[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy free-doc.ca.html free-doc.fa.htm...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy free-doc.ca.html free-doc.fa.htm... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 16/02/29 21:00:28
Modified files:
philosophy : free-doc.ca.html free-doc.fa.html
free-doc.hr.html free-doc.nl.html
free-doc.zh-cn.html nonfree-games.el.html
nonfree-games.pl.html
push-copyright-aside.nl.html
push-copyright-aside.pl.html
right-to-read.ca.html right-to-read.el.html
philosophy/po : free-doc.fa-diff.html free-doc.hr-diff.html
free-doc.nl-diff.html free-doc.zh-cn-diff.html
push-copyright-aside.nl-diff.html
right-to-read.ca-diff.html
Added files:
philosophy/po : free-doc.ca-diff.html
nonfree-games.el-diff.html
nonfree-games.pl-diff.html
push-copyright-aside.pl-diff.html
right-to-read.el-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-doc.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-doc.fa.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-doc.hr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-doc.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-doc.zh-cn.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/nonfree-games.el.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/nonfree-games.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/right-to-read.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/right-to-read.el.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.fa-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.zh-cn-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/right-to-read.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.el-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/right-to-read.el-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: free-doc.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-doc.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- free-doc.ca.html 21 May 2015 07:17:57 -0000 1.33
+++ free-doc.ca.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.34
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-doc.ca.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-doc.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/free-doc.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
<h2>Per què el programari lliure necessita documentació lliure</h2>
<blockquote class="note">
@@ -225,7 +231,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2015/05/21 07:17:57 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: free-doc.fa.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-doc.fa.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- free-doc.fa.html 5 Mar 2015 09:27:12 -0000 1.5
+++ free-doc.fa.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.6
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-doc.fa.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-doc.fa.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/free-doc.fa-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.fa.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.fa.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.fa.html" -->
<h2>Úرا ÙرÙ
اÙزار آزاد ÙÛاز ب٠Ù
ستÙدات آزاد
دارد</h2>
<blockquote class="note">
@@ -220,7 +226,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
آخرÛ٠ب٠رÙز رساÙÛ:
-$Date: 2015/03/05 09:27:12 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: free-doc.hr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-doc.hr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- free-doc.hr.html 21 May 2015 07:17:58 -0000 1.15
+++ free-doc.hr.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.16
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-doc.hr.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-doc.hr.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/free-doc.hr-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.hr.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.hr.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.hr.html" -->
<h2>Zašto slobodan softver treba slobodnu dokumentaciju</h2>
<blockquote class="note">
@@ -223,7 +229,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Zadnji put promijenjeno:
-$Date: 2015/05/21 07:17:58 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: free-doc.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-doc.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- free-doc.nl.html 9 Feb 2015 21:02:56 -0000 1.15
+++ free-doc.nl.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.16
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-doc.nl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-doc.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/free-doc.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>Waarom Vrije Software Vrije Handleidingen nodig heeft</h2>
<blockquote class="note">
@@ -224,7 +230,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2015/02/09 21:02:56 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: free-doc.zh-cn.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-doc.zh-cn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- free-doc.zh-cn.html 5 Jul 2014 04:58:38 -0000 1.16
+++ free-doc.zh-cn.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.17
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-doc.zh-cn.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-doc.zh-cn.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/free-doc.zh-cn-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-doc.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.zh-cn.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.zh-cn.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.zh-cn.html" -->
<h2>为ä»ä¹èªç±è½¯ä»¶éè¦èªç±æå</h2>
<blockquote class="note">
@@ -154,7 +160,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
æåæ´æ°ï¼
-$Date: 2014/07/05 04:58:38 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: nonfree-games.el.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/nonfree-games.el.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- nonfree-games.el.html 2 May 2015 23:27:18 -0000 1.1
+++ nonfree-games.el.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/nonfree-games.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.el.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.el.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/nonfree-games.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.el-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/nonfree-games.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.el.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.el.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.el.html" -->
<h2>Îη-ελεÏθεÏα Ïαιγνίδια με DRM ÏÏο GNU/Linux:
ÎÎ±Î»Ï Î® ÎακÏ;</h2>
<p>αÏÏ Ïον <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard Stallman</a></p>
@@ -177,7 +183,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ÎνημεÏÏθηκε:
-$Date: 2015/05/02 23:27:18 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: nonfree-games.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/nonfree-games.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- nonfree-games.pl.html 27 Jun 2014 21:58:23 -0000 1.8
+++ nonfree-games.pl.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.9
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/nonfree-games.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.pl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/nonfree-games.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/nonfree-games.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Niewolne gry z DRM na GNU/Linuksa: Dobre czy zÅe?</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard Stallman</a></p>
@@ -169,7 +175,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2014/06/27 21:58:23 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: push-copyright-aside.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- push-copyright-aside.nl.html 9 Feb 2015 21:03:01 -0000 1.14
+++ push-copyright-aside.nl.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:26 -0000 1.15
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.en.html"
-->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.nl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>De Wetenschap Moet Het Auteursrecht Terzijde Schuiven</h2>
<p>door <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong></p>
@@ -208,7 +214,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2015/02/09 21:03:01 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: push-copyright-aside.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- push-copyright-aside.pl.html 6 Sep 2014 05:04:06 -0000 1.31
+++ push-copyright-aside.pl.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:27 -0000 1.32
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.en.html"
-->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Nauka musi odsunÄ
Ä na bok prawa autorskie</h2>
<p><strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong></p>
@@ -231,7 +237,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2014/09/06 05:04:06 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:27 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: right-to-read.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/right-to-read.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- right-to-read.ca.html 6 Jan 2015 11:58:01 -0000 1.30
+++ right-to-read.ca.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:27 -0000 1.31
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.ca.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/right-to-read.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/right-to-read.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
<h2>El dret a llegir</h2>
<p>
@@ -454,7 +460,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2015/01/06 11:58:01 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:27 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: right-to-read.el.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/right-to-read.el.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- right-to-read.el.html 24 Apr 2015 15:59:56 -0000 1.1
