[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy po/ubuntu-spyware.translist ubun...
|
From: |
Pavel Kharitonov |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy po/ubuntu-spyware.translist ubun... |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:54:25 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev> 14/04/03 15:54:25
Modified files:
philosophy/po : ubuntu-spyware.translist
Removed files:
philosophy : ubuntu-spyware.pt-br.html
philosophy/po : ubuntu-spyware.pt-br-en.html ubuntu-spyware.pot
Log message:
Remove translation RT #900571.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=0
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist?cvsroot=www&r1=1.11&r2=1.12
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.pt-br-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=0
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=0
Patches:
Index: po/ubuntu-spyware.translist
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -b -r1.11 -r1.12
--- po/ubuntu-spyware.translist 24 Mar 2014 05:58:08 -0000 1.11
+++ po/ubuntu-spyware.translist 3 Apr 2014 15:54:25 -0000 1.12
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="fr" hreflang="fr"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.fr.html">français</a> [fr]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="hr" hreflang="hr"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.hr.html">hrvatski</a> [hr]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="ml" hreflang="ml"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.ml.html">മലയാളà´</a> [ml]</span>
-<span dir="ltr"><a lang="pt-br" hreflang="pt-br"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.pt-br.html">português do Brasil</a> [pt-br]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="ru" hreflang="ru"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.ru.html">ÑÑÑÑкий</a> [ru]</span>
</p>
</div>' -->
Index: ubuntu-spyware.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: ubuntu-spyware.pt-br.html
diff -N ubuntu-spyware.pt-br.html
--- ubuntu-spyware.pt-br.html 15 Mar 2014 12:25:40 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,233 +0,0 @@
-
-
-<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.76 -->
-
-<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
- <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.en.html" -->
-
-<title>Ubuntu Spyware: O que fazer? - Projeto GNU - Free Software
Foundation</title>
-
-<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
-<h2>Ubuntu Spyware: O que fazer?</h2>
-
-<p>por <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard Stallman</a></p>
-
-<p>Uma das principais vantagens do software livre é que a comunidade protege
os
-usuários de software malicioso. Agora o Ubuntu <a
-href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux</a> tornou-se um contra-exemplo. O
-que devemos fazer?</p>
-
-<p>Software proprietário é associado com tratamento malicioso do usuário:
-código de vigilância, algemas digitais (DRM ou Gerenciamento de Restrições
-Digitais) para restringir usuários, e backdoors (portas traseiras) que podem
-fazer coisas desagradáveis sob controles remotos. Programas que fazem
-qualquer dessas coisas são malwares e deveriam estar tratados como
-tais. Amplamente usados exemplos incluem Windows, o iThings, e a Amazon
-âtÃpicoâ produto para livro virtual gravando, que fazem todos três;
-Macintosh e o Playstation III que impõe DRM; a maioria dos telefones móveis,
-que fazem espionagem e têm portas traseiras (backdoors); Adobe Flash Player,
-que faz espionagem e força DRM; e abundância de aplicativos (apps) para
-iThings e Android, que são culpados de uma ou mais dessas práticas
-desagradáveis.</p>
-
-<p>Software livre dá aos usuários uma chance para proteger eles mesmos de
-comportamentos de software malicioso. Mesmo melhor, usualmente a comunidade
-protege todos, e a maioria dos usuários não tem que mover um músculo. Aqui
-está como.</p>
-
-<p>De vez em quando, usuários que conhecem programação encontram que
programas
-grátis tem código malicioso. Geralmente a próxima coisa que eles fazem é
-lançar uma versão corrigida do programa; com as quatro liberdades que
