www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www philosophy/essays-and-articles.es.html phil...

From: GNUN
Subject: www philosophy/essays-and-articles.es.html phil...
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:00:38 +0000 
CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     16/03/29 16:00:38

Modified files:
        philosophy     : essays-and-articles.es.html 
                         free-software-for-freedom.es.html 
                         gnutella.es.html 
                         network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html 
                         nonfree-games.es.html trivial-patent.es.html 
                         whats-wrong-with-youtube.es.html 
                         words-to-avoid.es.html 
        philosophy/po  : essays-and-articles.es-en.html 
                         free-software-for-freedom.es-en.html 
                         gnutella.es-en.html 
                         network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html 
                         nonfree-games.es-en.html 
                         trivial-patent.es-en.html 
                         whats-wrong-with-youtube.es-en.html 
                         words-to-avoid.es-en.html 
        software       : recent-releases-include.ru.html 
        software/po    : recent-releases-include.ru.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/essays-and-articles.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.81&r2=1.82
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.52&r2=1.53
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/gnutella.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/nonfree-games.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/trivial-patent.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.126&r2=1.127
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.54&r2=1.55
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-software-for-freedom.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/gnutella.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/trivial-patent.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.75&r2=1.76
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/recent-releases-include.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.855&r2=1.856
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1167&r2=1.1168

Patches:
Index: philosophy/essays-and-articles.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/essays-and-articles.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.81
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -b -r1.81 -r1.82
--- philosophy/essays-and-articles.es.html      15 Dec 2015 12:09:57 -0000      
1.81
+++ philosophy/essays-and-articles.es.html      29 Mar 2016 16:00:36 -0000      
1.82
@@ -236,7 +236,8 @@
 sistema para presentar una orden de compra a través de internet</a>, con
 notas de Richard Stallman [en inglés].</li>
 
-  <li><a href="http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";
+  <li><a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20000815064858/http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";
 id="SequentialIPandI">Innovación Secuencial, Patentes e Imitación</a>, un
 escrito que presenta un modelo matemático que muestra que las patentes
 pueden impedir el progreso en campos como el del software [en inglés].</li>
@@ -246,17 +247,17 @@
   <li><a href="/philosophy/guardian-article.html">No a la directiva europea 
sobre
 patentes de software</a>, una versión ligeramente modificada del artículo
 originalmente publicado en el periódico londinense <a
-href="http://www.guardian.co.uk";>The Guardian</a>, por Richard Stallman y
-Nick Hill.</li>
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/international";>The Guardian</a>, por
+Richard Stallman y Nick Hill.</li>
 
   <li><a
-href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/comment/story/0,12449,1540984,00.html";><cite>Soft
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/aug/02/comment.business";><cite>Soft
 sell</cite></a>. Comentarios de Richard Stallman acerca de la derrota de la
 directiva de la UE sobre las patentes de software. Publicado en <cite>The
 Guardian</cite>, en 2005 [en inglés].</li>
 
   <li><a
-href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2005/jun/23/onlinesupplement.insideit";><cite>La
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/jun/23/onlinesupplement.insideit";><cite>La
 absurdidad de las patentes</cite></a>, un artículo de Richard M. Stallman
 publicado en <cite>The Guardian</cite> [en inglés].</li>
 
@@ -428,7 +429,7 @@
 GNU/Linux: ¿para bien o para mal?</a>, por Richard Stallman.</li>
 
   <li> <a
-href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/apr/06/digital-economy-bill-richard-stallman";>Proyecto
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2010/apr/06/digital-economy-bill-richard-stallman";>Proyecto
 de ley sobre la economía digital: un payaso lo da y otro payaso lo
 quita</a>, por Richard Stallman [en inglés].</li>
 
@@ -458,7 +459,7 @@
 Sight</cite>»).</li>
 
   <li><a
-href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070806183422/http://www.insnet.org/ins_headlines.rxml?cust=212&amp;id=967";>Software
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060721162054/http://www.insnet.org/ins_headlines.rxml?cust=212&amp;id=967";>Software
 libre y desarrollo sostenible</a>, un breve artículo de Richard Stallman
 sobre el uso de software privativo en el desarrollo cultural [en inglés].</li>
 
