[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses translations.es.html why-not-lgpl....
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/licenses translations.es.html why-not-lgpl.... |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:48:01 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 16/02/18 10:48:01
Modified files:
licenses : translations.es.html why-not-lgpl.ar.html
why-not-lgpl.bg.html why-not-lgpl.ca.html
why-not-lgpl.ko.html why-not-lgpl.nl.html
why-not-lgpl.pl.html why-not-lgpl.ro.html
licenses/po : translations.es-en.html
why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html
why-not-lgpl.ko-diff.html
why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html
Added files:
licenses/po : why-not-lgpl.ar-diff.html
why-not-lgpl.bg-diff.html
why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html
why-not-lgpl.ro-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/translations.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.69&r2=1.70
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.bg.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ko.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.50&r2=1.51
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ro.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/translations.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.39&r2=1.40
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ko-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.bg-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ro-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: translations.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/translations.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.69
retrieving revision 1.70
diff -u -b -r1.69 -r1.70
--- translations.es.html 27 Oct 2015 07:10:29 -0000 1.69
+++ translations.es.html 18 Feb 2016 10:44:59 -0000 1.70
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
<li><!-- RT #816348 -->
<code>[ar]</code> Traducción de la GPL al <a
href="http://fairsultan.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/gpl-3-0-ar1.pdf";>
-árabo</a>.</li>
+árabe</a>.</li>
<!-- hidden problematic links (Visual Basic), commercial site, no
distribution terms
<li>
@@ -224,6 +224,13 @@
<li>
<code>[ro]</code> <a
href="http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_(licen%C8%9Ba,_versiunea_3)">Romanian</a></li>
-->
+<li>
+
+ <!-- RT #1086113 -->
+<code>[da]</code> <a
+href="http://netkoder.dk/licenser/gpl-3.0.da.txt";>Danés</a>, <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";> <address@hidden></a></li>
+
<!-- RT #784370 -->
<li><code>[ru]</code> <a href="http://rusgpl.ru/";>Ruso</a></li>
</ul>
@@ -433,7 +440,7 @@
</div>
<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010,
-2011, 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2011, 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
@@ -448,7 +455,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2015/10/27 07:10:29 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:44:59 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- why-not-lgpl.ar.html 8 Nov 2014 22:00:01 -0000 1.21
+++ why-not-lgpl.ar.html 18 Feb 2016 10:45:20 -0000 1.22
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ar.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
<h2>ÙÙ
اذا Ùجب Ø£Ùا تستخدÙ
غÙ٠اÙعÙ
ÙÙ
ÙØ© اÙصغرÙ
ÙÙ
Ùتبت٠اÙÙادÙ
Ø©</h2>
<p>
@@ -140,7 +146,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ØÙدÙثت:
-$Date: 2014/11/08 22:00:01 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:45:20 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.bg.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.bg.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- why-not-lgpl.bg.html 29 Dec 2014 09:29:45 -0000 1.19
+++ why-not-lgpl.bg.html 18 Feb 2016 10:45:31 -0000 1.20
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.bg.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.bg.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.bg-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.bg.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.bg.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.bg.html" -->
<h2>ÐаÑо не ÑÑÑбва да използваÑе Lesser GPL за
ÑледваÑаÑа Ñи библиоÑека</h2>
<p>
@@ -150,7 +156,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ÐоÑледно обновÑване:
-$Date: 2014/12/29 09:29:45 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:45:31 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- why-not-lgpl.ca.html 5 Jun 2014 15:31:20 -0000 1.24
+++ why-not-lgpl.ca.html 18 Feb 2016 10:45:43 -0000 1.25
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
<h2>Per què no haurÃeu d'utilitzar la Llicència Pública General Reduïda
per a la
vostra pròxima biblioteca</h2>
@@ -153,7 +159,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2014/06/05 15:31:20 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:45:43 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.ko.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ko.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- why-not-lgpl.ko.html 5 Jul 2014 04:58:33 -0000 1.18
+++ why-not-lgpl.ko.html 18 Feb 2016 10:45:50 -0000 1.19
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ko.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ko.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ko-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ko.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ko.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ko.html" -->
<h2>ë¼ì´ë¸ë¬ë¦¬ì LGPLì ì¬ì©íì§ ë§ìì¼ íë ì´ì </h2>
<p>
@@ -124,7 +130,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ìµì¢
ìì ì¼:
-$Date: 2014/07/05 04:58:33 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:45:50 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- why-not-lgpl.nl.html 9 Feb 2015 21:02:54 -0000 1.15
+++ why-not-lgpl.nl.html 18 Feb 2016 10:46:05 -0000 1.16
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>Waarom je voor je volgende bibliotheek niet de Lesser GPL zou moeten
gebruiken</h2>
@@ -147,7 +153,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2015/02/09 21:02:54 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:46:05 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -b -r1.50 -r1.51
--- why-not-lgpl.pl.html 6 Sep 2014 05:03:57 -0000 1.50
+++ why-not-lgpl.pl.html 18 Feb 2016 10:46:16 -0000 1.51
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Czemu nie należy stosowaÄ Lesser GPL dla kolejnej biblioteki</h2>
<p>
@@ -165,7 +171,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2014/09/06 05:03:57 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:46:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-not-lgpl.ro.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.ro.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- why-not-lgpl.ro.html 16 Mar 2015 16:01:00 -0000 1.5
+++ why-not-lgpl.ro.html 18 Feb 2016 10:46:26 -0000 1.6
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ro.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ro.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ro-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-12-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ro.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -10,6 +15,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ro.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ro.html" -->
