+    is being preserved as a resource on the landmark CDA case.</li>
+
+  <li><!-- activating this link… site is archived as of July 09, 1998 -->
+    The <a
+    href="https://web.archive.org/web/19980709161803/http://vtw.org/";>Voters
+    Telecommunications Watch</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived July 09,
+    1998) and their excellent announcement electronic mailing list.</li>
     
   <li>
     <a href="/philosophy/censoring-emacs.html">Censoring GNU Emacs</a>
@@ -45,13 +45,14 @@
     for Online Freedom of Speech, Press and Association.
   </li>
 
-  <!-- removing this link.. site is dead as of June 07 2004
-  <li>You can read <a href="http://www.vtw.org/speech/index.html#decision";>the
-       June 1996 appeals court decision</a>
-       rejecting censorship of the Internet.  But remember, this decision
-       is <em>not</em> final!  First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree;
-       then Congress gets a chance to look for another method of 
censorship.</li>
-    -->
+  <li><!-- activating this link… site is archived as of December 01, 2001 -->
+    You can read <a
+    
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20011201050533/http://www.vtw.org/speech/";>the
+    June 1996 appeals court decision</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived
+    December 01, 2001) rejecting censorship of the Internet. But remember, this
+    decision is <em>not</em> final! First, the Supreme Court will agree or
+    disagree; then Congress gets a chance to look for another method of
+    censorship.</li>
 
   <li><a href="/philosophy/savingeurope.html">Saving Europe from Software 
Patents</a></li>
 
@@ -93,18 +94,17 @@
 </div>
 
 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2007, 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2007, 2014, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:58:27 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:18 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/microsoft-new-monopoly.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- po/microsoft-new-monopoly.es-en.html        17 Oct 2015 09:28:47 -0000      
1.6
+++ po/microsoft-new-monopoly.es-en.html        3 May 2016 11:09:18 -0000       
1.7
@@ -57,8 +57,9 @@
 technique that Microsoft claims to hold a patent on. Microsoft offers
 a royalty-free patent license for certain limited purposes, but it is
 so limited that it does not allow free software. You can see the
-license here: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpspatentlic.mspx";>
-http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpspatentlic.mspx</a>.</p>
+license here: <a
+href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463420.aspx";>
+https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463420.aspx</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Free software is defined as software that respects four
 fundamental freedoms: (0) freedom to run the software as you wish,
@@ -182,7 +183,7 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2005, 2009, 2015 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2005, 2009, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -192,7 +193,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/10/17 09:28:47 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:18 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -b -r1.39 -r1.40
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html  2 Jan 2016 23:31:20 -0000       
1.39
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html  3 May 2016 11:09:18 -0000       
1.40
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
 &ldquo;free software&rdquo; has some kind of semantic problem&mdash;and 
 this includes &ldquo;open source software.&rdquo;</p>
 
-<p>The <a href="http://opensource.org/docs/osd";>official definition of
+<p>The <a href="https://opensource.org/definition/";>official definition of
 &ldquo;open source software&rdquo;</a> (which is published by the Open
 Source Initiative and is too long to include here) was derived
 indirectly from our criteria for free software.  It is not the same;
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@
 that anyone can get copies of its source code files.&rdquo; I don't
 think he deliberately sought to reject or dispute the official
 definition.  I think he simply applied the conventions of the English
-language to come up with a meaning for the term.
-The <a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/@*20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf";>state
+language to come up with a meaning for the term.  The <a 
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf";>state
 of Kansas</a> published a similar definition: &ldquo;Make use of
 open-source software (OSS).  OSS is software for which the source code
 is freely and publicly available, though the specific licensing
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/02 23:31:20 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:18 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html     29 Mar 2016 08:58:24 -0000      
1.22
+++ po/surveillance-vs-democracy.es-en.html     3 May 2016 11:09:18 -0000       
1.23
@@ -246,8 +246,8 @@
 who they talk with.</p>
 
 <p>Internet-connected cameras often have lousy digital security
-themselves,
-so <a 
href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/cia-wants-spy-you-through-your-appliances";>anyone
+themselves, so <a
+href="http://www.networkworld.com/article/2221934/microsoft-subnet/cia-wants-to-spy-on-you-through-your-appliances.html";>anyone
 could watch what the camera sees</a>.  To restore privacy, we should
 ban the use of Internet-connected cameras aimed where and when the
 public is admitted, except when carried by people.  Everyone must be
@@ -453,16 +453,16 @@
 
