[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy not-ipr.ar.html not-ipr.el.html ...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy not-ipr.ar.html not-ipr.el.html ... |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 03:00:01 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 14/08/05 03:00:01
Modified files:
philosophy : not-ipr.ar.html not-ipr.el.html not-ipr.ml.html
not-ipr.nl.html not-ipr.pt-br.html
not-ipr.sr.html not-ipr.zh-cn.html
philosophy/po : ebooks-must-increase-freedom.de.po
ebooks-must-increase-freedom.fr.po
ebooks-must-increase-freedom.pot
ebooks-must-increase-freedom.ru.po
not-ipr.ar-diff.html not-ipr.ar.po
not-ipr.de.po not-ipr.el-diff.html
not-ipr.el.po not-ipr.es.po not-ipr.fr.po
not-ipr.hr.po not-ipr.it.po not-ipr.ja.po
not-ipr.ml.po not-ipr.nl-diff.html
not-ipr.nl.po not-ipr.pl.po not-ipr.pot
not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html not-ipr.pt-br.po
not-ipr.ro.po not-ipr.ru.po not-ipr.sr.po
not-ipr.uk.po not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html
not-ipr.zh-cn.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.el.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.ml.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.sr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.zh-cn.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.hr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.11&r2=1.12
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ml.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ro.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.sr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.uk.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
Patches:
Index: not-ipr.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- not-ipr.ar.html 20 Sep 2013 14:30:14 -0000 1.17
+++ not-ipr.ar.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:53 -0000 1.18
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
@@ -9,13 +14,8 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar.po";>
- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar.po</a>' -->
- <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html" -->
- <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar-diff.html" -->
- <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
- <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
+
<h2>Ø£ÙÙت ”Ù
ÙÙÙØ© ÙÙرÙØ©“Ø Ø¥ÙÙا سراب
Ùاذب</h2>
<p>بÙÙÙ
<a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>رÙتشارد Ø¥Ù
. ستÙÙÙ
Ù</a></p>
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
ØÙدÙثت:
-$Date: 2013/09/20 14:30:14 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:53 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: not-ipr.el.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.el.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- not-ipr.el.html 23 Nov 2013 09:27:52 -0000 1.31
+++ not-ipr.el.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:53 -0000 1.32
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.el.html" -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
@@ -9,13 +14,8 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.el.html" -->
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el.po";>
- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el.po</a>' -->
- <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html" -->
- <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el-diff.html" -->
- <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
- <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.el.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.el.html" -->
+
<h2>ÎίÏαÏε “ΠνεÏ
μαÏική ÎδιοκÏηÏία”;
Îίναι μία αÏοÏλανηÏική αÏ
ÏαÏάÏη</h2>
<p>αÏÏ Ïον <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard M. Stallman</a></p>
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
ÎνημεÏÏθηκε:
-$Date: 2013/11/23 09:27:52 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:53 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: not-ipr.ml.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.ml.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- not-ipr.ml.html 9 May 2014 15:30:33 -0000 1.18
+++ not-ipr.ml.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:53 -0000 1.19
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="//philosophy/po/not-ipr.ml.po">
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ml.po">
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ml.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value=""
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
à´ªàµà´¤àµà´àµà´à´¿à´¯à´¤àµàµ:
-$Date: 2014/05/09 15:30:33 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:53 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: not-ipr.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- not-ipr.nl.html 20 Sep 2013 14:30:14 -0000 1.9
+++ not-ipr.nl.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:54 -0000 1.10
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
@@ -9,13 +14,8 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl.po";>
- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl.po</a>' -->
- <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html" -->
- <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl-diff.html" -->
- <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
- <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
+
<h2>Zei U: “Intellectueel Eigendom”? Dat Is Een Verleidelijke
Luchtspiegeling</h2>
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2013/09/20 14:30:14 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:54 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: not-ipr.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- not-ipr.pt-br.html 20 Sep 2013 14:30:14 -0000 1.26
+++ not-ipr.pt-br.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:54 -0000 1.27
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
@@ -9,13 +14,8 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br.po";>
- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br.po</a>' -->
- <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html" -->
- <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html" -->
- <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
- <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
+
<h2>Você Disse âPropriedade Intelectualâ? à uma Miragem Sedutora</h2>
<p>por <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard M. Stallman</a></p>
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima atualização:
-$Date: 2013/09/20 14:30:14 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:54 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: not-ipr.sr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.sr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- not-ipr.sr.html 16 Jun 2014 21:13:12 -0000 1.18
+++ not-ipr.sr.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:54 -0000 1.19
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.sr.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.sr.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value=""
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2011-09-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.sr.html" -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
@@ -16,13 +21,8 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.sr.html" -->
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.sr.po";>
- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.sr.po</a>' -->
- <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html" -->
- <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="" -->
- <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2011-09-20" -->
- <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.sr.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.sr.html" -->
+
<h2>РекоÑÑе ли âинÑелекÑÑална ÑвоÑинаâ? То
Ñе заводÑива илÑзиÑа.</h2>
<p>од <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>РиÑаÑда Ð.
СÑалмана</a></p>
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
ÐжÑÑиÑано:
-$Date: 2014/06/16 21:13:12 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:54 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: not-ipr.zh-cn.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.zh-cn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- not-ipr.zh-cn.html 20 Sep 2013 14:30:15 -0000 1.21
+++ not-ipr.zh-cn.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:54 -0000 1.22
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.zh-cn.html" -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
@@ -8,13 +13,8 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.zh-cn.html" -->
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po";>
- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po</a>' -->
- <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html" -->
- <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html" -->
- <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
- <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.zh-cn.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.zh-cn.html" -->
+
<h2>è¿å¨ç¨“ç¥è¯äº§æ”è¿è¯åï¼å®åªæ¯çä¸å»å¾ç¾</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>çæ¥å¾·Â·æ¯ææ¼</a> è</p>
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
æåæ´æ°
-$Date: 2013/09/20 14:30:15 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:54 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.de.po 11 Jul 2014 10:08:02 -0000
1.7
+++ po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.de.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:55 -0000
1.8
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-05-11 23:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-05-12 22:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Joerg Kohne <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -69,12 +70,25 @@
"mindestens sechsmal ausgeliehen. Mit gedruckten Büchern kann man das machen."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not
+# | allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has
+# | malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management [-or DRM-]
+# | {+(DRM, for short)+} to restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The
+# | e-books are encrypted so [-only-] that [-malicious-] {+only proprietary+}
+# | software {+with malicious functionality+} can display them.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not "
+#| "allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has "
+#| "malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management or DRM to "
+#| "restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so "
+#| "only that malicious software can display them."
msgid ""
"I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not "
"allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has "
-"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management or DRM to restrict "
-"reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so only that "
-"malicious software can display them."
+"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management (DRM, for short) "
+"to restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so "
+"that only proprietary software with malicious functionality can display them."
msgstr ""
"Ich könnte das mit den meisten kommerziellen elektronischen Büchern "
"nichtmachen. Es ist <em>nicht gestattet</em>. Und wenn ich versuchen würde, "
@@ -144,12 +158,40 @@
"sofern nicht durch den Staat angeordnet."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With software, either the users control the program (making such software
+# | <a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program
+# | controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the
+# | distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only
+# | relationship between the two. The <a
+# | [-href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html\">malicious-]
+# | {+href=\"/philosophy/proprietary/\">malicious+} software features</a>
+# | described above are imposed on users via software that's not Libre. If a
+# | Libre program had malicious features like those, some users skilled at
+# | programming would remove them, then provide the corrected version to all
+# | the other users. Users can't change non-Libre software, which makes it <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer\";>
+# | an ideal instrument for exercising power over the public</a>.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With software, either the users control the program (making such software "
+#| "<a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program "
+#| "controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the "
+#| "distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only "
+#| "relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html"
+#| "\">malicious software features</a> described above are imposed on users "
+#| "via software that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features "
+#| "like those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then "
+#| "provide the corrected version to all the other users. Users can't change "
+#| "non-Libre software, which makes it <a href=\"http://www.bostonreview.net/";
+#| "forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-"
+#| "controlled-its-developer\"> an ideal instrument for exercising power over "
+#| "the public</a>."
msgid ""
"With software, either the users control the program (making such software <a "
"href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program "
"controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the "
"distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only "
-"relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html"
+"relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary/"
"\">malicious software features</a> described above are imposed on users via "
"software that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features like "
"those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then provide the "
Index: po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.fr.po 12 May 2014 07:34:21 -0000
1.16
+++ po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.fr.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:56 -0000
1.17
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-05-11 23:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-05-12 09:32+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n > 1);\n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -75,12 +76,25 @@
"fil des années. Les livres imprimés nous permettent de faire ça."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not
+# | allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has
+# | malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management [-or DRM-]
+# | {+(DRM, for short)+} to restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The
+# | e-books are encrypted so [-only-] that [-malicious-] {+only proprietary+}
+# | software {+with malicious functionality+} can display them.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not "
+#| "allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has "
+#| "malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management or DRM to "
+#| "restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so "
+#| "only that malicious software can display them."
msgid ""
"I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not "
"allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has "
-"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management or DRM to restrict "
-"reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so only that "
-"malicious software can display them."
