[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy copyright-versus-community.html
From: |
Jeanne Rasata |
Subject: |
www/philosophy copyright-versus-community.html |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:07:24 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Jeanne Rasata <jrasata> 15/12/31 20:07:24
Modified files:
philosophy : copyright-versus-community.html
Log message:
added RMS footnote
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/copyright-versus-community.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.34&r2=1.35
Patches:
Index: copyright-versus-community.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/copyright-versus-community.html,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -b -r1.34 -r1.35
--- copyright-versus-community.html 26 Nov 2015 11:25:27 -0000 1.34
+++ copyright-versus-community.html 31 Dec 2015 20:07:24 -0000 1.35
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@
<p>But what about the second category, of works that say what certain
people thought, like memoirs, essays of opinion, scientific papers,
-and various other things? To publish a modified version of somebody
+and various other things?<a href="#footnote2">[2]</a> To publish a modified
version of somebody
else's statement of what he thought is misrepresenting [that]
somebody. That's not particularly a contribution to society.</p>
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@
our freedom.</p>
<p>Demand that they change the two evil parts of the New Zealand Copyright Act.
-They shouldn't replace the three strikes punishment<a
href="#footnote2">[2]</a>, because sharing is
+They shouldn't replace the three strikes punishment<a
href="#footnote3">[2]</a>, because sharing is
good, and they've got to get rid of the censorship for the software to break
DRM. Beware of ACTA—they're trying to negotiate a treaty between various
countries, for all of these countries to attack their citizens, and we don't
@@ -944,7 +944,14 @@
<ol>
<li id="footnote1">In 2010, the encryption system for digital video output was
definitively cracked.<br /><a
href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2369280,00.asp">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2369280,00.asp</a></li>
-<li id="footnote2">New Zealand had enacted a system of punishment
+<li id="footnote2">(2015) I included scientific papers because I
+thought that publishing modified versions of someone else's paper
+would cause harm; however, publishing physics and math papers under
+the Creative Commons Attribution license
+on <a href="arxiv.org">arxiv.org</a> and many libre journals seems to
+have no problems. Thus, I subsequently concluded that scientific
+papers ought to be free.</li>
+<li id="footnote3">New Zealand had enacted a system of punishment
without trial for Internet users accused of copying; then, facing
popular protest, the government did not implement it, and announced a
plan to implement a modified unjust punishment system. The point here
@@ -1013,7 +1020,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/11/26 11:25:27 $
+$Date: 2015/12/31 20:07:24 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
- www/philosophy copyright-versus-community.html,
Jeanne Rasata <=