 <p>Digital technology has brought about a tremendous increase in the
 level of surveillance of our movements, actions, and communications.
-It is far more than we experienced in the 1990s,
-and <a 
href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/06/your_iphone_works_for_the_secret_police.html";>far
+It is far more than we experienced in the 1990s, and <a
+href="https://hbr.org/2013/06/your-iphone-works-for-the-secret-police";>far
 more than people behind the Iron Curtain experienced</a> in the 1980s,
 and proposed legal limits on state use of the accumulated data would
 not alter that.</p>
 
 <p>Companies are designing even more intrusive surveillance.  Some
 project that pervasive surveillance, hooked to companies such as
-Facebook, could have deep effects
-on <a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/10/internet-of-things-predictable-people";>how
+Facebook, could have deep effects on <a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/10/internet-of-things-predictable-people";>how
 people think</a>.  Such possibilities are imponderable; but the threat
 to democracy is not speculation.  It exists and is visible today.</p>
 
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/03/29 08:58:24 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:18 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/ucita.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ucita.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- po/ucita.es-en.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:54 -0000      1.28
+++ po/ucita.es-en.html 3 May 2016 11:09:18 -0000       1.29
@@ -163,15 +163,7 @@
 <hr />
 <p style="text-align:center">
 If you support the anti UCITA campaign, <em>please make prominent links to
- this page,
-  <a 
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20001009121702/http://www.4cite.org/";>http://www.4cite.org[Archived
-  Page]</a>.
-  <!-- Link broken as of 21 October 2012
-  and
-  to <a 
href="http://archive.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?/features/990531ucita_home.htm";>
-   
http://archive.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?/features/990531ucita_home.htm</a>!
-  -->
-</em>
+ this page, http://www.4cite.org [closed].</em>
 </p>
 
 <hr />
@@ -180,7 +172,7 @@
  <li><a href="http://www.ieeeusa.org/policy/issues/UCITA/";>IEEE
   supports the movement to oppose UCITA</a></li>
 
- <li><a 
href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/41623/CIOs_join_fight_to_kill_Ucita";>CIOs
+ <li><a 
href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2593115/app-development/cios-join-fight-to-kill-ucita.html";>CIOs
  join fight to kill UCITA</a></li>
 
  <li><a 
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010818101424/http://interlog.com/~cjazz/bnews7.htm";>Anti
@@ -222,7 +214,7 @@
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -237,17 +229,17 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2000, 2008, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2000, 2008, 2013, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:54 $
+$Date: 2016/05/03 11:09:18 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/ucita.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ucita.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- po/ucita.es.po      3 May 2016 10:42:58 -0000       1.35
+++ po/ucita.es.po      3 May 2016 11:09:18 -0000       1.36
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
 msgid ""
 "UCITA is a proposed law, designed by the proprietary software developers, "
 "who are now asking all 50 states of the US to adopt it.  If UCITA is "
-"adopted, it will threaten the free software community <a href="
-"\"#Note1\">(1)</a> with disaster.  To understand why, please read on."
+"adopted, it will threaten the free software community <a href=\"#Note1\">(1)"
+"</a> with disaster.  To understand why, please read on."
 msgstr ""
 "<abbr title=\"Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act\">UCITA</abbr> "
 "es un proyecto de ley diseñado por los programadores de software privativo, "
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@
 "Verá, UCITA dice que por norma un programador o distribuidor de software "
 "asume completa responsabilidad jurídica de los fallos de un programa; pero "
 "también permite la omisión de esta condición mediante el uso de una "
-"«licencia de envoltura» <a href=\"#TransNote1\" id=\"TransNote1-rev"
-"\"><sup>[1]</sup></a>. Las sofisticadas compañías de software privativo "
-"usarán tales «licencias de envoltura» para eludir completamente la "
-"responsabilidad jurídica. Pero los aficionados y los contratistas "
-"independientes que programan software por encargo se verán frecuentemente "
-"perjudicados porque no conocían este problema. Y nosotros, los programadores 
"
-"de software libre, no tendremos ninguna manera segura de evitarlo."
+"«licencia de envoltura» <a href=\"#TransNote1\" id=\"TransNote1-rev\"><sup>"
+"[1]</sup></a>. Las sofisticadas compañías de software privativo usarán 
tales "
+"«licencias de envoltura» para eludir completamente la responsabilidad "
+"jurídica. Pero los aficionados y los contratistas independientes que "
+"programan software por encargo se verán frecuentemente perjudicados porque "
+"no conocían este problema. Y nosotros, los programadores de software libre, "
+"no tendremos ninguna manera segura de evitarlo."
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
 #. type: Content of: <p>
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]