+"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management (DRM, for short) "
+"to restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so "
+"that only proprietary software with malicious functionality can display them."
msgstr ""
"Je ne pourrais pas le faire avec la plupart des e-books (livres "
"électroniques) du commerce. Ce n'est « pas autorisé ». Et si j'essayais
de "
@@ -150,12 +164,40 @@
"l'Ãtat."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With software, either the users control the program (making such software
+# | <a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program
+# | controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the
+# | distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only
+# | relationship between the two. The <a
+# | [-href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html\">malicious-]
+# | {+href=\"/philosophy/proprietary/\">malicious+} software features</a>
+# | described above are imposed on users via software that's not Libre. If a
+# | Libre program had malicious features like those, some users skilled at
+# | programming would remove them, then provide the corrected version to all
+# | the other users. Users can't change non-Libre software, which makes it <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer\";>
+# | an ideal instrument for exercising power over the public</a>.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With software, either the users control the program (making such software "
+#| "<a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program "
+#| "controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the "
+#| "distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only "
+#| "relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html"
+#| "\">malicious software features</a> described above are imposed on users "
+#| "via software that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features "
+#| "like those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then "
+#| "provide the corrected version to all the other users. Users can't change "
+#| "non-Libre software, which makes it <a href=\"http://www.bostonreview.net/";
+#| "forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-"
+#| "controlled-its-developer\"> an ideal instrument for exercising power over "
+#| "the public</a>."
msgid ""
"With software, either the users control the program (making such software <a "
"href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program "
"controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the "
"distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only "
-"relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html"
+"relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary/"
"\">malicious software features</a> described above are imposed on users via "
"software that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features like "
"those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then provide the "
Index: po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.pot 11 May 2014 23:27:42 -0000 1.8
+++ po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.pot 5 Aug 2014 02:59:57 -0000 1.9
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-05-11 23:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -60,9 +60,10 @@
msgid ""
"I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not "
"allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has "
-"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management or DRM to restrict "
-"reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so only that "
-"malicious software can display them."
+"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management (DRM, for short) "
+"to restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so "
+"that only proprietary software with malicious functionality can display "
+"them."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -107,11 +108,11 @@
"controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the "
"distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only "
"relationship between the two. The <a "
-"href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html\">malicious software features</a> "
-"described above are imposed on users via software that's not Libre. If a "
-"Libre program had malicious features like those, some users skilled at "
-"programming would remove them, then provide the corrected version to all the "
-"other users. Users can't change non-Libre software, which makes it <a "
+"href=\"/philosophy/proprietary/\">malicious software features</a> described "
+"above are imposed on users via software that's not Libre. If a Libre program "
+"had malicious features like those, some users skilled at programming would "
+"remove them, then provide the corrected version to all the other "
+"users. Users can't change non-Libre software, which makes it <a "
"href=\"http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer\";>
"
"an ideal instrument for exercising power over the public</a>."
msgstr ""
Index: po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -b -r1.13 -r1.14
--- po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.ru.po 12 May 2014 08:02:44 -0000
1.13
+++ po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.ru.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:57 -0000
1.14
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-05-11 23:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-05-11 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -71,12 +72,25 @@
"позволÑÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¼ ÑÑо делаÑÑ."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not
+# | allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has
+# | malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management [-or DRM-]
+# | {+(DRM, for short)+} to restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The
+# | e-books are encrypted so [-only-] that [-malicious-] {+only proprietary+}
+# | software {+with malicious functionality+} can display them.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not "
+#| "allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has "
+#| "malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management or DRM to "
+#| "restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so "
+#| "only that malicious software can display them."
msgid ""
"I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's “not "
"allowed”. And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has "
-"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management or DRM to restrict "
-"reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so only that "
-"malicious software can display them."
+"malicious features called Digital Restrictions Management (DRM, for short) "
+"to restrict reading, so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so "
+"that only proprietary software with malicious functionality can display them."
msgstr ""
"Я не мог Ð±Ñ ÑÑого делаÑÑ Ñ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÑÑинÑÑвом
коммеÑÑеÑкиÑ
ÑлекÑÑоннÑÑ
книг. ÐÑо "
"“не позволено”. РеÑли Ð±Ñ Ñ
попÑобовал не подÑиниÑÑÑÑ, Ñо Ñ "
@@ -146,12 +160,40 @@
"оÑганов."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With software, either the users control the program (making such software
+# | <a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program
+# | controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the
+# | distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only
+# | relationship between the two. The <a
+# | [-href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html\">malicious-]
+# | {+href=\"/philosophy/proprietary/\">malicious+} software features</a>
+# | described above are imposed on users via software that's not Libre. If a
+# | Libre program had malicious features like those, some users skilled at
+# | programming would remove them, then provide the corrected version to all
+# | the other users. Users can't change non-Libre software, which makes it <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer\";>
+# | an ideal instrument for exercising power over the public</a>.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With software, either the users control the program (making such software "
+#| "<a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program "
+#| "controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the "
+#| "distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only "
+#| "relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html"
+#| "\">malicious software features</a> described above are imposed on users "
+#| "via software that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features "
+#| "like those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then "
+#| "provide the corrected version to all the other users. Users can't change "
+#| "non-Libre software, which makes it <a href=\"http://www.bostonreview.net/";
+#| "forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-"
+#| "controlled-its-developer\"> an ideal instrument for exercising power over "
+#| "the public</a>."
msgid ""
"With software, either the users control the program (making such software <a "
"href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">Libre or Free</a>) or the program "
"controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the "
"distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only "
-"relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary.html"
+"relationship between the two. The <a href=\"/philosophy/proprietary/"
"\">malicious software features</a> described above are imposed on users via "
"software that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features like "
"those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then provide the "
Index: po/not-ipr.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/not-ipr.ar-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:21 -0000 1.4
+++ po/not-ipr.ar-diff.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:57 -0000 1.5
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as
“intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only
reason people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that
-widespread use of the term has misled them.
+widespread use of the term has misled <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>them about the laws in question.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -87,11 +87,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers
-the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to
-promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the
-one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price
-that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>Copyright</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>For instance, copyright</em></ins></span> law
was designed to promote authorship and
+art, and covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was
+intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of
+giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in
+others.
</p>
<p>
@@ -99,7 +101,8 @@
way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are
buying. Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
-incentives for advertising.
+incentives for advertising. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>And these are just
+three out of many laws that the term refers to.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -110,15 +113,37 @@
</p>
<p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>In practice, nearly all general statements you
encounter that are
+formulated using “intellectual property” will be false.
+For instance, you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to
+“promote innovation”, but that only fits patent law and
+perhaps plant variety monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with
+innovation; a pop song or novel is copyrighted even if there is
+nothing innovative about it. Trademark law is not concerned with
+innovation; if I start a tea store and call it “rms tea”,
+that would be a solid trademark even if I sell the same teas in the
+same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is not concerned with
+innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers would be a
+trade secret with nothing to do with innovation.</p>
+
+<p>
+You will also see assertions that “intellectual property”
+is concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits
+copyright law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable
+invention. Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with
+creativity; the name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and
+neither is my secret list of tea customers.</p>
+
+<p></em></ins></span>
People often say “intellectual property” when they really
-mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries
+mean some larger or smaller <span
class="removed"><del><strong>category.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>set of laws.</em></ins></span> For instance, rich
countries
often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of
-them. Some of these laws are “intellectual property” laws,
-and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab
-for that label because it has become familiar to them. By using it,
-they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use
-an accurate term, such as “legislative colonization”, that
-gets to the heart of the matter.
+them. Some of these laws are <span class="inserted"><ins><em>among those
called</em></ins></span> “intellectual
+property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the
+practice often grab for that label because it has become familiar to
+them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It
+would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
</p>
<p>
@@ -140,9 +165,9 @@
<p>
That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That
-clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various
-others. The term “intellectual property” led that
-professor to make false generalization.
+clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark <span
class="removed"><del><strong>law</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>law, trade secret
+law,</em></ins></span> or various others. The term “intellectual
property”
+led that professor to make <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a</em></ins></span>
false generalization.
</p>
<p>
@@ -238,19 +263,19 @@
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.