+++ right-to-read.el.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:27 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.el.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/right-to-read.el.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/right-to-read.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.el-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-31" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.el.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.el.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.el.html" -->
<h2>Το δικαίÏμα ÏÏην ανάγνÏÏη</h2>
<p>
@@ -497,7 +503,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ÎνημεÏÏθηκε:
-$Date: 2015/04/24 15:59:56 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:27 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/free-doc.fa-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.fa-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/free-doc.fa-diff.html 28 Oct 2014 21:57:00 -0000 1.1
+++ po/free-doc.fa-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.2
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
price. The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly
Associates charged a price for printed copies—that in itself is
fine. (The Free Software Foundation
-<a href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells printed
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://shop.fsf.org/category/books/">sells</em></ins></span>
printed
copies</a> of free <a href="/doc/doc.html">GNU manuals</a>,
too.) But
GNU manuals are available in source code form, while these manuals are
available only on paper. GNU manuals come with permission to copy and
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -206,17 +206,18 @@
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2005, 2006, 2007, 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2005, 2006, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2009</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2009, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/10/28 21:57:00 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/free-doc.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/free-doc.hr-diff.html 31 Jan 2014 06:32:46 -0000 1.1
+++ po/free-doc.hr-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.2
@@ -11,16 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.75
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation</h2>
-<div style="text-align: center; font-size: 110%;text-shadow: 0 0 0.2em
#fff; width: 300px; float: right; margin: 12px; background-color: #a0f112;
color: #353831; padding: 1em;"><a
href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our mailing list about
the dangers of eBooks</a>.</div>
+<blockquote class="note">
+<p><a href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our
mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
<ul>
<li><a href="/copyleft/fdl.html">The GNU Free Documentation
License</a></li>
@@ -66,7 +68,7 @@
price. The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly
Associates charged a price for printed copies—that in itself is
fine. (The Free Software Foundation
-<a href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells printed
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://shop.fsf.org/category/books/">sells</em></ins></span>
printed
copies</a> of free <a href="/doc/doc.html">GNU manuals</a>,
too.) But
GNU manuals are available in source code form, while these manuals are
available only on paper. GNU manuals come with permission to copy and
@@ -156,25 +158,16 @@
[Note: We maintain a <a href="/doc/other-free-books.html">page
that lists free books available from other publishers</a>].</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -193,10 +186,11 @@
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>
+</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -211,28 +205,22 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2005, 2006, 2007, 2009 Free Software Foundation, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+2005, 2006, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2009</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2009, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<p>Updated:
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/01/31 06:32:46 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- All pages on the GNU web server
should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Index: po/free-doc.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/free-doc.nl-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:58:40 -0000 1.4
+++ po/free-doc.nl-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,20 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><div style="text-align: center;
font-size: 110%;text-shadow: 0 0 0.2em #fff; width: 300px; float: right;
margin: 12px; background-color: #a0f112; color: #353831; padding:
1em;"><a</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote class="note">
-<p><a</em></ins></span>
href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our mailing list about
the dangers of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>eBooks</a>.</div></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>eBooks</a>.</p>
-</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+<blockquote class="note">
+<p><a href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our
mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
<ul>
<li><a href="/copyleft/fdl.html">The GNU Free Documentation
License</a></li>
@@ -70,7 +68,7 @@
price. The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly
Associates charged a price for printed copies—that in itself is
fine. (The Free Software Foundation
-<a href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells printed
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://shop.fsf.org/category/books/">sells</em></ins></span>
printed
copies</a> of free <a href="/doc/doc.html">GNU manuals</a>,
too.) But
GNU manuals are available in source code form, while these manuals are
available only on paper. GNU manuals come with permission to copy and
@@ -160,26 +158,16 @@
[Note: We maintain a <a href="/doc/other-free-books.html">page
that lists free books available from other publishers</a>].</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -202,7 +190,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -217,30 +205,22 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2005, 2006, 2007, 2009 Free Software Foundation, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+2005, 2006, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2009</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2009, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:58:40 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- All pages on the GNU web server
should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Index: po/free-doc.zh-cn-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.zh-cn-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/free-doc.zh-cn-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:58:41 -0000 1.4
+++ po/free-doc.zh-cn-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,20 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><div style="text-align: center;
font-size: 110%;text-shadow: 0 0 0.2em #fff; width: 300px; float: right;
margin: 12px; background-color: #a0f112; color: #353831; padding:
1em;"><a</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote class="note">
-<p><a</em></ins></span>
href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our mailing list about
the dangers of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>eBooks</a>.</div></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>eBooks</a>.</p>
-</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+<blockquote class="note">
+<p><a href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our
mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
<ul>
<li><a href="/copyleft/fdl.html">The GNU Free Documentation
License</a></li>
@@ -70,7 +68,7 @@
price. The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly
Associates charged a price for printed copies—that in itself is
fine. (The Free Software Foundation
-<a href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells printed
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://shop.fsf.org/category/books/">sells</em></ins></span>
printed
copies</a> of free <a href="/doc/doc.html">GNU manuals</a>,
too.) But
GNU manuals are available in source code form, while these manuals are
available only on paper. GNU manuals come with permission to copy and
@@ -160,26 +158,16 @@
[Note: We maintain a <a href="/doc/other-free-books.html">page
that lists free books available from other publishers</a>].</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -202,7 +190,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -217,30 +205,22 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2005, 2006, 2007, 2009 Free Software Foundation, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+2005, 2006, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2009</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2009, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:58:41 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- All pages on the GNU web server
should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Index: po/push-copyright-aside.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/push-copyright-aside.nl-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:41 -0000
1.2
+++ po/push-copyright-aside.nl-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000
1.3
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Science must “push copyright aside”
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Science must push copyright aside</h2>
@@ -125,7 +125,8 @@
<p>Some universities have adopted policies to thwart the journal
publishers' power. For instance, here is MIT's.<br/>
-<a
href="http://info-libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/">http://info-libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/</a>.
