www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html

[Pavel Kharitonov]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev>       15/06/22 07:18:28

Modified files:
        philosophy     : words-to-avoid.html 

Log message:
        Fix typos.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.208&r2=1.209

Patches:
Index: words-to-avoid.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html,v
retrieving revision 1.208
retrieving revision 1.209
diff -u -b -r1.208 -r1.209
--- words-to-avoid.html 21 Jun 2015 14:20:29 -0000      1.208
+++ words-to-avoid.html 22 Jun 2015 07:18:27 -0000      1.209
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
 Why is this perverse usage spreading?  Some may feel that the term
 sounds sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent
 reasons can appear even more sophisticated.  Others may be acting from
-business interests (their own, or their employers&rsquo;).  Their use
+business interests (their own, or their employers').  Their use
 of the term in prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the
 &ldquo;correct&rdquo; term.</p>
 
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
 The term &ldquo;consumer,&rdquo; when used to refer to the users of
 computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject.  Some come
 from the idea that using the program &ldquo;consumes&rdquo; the program (see
-<a href="Consume">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to
+<a href="#Consume">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to
 impose on copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were
 drawn about uncopiable material products.</p>
 <p>
@@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/06/21 14:20:29 $
+$Date: 2015/06/22 07:18:27 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>