@@ -629,7 +630,7 @@
 el envío de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 1996-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 1996-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
@@ -644,7 +645,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/12/15 12:09:57 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:36 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -b -r1.52 -r1.53
--- philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.es.html        5 Jun 2015 12:06:42 
-0000       1.52
+++ philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.es.html        29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 
-0000      1.53
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 
 <p>
 En 1998, algunas de las personas de la comunidad de software libre empezaron
-a usar el término <a href="http://www.opensource.org/";>«software de código
+a usar el término <a href="https://opensource.org/";>«software de código
 abierto»</a> (del inglés «<span style="font-style:italic;">open source
 software</span>») en vez de «<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.es.html">software
 libre</a>» para describir lo que hacen. El término «código abierto» se
@@ -457,11 +457,12 @@
 el envío de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2007 Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2007, 2016 Free Software
+Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -472,7 +473,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/06/05 12:06:42 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/gnutella.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/gnutella.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- philosophy/gnutella.es.html 5 Jun 2015 12:06:43 -0000       1.30
+++ philosophy/gnutella.es.html 29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      1.31
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@
 
 <p>
 Hay muchos programas libres que implementan el protocolo de Gnutella, como
-<a href="http://gtk-gnutella.sourceforge.net/";>gtk-gnutella</a>, <a
-href="http://mutella.sourceforge.net/";>mutella</a>, y <a
-href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucleus/";>gnucleus</a>. Tenga en
+<a href="http://gtk-gnutella.sourceforge.net/en/";>gtk-gnutella</a>, <a
+href="http://mutella.sourceforge.net/";>Mutella</a>, y <a
+href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucleus/";>Gnucleus</a>. Tenga en
 cuenta que ninguno de estos programas son oficialmente <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.html#GNUsoftware">software de GNU</a>. GNU
 tiene su propio programa para redes de distribución entre pares
 [<cite>«peer-to-peer» - «P2P» </cite>] llamado <a
-href="/software/GNUnet/">GNUnet</a>, cuya documentación incluye una <a
+href="/software/gnunet/">GNUnet</a>, cuya documentación incluye una <a
 href="https://gnunet.org/compare";> comparativa de los protocolos</a>.</p>
 
 <p>
@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@
 el envío de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2004, 2005, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2004, 2005, 2007, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/06/05 12:06:43 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: 
/web/www/www/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html   5 Jun 2015 
12:06:45 -0000       1.22
+++ philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html   29 Mar 2016 
16:00:37 -0000      1.23
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
 <p>Los servicios que no son SaaSS pueden perjudicar a los usuarios de otras
 formas. Un servicio puede presentar problemas tales como el mal uso de los
 datos que usted envía, o la recopilación de otros datos (vigilancia). El <a
-href="http://autonomo.us/2008/07/franklin-street-statement/";><cite>Franklin
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090124084811/http://autonomo.us/2008/07/franklin-street-statement/";><cite>Franklin
 Street Statement</cite></a> intentó ocuparse de estos asuntos, pero aún no
 tenemos una posición firme con respecto a ellos. Lo que está claro es que
 los problemas que presenta un servicio son <em>diferentes</em> a los de un
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -204,11 +204,11 @@
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2012, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/06/05 12:06:45 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/nonfree-games.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/nonfree-games.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- philosophy/nonfree-games.es.html    6 Feb 2016 21:30:22 -0000       1.22
+++ philosophy/nonfree-games.es.html    29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      1.23
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
 recientemente que distribuirá estos juegos para GNU/Linux. ¿Qué efectos
 positivos y negativos puede tener esto?</p>
 
-<p>Supongo que la disponibilidad para GNU/Linux de programas muy populares que
-no son libres puede impulsar la adopción del sistema. Sin embargo, el
-objetivo de GNU va más allá del «éxito»; su propósito es <a
+<p>Supongo que la disponibilidad para el sistema GNU/Linux de programas muy
+populares que no son libres puede impulsar la adopción del sistema. Sin
+embargo, el objetivo de GNU va más allá del «éxito»; su propósito es <a
 href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">proporcionar
 libertad a los usuarios</a>.  Por lo tanto, la cuestión más amplia es
 preguntarse de qué manera este desarrollo afecta la libertad de los
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@
 
