[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy android-and-users-freedom.html
From: |
Dora Scilipoti |
Subject: |
www/philosophy android-and-users-freedom.html |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:01:29 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Dora Scilipoti <dora> 14/12/18 16:01:29
Modified files:
philosophy : android-and-users-freedom.html
Log message:
Fix three spurious words.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.48&r2=1.49
Patches:
Index: android-and-users-freedom.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html,v
retrieving revision 1.48
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -b -r1.48 -r1.49
--- android-and-users-freedom.html 17 Aug 2014 23:27:12 -0000 1.48
+++ android-and-users-freedom.html 18 Dec 2014 16:01:28 -0000 1.49
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
erroneous; Google has no power to change the license on the code of
Linux, and did not try. If the authors of Linux allowed its use under <a
href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL version 3</a>,
-then that code could be combined with Apache-licensed code, with the
+then that code could be combined with Apache-licensed code, and the
combination could be released under GPL version 3. But Linux has not
been released that way.</p>
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
</p>
<p>Android products also come with nonfree libraries. These are
-officially not part of Android, but that since various Android
+officially not part of Android, but since various Android
functionalities depend on them, they are part of any real Android
installation.</p>
@@ -205,11 +205,12 @@
<p>Android is not a self-hosting system; development for Android needs
to be done on some other system. The tools in Google's
-“software development kit” (SDK) are appear to be free,
+“software development kit” (SDK) appear to be free,
but it is hard work to check this. The definition files for certain
Google APIs are nonfree. Installing the SDK requires signing a
proprietary software license, which you should refuse to sign.
-<a
href="http://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/ReplicantSDK">Replicant's
SDK</a> is a free replacement.</p>
+<a href="http://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/ReplicantSDK">
+Replicant's SDK</a> is a free replacement.</p>
<p>Recent press coverage of Android focuses on the patent wars. During
20 years of campaigning for the abolition of software patents, we have
@@ -277,7 +278,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/08/17 23:27:12 $
+$Date: 2014/12/18 16:01:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy android-and-users-freedom.html,
Dora Scilipoti <=