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://info-libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/">http://info-libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/</a>.</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/
+">http://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/</a>.</em></ins></span>
Stronger policies are needed, however, as this one permits individual
authors to "opt out" (i.e., cave in).</p>
@@ -143,29 +144,20 @@
<p>However, the word "open" had the last laugh: influential
campaigners for "open access" subsequently dropped freedom to
redistribute from their goals. I stand by the position of
-the <a href="http://www.soros.org/openaccess">BOAI</a>, but now
that
+the <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.soros.org/openaccess">BOAI</a>,</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/">BOAI</a>,</em></ins></span>
but now that
"open access" means something else, I refer to it as "redistributable
publication" or "free-to-mirror publication".</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
-<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</em></ins></span>
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -179,44 +171,23 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright © 2001, 2012 Richard M. Stallman
-<br />
-This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
-
-<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-
-<p>Updated:
-<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:41 $
-<!-- timestamp end -->
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p></em></ins></span>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
-<!-- <span class="removed"><del><strong>All</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Regarding copyright, in general,
standalone</em></ins></span> pages <span class="inserted"><ins><em>(as opposed
to
- files generated as part of manuals)</em></ins></span> on the GNU web
server should <span class="removed"><del><strong>have the section about
-->
-<!-- verbatim copying.</strong></del></span>
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>be under CC BY-ND 3.0
US.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT <span class="inserted"><ins><em>change
or</em></ins></span> remove this
- without talking <span class="removed"><del><strong>-->
-<!--</strong></del></span> with the webmasters <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>or licensing team</em></ins></span> first. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>-->
-<!--</strong></del></span>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>document. For web pages, it is ok to
list just the latest year the</em></ins></span>
- document <span class="removed"><del><strong>-->
-<!-- and</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>was
modified, or published.
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
- If you wish to list earlier years,</em></ins></span> that <span
class="removed"><del><strong>it</strong></del></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>like this</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>ok too.
- Either</em></ins></span> "2001, <span class="removed"><del><strong>2002"
not this "2001-2002."</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
@@ -224,20 +195,21 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2001, 2012 Richard M. Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2001, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2012</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2012, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Richard M.
Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
-<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html"</em></ins></span> -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:41 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
-</div></em></ins></span>
+</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Index: po/right-to-read.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/right-to-read.ca-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/right-to-read.ca-diff.html 25 Aug 2013 19:28:52 -0000 1.2
+++ po/right-to-read.ca-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.3
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.75
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>The Right to Read
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>The Right to Read</h2>
@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@
<p>
by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard
Stallman</strong></a></p>
-<div style="text-align: center; font-size: 110%;text-shadow: 0 0 0.2em
#fff; width: 300px; float: right; margin: 12px; background-color: #a0f112;
color: #353831; padding: 1em;"><a
href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our mailing list about
the dangers of eBooks</a>.</div>
+<blockquote class="note">
+<p><a href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our
mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
<p>
<em>This article appeared in the February 1997 issue
@@ -162,10 +164,21 @@
universal right to read soon became one of its central aims.</p>
-<h3 id="AuthorsNote">Author's Note</h3>
+<h3 id="AuthorsNote">Author's Notes</h3>
-<p>[This note has been updated several times since the first
-publication of the story.]</p>
+<ul>
+<li>This story is supposedly a historical article that will be written in
+the future by someone else, describing Dan Halbert's youth under a
+repressive society shaped by the enemies that use “pirate” as
+propaganda. So it uses the terminology of that society.
+I have tried to project it from today so as to sound even more
+oppressive. See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy">“Piracy”</a>.
+</li>
+
+<li>
+<p>The following note has been updated several times since the first
+publication of the story.</p>
<p>
The right to read is a battle being fought today. Although it may
@@ -198,7 +211,7 @@
the danger is once again higher.</p>
<p>
-In 2001 the US began attempting to use the proposed Free Trade Area of
+In 2001 the US began attempting to use the proposed <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Free Trade</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“Free Trade”</em></ins></span> Area of
the Americas (FTAA) treaty to impose the same rules on all the countries in
the Western Hemisphere. The FTAA is one of the so-called free
trade treaties, which are actually designed to give business
@@ -288,6 +301,8 @@
<p>
This is an interesting approach to the Fourth Amendment: pressure most
everyone to agree, in advance, to waive their rights under it.</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
<h3 id="BadNews">Bad News</h3>
@@ -317,7 +332,7 @@
<p>If we want to stop the bad news and create some good news, we need
to organize and fight. The
FSF's <a href="http://defectivebydesign.org"> Defective by
Design</a>
-campaign has made a start — subscribe to the campaign's mailing
+campaign has made a <span class="removed"><del><strong>start
—</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>start;</em></ins></span> subscribe to the campaign's
mailing
list to lend a hand. And <a href="http://www.fsf.org/associate">join
the FSF</a> to help fund our work.
</p>
@@ -338,21 +353,21 @@
<li><a
href="http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/sold_out.htm">Sold Out</a>,
James Boyle, New York Times, 31 March 1996</li>
- <li><a <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130508120533/http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/199611/msg00012.html">Public
Data or Private Data</a>,
+ <li><a
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130508120533/http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/199611/msg00012.html">Public
Data or Private Data</a>,
Washington Post, 4 Nov 1996. </li>
- <li><a</em></ins></span>
href="http://www.public-domain.org/">Union for the Public
+ <li><a href="http://www.public-domain.org/">Union for the Public
Domain</a>—an organization which aims to resist and
reverse the overextension of copyright and patent powers.</li>
</ul>
<hr />
-<h4>This essay is published
+<blockquote id="fsfs"><p class="big">This essay is published
in <a
href="http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"><cite>Free
Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays of Richard
-M. Stallman</cite></a>.</h4>
+M. Stallman</cite></a>.</p></blockquote>
-<p><strong>Other Texts to Read</strong></p>
+<h5>Other Texts to Read</h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.html">Philosophy of the
@@ -362,25 +377,16 @@
Published in Computer World.</li>
</ul>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -394,19 +400,16 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -421,20 +424,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1996, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2010
Richard <span class="removed"><del><strong>Stallman
-<br />
-This</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Stallman</p>
-
-<p>This</em></ins></span> page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2010, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Richard
Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<p>Updated:
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/08/25 19:28:52 $
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/free-doc.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/free-doc.ca-diff.html
diff -N po/free-doc.ca-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/free-doc.ca-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/free-doc.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-doc.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+
+<h2>Why Free Software needs Free Documentation</h2>
+
+<blockquote class="note">
+<p><a href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our
mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<ul>
+<li><a href="/copyleft/fdl.html">The GNU Free Documentation
License</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+The biggest deficiency in free operating systems is not in the
+software—it is the lack of good free manuals that we can include
+in these systems. Many of our most important programs do not come
+with full manuals. Documentation is an essential part of any software
+package; when an important free software package does not come with a
+free manual, that is a major gap. We have many such gaps today.</p>
+
+<p>
+Once upon a time, many years ago, I thought I would learn Perl. I got
+a copy of a free manual, but I found it hard to read. When I asked
+Perl users about alternatives, they told me that there were better
+introductory manuals—but those were not free.</p>
+
+<p>
+Why was this? The authors of the good manuals had written them for
+O'Reilly Associates, which published them with restrictive
+terms—no copying, no modification, source files not
+available—which exclude them from the free software
+community.</p>
+
+<p>
+That wasn't the first time this sort of thing has happened, and (to
+our community's great loss) it was far from the last. Proprietary
+manual publishers have enticed a great many authors to restrict their
+manuals since then. Many times I have heard a GNU user eagerly tell
+me about a manual that he is writing, with which he expects to help
+the GNU Project—and then had my hopes dashed, as he proceeded to
+explain that he had signed a contract with a publisher that would
+restrict it so that we cannot use it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Given that writing good English is a rare skill among programmers, we
+can ill afford to lose manuals this way.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free documentation, like free software, is a matter of freedom, not
+price. The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly
+Associates charged a price for printed copies—that in itself is
+fine. (The Free Software Foundation
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation">sells</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://shop.fsf.org/category/books/">sells</em></ins></span>
printed
+copies</a> of free <a href="/doc/doc.html">GNU manuals</a>,
too.) But
+GNU manuals are available in source code form, while these manuals are
+available only on paper. GNU manuals come with permission to copy and
+modify; the Perl manuals do not. These restrictions are the
problems.</p>
+
+<p>
+The criterion for a free manual is pretty much the same as for free
+software: it is a matter of giving all users certain freedoms.