<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent
-to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
+to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
- Please send your comments and general suggestions in this
regard</em></ins></span>
- to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
<address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
@@ -299,7 +324,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:21 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:57 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/not-ipr.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- po/not-ipr.ar.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:12 -0000 1.24
+++ po/not-ipr.ar.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:57 -0000 1.25
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-05-11 21:24+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafik E. Younan <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -125,6 +125,15 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -132,7 +141,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"تعتبر بعض تÙ٠اÙأسÙ
اء Ø£ÙضÙØ ÙÙ٠استبداÙ
”اÙÙ
ÙÙÙØ© اÙÙÙرÙØ©“ بأ٠"
"اسÙ
آخر Ø®Ø·Ø£Ø Ùأ٠أ٠اسÙ
آخر ÙÙ ÙعاÙج اÙÙ
Ø´ÙÙØ© اÙØ£ÙØ¨Ø±Ø Ø£Ùا ÙÙ٠اÙÙ
باÙغة ÙÙ "
@@ -165,12 +174,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"صÙÙ
ÙÙ
ÙاÙÙÙ ØÙÙ٠اÙÙشر ÙتشجÙع اÙتأÙÙÙ
ÙاÙÙÙØ ÙÙÙ Ùغط٠تÙاصÙ٠اÙعÙ
ÙØ ÙأرÙد "
"بÙاÙÙ٠براءات اÙاختراع تشجÙع Ùشر اÙØ£ÙÙار
اÙÙ
ÙÙØ¯Ø©Ø Ù
Ùاب٠إعطاء Ù
Ù ÙÙشر ÙÙرة "
@@ -178,12 +194,20 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"ÙØ£Ù
ا ÙاÙÙ٠اÙعÙاÙ
ات اÙتجارÙØ©Ø ÙعÙ٠اÙعÙسØ
ÙÙ
ÙÙرÙد ب٠تشجÙع أ٠تصر٠Ù
عÙÙØ Ø¨Ù "
"تÙ
ÙÙ٠اÙÙ
شترÙÙ Ù
٠تÙ
ÙÙز Ù
ا ÙشترÙÙÙØ ÙÙÙ
اÙÙ
شرعÙ٠تØت تأثÙر ”اÙÙ
ÙÙÙØ© "
@@ -201,17 +225,54 @@
"باÙإضاÙØ© Ø¥Ù٠أÙداÙÙا ÙÙسائÙÙا اÙأساسÙØ©Ø
ÙÙذا إ٠عرÙت Ø´ÙئÙا ع٠ÙاÙÙÙ ØÙÙÙ "
"اÙÙØ´Ø±Ø ÙÙ
٠اÙØÙÙ
Ø© أ٠تÙترض Ø£Ù ÙاÙÙ٠براءات
اÙاختراع ÙخاÙÙÙ. ÙادرÙا Ù
ا ستخطئ!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"غاÙبÙا Ù
ا ÙÙÙ٠اÙÙاس ”اÙÙ
ÙÙÙØ©
اÙÙÙرÙØ©“ عÙدÙ
ا ÙعÙÙÙ Ù٠اÙØÙÙÙØ© "
"تصÙÙÙÙا Ø£Ùسع أ٠أصغر. ÙعÙ٠سبÙ٠اÙÙ
ثاÙØ
ÙØ«ÙرÙا Ù
ا تÙرض اÙدÙ٠اÙغÙÙØ© ÙÙاÙÙÙ "
@@ -247,12 +308,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"تشÙر Ùذ٠اÙعبارة Ø¥Ù٠اÙÙ
ادة 1 اÙÙسÙ
8 اÙبÙد
8 Ù
٠دستÙر اÙÙÙاÙات اÙÙ
تØدة "
"ÙاÙØ°Ù ÙسÙ
Ø Ø¨ØÙÙ٠اÙÙشر Ùبراءات اÙاختراع.
ÙÙÙ Ùذ٠اÙØ¹Ø¨Ø§Ø±Ø©Ø Ùا تتÙاÙÙ Ù
Ù ÙرÙب "
Index: po/not-ipr.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- po/not-ipr.de.po 10 Jul 2014 15:40:54 -0000 1.10
+++ po/not-ipr.de.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:57 -0000 1.11
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-02 22:00+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Joerg Kohne <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -128,6 +129,22 @@
"ebenso zwiespältiges Denken."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -135,7 +152,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Einige dieser alternativen Namen wären eine Verbesserung, aber es ist ein "
"Fehler den Begriff âGeistiges Eigentumâ mit einem anderen zu ersetzen.
Ein "
@@ -171,12 +188,24 @@
"auf."
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"Das Urheberrecht wurde entworfen, um Autorschaft und Kunst zu fördern und "
"umfasst die Einzelheiten eines Werkes. Das Patentrecht sollte die "
@@ -187,12 +216,26 @@
# ⦠auÃer Käufern lediglich â¦
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"Markenrecht sollte hingegen nicht irgendeine besondere Handlungsweise "
"fördern, sondern Käufern lediglich ermöglichen, zu wissen, was sie kaufen.
"
@@ -214,14 +257,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
+msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"Einige sagen oftmals âGeistiges Eigentumâ, wenn sie tatsächlich etwas
mehr "
"oder weniger anderes meinen. Beispielsweise verhängen reiche Länder oft "
@@ -261,12 +350,24 @@
"Kongress die Hände, was dessen Macht in vielfacher Hinsicht
einschränkte.â"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Diese Aussage bezieht sich auf Artikel 1, Abschnitt 8, Satz 8 der US-"
"Verfassung, welche Urheber- und Patentrecht autorisiert. Dieser Satz hat "
Index: po/not-ipr.el-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- po/not-ipr.el-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:22 -0000 1.5
+++ po/not-ipr.el-diff.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:57 -0000 1.6
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as
“intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only
reason people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that
-widespread use of the term has misled them.
+widespread use of the term has misled <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>them about the laws in question.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -87,11 +87,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers
-the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to
-promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the
-one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price
-that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>Copyright</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>For instance, copyright</em></ins></span> law
was designed to promote authorship and
+art, and covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was
+intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of
+giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in
+others.
</p>
<p>
@@ -99,7 +101,8 @@
way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are
buying. Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
-incentives for advertising.
+incentives for advertising. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>And these are just
+three out of many laws that the term refers to.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -110,15 +113,37 @@
</p>
<p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>In practice, nearly all general statements you
encounter that are
+formulated using “intellectual property” will be false.
+For instance, you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to
+“promote innovation”, but that only fits patent law and
+perhaps plant variety monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with
+innovation; a pop song or novel is copyrighted even if there is
+nothing innovative about it. Trademark law is not concerned with
+innovation; if I start a tea store and call it “rms tea”,
+that would be a solid trademark even if I sell the same teas in the
+same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is not concerned with
+innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers would be a
+trade secret with nothing to do with innovation.</p>
+
+<p>
+You will also see assertions that “intellectual property”
+is concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits
+copyright law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable
+invention. Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with
+creativity; the name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and
+neither is my secret list of tea customers.</p>
+
+<p></em></ins></span>
People often say “intellectual property” when they really
-mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries
+mean some larger or smaller <span
class="removed"><del><strong>category.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>set of laws.</em></ins></span> For instance, rich
countries
often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of
-them. Some of these laws are “intellectual property” laws,
-and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab
-for that label because it has become familiar to them. By using it,
-they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use
-an accurate term, such as “legislative colonization”, that
-gets to the heart of the matter.
+them. Some of these laws are <span class="inserted"><ins><em>among those
called</em></ins></span> “intellectual
+property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the
+practice often grab for that label because it has become familiar to
+them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It
+would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
</p>
<p>
@@ -140,9 +165,9 @@
<p>
That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That
-clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various
-others. The term “intellectual property” led that
-professor to make false generalization.
+clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark <span
class="removed"><del><strong>law</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>law, trade secret
+law,</em></ins></span> or various others. The term “intellectual
property”
+led that professor to make <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a</em></ins></span>
false generalization.
</p>
<p>
@@ -238,19 +263,19 @@
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.