-definem software livre (veja <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">
-http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>), eles são livres para fazer
-isto. Isto é chamado de âforkâ (garfo) do programa. Logo que a comunidade
-substitui para a versão corrigida, e a versão maliciosa é rejeitada. A
-perspectiva de rejeição vergonhosa não é muito tentadora; assim, na maioria
-do tempo, mesmo aqueles que não são interrompidos pelas suas consciências e
-pressão social abstêm-se de colocando más caracterÃsticas em softwares
-livres.</p>
-
-<p>Mas não sempre. Ubuntu, um amplamente usado e influente distribuição <a
-href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux</a>, tem instalado código de
-vigilância. Quando o usuário procura seus próprios arquivos locais para uma
-sequência de caracteres usando o desktop Ubuntu, Ubuntu envia aquela
-sequência de caracteres para um dos servidores da Canonical. (Canonical é a
-companhia que desenvolve Ubuntu.)</p>
-
-<p>Isto é apenas como a primeira prática de vigilância que eu aprendi sobre
o
-Windows. Meu falecido amigo Fravia disse me que quando ele procurava para
-uma sequência de caracteres nos arquivos de seu sistema Windows, isto envia
-um pacote para algum servidor, que foi detectado pelo seu firewall. Dado
-aquele primeiro exemplo eu prestei atenção e aprendi sobre a tendência do
-software proprietário ârespeitávelâ para ser malware. Talvez isto não é
-coincidência que Ubuntu envie a mesma informação.</p>
-
-<p>Ubuntu usa a informação sobre pesquisas para mostrar ao usuário anúncios
-para comprar várias coisas da Amazon. Amazon comete muitos erros (veja <a
-href="http://stallman.org/amazon.html";>
-http://stallman.org/amazon.html</a>); pelo promovendo Amazon, Canonical
-contribui para eles. Porém, os anúncios não são o cerne do problema. A
-principal questão é a espionagem. Canonical diz que isto não diz à Amazon
-quem pesquisou para o quê. Porém, isto é apenas como mal para Canonical
-coletar sua informação pessoal como isto poderia ter sido para Amazon
-coletar isto.</p>
-
-<p>O pessoal certamente fará uma versão modificada de Ubuntu sem esta
-vigilância. De fato, vários distros de GNU/Linux são versão modificadas de
-Ubuntu. Quando aquilo atualizar para o mais recente Ubuntu como base, eu
-espero eles irão remover isto. Canonical certamente expera isso também.</p>
-
-<p>A maioria dos desenvolvedores de software livre gostariam de abandonar tal
-plano, dada a perspectiva de uma alternância em massa para alguma outra
-versão corrigida. Mas Canonical não têm abandonado o spyware de
-Ubuntu. Talvez Canonical figura que o nome âUbuntuâ têm tanto impulso de
-momento e influência que isto pode evitar as consequências habituais e ir
-longe com vigilância.</p>
-
-<p>Canonical diz que esta funcionalidade procura a internet em outras
-maneiras. Dependendo dos detalhes, aquilo poderia ou não poderia fazer o
-maior problema, mas não o menor.</p>
-
-<p>Ubuntu permite usuários alternar a vigilância para desligado. Claramente
-Canonical pensa que muitos usuários Ubuntu irão deixar esta configuração no
-estado padrão (ligado). E muitos podem fazê-lo, porque isto não lhes ocorre
-para tentar fazer qualquer coissa sobre isto. Assim, a existência daquela
-alternância não faz o recurso de vigilância aprovado.</p>
-
-<p>Mesmo se isto fosse desabilitado por padrão, o recurso poderia ainda estar
-perigoso: âopt in, uma vez por todasâ para uma prática arriscada, onde os
-vários riscos dependendo sobre detalhes, convida ao descuido. Para proteger
-privacidade de usuários, sistemas deveriam fazer fácil prudência: quando um
-programa de pesquisa local tem um recurso de pesquisa de rede, isto deveria
-estar até o usuário escolher a pesquisa de rede explicitamente cada
-vez. Isto está fácil: tudo isto toma está para ter botões separados para
-pesquisas de rede e pesquisas locais, como versões anteriores de Ubuntu
-fizeram. Um recurso de pesquisa de rede deveria também informar o usuário
-claramente e concretamente sobre quem obterá qual informação pessoal delas,
-se e quando ela usa o recurso.</p>
-
-<p>Se uma parte suficiente de opinião dos lÃderes da nossa comunidade verem