+Redistribution (including commercial redistribution) must be
+permitted, so that the manual can accompany every copy of the program,
+on line or on paper. Permission for modification is crucial too.</p>
+
+<p>
+As a general rule, I don't believe that it is essential for people to
+have permission to modify all sorts of articles and books. The issues
+for writings are not necessarily the same as those for software. For
+example, I don't think you or I are obliged to give permission to
+modify articles like this one, which describe our actions and our
+views.</p>
+
+<p>
+But there is a particular reason why the freedom to modify is crucial
+for documentation for free software. When people exercise their right
+to modify the software, and add or change its features, if they are
+conscientious they will change the manual too—so they can provide
+accurate and usable documentation with the modified program. A manual
+which forbids programmers from being conscientious and finishing the job, or
+more precisely requires them to write a new manual from scratch if
+they change the program, does not fill our community's needs.</p>
+
+<p>
+While a blanket prohibition on modification is unacceptable, some
+kinds of limits on the method of modification pose no problem. For
+example, requirements to preserve the original author's copyright
+notice, the distribution terms, or the list of authors, are OK. It is
+also no problem to require modified versions to include notice that
+they were modified, even to have entire sections that may not be
+deleted or changed, as long as these sections deal with nontechnical
+topics. (Some GNU manuals have them.)</p>
+
+<p>
+These kinds of restrictions are not a problem because, as a practical
+matter, they don't stop the conscientious programmer from adapting the
+manual to fit the modified program. In other words, they don't block
+the free software community from making full use of the manual.</p>
+
+<p>
+However, it must be possible to modify all the <em>technical</em>
+content of the manual, and then distribute the result through all the usual
+media, through all the usual channels; otherwise, the restrictions do
+block the community, the manual is not free, and so we need another
+manual.</p>
+
+<p>
+Unfortunately, it is often hard to find someone to write another
+manual when a proprietary manual exists. The obstacle is that many
+users think that a proprietary manual is good enough—so they
+don't see the need to write a free manual. They do not see that the
+free operating system has a gap that needs filling.</p>
+
+<p>
+Why do users think that proprietary manuals are good enough? Some
+have not considered the issue. I hope this article will do something
+to change that.</p>
+
+<p>
+Other users consider proprietary manuals acceptable for the same
+reason so many people consider proprietary software acceptable: they
+judge in purely practical terms, not using freedom as a criterion.
+These people are entitled to their opinions, but since those opinions
+spring from values which do not include freedom, they are no guide for
+those of us who do value freedom.</p>
+
+<p>
+Please spread the word about this issue. We continue to lose manuals
+to proprietary publishing. If we spread the word that proprietary
+manuals are not sufficient, perhaps the next person who wants to help
+GNU by writing documentation will realize, before it is too late, that
+he must above all make it free.</p>
+
+<p>
+We can also encourage commercial publishers to sell free, copylefted
+manuals instead of proprietary ones. One way you can help this is to
+check the distribution terms of a manual before you buy it, and
+prefer copylefted manuals to noncopylefted ones.</p>
+<p>
+[Note: We maintain a <a href="/doc/other-free-books.html">page
+that lists free books available from other publishers</a>].</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+2005, 2006, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2009</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2009, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/nonfree-games.el-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/nonfree-games.el-diff.html
diff -N po/nonfree-games.el-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/nonfree-games.el-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/nonfree-games.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Nonfree DRM'd Games on GNU/Linux: Good or Bad?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Nonfree DRM'd Games on GNU/Linux: Good or Bad?</h2>
+
+<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard
Stallman</a></p>
+
+<p>A well known company, Valve, that distributes nonfree computer games
+with Digital Restrictions Management, recently announced it would
+distribute these games for GNU/Linux. What good and bad effects can
+this have?</p>
+
+<p>I suppose that availability of popular nonfree programs on
+GNU/Linux can boost adoption of the system. However, the aim of GNU
+goes beyond “success”; its purpose is
+to <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"> bring
+freedom to the users </a>. Thus, the larger question is how this
+development affects users' freedom.</p>
+
+<p>The problem with these games
+is not that <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Commercial"> they
are
+commercial</a>. (We see nothing wrong with that.) It
+is not that <a href="/philosophy/selling.html"> the developers
+sell copies</a>; that's not wrong either. The problem is that the
+games contain software that is
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">not free</a>
+(free in the sense of freedom, of course).</p>
+
+<p>Nonfree game programs (like other nonfree programs) are unethical
+because they deny freedom to their users. (Game art is a different
+issue, because it isn't software.) If you want freedom, one requisite
+for it is not having or running nonfree programs on your computer.