<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent
-to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
+to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
- Please send your comments and general suggestions in this
regard</em></ins></span>
- to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
<address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
@@ -299,7 +324,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:22 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:57 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/not-ipr.el.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.el.po,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- po/not-ipr.el.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:13 -0000 1.31
+++ po/not-ipr.el.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:58 -0000 1.32
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: www-el_v0.2.0\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-01-26 23:51+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Georgios Zarkadas <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Greek <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -135,6 +135,15 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -142,7 +151,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"ÎάÏÎ¿Î¹ÎµÏ Î±ÏÏ Î±Ï
ÏÎÏ ÏÎ¹Ï ÎµÎ½Î±Î»Î»Î±ÎºÏικÎÏ
ονομαÏÎ¯ÎµÏ Î¸Î± ήÏαν μία ÏÏÏοδοÏ, αλλά είναι "
"Î»Î¬Î¸Î¿Ï Î½Î± ανÏικαÏαÏÏαθεί η “ÏνεÏ
μαÏική
ιδιοκÏηÏία” με "
@@ -181,12 +190,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"ΠνÏÎ¼Î¿Ï Î³Î¹Î± Ïα ÏνεÏ
μαÏικά δικαιώμαÏα
ÏÏεδιάÏÏηκε για να ÏÏοÏθήÏει Ïη "
"ÏÏ
γγÏαÏή κειμÎνÏν και Ïην ÏÎÏνη, και
καλÏÏÏει ÏÎ¹Ï Î»ÎµÏÏομÎÏÎµÎ¹ÎµÏ ÏÎ·Ï ÎκÏÏαÏÎ·Ï "
@@ -197,12 +213,20 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"ΠνÏÎ¼Î¿Ï Î³Î¹Î± Ïα ÏήμαÏα καÏαÏεθÎνÏα, Ïε
ανÏίθεÏη, δεν είÏε ÏÏ ÏκοÏÏ Î½Î± "
"ÏÏοÏθήÏει κάÏοιο ÏÏ
γκεκÏιμÎνο ÏÏÏÏο
δÏάÏηÏ, αλλά αÏλά να εÏιÏÏÎÏει ÏÏοÏ
Ï "
@@ -224,17 +248,54 @@
"θα ήÏαν ÏοÏÏ Î½Î± Ï
ÏοθÎÏεÏε ÏÏι ο νÏÎ¼Î¿Ï Î³Î¹Î±
ÏÎ¹Ï ÏαÏÎνÏÎµÏ ÎµÎ¯Î½Î±Î¹ διαÏοÏεÏικÏÏ. "
"ΣÏάνια θα κάνεÏε λάθοÏ!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"Îι άνθÏÏÏοι ÏÏ
Ïνά λÎνε “ÏνεÏ
μαÏική
ιδιοκÏηÏία” ÏÏαν ÏÏαγμαÏικά "
"εννοοÏν κάÏοια μεγαλÏÏεÏη ή μικÏÏÏεÏη
καÏηγοÏία. Îια ÏαÏάδειγμα, οι ÏλοÏÏÎ¹ÎµÏ "
@@ -277,12 +338,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"ÎÏ
Ïή η δήλÏÏη αναÏÎÏεÏαι ÏÏο ÎÏθÏο 1, Î
αÏάγÏαÏÎ¿Ï 8, ÎάθεÏÎ¿Ï 8 ÏοÏ
"
"ΣÏ
νÏάγμαÏÎ¿Ï ÏÏν ÎÎ Î, Ïο οÏοίο εγκÏίνει ÏοÏ
Ï Î½ÏμοÏ
Ï Î³Î¹Î± Ïα ÏνεÏ
μαÏικά "
Index: po/not-ipr.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- po/not-ipr.es.po 24 Mar 2014 11:28:56 -0000 1.25
+++ po/not-ipr.es.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:58 -0000 1.26
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-02 11:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Dora Scilipoti <dora AT gnu DOT org>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"X-Poedit-Language: Spanish\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
@@ -132,6 +133,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -139,7 +156,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Algunos de estos nombres alternativos serÃan más adecuados, pero es un
error "
"sustituir «propiedad intelectual» por cualquier otra expresión. Un nombre "
@@ -175,12 +192,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"La legislación sobre los derechos de autor fue diseñada para promover a la "
"autorÃa y el arte, y se aplica a los detalles de la expresión de una obra. "
@@ -190,12 +219,26 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"La legislación sobre marcas, en cambio, no estaba destinada a promover "
"ninguna actividad en particular, solo intentaba permitir a los compradores "
@@ -217,17 +260,63 @@
"autor, lo mejor será que asuma que es diferente de la ley de patentes. "
"¡Seguramente no se equivocará!."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"La gente suele decir «propiedad intelectual» cuando en realidad se refiere
a "
"otra categorÃa, más grande o más pequeña. Por ejemplo, a menudo los
paÃses "
@@ -268,12 +357,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Esta cita se refiere al artÃculo 1, octava sección, cláusula 8 de la "
"Constitución de los EE.UU., que autoriza las leyes de derechos de autor y "
Index: po/not-ipr.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- po/not-ipr.fr.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:14 -0000 1.44
+++ po/not-ipr.fr.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:58 -0000 1.45
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-02 12:49+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -120,6 +121,22 @@
"« droits » est aussi du double langage."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -127,7 +144,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Certaines de ces alternatives seraient une amélioration, mais c'est une "
"erreur de remplacer « propriété intellectuelle » par un autre terme. Un
nom "
@@ -158,12 +175,24 @@
"et soulèvent des problèmes de politique publique différents."
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"La loi sur le copyright a été conçue pour promouvoir les Åuvres
littéraires "
"et artistiques, et couvre les détails d'une Åuvre. La loi sur les brevets a
"
@@ -172,12 +201,26 @@
"justifié dans certains domaines et pas dans d'autres."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"La loi sur les marques déposées n'était pas destinée à promouvoir un "
"quelconque comportement, mais seulement à permettre aux acheteurs de savoir "
@@ -200,14 +243,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
+msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"Les gens disent souvent « propriété intellectuelle » quand ils veulent
en "
"fait désigner une catégorie plus étendue ou plus restreinte. Par exemple, "
@@ -246,12 +335,24 @@
"lié les mains du Congrès, en restreignant son pouvoir de diverses
manières."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Cette affirmation se réfère à l'article 1, section 8, clause 8 de la "
"Constitution américaine qui autorise les lois sur le copyright et les lois "
Index: po/not-ipr.hr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.hr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -b -r1.11 -r1.12
--- po/not-ipr.hr.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:14 -0000 1.11
+++ po/not-ipr.hr.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:58 -0000 1.12
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-04 19:43+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Martina Bebek <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: GNU Croatian Translation Team <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.5.4\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n"
"%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
@@ -122,6 +123,22 @@
"rijeÄju “pravo” je isto dvosmisleno."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -129,7 +146,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Neka od tih zamjenskih imena bi bila poboljšanje, ali greška je zamijeniti "
"“intelektualno vlasniÅ¡tvo” sa bilo kojim drugim terminom. Drugo "
@@ -163,12 +180,24 @@
"postavljaju razliÄita pitanja javne politike. "
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"Zakon o autorskim pravima je bio dizajnirani da promovira autorstvo i "
"umjetnost, i obuhvaÄa detalje izraza djela. Patentni zakon je bio namijenjen
"
@@ -177,12 +206,26 @@
"isplati u nekim profesijama, ali ne u nekim drugima."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"U kontrastu, zakon o zaštitnim znakovima, nije bio namijenjen da promovira "
"neki partikularni naÄin djelovanja, nego jednostavno da omoguÄi kupcima da "
@@ -204,14 +247,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
+msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"Ljudi Äesto kažu “intelektualno vlasniÅ¡tvo” kada zapravo misle
"
"na neku veÄu ili manju kategoriju. Na primjer, bogate zemlje Äesto nameÄu "
@@ -248,12 +337,24 @@
"zavezali su ruke kongresu, ograniÄavajuÄi njegovu moÄ na viÅ¡estruke
naÄine. "
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Ta izjava referira na Älanak 1, odjeljak 8, toÄku 8 ustava SAD-a, koji "
"ovlaÅ¡Äuje zakon o autorskom pravu i patentni zakon. MeÄutim, ta toÄka,
nema "
Index: po/not-ipr.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -b -r1.41 -r1.42
--- po/not-ipr.it.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:14 -0000 1.41
+++ po/not-ipr.it.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:58 -0000 1.42
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-05 23:24+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.5.4\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
@@ -127,6 +128,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -134,7 +151,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"à tuttavia un errore sostituire a \"proprietà intellettuale\" un qualunque "
"altro termine. Un diverso nome potrebbe eliminare la suddetta tendenziosità ,
"
@@ -172,12 +189,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"La legge sul copyright fu pensata per incoraggiare la gente a produrre "
"scritti e opere artistiche, e copre i dettagli dell'opera scritta o "
@@ -187,12 +216,26 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"La legge sui marchi di fabbrica non è stata pensata per promuovere alcuna "
"attività affaristica, ma semplicemente per permettere agli acquirenti di "
@@ -214,17 +257,63 @@
"che per la legge sui brevetti sia diverso. Difficilmente sbaglierete "
"facendo così! "
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"Spesso si dice \"proprietà intellettuale\" quando in realtà si intende "
"qualche altra categoria, più ampia o più ristretta della \"proprietà "
@@ -268,12 +357,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"La dichiarazione si riferisce all'articolo 1 sezione 8 comma 8 della "
"Costituzione statunitense, che autorizza la legge sul copyright e sui "
Index: po/not-ipr.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- po/not-ipr.ja.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:14 -0000 1.18
+++ po/not-ipr.ja.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:58 -0000 1.19
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-02 10:23+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -115,6 +116,15 @@
"ç¾ããäºã¤ã®èããåæã«å®¹èªããäºéæèã¨è¨ãã¾ãããã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -122,7 +132,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"ãããã代æ¿æ¡ã®ããã¤ãã¯ããç¥ç財ç£ãã«æ¯ã¹ãã°æ¹åã¨è¨ããããããã¾ãã"
"ããããã§ããç¥ç財ç£ããä½ãä»ã®ç¨èªã§ç½®ãæããã®ã¯èª¤ãã§ããç°ãªãå称ã"
@@ -155,12 +165,19 @@
"ã®åé¡ãæèµ·ãã¦ãã¾ãã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"èä½æ¨©æ³ã¯ãªã¼ãµã¼ã·ãããè¸è¡ãæ¨é²ããããã«è¨è¨ãããããèä½ç©ã®è¡¨ç¾æ¹æ³"
"ã®è©³ç´°ãã«ãã¼ãã¾ããç¹è¨±æ³ã¯æç¨ãªã¢ã¤ãã¢ã®å
¬è¡¨ãæ¨é²ãããã¨ãæå³ãã¦ã"
@@ -169,12 +186,20 @@
"ã§ãããã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"対ç
§çã«åæ¨æ³ã¯ãããç¹å®ã®è¡åãæ¨é²ãããã¨ãæå³ãã¦ããã®ã§ã¯ããã¾ã"
"ããåæ¨æ³ã¯ãè³¼å
¥è
ã«å¯¾ãã¦å½¼ããä½ãè²·ã£ã¦ããã®ããç¥ãããã¦ããã
ãã§"
@@ -195,14 +220,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
+msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"人ã
ã¯ãã°ãã°ããç¥ç財ç£ãã¨ããè¨èããå®éã«ã¯ãã®è¨èãæã示ãããåºã"
"ãçãã«ãã´ãªãæå³ããã®ã«ä½¿ãã¾ãããã¨ãã°ãå¯è£ãªå½ã
ã¯ãã°ãã°è²§ãã"
@@ -239,12 +301,19 @@
"ããè¤æ°ã®æ¹æ³ã«ãã£ã¦ãã®æ¨©åãå¶éãã¦ããã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"ãã®ä¸»å¼µãè¨åãã¦ããã®ã¯ã¢ã¡ãªã«åè¡å½æ²æ³ã®ç¬¬1æ¡ç¬¬8ç¯ç¬¬8é
ã§ãããã§ã¯èä½"
"権æ³ãç¹è¨±æ³ãæ£å½åãã¦ãã¾ããããããã®é
ã¯ãåæ¨æ³ãä»ã®æ³å¾ã¨ã¯ä½ã®é¢ä¿"
Index: po/not-ipr.ml.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ml.po,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- po/not-ipr.ml.po 25 Apr 2014 04:30:55 -0000 1.25
+++ po/not-ipr.ml.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:58 -0000 1.26
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-07-09 09:19+0530\n"
"Last-Translator: Shyam Karanatt<address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Swathanthra Malayalam Computing<address@hidden"
@@ -141,6 +141,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -148,7 +164,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"à´à´ªàµà´ªà´±à´àµà´à´µà´¯à´¿à´²àµâ à´à´¿à´² à´ªàµà´°àµà´à´³àµâ
à´®àµà´àµà´à´ തനàµà´¨àµ, à´ªà´àµà´·àµ
“à´¬àµà´¦àµà´§à´¿à´ à´¸àµà´µà´¤àµà´¤àµàµ”
à´à´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¿à´¨àµ à´ªà´à´°à´ "
"à´µàµà´±àµà´¯àµà´¤àµàµ
പദമàµà´ªà´¯àµà´à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµà´
à´¤àµà´±àµà´±à´¾à´£àµàµ. à´µàµà´±àµà´¾à´°àµ
വാà´àµà´àµà´ªà´¯àµà´à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨àµ
à´à´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµà´àµà´¾à´£àµà´àµàµ ഠപദതàµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ "
@@ -183,12 +199,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"à´ªà´à´°àµâà´ªàµà´ªà´µà´à´¾à´¶à´¨à´¿à´¯à´®à´àµà´à´³àµâ
à´°àµà´ªà´à´²àµà´ªà´¨ à´àµà´¯àµà´¤à´¤àµàµ,
à´à´´àµà´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµà´¯àµà´ à´à´²à´¯àµà´¯àµà´,
à´ªàµà´°àµà´¤àµà´¸à´¾à´¹à´¿à´ªàµà´ªà´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´à´¾à´¨à´¾à´£àµàµ.