-esta questão em somente termos pessoais, se eles alternam a vigilância no
-modo desligado para eles mesmos e continuam a promover Ubuntu, Canonical
-poderia fugir com isto. Aquilo seria uma grande perda para a comunidade de
-software livre.</p>
-
-<p>Nós que apresentamos software livre como uma defesa contra malware não
-dizemos que isto é uma defesa perfeita. Nenhuma defesa perfeita é
-conhecida. Nós não dizemos que a comunidade deterá malware <em>sem
-falhar</em>. Assim, estritamente falando, o exemplo spyware Ubuntu não
-significa que nós temos que comer nossas palavras.</p>
-
-<p>Mas há mais em jogo aqui do que saber se alguns de nós temos que comer
-certas palavras. O que está em jogo é saber se nossa comunidade pode
-efetivamente usar o argumento baseado sobre spyware proprietário. Se nós
-podemos somente dizer, âsoftware livre não espiará sobre você, a menos que
-seja o Ubuntuâ, que é muito menos poderoso que dizendo, âsoftware livre
não
-espiará sobre vocêâ.</p>
-
-<p>Cabe a nós dar à Canonical o que quer que rejeição está necessário
para
-fazê-lo parar isso. Qualquer desculpa da Canonical está inadequada, mesmo se
-isto usou todo o dinheiro isto obtêm desde Amazon para desenvolver software
-livre, que pode dificilmente superar o que software livre perderá se isto
-deixa para oferecer uma maneira efetiva para evitar abuso dos usuários.</p>
-
-<p>Se você mesmo assim recomenda ou redistribui GNU/Linux, por favor remova
-Ubuntu das distros que você recomenda ou redistribui. Se esta prática de
-instalando e recomendando software não-livre não convenceu você para parar,
-deixe isto convencer você. Em suas festas de instalação, em seus eventos de
-Software Freedom Day, em seus eventos de FLISoL, não instale ou recomende
-Ubuntu. Em vez disso, diga à pessoa que Ubuntu está evitado por
espionagem.</p>
-
-<p>Enquanto você está nisso, você pode também dizer-lhes que Ubuntu contêm
-programas não-livres e sugere outros programas não-livres. (Veja <a
-href="/distros/common-distros.html">
-http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html</a>.) Aquilo contrariará a
-outra forma de influência negativa que Ubuntu exerce na comunidade de
-software livre: legitimizando software não-livre.</p>
-
-
-<div style="font-size: small;">
-
-<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
- </div>
-</div>
-
-<!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.pt-br.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
-<div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Envie perguntas em geral sobre a FSF e o GNU para <a
-href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>. Também existem <a
-href="/contact/">outros meios de contatar</a> a FSF. Links quebrados e
-outras correções ou sugestões podem ser enviadas para <a
-href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
-
-<p>
-<!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
- replace it with the translation of these two:
-
- We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
- translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
- Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
- to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
-
- <address@hidden></a>.</p>
-
- <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
- our web pages, see <a
- href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. -->
-A equipe de traduções para o português brasileiro se esforça para oferecer
-traduções acuradas e de boa qualidade, mas não estamos isentos de erros. Por
-favor, envie seus comentários e sugestões em geral sobre as traduções para
-<a
-href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
-</p><p>Consulte o <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Guia
-para as traduções</a> para mais informações sobre a coordenação e o
envio de
-traduções das páginas desse site.</p>
-</div>
-
-<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
- files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
- without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
- document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
- document was modified, or published.