+That much is clear.</p>
+
+<p>However, if you're going to use these games, you're better off using
+them on GNU/Linux rather than on Microsoft Windows. At least you avoid
+<a href="http://upgradefromwindows8.org/">the harm to your freedom that
Windows
+would do</a>.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, in direct practical terms, this development can do both harm
+and good. It might encourage GNU/Linux users to install these games,
+and it might encourage users of the games to replace Windows with
+GNU/Linux. My guess is that the direct good effect will be bigger than
+the direct harm. But there is also an indirect effect: what does the
+use of these games teach people in our community?</p>
+
+<p>Any GNU/Linux distro that comes with software to offer these games
+will teach users that the point is not freedom. <a
+href="/distros/common-distros.html">Nonfree software in GNU/Linux
+distros</a> already works against the goal of freedom. Adding these
+games to a distro would augment that effect.</p>
+
+<p>Free software is a matter of freedom, not price. A free game need
+not be gratis. It is feasible to develop free games commercially,
+while respecting your freedom to change the software you use. Since
+the art in the game is not software, it <span
class="removed"><del><strong>does</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>need</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>ethically imperative</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>be
+free.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>make the art free — though free art is
an additional
+contribution.</em></ins></span> There is in fact free game software developed
by
+companies, as well as free games developed noncommercially by
+volunteers. Crowdfunding development will only get easier.</p>
+
+<p>But if we suppose that it is <em>not feasible</em> in the
current
+situation to develop a certain
+kind of free game — what would follow then? There's no good in
+writing it as a nonfree game. To have freedom in your computing,
+requires rejecting nonfree software, pure and simple.
+You as a freedom-lover won't use the nonfree game if it exists, so
+you won't lose anything if it does not exist.</p>
+
+<p>If you want to promote the cause of freedom in computing, please
+take care not to talk about the availability of these games on
+GNU/Linux as support for our cause. Instead you could tell people
+about the <a href="https://libregamewiki.org/Main_Page">libre games
+wiki</a> that attempts to catalog free
+games, <a href="http://forum.freegamedev.net/index.php"> the Free Game
+Dev Forum</a>, and the LibrePlanet Gaming
+Collective's <a
href="http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:LibrePlanet_Gaming_Collective">
+free gaming night.</a> </p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/nonfree-games.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/nonfree-games.pl-diff.html
diff -N po/nonfree-games.pl-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/nonfree-games.pl-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/nonfree-games.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Nonfree DRM'd Games on GNU/Linux: Good or Bad?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Nonfree DRM'd Games on GNU/Linux: Good or Bad?</h2>
+
+<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard
Stallman</a></p>
+
+<p>A well known company, Valve, that distributes nonfree computer games
+with Digital Restrictions Management, recently announced it would
+distribute these games for GNU/Linux. What good and bad effects can
+this have?</p>
+
+<p>I suppose that availability of popular nonfree programs on
+GNU/Linux can boost adoption of the system. However, the aim of GNU
+goes beyond “success”; its purpose is
+to <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"> bring
+freedom to the users </a>. Thus, the larger question is how this
+development affects users' freedom.</p>
+
+<p>The problem with these games
+is not that <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Commercial"> they
are
+commercial</a>. (We see nothing wrong with that.) It
+is not that <a href="/philosophy/selling.html"> the developers
+sell copies</a>; that's not wrong either. The problem is that the
+games contain software that is
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">not free</a>
+(free in the sense of freedom, of course).</p>
+
+<p>Nonfree game programs (like other nonfree programs) are unethical
+because they deny freedom to their users. (Game art is a different
+issue, because it isn't software.) If you want freedom, one requisite
+for it is not having or running nonfree programs on your computer.
+That much is clear.</p>
+
+<p>However, if you're going to use these games, you're better off using
+them on GNU/Linux rather than on Microsoft Windows. At least you avoid
+<a href="http://upgradefromwindows8.org/">the harm to your freedom that
Windows
+would do</a>.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, in direct practical terms, this development can do both harm
+and good. It might encourage GNU/Linux users to install these games,
+and it might encourage users of the games to replace Windows with
+GNU/Linux. My guess is that the direct good effect will be bigger than
+the direct harm. But there is also an indirect effect: what does the
+use of these games teach people in our community?</p>
+
+<p>Any GNU/Linux distro that comes with software to offer these games
+will teach users that the point is not freedom. <a
+href="/distros/common-distros.html">Nonfree software in GNU/Linux
+distros</a> already works against the goal of freedom. Adding these
+games to a distro would augment that effect.</p>
+
+<p>Free software is a matter of freedom, not price. A free game need
+not be gratis. It is feasible to develop free games commercially,
+while respecting your freedom to change the software you use. Since
+the art in the game is not software, it <span
class="removed"><del><strong>does</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>need</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>ethically imperative</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>be
+free.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>make the art free — though free art is
an additional
+contribution.</em></ins></span> There is in fact free game software developed
by
+companies, as well as free games developed noncommercially by
+volunteers. Crowdfunding development will only get easier.</p>
+
+<p>But if we suppose that it is <em>not feasible</em> in the
current
+situation to develop a certain
+kind of free game — what would follow then? There's no good in
+writing it as a nonfree game. To have freedom in your computing,
+requires rejecting nonfree software, pure and simple.
+You as a freedom-lover won't use the nonfree game if it exists, so
+you won't lose anything if it does not exist.</p>
+
+<p>If you want to promote the cause of freedom in computing, please
+take care not to talk about the availability of these games on
+GNU/Linux as support for our cause. Instead you could tell people
+about the <a href="https://libregamewiki.org/Main_Page">libre games
+wiki</a> that attempts to catalog free
+games, <a href="http://forum.freegamedev.net/index.php"> the Free Game
+Dev Forum</a>, and the LibrePlanet Gaming
+Collective's <a
href="http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:LibrePlanet_Gaming_Collective">
+free gaming night.</a> </p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/push-copyright-aside.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/push-copyright-aside.pl-diff.html
diff -N po/push-copyright-aside.pl-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/push-copyright-aside.pl-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Science must “push copyright aside”
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Science must push copyright aside</h2>
+
+<p>by <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong></p>
+
+<p><em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom
must be
+universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in
+different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles
+related to software freedom to the area of literature.
+Generally, such issues are orthogonal to software freedom, but we
+include essays like this here since many people interested in Free
+Software want to know more about how the principles can be applied to
+areas other than software.</em></p>
+
+<p>(This article appeared in <em>Nature</em> magazine's
+<b>web</b>debates forum in 2001.)</p>
+
+<p>It should be a truism that the scientific literature exists to
+disseminate scientific knowledge, and that scientific journals exist
+to facilitate the process. It therefore follows that rules for use of
+the scientific literature should be designed to help achieve that
+goal.</p>
+
+<p>The rules we have now, known as copyright, were established in the
+age of the printing press, an inherently centralized method of
+mass-production copying. In a print environment, copyright on journal
+articles restricted only journal publishers—requiring them to
+obtain permission to publish an article—and would-be
+plagiarists. It helped journals to operate and disseminate knowledge,
+without interfering with the useful work of scientists or students,
+either as writers or readers of articles. These rules fit that system
+well.</p>
+
+<p>The modern technology for scientific publishing, however, is the
+World Wide Web. What rules would best ensure the maximum
+dissemination of scientific articles, and knowledge, on the web?