 <p>Los videojuegos que no son libres (así como otros programas que no son
 libres) no son éticos porque niegan la libertad a los usuarios (el tema de
-las ilustraciones y los sonidos de los juegos es diferente, porque eso no es
-software). Lo que está claro es que si desea tener libertad, un requisito
-para lograrla es no tener ni ejecutar en su ordenador programas que no sean
-libres.</p>
+las ilustraciones y los sonidos de los juegos es diferente, porque eso <a
+href="/philosophy/copyright-versus-community.html">no es software</a>). Lo
+que está claro es que si desea tener libertad, un requisito para lograrla es
+no tener ni ejecutar en su ordenador programas que no sean libres.</p>
 
 <p>No obstante, si va a hacer uso de estos juegos, es mucho mejor que lo haga
 en GNU/Linux y no en Microsoft Windows. Así al menos evitará <a
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2016/02/06 21:30:22 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/trivial-patent.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/trivial-patent.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- philosophy/trivial-patent.es.html   5 Jun 2015 12:06:49 -0000       1.12
+++ philosophy/trivial-patent.es.html   29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      1.13
@@ -243,10 +243,10 @@
 creamos sin cuestionamientos que el sistema tiene ese efecto. Pero la
 experiencia de los programadores indica lo contrario. Recientes análisis
 teóricos muestran que esto no tiene nada de paradójico (véase <a
-href="http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";>
-http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf</a>). No hay ninguna razón
-para que la sociedad exponga a los desarrolladores de software y a los
-usuarios al peligro de las patentes de software.</p>
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20000815064858/http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";>researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf</a>
+en web.archive.org). No hay ninguna razón para que la sociedad exponga a los
+desarrolladores de software y a los usuarios al peligro de las patentes de
+software.</p>
 
 <div class="translators-notes">
 
@@ -291,11 +291,11 @@
 el envío de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2006 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2006, 2016 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/06/05 12:06:49 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es.html 5 Jun 2015 12:06:50 -0000       
1.10
+++ philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es.html 29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      
1.11
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 conocimientos pueden evitarlo. Por ejemplo, se puede acceder a la mayoría de
 los vídeos que no son HTML5 utilizando <a href="/software/gnash/">Gnash</a>,
 y la mayor parte de los vídeos HTML5 se puede descargar con <a
-href="http://youtube-dl.org/";>youtube-dl</a>.</p>
+href="http://youtube-dl.org/";>youtube-dl</a> (o algún otro programa).</p>
 
    <p>Sin embargo, la mayoría de los usuarios no aplica estos métodos, de 
modo que
 subir vídeos a YouTube los conduce hacia el software que no es libre.</p>
@@ -135,11 +135,11 @@
 el envío de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2015/06/05 12:06:50 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.126
retrieving revision 1.127
diff -u -b -r1.126 -r1.127
--- philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html   24 Mar 2016 09:57:44 -0000      1.126
+++ philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html   29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      1.127
@@ -186,10 +186,10 @@
 
 <p>
 Curiosamente, Larry Ellison, un programador de software privativo, también
-<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-10052188-80.html";> notó la
-vaguedad de la expresión «computación en la nube»</a>. Aun así, decidió
-emplearla porque, como programador de software privativo, no le mueven los
-mismos ideales que a nosotros.
+<a href="http://www.cnet.com/news/oracles-ellison-nails-cloud-computing/";>
+notó la vaguedad de la expresión «computación en la nube»</a>. Aun así,
+decidió emplearla porque, como programador de software privativo, no le
+mueven los mismos ideales que a nosotros.
 </p>
 
 <h3 id="Commercial">«Comercial»</h3>
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@
 software con fines propagandísticos Llaman «industria» al desarrollo de
 software, y basándose en esa idea tratan de argumentar que el desarrollo de
 software debería estar sometido a los monopolios de las patentes. <a
-href="https://web.archive.org/web/20071211112325/http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/";
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20071215073111/http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/";
 title="archived version of http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/";>El
 Parlamento Europeo, cuando en 2003 rechazó las patentes de software, votó
 por definir «industria» como «producción automatizada de bienes
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2016/03/24 09:57:44 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.54
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -b -r1.54 -r1.55
--- philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.es-en.html        15 Dec 2015 12:10:00 
-0000      1.54
+++ philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.es-en.html        29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 
-0000      1.55
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
   for placing a purchase order over the internet</a>, with notes by Richard
   Stallman.</li>
 
