www/philosophy/po software-patents.fr.po softwa...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     16/05/02 17:29:39

Modified files:
        philosophy/po  : software-patents.fr.po software-patents.pot 
                         software-patents.ru.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/software-patents.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.55&r2=1.56
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/software-patents.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/software-patents.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22

Patches:
Index: software-patents.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/software-patents.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.55
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -b -r1.55 -r1.56
--- software-patents.fr.po      2 May 2016 15:32:04 -0000       1.55
+++ software-patents.fr.po      2 May 2016 17:29:38 -0000       1.56
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: software-patents.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-05-02 11:58+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-05-02 17:26+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2015-08-19 10:33+0200\n"
 "Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -2104,12 +2104,13 @@
 # | According to <a href=\"http://people.ffii.org/~phm/index.en.html\";>Hartmut
 # | Pilch</a>, who is one of the leaders in the European struggle against
 # | software patents, the main impetus comes from the <a
-# | [-href=\"http://www.patent.gov.uk/\";>UK Patent office</a>.-]
+# | [-href=\"http://www.patent.gov.uk/\";>UK Patent office</a>.  The UK Patent
+# | Office-]
 # | {+href=\"https://www.gov.uk/topic/intellectual-property/patents\";>UK
-# | &ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo; Office</a>.+}  The UK Patent Office is
-# | simply biased in favor of software patents.  It had a public consultation
-# | and most of the responses were opposed to software patents.  They then
-# | wrote a report saying that people seem to be content with them, completely
+# | &ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  This office+} is simply
+# | biased in favor of software patents.  It had a public consultation and
+# | most of the responses were opposed to software patents.  They then wrote a
+# | report saying that people seem to be content with them, completely
 # | disregarding the answers.  You see, the free software community said
 # | please send the answers to them and please send your answers to us too and
 # | we'll publish them.  So they published these answers which were generally
@@ -2134,8 +2135,8 @@
 "Pilch</a>, who is one of the leaders in the European struggle against "
 "software patents, the main impetus comes from the <a href=\"https://www.gov.";
 "uk/topic/intellectual-property/patents\">UK &ldquo;Intellectual "
-"Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  The UK Patent Office is simply biased in favor "
-"of software patents.  It had a public consultation and most of the responses "
+"Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  This office is simply biased in favor of "
+"software patents.  It had a public consultation and most of the responses "
 "were opposed to software patents.  They then wrote a report saying that "
 "people seem to be content with them, completely disregarding the answers.  "
 "You see, the free software community said please send the answers to them "

Index: software-patents.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/software-patents.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- software-patents.pot        2 May 2016 11:58:59 -0000       1.22
+++ software-patents.pot        2 May 2016 17:29:38 -0000       1.23
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: software-patents.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-05-02 11:58+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-05-02 17:26+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -1263,15 +1263,14 @@
 "Pilch</a>, who is one of the leaders in the European struggle against "
 "software patents, the main impetus comes from the <a "
 "href=\"https://www.gov.uk/topic/intellectual-property/patents\";>UK "
-"&ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  The UK Patent Office is "
-"simply biased in favor of software patents.  It had a public consultation "
-"and most of the responses were opposed to software patents.  They then wrote "
-"a report saying that people seem to be content with them, completely "
-"disregarding the answers.  You see, the free software community said please "
-"send the answers to them and please send your answers to us too and we'll "
-"publish them.  So they published these answers which were generally "
-"opposed.  You'd have never guessed that from the report that the UK Patent "
-"Office published."
+"&ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  This office is simply "
+"biased in favor of software patents.  It had a public consultation and most "
+"of the responses were opposed to software patents.  They then wrote a report "
+"saying that people seem to be content with them, completely disregarding the "
+"answers.  You see, the free software community said please send the answers "
+"to them and please send your answers to us too and we'll publish them.  So "
+"they published these answers which were generally opposed.  You'd have never "
+"guessed that from the report that the UK Patent Office published."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>

Index: software-patents.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/software-patents.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- software-patents.ru.po      2 May 2016 16:33:38 -0000       1.21
+++ software-patents.ru.po      2 May 2016 17:29:38 -0000       1.22
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: software-patents.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-05-02 11:58+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-05-02 17:26+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2016-05-02 17:00+0000\n"
 "Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-05-02 17:26+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid "Software Patents - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -2064,13 +2065,41 @@
 "патентов на программы, и жизненно важно 
начать делать это и здесь."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
+# | According to <a href=\"http://people.ffii.org/~phm/index.en.html\";>Hartmut
+# | Pilch</a>, who is one of the leaders in the European struggle against
+# | software patents, the main impetus comes from the <a
+# | href=\"https://www.gov.uk/topic/intellectual-property/patents\";>UK
+# | &ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  [-The UK Patent Office-] 
+# | {+This office+} is simply biased in favor of software patents.  It had a
+# | public consultation and most of the responses were opposed to software
+# | patents.  They then wrote a report saying that people seem to be content
+# | with them, completely disregarding the answers.  You see, the free
+# | software community said please send the answers to them and please send
+# | your answers to us too and we'll publish them.  So they published these
+# | answers which were generally opposed.  You'd have never guessed that from
+# | the report that the UK Patent Office published.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "According to <a href=\"http://people.ffii.org/~phm/index.en.html";
+#| "\">Hartmut Pilch</a>, who is one of the leaders in the European struggle "
+#| "against software patents, the main impetus comes from the <a href="
+#| "\"https://www.gov.uk/topic/intellectual-property/patents\";>UK &ldquo;"
+#| "Intellectual Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  The UK Patent Office is simply "
+#| "biased in favor of software patents.  It had a public consultation and "
+#| "most of the responses were opposed to software patents.  They then wrote "
+#| "a report saying that people seem to be content with them, completely "
+#| "disregarding the answers.  You see, the free software community said "
+#| "please send the answers to them and please send your answers to us too "
+#| "and we'll publish them.  So they published these answers which were "
+#| "generally opposed.  You'd have never guessed that from the report that "
+#| "the UK Patent Office published."
 msgid ""
 "According to <a href=\"http://people.ffii.org/~phm/index.en.html\";>Hartmut "
 "Pilch</a>, who is one of the leaders in the European struggle against "
 "software patents, the main impetus comes from the <a href=\"https://www.gov.";
 "uk/topic/intellectual-property/patents\">UK &ldquo;Intellectual "
-"Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  The UK Patent Office is simply biased in favor "
-"of software patents.  It had a public consultation and most of the responses "
+"Property&rdquo; Office</a>.  This office is simply biased in favor of "
+"software patents.  It had a public consultation and most of the responses "
 "were opposed to software patents.  They then wrote a report saying that "
 "people seem to be content with them, completely disregarding the answers.  "
 "You see, the free software community said please send the answers to them "