+Articles should be distributed in nonproprietary formats, with open
+access for all. And everyone should have the right to
+“mirror” articles—that is, to republish them verbatim
+with proper attribution.</p>
+
+<p>These rules should apply to past as well as future articles, when
+they are distributed in electronic form. But there is no crucial need
+to change the present copyright system as it applies to paper
+publication of journals because the problem is not in that domain.</p>
+
+<p>Unfortunately, it seems that not everyone agrees with the truisms
+that began this article. Many journal publishers appear to believe
+that the purpose of scientific literature is to enable them to publish
+journals so as to collect subscriptions from scientists and
+students. Such thinking is known as “confusion of the means with
+the ends”.</p>
+
+<p>Their approach has been to restrict access even to read the
+scientific literature to those who can and will pay for it. They use
+copyright law, which is still in force despite its inappropriateness
+for computer networks, as an excuse to stop scientists from choosing
+new rules.</p>
+
+<p>For the sake of scientific cooperation and humanity's future, we
+must reject that approach at its root—not merely the
+obstructive systems that have been instituted, but the mistaken
+priorities that inspired them.</p>
+
+<p>Journal publishers sometimes claim that online access requires
+expensive high-powered server machines, and that they must charge
+access fees to pay for these servers. This “problem” is a
+consequence of its own “solution.” Give everyone the
+freedom to mirror, and libraries around the world will set up mirror
+sites to meet the demand. This decentralized solution will reduce
+network bandwidth needs and provide faster access, all the while
+protecting the scholarly record against accidental loss.</p>
+
+<p>Publishers also argue that paying the editors requires charging for
+access. Let us accept the assumption that editors must be paid; this
+tail need not wag the dog. The cost of editing for a typical paper is
+between 1 percent and 3 percent of the cost of funding the research to produce
+it. Such a small percentage of the cost can hardly justify obstructing
+the use of the results.</p>
+
+<p>Instead, the cost of editing could be recovered, for example,
+through page charges to the authors, who can pass these on to the
+research sponsors. The sponsors should not mind, given that they
+currently pay for publication in a more cumbersome way, through
+overhead fees for the university library's subscription to the
+journal. By changing the economic model to charge editing costs to the
+research sponsors, we can eliminate the apparent need to restrict
+access. The occasional author who is not affiliated with an
+institution or company, and who has no research sponsor, could be
+exempted from page charges, with costs levied on institution-based
+authors.</p>
+
+<p>Another justification for access fees to online publications is to
+fund conversion of the print archives of a journal into online
+form. That work needs to be done, but we should seek alternative ways
+of funding it that do not involve obstructing access to the
+result. The work itself will not be any more difficult, or cost any
+more. It is self-defeating to digitize the archives and waste the
+results by restricting access.</p>
+
+<p>The US Constitution says that copyright exists “to promote
+the Progress of Science”. When copyright impedes the progress of
+science, science must push copyright out of the way.</p>
+
+<hr />
+
+Later developments:
+
+<p>Some universities have adopted policies to thwart the journal
+publishers' power. For instance, here is MIT's.<br/>
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://info-libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/">http://info-libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/</a>.</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/
+">http://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-at-mit/mit-open-access-policy/</a>.</em></ins></span>
+Stronger policies are needed, however, as this one permits individual
+authors to "opt out" (i.e., cave in).</p>
+
+<p>The US government has imposed a requirement known as "public
+access" on some funded research. This requires publication within a
+certain period in a site that allows anyone to view the article. This
+requirement is a positive step, but inadequate because it does not
+include freedom to redistribute the article.</p>
+
+<p>Curiously, the concept of "open access" in the 2002 Budapest Open
+Access Initiative did include freedom to redistribute. I signed that
+declaration, despite my distaste for the word "open", because the
+substance of the position was right.</p>
+
+<p>However, the word "open" had the last laugh: influential
+campaigners for "open access" subsequently dropped freedom to
+redistribute from their goals. I stand by the position of
+the <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.soros.org/openaccess">BOAI</a>,</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/">BOAI</a>,</em></ins></span>
but now that
+"open access" means something else, I refer to it as "redistributable
+publication" or "free-to-mirror publication".</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2001, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2012</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2012, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Richard M.
Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/right-to-read.el-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/right-to-read.el-diff.html
diff -N po/right-to-read.el-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/right-to-read.el-diff.html 29 Feb 2016 21:00:28 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,445 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/right-to-read.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>The Right to Read
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/right-to-read.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>The Right to Read</h2>
+
+<p>
+by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard
Stallman</strong></a></p>
+
+<blockquote class="note">
+<p><a href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join our
mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>
+<em>This article appeared in the February 1997 issue
+of <strong>Communications of the ACM</strong> (Volume 40, Number
+2).</em></p>
+
+<blockquote><p>
+ From <cite>The Road To Tycho</cite>, a collection of
+ articles about the antecedents of the Lunarian
+ Revolution, published in Luna City in 2096.
+</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>
+For Dan Halbert, the road to Tycho began in college—when Lissa
+Lenz asked to borrow his computer. Hers had broken down, and unless
+she could borrow another, she would fail her midterm project. There
+was no one she dared ask, except Dan.</p>
+
+<p>
+This put Dan in a dilemma. He had to help her—but if he lent
+her his computer, she might read his books. Aside from the fact that
+you could go to prison for many years for letting someone else read
+your books, the very idea shocked him at first. Like everyone, he had
+been taught since elementary school that sharing books was nasty and
+wrong—something that only pirates would do.</p>
+
+<p>
+And there wasn't much chance that the SPA—the Software
+Protection Authority—would fail to catch him. In his software
+class, Dan had learned that each book had a copyright monitor that
+reported when and where it was read, and by whom, to Central
+Licensing. (They used this information to catch reading pirates, but
+also to sell personal interest profiles to retailers.) The next time
+his computer was networked, Central Licensing would find out. He, as
+computer owner, would receive the harshest punishment—for not
+taking pains to prevent the crime.</p>
+
+<p>
+Of course, Lissa did not necessarily intend to read his books. She
+might want the computer only to write her midterm. But Dan knew she
+came from a middle-class family and could hardly afford the tuition,
+let alone her reading fees. Reading his books might be the only way
+she could graduate. He understood this situation; he himself had had
+to borrow to pay for all the research papers he read. (Ten percent of those
+fees went to the researchers who wrote the papers; since Dan aimed for
+an academic career, he could hope that his own research papers, if
+frequently referenced, would bring in enough to repay this loan.)</p>
+
+<p>
+Later on, Dan would learn there was a time when anyone could go to the
+library and read journal articles, and even books, without having to
+pay. There were independent scholars who read thousands of pages
+without government library grants. But in the 1990s, both commercial
+and nonprofit journal publishers had begun charging fees for access.