-  <li><a href="http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";
+  <li><a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20000815064858/http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";
   id="SequentialIPandI">Sequential Innovation, Patents, and
   Imitation</a> is a paper that presents a mathematical model showing
   how patents can impede progress in fields like software.</li>
@@ -236,14 +236,14 @@
 
   <li><a href="/philosophy/guardian-article.html">Opposing The European
   Software Patent Directive</a>, a slightly modified version of the 
-  article originally published in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk";>
+  article originally published in <a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/international";>
   The Guardian</a> of London, by Richard Stallman and Nick Hill.</li>
 
-  <li><a 
href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/comment/story/0,12449,1540984,00.html";>
+  <li><a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/aug/02/comment.business";>
   Soft sell</a>. Richard Stallman's comments on the defeat of the EU 
   software patenting directive. Published in <i>The Guardian</i> in 2005.</li>
 
-  <li><a 
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2005/jun/23/onlinesupplement.insideit";>
+  <li><a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/jun/23/onlinesupplement.insideit";>
   Patent absurdity</a>, an article by Richard M. Stallman published in
   <i>The Guardian</i> in 2005.</li>
 
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@
   <li><a href="/philosophy/nonfree-games.html">Nonfree DRM'd Games on
   GNU/Linux: Good or Bad?</a> by Richard Stallman.</li>
 
-  <li> <a 
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/apr/06/digital-economy-bill-richard-stallman";>
+  <li> <a 
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2010/apr/06/digital-economy-bill-richard-stallman";>
   Digital economy bill: One clown giveth and the other clown taketh 
   away</a>, by Richard Stallman.</li>
 
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@
   Stallman (originally published under the title &ldquo;Second
   Sight&rdquo;).</li>
 
-  <li><a 
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070806183422/http://www.insnet.org/ins_headlines.rxml?cust=212&amp;id=967";>
+  <li><a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060721162054/http://www.insnet.org/ins_headlines.rxml?cust=212&amp;id=967";>
   Free Software and Sustainable Development</a> &mdash; A short
   article by Richard Stallman regarding the use of proprietary
   software in cultural development.</li>
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@
 information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 1996-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 1996-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/12/15 12:10:00 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/free-software-for-freedom.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-software-for-freedom.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- philosophy/po/free-software-for-freedom.es-en.html  18 Nov 2014 10:36:24 
-0000      1.26
+++ philosophy/po/free-software-for-freedom.es-en.html  29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 
-0000      1.27
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 
 <p>
 In 1998, some of the people in the free software community began using
-the term <a href="http://www.opensource.org/";>&ldquo;open source
+the term <a href="https://opensource.org/";>&ldquo;open source
 software&rdquo;</a> instead of <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">&ldquo;free
 software&rdquo;</a> to describe what they do.  The term &ldquo;open 
source&rdquo;
 quickly became associated with a different approach, a different
@@ -432,18 +432,18 @@
 information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2007 Free Software Foundation,
+<p>Copyright &copy; 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2007, 2016 Free Software 
Foundation,
 Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/11/18 10:36:24 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/gnutella.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/gnutella.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- philosophy/po/gnutella.es-en.html   12 Apr 2014 13:58:55 -0000      1.17
+++ philosophy/po/gnutella.es-en.html   29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      1.18
@@ -29,13 +29,13 @@
 <p>
 There are a number of free software programs that implement the
 Gnutella protocol, such as <a
-href="http://gtk-gnutella.sourceforge.net/";>gtk-gnutella</a>, <a
-href="http://mutella.sourceforge.net/";>mutella</a>, and <a
-href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucleus/";>gnucleus</a>.  Please
+href="http://gtk-gnutella.sourceforge.net/en/";>Gtk-Gnutella</a>, <a
+href="http://mutella.sourceforge.net/";>Mutella</a>, and <a
+href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucleus/";>Gnucleus</a>.  Please
 note, however, that none of these programs are officially <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.html#GNUsoftware">GNU software</a>
 either.  GNU has its own peer-to-peer networking program, <a
-href="/software/GNUnet/">GNUnet</a>, whose
+href="/software/gnunet/">GNUnet</a>, whose
 documentation includes a <a
 href="https://gnunet.org/compare";>comparison of the
 protocols</a>.</p>
@@ -86,17 +86,17 @@
 information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2004, 2005, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2004, 2005, 2007, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:58:55 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: 
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html     29 Jun 
2014 11:28:22 -0000      1.15
+++ philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html     29 Mar 
2016 16:00:37 -0000      1.16
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@
 <p>Non-SaaSS services can mistreat their users in other ways. Issues
 about a service can include whether it misuses the data you send it,
 and whether it collects other data
-(surveillance). The <a 
href="http://autonomo.us/2008/07/franklin-street-statement/";>Franklin
+(surveillance). The <a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090124084811/http://autonomo.us/2008/07/franklin-street-statement/";>Franklin
 Street Statement</a> made a stab at addressing these issues, but we
 don't have a firm position on them as yet. What's clear is that the
 issues about a service are <em>different</em> from the issues about a
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -180,17 +181,17 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2012, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/06/29 11:28:22 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/nonfree-games.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- philosophy/po/nonfree-games.es-en.html      2 Jan 2016 23:31:18 -0000       
1.15
+++ philosophy/po/nonfree-games.es-en.html      29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      
1.16
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 this have?</p>
 