<h2>De ce n-ar trebui sÄ folosiÅ£i LicenÅ£a PublicÄ GNU RedusÄ (Lesser GPL)
pentru
urmÄtoarea d-voastrÄ librÄrie</h2>
@@ -163,7 +169,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Actualizat la:
-$Date: 2015/03/16 16:01:00 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:46:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/translations.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/translations.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -b -r1.39 -r1.40
--- po/translations.es-en.html 27 Oct 2015 07:11:11 -0000 1.39
+++ po/translations.es-en.html 18 Feb 2016 10:46:47 -0000 1.40
@@ -202,7 +202,12 @@
<!-- wikipedia links; the distribution terms are CC-BY-SA
<li><code>[ro]</code> <a
href="http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_(licen%C8%9Ba,_versiunea_3)">Romanian</a></li>
-->
-
+<li>
+ <!-- RT #1086113 -->
+ <code>[da]</code>
+ <a href="http://netkoder.dk/licenser/gpl-3.0.da.txt";>Danish</a>,
+ <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+ <address@hidden></a></li>
<!-- RT #784370 -->
<li><code>[ru]</code> <a href="http://rusgpl.ru/";>Russian</a></li>
</ul>
@@ -376,7 +381,7 @@
</div>
<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009,
-2010, 2011, 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2010, 2011, 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -386,7 +391,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/10/27 07:11:11 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:46:47 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html 4 Jun 2014 00:29:32 -0000 1.1
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.ca-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:18 -0000 1.2
@@ -11,13 +11,19 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.76</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.77</em></ins></span> -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
+choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
+recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
+</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+
<p>
The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
is the GNU Lesser GPL; the other is the ordinary GNU GPL. The choice
@@ -118,7 +124,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -133,19 +139,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2014</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong><p></p><p</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p</em></ins></span>
class="unprintable">Updated:
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/06/04 00:29:32 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:18 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.ko-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.ko-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/why-not-lgpl.ko-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:54:43 -0000 1.4
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.ko-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:31 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,20 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
+choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
+recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
+</blockquote></em></ins></span>
<p>
The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
@@ -94,31 +92,16 @@
have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
better against the competition.</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
-
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
<span class="removed"><del><strong>(or suggestions)</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>or suggestions can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -132,20 +115,16 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -160,22 +139,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1999, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2007</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2007, 2013, 2014</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:54:43 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:31 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:54:43 -0000 1.4
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.nl-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:39 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,20 +11,18 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
+choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
+recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
+</blockquote></em></ins></span>
<p>
The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
@@ -94,31 +92,16 @@
have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
better against the competition.</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
-
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
<span class="removed"><del><strong>(or suggestions)</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>or suggestions can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -132,20 +115,16 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -160,22 +139,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1999, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2007</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2007, 2013, 2014</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:54:43 $
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-not-lgpl.ar-diff.html
diff -N po/why-not-lgpl.ar-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.ar-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:46:57 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
+choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
+recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
+</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
+is the GNU Lesser GPL; the other is the ordinary GNU GPL. The choice
+of license makes a big difference: using the Lesser GPL permits use
+of the library in proprietary programs; using the ordinary GPL for a
+library makes it available only for free programs.</p>
+<p>
+Which license is best for a given library is a matter of strategy, and
+it depends on the details of the situation. At present, most GNU
+libraries are covered by the Lesser GPL, and that means we are using
+only one of these two strategies, neglecting the other. So we are
+now seeking more libraries to release <strong>under the ordinary
GPL</strong>.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers have the advantage of money; free
+software developers need to make advantages for each other. Using the
+ordinary GPL for a library gives free software developers an advantage
+over proprietary developers: a library that they can use, while
+proprietary developers cannot use it.</p>
+<p>
+Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
+are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
+cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
+readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
+particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
+library.</p>
+<p>
+This is why we used the Lesser GPL for the GNU C library. After all,
+there are plenty of other C libraries; using the GPL for ours would
+have driven proprietary software developers to use another—no problem
+for them, only for us.</p>
+<p>
+However, when a library provides a significant unique capability, like
+GNU Readline, that's a horse of a different color. The Readline
+library implements input editing and history for interactive programs,
+and that's a facility not generally available elsewhere. Releasing it
+under the GPL and limiting its use to free programs gives our
+community a real boost. At least one application program is free
+software today specifically because that was necessary for using
+Readline.</p>
+<p>
+If we amass a collection of powerful GPL-covered libraries that have
+no parallel available to proprietary software, they will provide a
+range of useful modules to serve as building blocks in new free
+programs. This will be a significant advantage for further free
+software development, and some projects will decide to make software
+free in order to use these libraries. University projects can easily
+be influenced; nowadays, as companies begin to consider making
+software free, even some commercial projects can be influenced in this
+way.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers, seeking to deny the free competition
+an important advantage, will try to convince authors not to contribute
+libraries to the GPL-covered collection. For example, they may appeal
+to the ego, promising “more users for this library” if we
+let them use the code in proprietary software products. Popularity is
+tempting, and it is easy for a library developer to rationalize the
+idea that boosting the popularity of that one library is what the
+community needs above all.</p>
+<p>
+But we should not listen to these temptations, because we can achieve
+much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
+support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
+software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
+the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
+better against the competition.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:46:57 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.bg-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-not-lgpl.bg-diff.html
diff -N po/why-not-lgpl.bg-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.bg-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:04 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
+choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
+recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
+</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
+is the GNU Lesser GPL; the other is the ordinary GNU GPL. The choice
+of license makes a big difference: using the Lesser GPL permits use
+of the library in proprietary programs; using the ordinary GPL for a
+library makes it available only for free programs.</p>
+<p>
+Which license is best for a given library is a matter of strategy, and
+it depends on the details of the situation. At present, most GNU
+libraries are covered by the Lesser GPL, and that means we are using
+only one of these two strategies, neglecting the other. So we are
+now seeking more libraries to release <strong>under the ordinary
GPL</strong>.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers have the advantage of money; free
+software developers need to make advantages for each other. Using the
+ordinary GPL for a library gives free software developers an advantage
+over proprietary developers: a library that they can use, while
+proprietary developers cannot use it.</p>
+<p>
+Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
+are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
+cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
+readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
+particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
+library.</p>
+<p>
+This is why we used the Lesser GPL for the GNU C library. After all,
+there are plenty of other C libraries; using the GPL for ours would
+have driven proprietary software developers to use another—no problem
+for them, only for us.</p>
+<p>
+However, when a library provides a significant unique capability, like
+GNU Readline, that's a horse of a different color. The Readline
+library implements input editing and history for interactive programs,
+and that's a facility not generally available elsewhere. Releasing it
+under the GPL and limiting its use to free programs gives our
+community a real boost. At least one application program is free
+software today specifically because that was necessary for using
+Readline.</p>
+<p>
+If we amass a collection of powerful GPL-covered libraries that have
+no parallel available to proprietary software, they will provide a
+range of useful modules to serve as building blocks in new free
+programs. This will be a significant advantage for further free
+software development, and some projects will decide to make software
+free in order to use these libraries. University projects can easily
+be influenced; nowadays, as companies begin to consider making
+software free, even some commercial projects can be influenced in this
+way.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers, seeking to deny the free competition
+an important advantage, will try to convince authors not to contribute
+libraries to the GPL-covered collection. For example, they may appeal
+to the ego, promising “more users for this library” if we
+let them use the code in proprietary software products. Popularity is
+tempting, and it is easy for a library developer to rationalize the
+idea that boosting the popularity of that one library is what the
+community needs above all.</p>
+<p>
+But we should not listen to these temptations, because we can achieve
+much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
+support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
+software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
+the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
+better against the competition.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:04 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html
diff -N po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.pl-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:43 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
+choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
+recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
+</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
+is the GNU Lesser GPL; the other is the ordinary GNU GPL. The choice
+of license makes a big difference: using the Lesser GPL permits use
+of the library in proprietary programs; using the ordinary GPL for a
+library makes it available only for free programs.</p>
+<p>
+Which license is best for a given library is a matter of strategy, and
+it depends on the details of the situation. At present, most GNU
+libraries are covered by the Lesser GPL, and that means we are using
+only one of these two strategies, neglecting the other. So we are