à´à´°àµ "
"à´¸àµà´·àµà´à´¿à´¯àµà´àµ
à´à´µà´¿à´·àµà´à´¾à´°à´¤àµà´¤àµà´àµà´àµà´±à´¿à´àµà´à´¾à´£àµàµ
à´à´¤àµàµ à´ªàµà´°à´¤à´¿à´ªà´¾à´¦à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµàµ.
à´ªàµà´±àµà´±à´¨àµà´±àµ നിയമതàµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
à´à´¦àµà´¦àµà´¶à´ "
@@ -198,12 +226,26 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"à´à´¨àµà´¨à´¾à´²àµâ à´àµà´°àµà´¡àµâമാരàµâà´àµà´àµ
നിയമà´,à´ªàµà´°à´¤àµà´¯àµà´à´¿à´àµà´àµà´¾à´°àµ
à´°àµà´¤à´¿à´¯àµà´¯àµà´
à´ªàµà´°àµà´¤àµà´¸à´¾à´¹à´¿à´ªàµà´ªà´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´à´¾à´¨àµà´³àµà´³à´¤à´¾à´¯à´¿à´°àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¿à´²àµà´².
"
"വാà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´µà´°àµâà´àµà´àµàµ à´
വരàµà´¨àµà´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ വാà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµà´¨àµà´¨àµàµ
à´
റിയാനàµâ സാധàµà´¯à´®à´¾à´àµà´àµà´
à´à´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ à´
തിനàµà´±àµ à´à´¦àµà´¦àµà´¶à´ . "
@@ -223,17 +265,63 @@
"പഠിയàµà´àµà´àµà´®àµà´ªàµà´³àµâ à´ªàµà´±àµà´±à´¨àµà´±àµ
നിയമഠവàµà´¯à´¤àµà´¯à´¸àµà´¤à´®à´¾à´£àµàµ
à´à´¨àµà´¨à´¾à´²àµà´à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ
à´¬àµà´¦àµà´§à´¿. à´
à´ªàµà´ªàµà´³àµâ
à´¤àµà´±àµà´±àµà´ªà´±àµà´±à´¾à´¨àµà´³àµà´³ "
"സാധàµà´¯à´¤ വളരൠà´àµà´±à´µà´¾à´£àµàµ!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"“à´¬àµà´¦àµà´§à´¿à´
à´¸àµà´µà´¤àµà´¤àµàµ”à´à´¨àµà´¨àµàµ à´à´¨à´àµà´à´³àµâ
സാധാരണപറയàµà´®àµà´ªàµà´³àµâ, à´
വരàµâ
യഥാരàµâà´¤àµà´¥à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´²àµà´¦àµà´¦àµà´¶à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµàµ
"
"താരതമàµà´¯àµà´¨ വലàµà´¤àµ, à´àµà´±àµà´¤àµ à´à´¯
മറàµà´±àµà´¾à´°àµ വിഷയമാണàµàµ.
à´à´¦à´¾à´¹à´°à´£à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµàµ, പാവപàµà´ªàµà´àµà´
രാഷàµà´àµà´°à´àµà´à´³à´¿à´²àµâ നിനàµà´¨àµàµ "
@@ -284,12 +372,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"à´ªà´à´°àµâà´ªàµà´ªà´µà´à´¾à´¶à´¤àµà´¤àµà´¯àµà´
à´ªàµà´±àµà´±à´¨àµà´±à´¿à´¨àµà´¯àµà´
സാധàµà´à´°à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨, യൠà´à´¸àµ
à´à´°à´£à´à´à´¨à´¯à´¿à´²àµ 1-ാഠലàµà´à´¨à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´²àµ 8-à´¾à´
"
"വിà´à´¾à´à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´²àµ 8-ാഠവരിയàµ
à´àµà´±à´¿à´àµà´à´¾à´£àµàµ à´®àµà´à´³à´¿à´²àµâ പറà´àµà´
à´ªàµà´°à´¸àµà´¤à´¾à´µà´¨
à´ªàµà´°à´¤à´¿à´ªà´¾à´¦à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµàµ. à´
വരിയàµà´àµà´àµàµ "
Index: po/not-ipr.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/not-ipr.nl-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:22 -0000 1.4
+++ po/not-ipr.nl-diff.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:59 -0000 1.5
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as
“intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only
reason people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that
-widespread use of the term has misled them.
+widespread use of the term has misled <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>them about the laws in question.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -87,11 +87,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers
-the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to
-promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the
-one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price
-that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>Copyright</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>For instance, copyright</em></ins></span> law
was designed to promote authorship and
+art, and covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was
+intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of
+giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in
+others.
</p>
<p>
@@ -99,7 +101,8 @@
way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are
buying. Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
-incentives for advertising.
+incentives for advertising. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>And these are just
+three out of many laws that the term refers to.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -110,15 +113,37 @@
</p>
<p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>In practice, nearly all general statements you
encounter that are
+formulated using “intellectual property” will be false.
+For instance, you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to
+“promote innovation”, but that only fits patent law and
+perhaps plant variety monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with
+innovation; a pop song or novel is copyrighted even if there is
+nothing innovative about it. Trademark law is not concerned with
+innovation; if I start a tea store and call it “rms tea”,
+that would be a solid trademark even if I sell the same teas in the
+same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is not concerned with
+innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers would be a
+trade secret with nothing to do with innovation.</p>
+
+<p>
+You will also see assertions that “intellectual property”
+is concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits
+copyright law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable
+invention. Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with
+creativity; the name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and
+neither is my secret list of tea customers.</p>
+
+<p></em></ins></span>
People often say “intellectual property” when they really
-mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries
+mean some larger or smaller <span
class="removed"><del><strong>category.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>set of laws.</em></ins></span> For instance, rich
countries
often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of
-them. Some of these laws are “intellectual property” laws,
-and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab
-for that label because it has become familiar to them. By using it,
-they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use
-an accurate term, such as “legislative colonization”, that
-gets to the heart of the matter.
+them. Some of these laws are <span class="inserted"><ins><em>among those
called</em></ins></span> “intellectual
+property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the
+practice often grab for that label because it has become familiar to
+them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It
+would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
</p>
<p>
@@ -140,9 +165,9 @@
<p>
That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That
-clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various
-others. The term “intellectual property” led that
-professor to make false generalization.
+clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark <span
class="removed"><del><strong>law</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>law, trade secret
+law,</em></ins></span> or various others. The term “intellectual
property”
+led that professor to make <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a</em></ins></span>
false generalization.
</p>
<p>
@@ -238,19 +263,19 @@
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.