+By 2047, libraries offering free public access to scholarly literature
+were a dim memory.</p>
+
+<p>
+There were ways, of course, to get around the SPA and Central
+Licensing. They were themselves illegal. Dan had had a classmate in
+software, Frank Martucci, who had obtained an illicit debugging tool,
+and used it to skip over the copyright monitor code when reading
+books. But he had told too many friends about it, and one of them
+turned him in to the SPA for a reward (students deep in debt were
+easily tempted into betrayal). In 2047, Frank was in prison, not for
+pirate reading, but for possessing a debugger.</p>
+
+<p>
+Dan would later learn that there was a time when anyone could have
+debugging tools. There were even free debugging tools available on CD
+or downloadable over the net. But ordinary users started using them
+to bypass copyright monitors, and eventually a judge ruled that this
+had become their principal use in actual practice. This meant they
+were illegal; the debuggers' developers were sent to prison.</p>
+
+<p>
+Programmers still needed debugging tools, of course, but debugger
+vendors in 2047 distributed numbered copies only, and only to
+officially licensed and bonded programmers. The debugger Dan used in
+software class was kept behind a special firewall so that it could be
+used only for class exercises.</p>
+
+<p>
+It was also possible to bypass the copyright monitors by installing a
+modified system kernel. Dan would eventually find out about the free
+kernels, even entire free operating systems, that had existed around
+the turn of the century. But not only were they illegal, like
+debuggers—you could not install one if you had one, without
+knowing your computer's root password. And neither
+the <abbr title="Federal Bureau of Investigation">FBI</abbr> nor
+Microsoft Support would tell you that.</p>
+
+<p>
+Dan concluded that he couldn't simply lend Lissa his computer. But he
+couldn't refuse to help her, because he loved her. Every chance to
+speak with her filled him with delight. And that she chose him to ask
+for help, that could mean she loved him too.</p>
+
+<p>
+Dan resolved the dilemma by doing something even more
+unthinkable—he lent her the computer, and told her his password.
+This way, if Lissa read his books, Central Licensing would think he
+was reading them. It was still a crime, but the SPA would not
+automatically find out about it. They would only find out if Lissa
+reported him.</p>
+
+<p>
+Of course, if the school ever found out that he had given Lissa his
+own password, it would be curtains for both of them as students,
+regardless of what she had used it for. School policy was that any
+interference with their means of monitoring students' computer use was
+grounds for disciplinary action. It didn't matter whether you did
+anything harmful—the offense was making it hard for the
+administrators to check on you. They assumed this meant you were
+doing something else forbidden, and they did not need to know what it
+was.</p>
+
+<p>
+Students were not usually expelled for this—not directly.
+Instead they were banned from the school computer systems, and would
+inevitably fail all their classes.</p>
+
+<p>
+Later, Dan would learn that this kind of university policy started
+only in the 1980s, when university students in large numbers began
+using computers. Previously, universities maintained a different
+approach to student discipline; they punished activities that were
+harmful, not those that merely raised suspicion.</p>
+
+<p>
+Lissa did not report Dan to the SPA. His decision to help her led to
+their marriage, and also led them to question what they had been
+taught about piracy as children. The couple began reading about the
+history of copyright, about the Soviet Union and its restrictions on
+copying, and even the original United States Constitution. They moved
+to Luna, where they found others who had likewise gravitated away from
+the long arm of the SPA. When the Tycho Uprising began in 2062, the
+universal right to read soon became one of its central aims.</p>
+
+
+<h3 id="AuthorsNote">Author's Notes</h3>
+
+<ul>
+<li>This story is supposedly a historical article that will be written in
+the future by someone else, describing Dan Halbert's youth under a
+repressive society shaped by the enemies that use “pirate” as
+propaganda. So it uses the terminology of that society.
+I have tried to project it from today so as to sound even more
+oppressive. See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy">“Piracy”</a>.
+</li>
+
+<li>
+<p>The following note has been updated several times since the first
+publication of the story.</p>
+
+<p>
+The right to read is a battle being fought today. Although it may
+take 50 years for our present way of life to fade into obscurity, most
+of the specific laws and practices described above have already been
+proposed; many have been enacted into law in the US and elsewhere. In
+the US, the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) established the legal
+basis to restrict the reading and lending of computerized books (and
+other works as well). The European Union imposed similar restrictions
+in a 2001 copyright directive. In France, under the DADVSI law
+adopted in 2006, mere possession of a copy of DeCSS, the free program
+to decrypt video on a DVD, is a crime.</p>
+
+<p>
+In 2001, Disney-funded Senator Hollings proposed a bill called the
+SSSCA that would require every new computer to have mandatory
+copy-restriction facilities that the user cannot bypass. Following
+the Clipper chip and similar US government key-escrow proposals, this
+shows a long-term trend: computer systems are increasingly set up to
+give absentees with clout control over the people actually using the
+computer system. The SSSCA was later renamed to the unpronounceable
+CBDTPA, which was glossed as the “Consume But Don't Try
+Programming Act”.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The Republicans took control of the US senate shortly thereafter.
+They are less tied to Hollywood than the Democrats, so they did not
+press these proposals. Now that the Democrats are back in control,
+the danger is once again higher.</p>
+
+<p>
+In 2001 the US began attempting to use the proposed <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Free Trade</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“Free Trade”</em></ins></span> Area of
+the Americas (FTAA) treaty to impose the same rules on all the countries in
+the Western Hemisphere. The FTAA is one of the so-called free
+trade treaties, which are actually designed to give business
+increased power over democratic governments; imposing laws like the
+DMCA is typical of this spirit. The FTAA was effectively killed by
+Lula, President of Brazil, who rejected the DMCA requirement and
+others.</p>
+
+<p>
+Since then, the US has imposed similar requirements on countries such
+as Australia and Mexico through bilateral “free trade”
+agreements, and on countries such as Costa Rica through another
+treaty, CAFTA. Ecuador's President Correa refused to sign a
+“free trade” agreement with the US, but I've heard Ecuador
+had adopted something like the DMCA in 2003.</p>
+
+<p>
+One of the ideas in the story was not proposed in reality until 2002.