-
- If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
- Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
- years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
- year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
- being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
-
- There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
- Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2012 Richard Stallman<br /> Copyright © 2014 Thiago
-Henrique Ferreira Zoroastro (translation)</p>
-
-<p>Esta página está licenciada sob uma <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>licença Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States</a>.</p>
-
-<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.pt-br.html" -->
-<div class="translators-credits">
-
-<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
-<b>Tradução</b>: Thiago Zoroastro</div>
-
-
- <p></p><p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
-Ãltima atualização:
-
-$Date: 2014/03/15 12:25:40 $
-
-<!-- timestamp end -->
-</p>
-</div>
-</div>
-</body>
-</html>
Index: po/ubuntu-spyware.pt-br-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/ubuntu-spyware.pt-br-en.html
diff -N po/ubuntu-spyware.pt-br-en.html
--- po/ubuntu-spyware.pt-br-en.html 15 Mar 2014 12:25:47 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,201 +0,0 @@
-<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.76 -->
-<title>Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do?
- - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
-<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
-<h2>Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do?</h2>
-
-<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard Stallman</a></p>
-
-<p>One of the major advantages of free software is that the community
- protects users from malicious software. Now
- Ubuntu <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html"> GNU/Linux </a> has become
- a counterexample. What should we do?</p>
-
-<p>Proprietary software is associated with malicious treatment of the user:
- surveillance code, digital handcuffs (DRM or Digital Restrictions
- Management) to restrict users, and back doors that can do nasty things
- under remote control. Programs that do any of these things are
- malware and should be treated as such. Widely used examples include
- Windows, the iThings, and the Amazon “Kindle” product for
virtual book
- burning, which do all three; Macintosh and the Playstation III which
- impose DRM; most portable phones, which do spying and have back doors;
- Adobe Flash Player, which does spying and enforces DRM; and plenty of
- apps for iThings and Android, which are guilty of one or more of these
- nasty practices.</p>
-
-<p>Free software gives users a chance to protect themselves from
- malicious software behaviors. Even better, usually the community
- protects everyone, and most users don't have to move a muscle. Here's
- how.</p>
-
-<p>Once in a while, users who know programming find that a free program
- has malicious code. Generally the next thing they do is release a
- corrected version of the program; with the four freedoms that define
- free software (see <a
href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>),
they
- are free to do this. This is called a “fork” of the program.
Soon
- the community switches to the corrected fork, and the malicious
- version is rejected. The prospect of ignominious rejection is not
- very tempting; thus, most of the time, even those who are not stopped
- by their consciences and social pressure refrain from putting
- malfeatures in free software.</p>
-
-<p>But not always. Ubuntu, a widely used and
- influential <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html"> GNU/Linux </a>
- distribution, has installed surveillance code. When the user
- searches her own local files for a string using the Ubuntu desktop,
- Ubuntu sends that string to one of Canonical's servers. (Canonical
- is the company that develops Ubuntu.)</p>
-
-<p>This is just like the first surveillance practice I learned about in
- Windows. My late friend Fravia told me that when he searched for a
- string in the files of his Windows system, it sent a packet to some
- server, which was detected by his firewall. Given that first example
- I paid attention and learned about the propensity of “reputable”
- proprietary software to be malware. Perhaps it is no coincidence that
- Ubuntu sends the same information.</p>
-
-<p>Ubuntu uses the information about searches to show the user ads to buy
- various things from Amazon. Amazon commits many wrongs (see
- <a
href="http://stallman.org/amazon.html";>http://stallman.org/amazon.html</a>); by
promoting Amazon, Canonical
- contributes to them. However, the ads are not the core of the
- problem. The main issue is the spying. Canonical says it does not
- tell Amazon who searched for what. However, it is just as bad for
- Canonical to collect your personal information as it would have been
- for Amazon to collect it.</p>
-
-<p>People will certainly make a modified version of Ubuntu without this
- surveillance. In fact, several GNU/Linux distros are modified
- versions of Ubuntu. When those update to the latest Ubuntu as a base,
- I expect they will remove this. Canonical surely expects that too.</p>
-
-<p>Most free software developers would abandon such a plan given the
- prospect of a mass switch to someone else's corrected version. But
- Canonical has not abandoned the Ubuntu spyware. Perhaps Canonical
- figures that the name “Ubuntu” has so much momentum and
influence that
- it can avoid the usual consequences and get away with surveillance.</p>
-
-<p>Canonical says this feature searches the Internet in other ways.