+now seeking more libraries to release <strong>under the ordinary
GPL</strong>.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers have the advantage of money; free
+software developers need to make advantages for each other. Using the
+ordinary GPL for a library gives free software developers an advantage
+over proprietary developers: a library that they can use, while
+proprietary developers cannot use it.</p>
+<p>
+Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
+are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
+cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
+readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
+particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
+library.</p>
+<p>
+This is why we used the Lesser GPL for the GNU C library. After all,
+there are plenty of other C libraries; using the GPL for ours would
+have driven proprietary software developers to use another—no problem
+for them, only for us.</p>
+<p>
+However, when a library provides a significant unique capability, like
+GNU Readline, that's a horse of a different color. The Readline
+library implements input editing and history for interactive programs,
+and that's a facility not generally available elsewhere. Releasing it
+under the GPL and limiting its use to free programs gives our
+community a real boost. At least one application program is free
+software today specifically because that was necessary for using
+Readline.</p>
+<p>
+If we amass a collection of powerful GPL-covered libraries that have
+no parallel available to proprietary software, they will provide a
+range of useful modules to serve as building blocks in new free
+programs. This will be a significant advantage for further free
+software development, and some projects will decide to make software
+free in order to use these libraries. University projects can easily
+be influenced; nowadays, as companies begin to consider making
+software free, even some commercial projects can be influenced in this
+way.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers, seeking to deny the free competition
+an important advantage, will try to convince authors not to contribute
+libraries to the GPL-covered collection. For example, they may appeal
+to the ego, promising “more users for this library” if we
+let them use the code in proprietary software products. Popularity is
+tempting, and it is easy for a library developer to rationalize the
+idea that boosting the popularity of that one library is what the
+community needs above all.</p>
+<p>
+But we should not listen to these temptations, because we can achieve
+much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
+support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
+software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
+the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
+better against the competition.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:43 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-not-lgpl.ro-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-not-lgpl.ro-diff.html
diff -N po/why-not-lgpl.ro-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-not-lgpl.ro-diff.html 18 Feb 2016 10:47:52 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library</h2>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote><p>
+See <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">“How to
+choose a license for your own work”</a> for general
+recommendations about choosing a license for your work.</p>
+</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One
+is the GNU Lesser GPL; the other is the ordinary GNU GPL. The choice
+of license makes a big difference: using the Lesser GPL permits use
+of the library in proprietary programs; using the ordinary GPL for a
+library makes it available only for free programs.</p>
+<p>
+Which license is best for a given library is a matter of strategy, and
+it depends on the details of the situation. At present, most GNU
+libraries are covered by the Lesser GPL, and that means we are using
+only one of these two strategies, neglecting the other. So we are
+now seeking more libraries to release <strong>under the ordinary
GPL</strong>.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers have the advantage of money; free
+software developers need to make advantages for each other. Using the
+ordinary GPL for a library gives free software developers an advantage
+over proprietary developers: a library that they can use, while
+proprietary developers cannot use it.</p>
+<p>
+Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
+are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
+cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
+readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
+particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
+library.</p>
+<p>
+This is why we used the Lesser GPL for the GNU C library. After all,
+there are plenty of other C libraries; using the GPL for ours would
+have driven proprietary software developers to use another—no problem
+for them, only for us.</p>
+<p>
+However, when a library provides a significant unique capability, like
+GNU Readline, that's a horse of a different color. The Readline
+library implements input editing and history for interactive programs,
+and that's a facility not generally available elsewhere. Releasing it
+under the GPL and limiting its use to free programs gives our
+community a real boost. At least one application program is free
+software today specifically because that was necessary for using
+Readline.</p>
+<p>
+If we amass a collection of powerful GPL-covered libraries that have
+no parallel available to proprietary software, they will provide a
+range of useful modules to serve as building blocks in new free
+programs. This will be a significant advantage for further free
+software development, and some projects will decide to make software
+free in order to use these libraries. University projects can easily
+be influenced; nowadays, as companies begin to consider making
+software free, even some commercial projects can be influenced in this
+way.</p>
+<p>
+Proprietary software developers, seeking to deny the free competition
+an important advantage, will try to convince authors not to contribute
+libraries to the GPL-covered collection. For example, they may appeal
+to the ego, promising “more users for this library” if we
+let them use the code in proprietary software products. Popularity is
+tempting, and it is easy for a library developer to rationalize the
+idea that boosting the popularity of that one library is what the
+community needs above all.</p>
+<p>
+But we should not listen to these temptations, because we can achieve
+much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
+support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
+software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
+the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
+better against the competition.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/02/18 10:47:52 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses translations.es.html why-not-lgpl....,
GNUN <=