[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html m...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html m... |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:59:09 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 15/12/15 18:59:09
Modified files:
philosophy : microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html
microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.html
philosophy/po : microsoft-new-monopoly.nl-diff.html
Added files:
philosophy/po : microsoft-new-monopoly.ca-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html 23 May 2015 06:10:57 -0000 1.30
+++ microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html 15 Dec 2015 18:59:06 -0000 1.31
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.en.html"
-->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-10-16" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
<h2>El nou monopoli de Microsoft</h2>
<p>per <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>Richard
Stallman</strong></a></p>
@@ -211,7 +217,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2015/05/23 06:10:57 $
+$Date: 2015/12/15 18:59:06 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.html 9 Feb 2015 21:02:59 -0000 1.14
+++ microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.html 15 Dec 2015 18:59:07 -0000 1.15
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.en.html"
-->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-10-16" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>Het Nieuwe Monopolie van Microsoft</h2>
<p>door <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>Richard
@@ -211,7 +217,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2015/02/09 21:02:59 $
+$Date: 2015/12/15 18:59:07 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:10 -0000
1.2
+++ po/microsoft-new-monopoly.nl-diff.html 15 Dec 2015 18:59:08 -0000
1.3
@@ -11,28 +11,25 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Microsoft's New Monopoly
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.translist"
-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Microsoft's New Monopoly</h2>
<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard
Stallman</strong></a></p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><i>This</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><blockquote>
-<p>This</em></ins></span> article was written in July 2005. Microsoft
adopted a
+<blockquote>
+<p>This article was written in July 2005. Microsoft adopted a
different policy in 2006, so the specific policies described below and
the specific criticisms of them are only of historical significance.
The overall problem remains, however:
-<a
href="http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Patent_rights_to_implement_the_Ecma_376_specification_have_not_been_granted">
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Patent_rights_to_implement_the_Ecma_376_specification_have_not_been_granted"></strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://web.archive.org/web/20120831070708/http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Patent_rights_to_implement_the_Ecma_376_specification_have_not_been_granted"></em></ins></span>
Microsoft's cunningly worded new policy does not give anyone clear
permission to implement OOXML.</a>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong></i></strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></p>
-</blockquote></em></ins></span>
+</p>
+</blockquote>
<p>European legislators who endorse software patents frequently claim
that those wouldn't affect free software (or “open
@@ -150,25 +147,16 @@
to participate in the campaign against software patents in Europe.
</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
-<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</em></ins></span>
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -182,65 +170,45 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright © 2005, 2009 Richard Stallman
-<br />
-This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
-
-<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-
-<p>Updated:
-<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:10 $
-<!-- timestamp end -->
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p></em></ins></span>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
-<!-- <span class="removed"><del><strong>All</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Regarding copyright, in general,
standalone</em></ins></span> pages <span class="inserted"><ins><em>(as opposed
to
- files generated as part of manuals)</em></ins></span> on the GNU web
server should <span class="removed"><del><strong>have the section about
-->
-<!-- verbatim copying.</strong></del></span>
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>be under CC BY-ND 3.0
US.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT <span class="inserted"><ins><em>change
or</em></ins></span> remove this
- without talking <span class="removed"><del><strong>-->
-<!--</strong></del></span> with the webmasters <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>or licensing team</em></ins></span> first. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>-->
-<!--</strong></del></span>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>document. For web pages, it is ok to
list just the latest year the</em></ins></span>
- document <span class="removed"><del><strong>-->
-<!-- and</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>was
modified, or published.
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
- If you wish to list earlier years,</em></ins></span> that <span
class="removed"><del><strong>it</strong></del></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>like this</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>ok too.
- Either</em></ins></span> "2001, <span class="removed"><del><strong>2002"
not this "2001-2002."</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
- Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain.</em></ins></span> -->
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Copyright © 2005, 2009 Richard
Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2005, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2009</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2009, 2015</em></ins></span> Richard
Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:10 $
+$Date: 2015/12/15 18:59:08 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
-</div></em></ins></span>
+</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Index: po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft-new-monopoly.ca-diff.html 15 Dec 2015 18:59:07 -0000
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Microsoft's New Monopoly
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-new-monopoly.translist"
-->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Microsoft's New Monopoly</h2>
+
+<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard
Stallman</strong></a></p>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p>This article was written in July 2005. Microsoft adopted a
+different policy in 2006, so the specific policies described below and
+the specific criticisms of them are only of historical significance.