- Depending on the details, that might or might not make the problem
- bigger, but not smaller.</p>
-
-<p>Ubuntu allows users to switch the surveillance off. Clearly Canonical
- thinks that many Ubuntu users will leave this setting in the default
- state (on). And many may do so, because it doesn't occur to them to
- try to do anything about it. Thus, the existence of that switch does
- not make the surveillance feature ok.</p>
-
-<p>Even if it were disabled by default, the feature would still be
- dangerous: “opt in, once and for all” for a risky practice,
where the
- risk varies depending on details, invites carelessness. To protect
- users' privacy, systems should make prudence easy: when a local search
- program has a network search feature, it should be up to the user to
- choose network search explicitly <em>each time</em>. This is easy:
- all it takes is to have separate buttons for network searches and
- local searches, as earlier versions of Ubuntu did. A network search
- feature should also inform the user clearly and concretely about who
- will get what personal information of hers, if and when she uses the
- feature.</p>
-
-<p>If a sufficient part of our community's opinion leaders view this
- issue in personal terms only, if they switch the surveillance off for
- themselves and continue to promote Ubuntu, Canonical might get away
- with it. That would be a great loss to the free software community.</p>
-
-<p>We who present free software as a defense against malware do not say
- it is a perfect defense. No perfect defense is known. We don't say
- the community will deter malware <em>without fail</em>. Thus,
- strictly speaking, the Ubuntu spyware example doesn't mean we have to
- eat our words.</p>
-
-<p>But there's more at stake here than whether some of us have to eat
- some words. What's at stake is whether our community can effectively
- use the argument based on proprietary spyware. If we can only say,
- “free software won't spy on you, unless it's Ubuntu,” that's
much less
- powerful than saying, “free software won't spy on you.”</p>
-
-<p>It behooves us to give Canonical whatever rebuff is needed to make it
- stop this. Any excuse Canonical offers is inadequate; even if it used
- all the money it gets from Amazon to develop free software, that can
- hardly overcome what free software will lose if it ceases to offer an
- effective way to avoid abuse of the users.</p>
-
-<p>If you ever recommend or redistribute GNU/Linux, please remove Ubuntu
- from the distros you recommend or redistribute. If its practice of
- installing and recommending nonfree software didn't convince you to
- stop, let this convince you. In your install fests, in your Software
- Freedom Day events, in your FLISOL events, don't install or recommend
- Ubuntu. Instead, tell people that Ubuntu is shunned for spying.</p>
-
-<p>While you're at it, you can also tell them that Ubuntu contains
- nonfree programs and suggests other nonfree programs. (See
- <a href="/distros/common-distros.html">
- http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html</a>.) That will counteract
- the other form of negative influence that Ubuntu exerts in the free
- software community: legitimizing nonfree software.</p>
-
-</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
-<div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
-There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
-to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
-
-<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
- replace it with the translation of these two:
-
- We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
- translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
- Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
- to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
- <address@hidden></a>.</p>
-
- <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
- our web pages, see <a
- href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. -->
-Please see the <a
-href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this article.</p>
-</div>
-
-<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
- files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
- without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
- document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
- document was modified, or published.
-
- If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
- Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
- years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
- year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
- being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
-
- There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
- Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-
-<p>Copyright © 2012 Richard Stallman</p>
-
-<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
-
-<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-
-<p></p><p class="unprintable">Updated:
-<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/03/15 12:25:47 $
-<!-- timestamp end -->
-</p>
-</div>
-</div>
-</body>
-</html>
Index: po/ubuntu-spyware.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: po/ubuntu-spyware.pot
diff -N po/ubuntu-spyware.pot
--- po/ubuntu-spyware.pot 2 Apr 2014 17:02:00 -0000 1.4
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,276 +0,0 @@
-# LANGUAGE translation of http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.html
-# Copyright (C) YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-# This file is distributed under the same license as the original article.
-# FIRST AUTHOR <address@hidden>, YEAR.