<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent
-to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
+to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
- Please send your comments and general suggestions in this
regard</em></ins></span>
- to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
<address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
@@ -299,7 +324,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:22 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:59 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/not-ipr.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- po/not-ipr.nl.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:15 -0000 1.8
+++ po/not-ipr.nl.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:59 -0000 1.9
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Tom Uijldert <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: \n"
@@ -123,6 +123,22 @@
"rechten” klopt ook niet."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -130,7 +146,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Sommige van de alternatieve uitdrukkingen zouden zeker een verbetering zijn "
"maar het is een vergissing om de term “intellectueel eigendom” "
@@ -165,12 +181,24 @@
"openbaar beleid."
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"Het auteursrecht was in het leven geroepen om het schrijven en de kunsten te "
"bevorderen en regelt de verschijningsvorm van een werk. Het patentrecht had "
@@ -180,12 +208,26 @@
"anderen weer niet."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"In tegestelling hiermee was het handelsmerk nooit bedoeld om bepaalde akties "
"te bevorderen maar gewoon om kopers te laten weten wat ze eigenlijk "
@@ -207,14 +249,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
+msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"Mensen misbruiken vaak de uitdrukking “intellectueel eigendom” "
"voor een veel breder begrip, of iets veel specifiekers. Rijke landen "
@@ -253,12 +341,24 @@
"congres en dus zijn macht op meerdere wijzen”."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Deze uitspraak slaat op artikel 1, sectie 8, sub 8 van de amerikaanse "
"grondwet, die auteursrecht en patentrecht toestaat. Deze clausule heeft "
Index: po/not-ipr.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- po/not-ipr.pl.po 1 Apr 2014 02:02:57 -0000 1.28
+++ po/not-ipr.pl.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:59 -0000 1.29
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-03-06 19:49-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n==1 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 "
"|| n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
"X-Generator: Virtaal 0.7.0\n"
@@ -133,6 +134,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -140,7 +157,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Niektóre z tych zastÄpników stanowiÄ
pewien stopniowy postÄp,
ale "
"zastÄpowanie „wÅasnoÅci intelektualnej” jakimkolwiek innym "
@@ -177,12 +194,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"Prawo autorskie zostaÅo zaprojektowane, by promowaÄ pisanie i "
"sztukÄ, i obejmuje szczegóÅy zwiÄ
zane z pisarstwem lub "
@@ -192,12 +221,26 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"Prawo o znaku handlowym nie byÅo stworzone z myÅlÄ
o "
"promowaniu jakiejkolwiek dziaÅalnoÅci handlowej, ale po to "
@@ -219,17 +262,63 @@
"najlepiej, żebyÅcie przyjÄli, że prawo patentowe jest inne. Rzadko "
"kiedy bÄdziecie siÄ myliÄ!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"Ludzie mówiÄ
czÄsto „wÅasnoÅÄ intelektualna”, kiedy tak
naprawdÄ "
"majÄ
na myÅli jakÄ
Å szerszÄ
lub wÄższÄ
kategoriÄ.
Na przykÅad "
@@ -273,12 +362,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Powyższa wypowiedź odnosi siÄ do artykuÅu Konstytucji USA, który "
"legitymizuje prawo patentowe i prawo autorskie, ale ten artykuÅ "
Index: po/not-ipr.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- po/not-ipr.pot 14 Mar 2014 05:45:15 -0000 1.20
+++ po/not-ipr.pot 5 Aug 2014 02:59:59 -0000 1.21
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -104,11 +104,11 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -117,7 +117,8 @@
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -130,15 +131,40 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as "
-"“legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the "
-"matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -161,9 +187,9 @@
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: po/not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:22 -0000 1.4
+++ po/not-ipr.pt-br-diff.html 5 Aug 2014 02:59:59 -0000 1.5
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as
“intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only
reason people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that
-widespread use of the term has misled them.
+widespread use of the term has misled <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>them about the laws in question.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -87,11 +87,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers
-the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to
-promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the
-one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price
-that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>Copyright</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>For instance, copyright</em></ins></span> law
was designed to promote authorship and
+art, and covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was
+intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of
+giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in
+others.
</p>
<p>
@@ -99,7 +101,8 @@
way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are
buying. Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
-incentives for advertising.
+incentives for advertising. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>And these are just
+three out of many laws that the term refers to.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -110,15 +113,37 @@
</p>
<p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>In practice, nearly all general statements you
encounter that are
+formulated using “intellectual property” will be false.
+For instance, you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to
+“promote innovation”, but that only fits patent law and
+perhaps plant variety monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with
+innovation; a pop song or novel is copyrighted even if there is
+nothing innovative about it. Trademark law is not concerned with
+innovation; if I start a tea store and call it “rms tea”,
+that would be a solid trademark even if I sell the same teas in the
+same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is not concerned with
+innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers would be a
+trade secret with nothing to do with innovation.</p>
+
+<p>
+You will also see assertions that “intellectual property”
+is concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits
+copyright law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable
+invention. Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with
+creativity; the name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and
+neither is my secret list of tea customers.</p>
+
+<p></em></ins></span>
People often say “intellectual property” when they really
-mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries
+mean some larger or smaller <span
class="removed"><del><strong>category.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>set of laws.</em></ins></span> For instance, rich
countries
often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of
-them. Some of these laws are “intellectual property” laws,
-and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab
-for that label because it has become familiar to them. By using it,
-they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use
-an accurate term, such as “legislative colonization”, that
-gets to the heart of the matter.
+them. Some of these laws are <span class="inserted"><ins><em>among those
called</em></ins></span> “intellectual
+property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the
+practice often grab for that label because it has become familiar to
+them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It
+would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
</p>
<p>
@@ -140,9 +165,9 @@
<p>
That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That
-clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various
-others. The term “intellectual property” led that
-professor to make false generalization.
+clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark <span
class="removed"><del><strong>law</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>law, trade secret
+law,</em></ins></span> or various others. The term “intellectual
property”
+led that professor to make <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a</em></ins></span>
false generalization.
</p>
<p>
@@ -238,19 +263,19 @@
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.
<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent
-to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
+to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
- Please send your comments and general suggestions in this
regard</em></ins></span>
- to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
<address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
@@ -299,7 +324,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:22 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 02:59:59 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/not-ipr.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- po/not-ipr.pt-br.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:16 -0000 1.19
+++ po/not-ipr.pt-br.po 5 Aug 2014 02:59:59 -0000 1.20
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-03-11 09:45-0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafael Beraldo <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Brazilian Portuguese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -128,6 +128,15 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -135,7 +144,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Alguns desses nomes alternativos seriam um avanço, mas é um engano "
"substituir âpropriedade intelectualâ por qualquer outro termo. Um nome "
@@ -172,12 +181,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"A lei de copyright foi projetada para promover a autoria e a arte, e cobre "
"os detalhes de expressão de um trabalho. A lei de patentes visava favorecer
"
@@ -187,12 +203,20 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"A lei de marcas, ao contrário, não pretendia apoiar nenhum maneira "
"particular de atuar, mas simplesmente permitir aos compradores saber o que "
@@ -214,17 +238,54 @@
"copyright, você será sábio ao supor que a lei das patentes é diferente. "
"Você raramente estará errado!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"As pessoas geralmente dizem âpropriedade intelectualâ quando realmente "
"querem dizer algo de uma categoria maior ou menor. Por exemplo, paÃses "
@@ -265,12 +326,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Essa afirmação se refere ao artigo 1, seção 8, cláusula 8 da
Constituição "
"dos EUA, que autoriza a lei do copyright e a lei das patentes. Essa "
Index: po/not-ipr.ro.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ro.po,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -b -r1.13 -r1.14
--- po/not-ipr.ro.po 16 Jun 2014 21:29:50 -0000 1.13
+++ po/not-ipr.ro.po 5 Aug 2014 03:00:00 -0000 1.14
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-06-20 17:14-0500\n"
"Last-Translator: RÄzvan Sandu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Romanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -125,6 +125,15 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -132,7 +141,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Folosirea unora dintre termenii alternativi ar reprezenta o oarecare "
"îmbunÄtÄÈire, dar este o greÈealÄ sÄ Ã®nlocuieÈti âproprietate
intelectualÄâ "
@@ -169,12 +178,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"Legea drepturilor de autor (copyright) a fost proiectatÄ sÄ Ã®ncurajeze "
"creaÈia Èi arta Èi acoperÄ detaliile exprimÄrii unei opere. Legea
patentelor "
@@ -184,12 +200,20 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"Din contrÄ, legea mÄrcilor comerciale nu intenÈiona sÄ Ã®ncurajeze nici
un "
"mod anume de a acÈiona, ci doar sÄ permitÄ cumpÄrÄtorilor sÄ Ètie ce
anume "
@@ -211,17 +235,54 @@
"înÈelept sÄ presupuneÈi cÄ Ã®n legea patentelor lucrurile stau altfel. "
"Rareori vÄ veÈi înÈela!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"De obicei, oamenii spun âproprietate intelectualÄâ atunci când, de
fapt, se "
"referÄ la o categorie mai restrânsÄ sau mai largÄ. De exemplu, ÈÄrile
bogate "
@@ -262,12 +323,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"AfirmaÈia se referÄ la Articolul 1, SecÈiunea 8, Paragraful 8 din "
"ConstituÈia Statelor Unite, care autorizeazÄ legea dreptului de autor Èi "
Index: po/not-ipr.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- po/not-ipr.ru.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:16 -0000 1.30
+++ po/not-ipr.ru.po 5 Aug 2014 03:00:00 -0000 1.31
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-05 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -133,6 +134,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other
+# | term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem:
+# | overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual
+# | property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has
+# | misled [-them.-] {+them about the laws in question.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -140,7 +157,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"ÐекоÑоÑÑе из ÑÑиÑ
алÑÑеÑнаÑивнÑÑ
названий ÑлÑÑÑили Ð±Ñ Ð´ÐµÐ»Ð¾, но бÑло Ð±Ñ "
"оÑибкой заменÑÑÑ “инÑеллекÑÑалÑнÑÑ
ÑобÑÑвенноÑÑÑ” дÑÑгим "
@@ -179,12 +196,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+# | [-Copyright-]{+For instance, copyright+} law was designed to promote
+# | authorship and art, and covers the details of expression of a work.