+The overall problem remains, however:
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Patent_rights_to_implement_the_Ecma_376_specification_have_not_been_granted"></strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://web.archive.org/web/20120831070708/http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Patent_rights_to_implement_the_Ecma_376_specification_have_not_been_granted"></em></ins></span>
+Microsoft's cunningly worded new policy does not give anyone clear
+permission to implement OOXML.</a>
+</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>European legislators who endorse software patents frequently claim
+that those wouldn't affect free software (or “open
+source”). Microsoft's lawyers are determined to prove they are
+mistaken.</p>
+
+<p>Leaked internal documents in 1998 said that Microsoft considered
+the free software GNU/Linux operating system (referred to therein as
+“Linux”) as the principal competitor to Windows, and spoke
+of using patents and secret file formats to hold us back.</p>
+
+<p>Because Microsoft has so much market power, it can often impose
+new standards at will. It need only patent some minor idea, design
+a file format, programming language, or communication protocol
+based on it, and then pressure users to adopt it. Then we in the
+free software community will be forbidden to provide software that
+does what these users want; they will be locked in to Microsoft,
+and we will be locked out from serving them.</p>
+<p>Previously Microsoft tried to get its patented scheme for
+spam blocking adopted as an Internet standard, so as to exclude free
+software from handling email. The standards committee in charge
+rejected the proposal, but Microsoft said it would try to convince
+large <abbr title="Internet service provider">ISP</abbr>s to use
the
+scheme anyway.</p>
+
+<p>Now Microsoft is planning to try something similar for Word
+files.</p>
+
+<p>Several years ago, Microsoft abandoned its documented format for
+saving documents, and switched to a new format which was secret.
+However, the developers of free software word processors such as
+AbiWord and OpenOffice.org experimented assiduously for years to
+figure out the format, and now those programs can read most Word
+files. But Microsoft isn't licked yet.</p>
+
+<p>The next version of Microsoft Word will use formats that involve a
+technique that Microsoft claims to hold a patent on. Microsoft offers
+a royalty-free patent license for certain limited purposes, but it is
+so limited that it does not allow free software. You can see the
+license here: <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpspatentlic.mspx">
+http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpspatentlic.mspx</a>.</p>
+
+<p>Free software is defined as software that respects four
+fundamental freedoms: (0) freedom to run the software as you wish,
+(1) freedom to study the source code and modify it to do what you
+wish, (2) freedom to make and redistribute copies, and (3) freedom
+to publish modified versions. Only programmers can directly
+exercise freedoms 1 and 3, but all users can exercise freedoms 0
+and 2, and all users benefit from the modifications that
+programmers write and publish.</p>
+
+<p>Distributing an application under Microsoft's patent license
+imposes license terms that prohibit most possible modifications of the
+software. Lacking freedom 3, the freedom to publish modified versions,
+it would not be free software. (I think it could not be “open
+source” software either, since that definition is similar; but
+it is not identical, and I cannot speak for the advocates of open
+source.)</p>
+
+<p>The Microsoft license also requires inclusion of a specific
+statement. That requirement would not in itself prevent the program
+from being free: it is normal for free software to carry license
+notices that cannot be changed, and this statement could be included
+in one of them. The statement is biased and confusing, since it uses
+the term “intellectual property”; fortunately,
+one is not required to endorse the statement as true or even meaningful, only
to
+include it. The software developer could cancel its misleading effect
+with a disclaimer like this: “The following misleading statement
+has been imposed on us by Microsoft; please be advised that it is
+propaganda. See <a href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html">
+http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html</a> for more
+explanation.”</p>
+
+<p>However, the requirement to include a fixed piece of text is
+actually quite cunning, because anyone who does so has explicitly
+accepted and applied the restrictions of the Microsoft patent
+license. The resulting program is clearly not free software.</p>
+
+<p>Some free software licenses, such as the most popular GNU General
+Public License (GNU GPL), forbid publication of a modified version if it isn't
+free software in the same way. (We call that the “liberty or
+death” clause, since it ensures the program will remain free or
+die.) To apply Microsoft's license to a program under the GNU GPL
+would violate the program's license; it would be illegal. Many other
+free software licenses permit nonfree modified versions. It wouldn't
+be illegal to modify such a program and publish the modified version
+under Microsoft's patent license. But that modified version, with its
+modified license, wouldn't be free software.</p>
+
+<p>Microsoft's patent covering the new Word format is a US patent.
+It doesn't restrict anyone in Europe; Europeans are free to make
+and use software that can read this format. Europeans that develop
+or use software currently enjoy an advantage over Americans:
+Americans can be sued for patent infringement for their software
+activities in the US, but the Europeans cannot be sued for their
+activities in Europe. Europeans can already get US software patents
+and sue Americans, but Americans cannot get European software
+patents if Europe doesn't allow them.
+</p>
+
+<p>All that will change if the European Parliament authorizes
+software patents. Microsoft will be one of thousands of foreign
+software patent holders that will bring their patents over to
+Europe to sue the software developers and computer users there. Of
+the 50,000-odd putatively invalid software patents issued by the
+European Patent Office, around 80 percent do not belong to Europeans. The
+European Parliament should vote to keep these patents invalid, and
+keep Europeans safe.</p>
+
+<p>
+[2009 note]: the EU directive to allow software patents was
+rejected, but the European Patent Office has continued issuing them
+and some countries treat them as valid.
+See <a href="http://ffii.org"> ffii.org</a> for more information
and
+to participate in the campaign against software patents in Europe.
+</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2005, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2009</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2009, 2015</em></ins></span> Richard
Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/12/15 18:59:07 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy microsoft-new-monopoly.ca.html m...,
GNUN <=