-#
-#, fuzzy
-msgid ""
-msgstr ""
-"Project-Id-Version: ubuntu-spyware.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-04-02 16:58+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
-"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
-"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
-"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
-"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CHARSET\n"
-"Content-Transfer-Encoding: ENCODING"
-
-#. type: Content of: <title>
-msgid "Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <h2>
-msgid "Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do?"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "by <a href=\"http://www.stallman.org/\";>Richard Stallman</a>"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"One of the major advantages of free software is that the community protects "
-"users from malicious software. Now Ubuntu <a "
-"href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\"> GNU/Linux </a> has become a "
-"counterexample. What should we do?"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Proprietary software is associated with malicious treatment of the user: "
-"surveillance code, digital handcuffs (DRM or Digital Restrictions "
-"Management) to restrict users, and back doors that can do nasty things under "
-"remote control. Programs that do any of these things are malware and should "
-"be treated as such. Widely used examples include Windows, the iThings, and "
-"the Amazon “Kindle” product for virtual book burning, which do "
-"all three; Macintosh and the Playstation III which impose DRM; most portable "
-"phones, which do spying and have back doors; Adobe Flash Player, which does "
-"spying and enforces DRM; and plenty of apps for iThings and Android, which "
-"are guilty of one or more of these nasty practices."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Free software gives users a chance to protect themselves from malicious "
-"software behaviors. Even better, usually the community protects everyone, "
-"and most users don't have to move a muscle. Here's how."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Once in a while, users who know programming find that a free program has "
-"malicious code. Generally the next thing they do is release a corrected "
-"version of the program; with the four freedoms that define free software "
-"(see <a "
-"href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>),
"
-"they are free to do this. This is called a “fork” of the "
-"program. Soon the community switches to the corrected fork, and the "
-"malicious version is rejected. The prospect of ignominious rejection is not "
-"very tempting; thus, most of the time, even those who are not stopped by "
-"their consciences and social pressure refrain from putting malfeatures in "
-"free software."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"But not always. Ubuntu, a widely used and influential <a "
-"href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\"> GNU/Linux </a> distribution, has installed "
-"surveillance code. When the user searches her own local files for a string "
-"using the Ubuntu desktop, Ubuntu sends that string to one of Canonical's "
-"servers. (Canonical is the company that develops Ubuntu.)"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"This is just like the first surveillance practice I learned about in "
-"Windows. My late friend Fravia told me that when he searched for a string "
-"in the files of his Windows system, it sent a packet to some server, which "
-"was detected by his firewall. Given that first example I paid attention and "
-"learned about the propensity of “reputable” proprietary software "
-"to be malware. Perhaps it is no coincidence that Ubuntu sends the same "
-"information."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Ubuntu uses the information about searches to show the user ads to buy "
-"various things from Amazon. Amazon commits many wrongs (see <a "
-"href=\"http://stallman.org/amazon.html\";>http://stallman.org/amazon.html</a>);
"
-"by promoting Amazon, Canonical contributes to them. However, the ads are "
-"not the core of the problem. The main issue is the spying. Canonical says "
-"it does not tell Amazon who searched for what. However, it is just as bad "
-"for Canonical to collect your personal information as it would have been for "
-"Amazon to collect it."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"People will certainly make a modified version of Ubuntu without this "
-"surveillance. In fact, several GNU/Linux distros are modified versions of "
-"Ubuntu. When those update to the latest Ubuntu as a base, I expect they "
-"will remove this. Canonical surely expects that too."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Most free software developers would abandon such a plan given the prospect "
-"of a mass switch to someone else's corrected version. But Canonical has not "
-"abandoned the Ubuntu spyware. Perhaps Canonical figures that the name "
-"“Ubuntu” has so much momentum and influence that it can avoid "
-"the usual consequences and get away with surveillance."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Canonical says this feature searches the Internet in other ways. Depending "
-"on the details, that might or might not make the problem bigger, but not "
-"smaller."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Ubuntu allows users to switch the surveillance off. Clearly Canonical "
-"thinks that many Ubuntu users will leave this setting in the default state "
-"(on). And many may do so, because it doesn't occur to them to try to do "