+# | Patent law was intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the
+# | price of giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+# | it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"ÐÐ°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ñ Ð¾Ð± авÑоÑÑком пÑаве ÑоÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð´Ð»Ñ
ÑодейÑÑÐ²Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ÑкÑÑÑÑÐ²Ñ Ð¸ авÑоÑам. ÐÑ
"
"обÑÐµÐºÑ — деÑали вÑÑÐ°Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ
ÑдожеÑÑвенной ÑабоÑÑ. ÐаÑенÑное пÑаво "
@@ -195,12 +224,26 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
+# | property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
+# | incentives for advertising. {+And these are just three out of many laws
+# | that the term refers to.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"Ðакон о ÑоваÑнÑÑ
знакаÑ
, напÑоÑив,
пÑедназнаÑалÑÑ Ð½Ðµ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ \n"
"какого-Ñо Ñода деÑÑелÑноÑÑи, а пÑоÑÑо длÑ
Ñого, \n"
@@ -222,17 +265,63 @@
"Ñзнали ÑÑо-нибÑÐ´Ñ Ð¾Ð± авÑоÑÑком пÑаве, Ñо
Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð±Ñло Ð±Ñ ÑазÑмно полагаÑÑ, "
"ÑÑо в паÑенÑном пÑаве ÑÑо по-дÑÑгомÑ. ÐÑ
Ñедко оÑибеÑеÑÑ!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean
+# | some larger or smaller [-category.-] {+set of laws.+} For instance, rich
+# | countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out
+# | of them. Some of these laws are {+among those called+}
+# | “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless,
+# | critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become
+# | familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.
+# | It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+# | colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑди ÑаÑÑо говоÑÑÑ “инÑеллекÑÑалÑнаÑ
ÑобÑÑвенноÑÑÑ”, когда \n"
"в дейÑÑвиÑелÑноÑÑи подÑазÑмеваÑÑ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐµ
ÑиÑокое или более Ñзкое понÑÑие. \n"
@@ -277,12 +366,24 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
+# | Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
+# | though, has nothing to do with trademark [-law-] {+law, trade secret
+# | law,+} or various others. The term “intellectual property”
+# | led that professor to make {+a+} false generalization.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑо ÑÑвеÑждение оÑноÑиÑÑÑ Ðº ÑÑаÑÑе 1,
ÑÐ°Ð·Ð´ÐµÐ»Ñ 8, паÑагÑаÑÑ 8 "
"ÐонÑÑиÑÑÑии \n"
Index: po/not-ipr.sr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.sr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- po/not-ipr.sr.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:16 -0000 1.20
+++ po/not-ipr.sr.po 5 Aug 2014 03:00:00 -0000 1.21
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-17 18:55+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Strahinya Radich <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Serbian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -138,6 +138,15 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -145,7 +154,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"Ðеки од овиÑ
алÑеÑнаÑивниÑ
назива би
пÑедÑÑавÑали побоÑÑаÑе, али Ñе погÑеÑно "
"меÑаÑи изÑаз âинÑелекÑÑална ÑвоÑинаâ
било коÑим дÑÑгим. ÐÑÑгаÑиÑи назив не "
@@ -182,12 +191,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"Ðакон о аÑÑоÑÑким пÑавима Ñе замиÑÑен да
подÑÑакне ÑÑваÑалаÑÑво и ÑмеÑноÑÑ, "
"и обÑÑ
ваÑа деÑаÑе изÑаза дела. ÐаÑенÑни
закон Ñе намеÑен подÑÑиÑаÑÑ "
@@ -197,12 +213,20 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"Ðакон о Ñобним маÑкама, наÑÑпÑÐ¾Ñ Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ð¼Ðµ,
ниÑе замиÑÑен да подÑÑакне било коÑи "
"конкÑеÑан наÑин деловаÑа, Ð²ÐµÑ Ñамо да
омогÑÑи кÑпÑима да знаÑÑ ÑÑа кÑпÑÑÑ. "
@@ -222,17 +246,54 @@
"Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ñ Ð¾ аÑÑоÑÑким пÑавима, Ñа пÑавом
можеÑе пÑеÑпоÑÑавиÑи да Ñе Ñо "
"дÑÑгаÑиÑе Ñ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ñ Ð¾ паÑенÑнима. ТеÑко да
можеÑе да погÑеÑиÑе!"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑди ÑеÑÑо говоÑе âинÑелекÑÑална
ÑвоÑинаâ када Ñ ÑÑваÑи миÑле на Ð½ÐµÐºÑ Ð²ÐµÑÑ "
"или маÑÑ ÐºÐ°ÑегоÑиÑÑ. Ðа пÑимеÑ, богаÑе
земÑе ÑеÑÑо намеÑÑ Ð½ÐµÐ¿Ñаведне законе "
@@ -289,9 +350,9 @@
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Ðва изÑава Ñе одноÑи на Ñлан 1, ÑекÑиÑÑ 8,
ÑаÑÐºÑ 8 УÑÑава СÐÐ, коÑа "
"овлаÑÑÑÑе закон о аÑÑоÑÑким пÑавима и
закон о паÑенÑима. ÐеÑÑÑим, Ñа ÑаÑка "
@@ -506,11 +567,19 @@
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "This page is licensed under a <a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://";
+#| "creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/\">Creative Commons Attribution-"
+#| "NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>."
msgid ""
"This page is licensed under a <a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://";
"creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/\">Creative Commons Attribution-"
"NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>."
msgstr ""
+"Ðва ÑÑÑана Ñе лиÑенÑиÑана под ÑÑловима
лиÑенÑе<a rel=\"license\" href="
+"\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.sr\";>Creative "
+"Commons ÐÑÑоÑÑÑво-Ðез пÑеÑада 3.0 СÐÐ</a>."
# type: Content of: <div><div>
#. TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.
Index: po/not-ipr.uk.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.uk.po,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- po/not-ipr.uk.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:16 -0000 1.8
+++ po/not-ipr.uk.po 5 Aug 2014 03:00:00 -0000 1.9
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-02 16:09+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Andriy Bandura <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Ukrainian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: ENCODINGLanguage: uk\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n"
"%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
"X-Generator: Lokalize 1.5\n"
@@ -116,6 +117,15 @@
"“пÑавами” Ñеж внÑÑÑÑÑнÑо
ÑÑпеÑеÑливо."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -123,7 +133,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"ÐеÑÐºÑ Ð· ÑиÑ
алÑÑеÑнаÑивниÑ
назв полÑпÑили
б ÑпÑава, але замÑнÑваÑи “"
"ÑнÑелекÑÑалÑÐ½Ñ Ð²Ð»Ð°ÑнÑÑÑÑ” ÑнÑим
ÑеÑмÑном — Ñе помилка. ÐнÑа "
@@ -156,12 +166,19 @@
"ÑÑÐ·Ð½Ñ Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ð½Ñ ÑÑÑпÑлÑного ÑÑÑÑоÑ."
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"Ðакони пÑо авÑоÑÑÑке пÑаво ÑÐºÐ»Ð°Ð´ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð´Ð»Ñ
заоÑ
оÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð¼Ð¸ÑÑеÑÑва Ñа авÑоÑÑÑва. "
"Ðони оÑ
оплÑÑÑÑ Ð´ÐµÑÐ°Ð»Ñ Ð²Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ñ
ÑдожнÑÐ¾Ñ ÑобоÑи. ÐаÑенÑне пÑаво "
@@ -170,12 +187,20 @@
"ваÑÑо заплаÑиÑи в одниÑ
галÑзÑÑ
Ñ Ð½Ðµ ваÑÑо
— в ÑнÑиÑ
."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"Ðакон пÑо ÑоваÑÐ½Ñ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÐºÐ¸, навпаки,
пÑизнаÑавÑÑ Ð½Ðµ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð·Ð°Ð¾Ñ
оÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ ÑкогоÑÑ ÑодÑ
"
"дÑÑлÑноÑÑÑ, а пÑоÑÑо Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñого, Ñоб покÑпÑÑ
могли знаÑи, Ñо вони кÑпÑÑÑÑ. "
@@ -196,14 +221,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
+msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑди ÑаÑÑо кажÑÑÑ “ÑнÑелекÑÑалÑна
влаÑнÑÑÑÑ”, коли наÑпÑÐ°Ð²Ð´Ñ "
"ÑозÑмÑÑÑÑÑÑ ÑиÑÑе або вÑжÑе понÑÑÑÑ.