 <p>I suppose that availability of popular nonfree programs on
-GNU/Linux can boost adoption of the system.  However, the aim of GNU
+the GNU/Linux system can boost adoption of the system.  However, the aim of GNU
 goes beyond &ldquo;success&rdquo;; its purpose is
 to <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"> bring
 freedom to the users </a>.  Thus, the larger question is how this
@@ -31,9 +31,11 @@
 
 <p>Nonfree game programs (like other nonfree programs) are unethical
 because they deny freedom to their users.  (Game art is a different
-issue, because it isn't software.)  If you want freedom, one requisite
-for it is not having or running nonfree programs on your computer.
-That much is clear.</p>
+issue, because
+it <a href="/philosophy/copyright-versus-community.html">isn't
+software</a>.)  If you want freedom, one requisite for it is not
+having or running nonfree programs on your computer.  That much is
+clear.</p>
 
 <p>However, if you're going to use these games, you're better off using
 them on GNU/Linux rather than on Microsoft Windows.  At least you avoid
@@ -137,7 +139,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/02 23:31:18 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/trivial-patent.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/trivial-patent.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- philosophy/po/trivial-patent.es-en.html     12 Apr 2014 13:59:54 -0000      
1.3
+++ philosophy/po/trivial-patent.es-en.html     29 Mar 2016 16:00:37 -0000      
1.4
@@ -235,14 +235,13 @@
 the software field do no good either.  What software patents do is put
 software developers and users under threat.</p>
 
-<p>The patent system is supposed, intended, to promote progress, and
-those who benefit from software patents ask us to believe without
-question that they do have that effect.  But programmers' experience
-shows otherwise.  New theoretical analysis shows that this is no paradox.
-(See <a href="http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";>
-http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf</a>.)  There is no reason
-why society should expose software developers and users to the danger
-of software patents.</p>
+<p>The patent system is supposed, intended, to promote progress, and those who
+benefit from software patents ask us to believe without question that they do
+have that effect. But programmers' experience shows otherwise. New theoretical
+analysis shows that this is no paradox. (See <a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20000815064858/http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf";>researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf</a>
+on web.archive.org.) There is no reason why society should expose software
+developers and users to the danger of software patents.</p>
 
 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 
@@ -275,17 +274,17 @@
 of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2006 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2006, 2016 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:54 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es-en.html   20 Mar 2015 16:57:59 
-0000      1.7
+++ philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.es-en.html   29 Mar 2016 16:00:38 
-0000      1.8
@@ -35,7 +35,9 @@
    doing so. For instance, you can access most non-HTML5 videos
    with
    <a href="/software/gnash/">Gnash</a>, and you can get most HTML5
-   videos with <a href="http://youtube-dl.org/";>youtube-dl</a>.</p>
+   videos with <a href="http://youtube-dl.org/";>youtube-dl</a> (or some
+   other programs).
+.</p>
 