-"anything about it. Thus, the existence of that switch does not make the "
-"surveillance feature ok."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Even if it were disabled by default, the feature would still be dangerous: "
-"“opt in, once and for all” for a risky practice, where the risk "
-"varies depending on details, invites carelessness. To protect users' "
-"privacy, systems should make prudence easy: when a local search program has "
-"a network search feature, it should be up to the user to choose network "
-"search explicitly <em>each time</em>. This is easy: all it takes is to have "
-"separate buttons for network searches and local searches, as earlier "
-"versions of Ubuntu did. A network search feature should also inform the "
-"user clearly and concretely about who will get what personal information of "
-"hers, if and when she uses the feature."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"If a sufficient part of our community's opinion leaders view this issue in "
-"personal terms only, if they switch the surveillance off for themselves and "
-"continue to promote Ubuntu, Canonical might get away with it. That would be "
-"a great loss to the free software community."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"We who present free software as a defense against malware do not say it is a "
-"perfect defense. No perfect defense is known. We don't say the community "
-"will deter malware <em>without fail</em>. Thus, strictly speaking, the "
-"Ubuntu spyware example doesn't mean we have to eat our words."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"But there's more at stake here than whether some of us have to eat some "
-"words. What's at stake is whether our community can effectively use the "
-"argument based on proprietary spyware. If we can only say, “free "
-"software won't spy on you, unless it's Ubuntu,” that's much less "
-"powerful than saying, “free software won't spy on you.”"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"It behooves us to give Canonical whatever rebuff is needed to make it stop "
-"this. Any excuse Canonical offers is inadequate; even if it used all the "
-"money it gets from Amazon to develop free software, that can hardly overcome "
-"what free software will lose if it ceases to offer an effective way to avoid "
-"abuse of the users."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"If you ever recommend or redistribute GNU/Linux, please remove Ubuntu from "
-"the distros you recommend or redistribute. If its practice of installing "
-"and recommending nonfree software didn't convince you to stop, let this "
-"convince you. In your install fests, in your Software Freedom Day events, "
-"in your FLISOL events, don't install or recommend Ubuntu. Instead, tell "
-"people that Ubuntu is shunned for spying."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"While you're at it, you can also tell them that Ubuntu contains nonfree "
-"programs and suggests other nonfree programs. (See <a "
-"href=\"/distros/common-distros.html\"> "
-"http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html</a>.) That will counteract "
-"the other form of negative influence that Ubuntu exerts in the free software "
-"community: legitimizing nonfree software."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <blockquote><p>
-msgid ""
-"As of March, 2014, I have heard talk of a plan to change Ubuntu to remove "
-"this surveillance malfeature. I hope Ubuntu does make that change and soon, "
-"since that will vindicate free software's reputation. If and when the "
-"current Ubuntu release no longer has this search functionality, I will note "
-"that in this page."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <blockquote><p>
-msgid ""
-"The presence of nonfree software in Ubuntu is a separate issue. For Ubuntu "
-"to be ethical, that too must be fixed."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.
-#. type: Content of: <div>
-msgid "*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S NOTES*"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a "
-"href=\"mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>. There are also <a "
-"href=\"/contact/\">other ways to contact</a> the FSF. Broken links and "
-"other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a "
-"href=\"mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
-#. replace it with the translation of these two:
-#
-#. We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
-#. translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
-#. Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
-#. to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
-#
-#. <address@hidden></a>.</p>
-#
-#. <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
-#. our web pages, see <a
-#. href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-#. README</a>.
-#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Please see the <a "
-"href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html\">Translations README</a> "
-"for information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2012 Richard Stallman"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"This page is licensed under a <a rel=\"license\" "
-"href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/\";>Creative Commons "
-"Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.
-#. type: Content of: <div><div>
-msgid "*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. timestamp start
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Updated:"
-msgstr ""
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy po/ubuntu-spyware.translist ubun...,
Pavel Kharitonov <=