ÐапÑиклад, багаÑÑ ÐºÑаÑни ÑаÑÑо "
@@ -241,12 +303,19 @@
"заÑ
одами. "
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"Це ÑвеÑÐ´Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð²ÑдноÑиÑÑÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ ÑÑаÑÑÑ 1,
ÑоздÑÐ»Ñ 8, паÑагÑаÑÑ 8 "
"ÐонÑÑиÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¡Ð¨Ð, де говоÑиÑÑÑÑ Ð¿Ñо
авÑоÑÑÑке пÑаво Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑне пÑаво. Цей "
Index: po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:23 -0000 1.4
+++ po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html 5 Aug 2014 03:00:00 -0000 1.5
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as
“intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only
reason people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that
-widespread use of the term has misled them.
+widespread use of the term has misled <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>them about the laws in question.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -87,11 +87,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers
-the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to
-promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the
-one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price
-that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>Copyright</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>For instance, copyright</em></ins></span> law
was designed to promote authorship and
+art, and covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was
+intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of
+giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+it—a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in
+others.
</p>
<p>
@@ -99,7 +101,8 @@
way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are
buying. Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
-incentives for advertising.
+incentives for advertising. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>And these are just
+three out of many laws that the term refers to.</em></ins></span>
</p>
<p>
@@ -110,15 +113,37 @@
</p>
<p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>In practice, nearly all general statements you
encounter that are
+formulated using “intellectual property” will be false.
+For instance, you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to
+“promote innovation”, but that only fits patent law and
+perhaps plant variety monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with
+innovation; a pop song or novel is copyrighted even if there is
+nothing innovative about it. Trademark law is not concerned with
+innovation; if I start a tea store and call it “rms tea”,
+that would be a solid trademark even if I sell the same teas in the
+same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is not concerned with
+innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers would be a
+trade secret with nothing to do with innovation.</p>
+
+<p>
+You will also see assertions that “intellectual property”
+is concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits
+copyright law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable
+invention. Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with
+creativity; the name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and
+neither is my secret list of tea customers.</p>
+
+<p></em></ins></span>
People often say “intellectual property” when they really
-mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries
+mean some larger or smaller <span
class="removed"><del><strong>category.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>set of laws.</em></ins></span> For instance, rich
countries
often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of
-them. Some of these laws are “intellectual property” laws,
-and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab
-for that label because it has become familiar to them. By using it,
-they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use
-an accurate term, such as “legislative colonization”, that
-gets to the heart of the matter.
+them. Some of these laws are <span class="inserted"><ins><em>among those
called</em></ins></span> “intellectual
+property” laws, and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the
+practice often grab for that label because it has become familiar to
+them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue. It
+would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
+colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter.
</p>
<p>
@@ -140,9 +165,9 @@
<p>
That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That
-clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various
-others. The term “intellectual property” led that
-professor to make false generalization.
+clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark <span
class="removed"><del><strong>law</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>law, trade secret
+law,</em></ins></span> or various others. The term “intellectual
property”
+led that professor to make <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a</em></ins></span>
false generalization.
</p>
<p>
@@ -238,19 +263,19 @@
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.
<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent
-to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
+to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
- Please send your comments and general suggestions in this
regard</em></ins></span>
- to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
<address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
@@ -299,7 +324,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:23 $
+$Date: 2014/08/05 03:00:00 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po 14 Mar 2014 05:45:16 -0000 1.19
+++ po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po 5 Aug 2014 03:00:00 -0000 1.20
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: not-ipr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:34+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-08-05 02:57+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-01-28 13:47-0500\n"
"Last-Translator: Deng, Nan <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -120,6 +120,15 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other "
+#| "term. A different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “"
+#| "intellectual property”—it is a mirage. The only reason "
+#| "people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use "
+#| "of the term has misled them."
msgid ""
"Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a mistake "
"to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A "
@@ -127,7 +136,7 @@
"overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as “intellectual "
"property”—it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes "
"sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term has misled "
-"them."
+"them about the laws in question."
msgstr ""
"è¿äºæ¿ä»£è¯å¾å¾æ¯åè¯æäºä¸å°çæ¹è¿ãä¸è¿æ
论“ç¥è¯äº§æ”è¿è¯æ¢æä»"
"ä¹ï¼é½æ¯ä¸ªé误ãå纯æ¢ä¸ªè¯ï¼å¹¶ä¸è½è§£å³æ·±å±æ¬¡çé®é¢ï¼è¿åº¦æ¦æ¬ãè¿ä¸çä¸åæ
¹å°±"
@@ -160,12 +169,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
-"details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
-"publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an "
-"idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in "
-"some fields and not in others."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth "
+#| "paying in some fields and not in others."
+msgid ""
+"For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and "
+"covers the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to "
+"promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who "
+"publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be "
+"worth paying in some fields and not in others."
msgstr ""
"çææ³è¢«è®¾è®¡ç¨ä»¥é¼å±åæ¨å¨åä½åææ¯ãå®è¦çäºæ´ä¸ªåä½å®ç°çæ¯ä¸ªç»èãä¸å©æ³"
"åæå¨æ¨è¿å®ç¨åæçåå¸ãéè¿å¨ä¸å®æ¶æå
ï¼èµäºåæè
对该åæçåææï¼æ¥è¾¾"
@@ -173,12 +189,20 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
+#| "property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
+#| "incentives for advertising."
msgid ""
"Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way "
"of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
"Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual "
"property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides "
-"incentives for advertising."
+"incentives for advertising. And these are just three out of many laws that "
+"the term refers to."
msgstr ""
"ç¸åï¼åæ
æ³åä¸æ¯ç¨ä»¥æ¨å¨ä»ä¹ç¹æ®æ´»å¨ãå®åªæ¯ç¨æ¥è®©æ¶è´¹è
们ç¥éèªå·±ä¹°äºä»"
"ä¹ãèç«æ³è
们ç±äºè¢«“ç¥è¯äº§æ”è¿ä¸ªè¯å½±åï¼è®¤ä¸ºåæ
æ³æ¯ç¨ä»¥æ¨å¨å¹¿"
@@ -196,17 +220,54 @@
"ç®çåæ¹æ³ä¸ä¹æ¯ä¸ä¸æ ·çãæ以ï¼å¨ä½
å¦äºä¸äºçææ³çç¥è¯ä¹åï¼è½å¤åºå对å¾
ä¸"
"å©æ³ï¼é£ä½ å°±å¾å°ç¯éäºã"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are formulated "
+"using “intellectual property” will be false. For instance, "
+"you'll see claims that “its” purpose is to “promote "
+"innovation”, but that only fits patent law and perhaps plant variety "
+"monopolies. Copyright law is not concerned with innovation; a pop song or "
+"novel is copyrighted even if there is nothing innovative about it. "
+"Trademark law is not concerned with innovation; if I start a tea store and "
+"call it “rms tea”, that would be a solid trademark even if I "
+"sell the same teas in the same way as everyone else. Trade secret law is "
+"not concerned with innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers "
+"would be a trade secret with nothing to do with innovation."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"You will also see assertions that “intellectual property” is "
+"concerned with ”creativity”, but really that only fits copyright "
+"law. More than creativity is needed to make a patentable invention. "
+"Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with creativity; the "
+"name “rms tea” isn't creative at all, and neither is my secret "
+"list of tea customers."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say “intellectual property” when they really "
+#| "mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often "
+#| "impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some "
+#| "of these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others "
+#| "are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label "
+#| "because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent "
+#| "the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, "
+#| "such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of "
+#| "the matter."
msgid ""
"People often say “intellectual property” when they really mean "
-"some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
-"unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
-"laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not; "
-"nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it "
-"has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of "
-"the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “"
-"legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+"some larger or smaller set of laws. For instance, rich countries often "
+"impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of "
+"these laws are among those called “intellectual property” laws, "
+"and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that "
+"label because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they "
+"misrepresent the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate "
+"term, such as “legislative colonization”, that gets to the heart "
+"of the matter."
msgstr ""
"人们说“ç¥è¯äº§æ”çæ¶åï¼å¾å¾æ¯æ代çä¸äºæ´å¤§æè
æ´å°çé¢åãæ¯å¦"
"说ï¼ä¸äºå¯å¼ºçå½å®¶å¾å¾ç»è´«å°å½å®¶å¼ºå
ä¸äºä¸å¹³ççæ³å¾ï¼ä»ä¸æ¦¨åå©çãè¿å
¶ä¸æ"
@@ -241,12 +302,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That "
+#| "clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. "
+#| "The term “intellectual property” led that professor to make "
+#| "false generalization."
msgid ""
"That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US "
"Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
-"though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term "
-"“intellectual property” led that professor to make false "
-"generalization."
+"though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret law, or various "
+"others. The term “intellectual property” led that professor to "
+"make a false generalization."
msgstr ""
"è¿ä¸éå¶æ¯æç¾å½å®ªæ³ç¬¬ä¸æ¡ç¬¬å
«æ¬¾ä¸çéè¿°ãçææ³åä¸å©æ³åç´æ¥ææäºè¯¥æ¬¾ãä¸"
"è¿å®ªæ³ä¸çè¿ä¸æ¬¾å¯æ²¡æå°åæ æè
å
¶ä»ä¸è¥¿ãèè¿ä½ææ使ç¨äº“ç¥è¯äº§æ"
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy not-ipr.ar.html not-ipr.el.html ...,
GNUN <=