+This is the idea that the <abbr>FBI</abbr> and Microsoft will keep
the
+root passwords for your personal computers, and not let you have
+them.</p>
+
+<p>
+The proponents of this scheme have given it names such as
+“trusted computing” and “Palladium”. We call
+it <a href="/philosophy/can-you-trust.html">“treacherous
+computing”</a> because the effect is to make your computer obey
+companies even to the extent of disobeying and defying you. This was
+implemented in 2007 as part of <a href="http://badvista.org/">Windows
+Vista</a>; we expect Apple to do something similar. In this scheme,
+it is the manufacturer that keeps the secret code, but
+the <abbr>FBI</abbr> would have little trouble getting
it.</p>
+
+<p>
+What Microsoft keeps is not exactly a password in the traditional
+sense; no person ever types it on a terminal. Rather, it is a
+signature and encryption key that corresponds to a second key stored
+in your computer. This enables Microsoft, and potentially any web
+sites that cooperate with Microsoft, the ultimate control over what
+the user can do on his own computer.</p>
+
+<p>
+Vista also gives Microsoft additional powers; for instance, Microsoft
+can forcibly install upgrades, and it can order all machines running
+Vista to refuse to run a certain device driver. The main purpose of
+Vista's many restrictions is to impose DRM (Digital Restrictions
+Management) that users can't overcome. The threat of DRM is why we
+have established the <a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org">
+Defective by Design</a> campaign.</p>
+
+<p>
+When this story was first written, the SPA was threatening small
+Internet service providers, demanding they permit the SPA to monitor
+all users. Most ISPs surrendered when threatened, because they cannot
+afford to fight back in court. One ISP, Community ConneXion in
+Oakland, California, refused the demand and was actually sued. The
+SPA later dropped the suit, but obtained the DMCA, which gave them the
+power they sought.</p>
+
+<p>
+The SPA, which actually stands for Software Publishers Association,
+has been replaced in its police-like role by the Business
+Software Alliance. The BSA is not, today, an official police force;
+unofficially, it acts like one. Using methods reminiscent of the
+erstwhile Soviet Union, it invites people to inform on their coworkers
+and friends. A BSA terror campaign in Argentina in 2001 made
+slightly veiled threats that people sharing software would be raped.</p>
+
+<p>
+The university security policies described above are not imaginary.
+For example, a computer at one Chicago-area university displayed this
+message upon login:</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>
+This system is for the use of authorized users only. Individuals using
+this computer system without authority or in the excess of their authority
+are subject to having all their activities on this system monitored and
+recorded by system personnel. In the course of monitoring individuals
+improperly using this system or in the course of system maintenance, the
+activities of authorized user may also be monitored. Anyone using this
+system expressly consents to such monitoring and is advised that if such
+monitoring reveals possible evidence of illegal activity or violation of
+University regulations system personnel may provide the evidence of such
+monitoring to University authorities and/or law enforcement officials.
+</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>
+This is an interesting approach to the Fourth Amendment: pressure most
+everyone to agree, in advance, to waive their rights under it.</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="BadNews">Bad News</h3>
+
+<p>
+The battle for the right to read is already in progress,
+The enemy is organized, while we are not, so it is going against us.
+Here are articles about bad things that have happened since the
+original publication of this article.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Today's commercial ebooks <a
href="/philosophy/the-danger-of-ebooks.html">
+ abolish readers' traditional freedoms.</a></li>
+<li><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature_education/biology.html">
+ A "biology textbook" web site</a> that you can access only by
signing
+ a <a href="http://www.nature.com/principles/viewTermsOfUse">
+ contract not to lend it to anyone else</a>, which the publisher can
+ revoke at will.</li>
+<li><a
href="http://www.zdnet.com/news/seybold-opens-chapter-on-digital-books/103151">Electronic
+ Publishing:</a> An article about distribution of books in
+ electronic form, and copyright issues affecting the right to read
+ a copy.</li>
+<li><a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/1999/Aug99/SeyboldPR.aspx">Books
+ inside Computers:</a> Software to control who can read
+ books and documents on a PC.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>If we want to stop the bad news and create some good news, we need
+to organize and fight. The
+FSF's <a href="http://defectivebydesign.org"> Defective by
Design</a>
+campaign has made a <span class="removed"><del><strong>start
—</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>start;</em></ins></span> subscribe to the campaign's
mailing
+list to lend a hand. And <a href="http://www.fsf.org/associate">join
+the FSF</a> to help fund our work.
+</p>
+
+<h3 id="References">References</h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>The administration's “White Paper”: Information
+ Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property [<a
+ href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html">sic</a>] and the
+ National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working
+ Group on Intellectual Property [sic] Rights (1995).</li>
+
+ <li><a
href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.01/white.paper_pr.html">An
+ explanation of the White Paper:
+ The Copyright Grab</a>, Pamela Samuelson, Wired, Jan.
1996</li>
+
+ <li><a
href="http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/sold_out.htm">Sold Out</a>,
+ James Boyle, New York Times, 31 March 1996</li>
+
+ <li><a
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130508120533/http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/199611/msg00012.html">Public
Data or Private Data</a>,
+ Washington Post, 4 Nov 1996. </li>
+
+ <li><a href="http://www.public-domain.org/">Union for the Public
+ Domain</a>—an organization which aims to resist and
+ reverse the overextension of copyright and patent powers.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<hr />
+<blockquote id="fsfs"><p class="big">This essay is published
+in <a
href="http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"><cite>Free
+Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays of Richard
+M. Stallman</cite></a>.</p></blockquote>
+
+<h5>Other Texts to Read</h5>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.html">Philosophy of the
+ GNU Project</a></li>
+ <li><a
href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/49358/Copy_Protection_Just_Say_No";
+ id="COPYPROCTECTION">Copy Protection: Just Say No</a>,
+ Published in Computer World.</li>
+</ul>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2010, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Richard
Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/29 21:00:28 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy free-doc.ca.html free-doc.fa.htm...,
GNUN <=