    <p>However, most users don't use these methods, so putting a video
    on YouTube directs them towards nonfree software.</p>
@@ -116,17 +118,17 @@
 of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/03/20 16:57:59 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:38 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.75
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -b -r1.75 -r1.76
--- philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html     24 Mar 2016 09:57:44 -0000      
1.75
+++ philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html     29 Mar 2016 16:00:38 -0000      
1.76
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@
 
 <p>
 Curiously, Larry Ellison, a proprietary software developer,
-also <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-10052188-80.html";>
+also <a href="http://www.cnet.com/news/oracles-ellison-nails-cloud-computing/";>
 noted the vacuity of the term &ldquo;cloud computing.&rdquo;</a>  He
 decided to use the term anyway because, as a proprietary software
 developer, he isn't motivated by the same ideals as we are.
@@ -967,8 +967,9 @@
 The term &ldquo;industry&rdquo; is being used as propaganda by
 advocates of software patents.  They call software development
 &ldquo;industry&rdquo; and then try to argue that this means it should
-be subject to patent
-monopolies.  <a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20071211112325/http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/";
 title="archived version of http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/";> The
+be subject to patent monopolies.  <a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20071215073111/http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/";
+title="archived version of http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/";>The
 European Parliament, rejecting software patents in 2003, voted to
 define &ldquo;industry&rdquo; as &ldquo;automated production of
 material goods.&rdquo;</a></p>
@@ -1122,7 +1123,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/03/24 09:57:44 $
+$Date: 2016/03/29 16:00:38 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: software/recent-releases-include.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/recent-releases-include.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.855
retrieving revision 1.856
diff -u -b -r1.855 -r1.856
--- software/recent-releases-include.ru.html    29 Mar 2016 14:58:27 -0000      
1.855
+++ software/recent-releases-include.ru.html    29 Mar 2016 16:00:38 -0000      
1.856
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
 <ul>
-<li><strong>March 29, 2016</strong>
+<li><strong>29 марта 2016</strong>
 <ul>
 <li><a
-href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-03/msg00015.html";>GNU
-Guix &amp; GuixSD 0.10.0 released</a>, <i>Ludovic Courtès</i>,
-<tt>09:31</tt></li>
+href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-03/msg00015.html";>Выпущены
+GNU Guix &amp; GuixSD 0.10.0</a>, <i>Людовик Курте</i>, 
<tt>09:31</tt></li>
 </ul></li>
 <li><strong>28 марта 2016</strong>
 <ul>

Index: software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.1167
retrieving revision 1.1168
diff -u -b -r1.1167 -r1.1168
--- software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po   29 Mar 2016 15:32:15 -0000      
1.1167
+++ software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po   29 Mar 2016 16:00:38 -0000      
1.1168
@@ -14,30 +14,20 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-03-29 14:56+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <strong>March 2[-8-]{+9+}, 2016</strong>
-#| msgid "<strong>March 28, 2016</strong>"
 msgid "<strong>March 29, 2016</strong>"
 msgstr "<strong>29 марта 2016</strong>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li><ul><li>
-# | <a
-# | 
[-href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2015-11/msg00002.html\";>GNU-]
-# | 
{+href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-03/msg00015.html\";>GNU+}
-# | Guix [-0.9.0-] {+&amp; GuixSD 0.10.0+} released</a>, <i>Ludovic
-# | Courtès</i>, [-<tt>09:10</tt>-] {+<tt>09:31</tt>+}
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2015-11/msg00002.html";
-#| "\">GNU Guix 0.9.0 released</a>, <i>Ludovic Courtès</i>, <tt>09:10</tt>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-03/msg00015.html";
 "\">GNU Guix &amp; GuixSD 0.10.0 released</a>, <i>Ludovic Courtès</i>, "
 "<tt>09:31</tt>"
 msgstr ""
 "<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-03/msg00015.html";
-"\">Выпущены GNU Guix &amp; GuixSD 0.10.0</a>, <i>Людовик 
Курте</i>, <tt>09:31</tt>"
+"\">Выпущены GNU Guix &amp; GuixSD 0.10.0</a>, <i>Людовик 
Курте</i>, "
+"<tt>09:31</tt>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid "<strong>March 28, 2016</strong>"
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]