www/philosophy surveillance-vs-democracy.it.htm...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     14/01/20 23:28:34

Modified files:
        philosophy     : surveillance-vs-democracy.it.html 
        philosophy/po  : surveillance-vs-democracy.it-en.html 
                         surveillance-vs-democracy.it.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13

Patches:
Index: surveillance-vs-democracy.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- surveillance-vs-democracy.it.html   3 Jan 2014 10:58:46 -0000       1.1
+++ surveillance-vs-democracy.it.html   20 Jan 2014 23:28:33 -0000      1.2
@@ -158,6 +158,36 @@
 da quel momento. Quanto a sospendere o ignorare temporaneamente questa
 legge, l’idea sarebbe priva di senso.</p>
 
+<h3>Primo, non essere sciocchi</h3>
+
+<p>Per avere privacy dovete evitare di buttarla via: voi dovete essere i primi
+a proteggere la vostra privacy. Non rivelate a un'azienda come Facebook
+informazioni personali che non vorreste fossero pubblicate, e lo stesso per
+quanto riguarda informazioni sui vostri amici. Anzi, se potete evitate
+proprio di usare Facebook.</p>
+
+<p>Non date ad alcun sito la vostra lista di contatti e-mail o
+telefonici. Conservate voi i vostri dati, senza metterli nel
+&ldquo;comodo&rdquo; server di un'azienda. &Egrave; comunque sicuro
+utilizzare un servizio commerciale per il backup dei dati, purché i dati,
+nomi di file compresi, siano criptati con software libero sul vostro
+computer prima dell'upload.</p>
+
+<p>Ai fini della privacy il software non libero va evitato poiché, come
+conseguenza del dare ad altri il controllo delle vostre operazioni
+informatiche, è probabile che <a
+href="/philosophy/proprietary-surveillance.html"> vi spii </a>.  Bisogna
+anche evitare i <a
+href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html"> servizi
+sostitutivi del software </a>; oltre a dare il controllo delle vostre
+operazioni informatiche ad altri, vi costringe a consegnare ad un server
+tutti i relativi dati.</p>
+
+<p>Comunque, anche la protezione personale più rigorosa non basta per
+proteggere la propria privacy in (o da) sistemi di altri. Quando
+comunichiamo con gli altri o ci muoviamo in città , la nostra privacy dipende
+dalle pratiche della società .</p>
+
 <h3>Dobbiamo progettare tutti i sistemi tenendo a mente la privacy</h3>
 
 <p>Se non vogliamo una società a sorveglianza totale, dobbiamo considerare la
@@ -245,10 +275,12 @@
 pagamenti anonimi, cioè anonimi per chi paga. (Non vogliamo che i venditori
 evadano il fisco.) <a
 
href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/05/lets-cut-through-the-bitcoin-hype/";>Bitcoin
-non è anonimo</a>, ma la tecnologia per <a
+non è anonimo</a> (benché siano allo studio sistemi per pagare in maniera
+anonima in Bitcoin), ma la tecnologia per <a
 href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/emoney_pr.html";>la moneta
-digitale</a> è stata sviluppata 25 anni fa; ci occorrono solo dei modelli di
-business adatti, che non vengano intralciati dallo stato.</p>
+digitale</a> è stata sviluppata negli anni Ottanta del secolo scorso; ci
+occorrono solo dei modelli di business adatti, che non vengano intralciati
+dallo stato.</p>
 
 <p>Un rischio ulteriore della raccolta di dati personali da parte dei siti è
 che altri possano violare i loro sistemi di sicurezza, impadronirsi dei dati
@@ -482,7 +514,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Ultimo aggiornamento:
 
-$Date: 2014/01/03 10:58:46 $
+$Date: 2014/01/20 23:28:33 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it-en.html     3 Jan 2014 10:58:47 -0000       
1.1
+++ po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it-en.html     20 Jan 2014 23:28:33 -0000      
1.2
@@ -157,6 +157,36 @@
 collect data starting at that date.  As for suspending or momentarily
 ignoring this law, the idea would hardly make sense.</p>
 
+<h3>First, Don't Be Foolish</h3>
+
+<p>To have privacy, you must not throw it away: the first one who has
+to protect your privacy is you.  Don't tell a company such as Facebook
+anything about you that you hesitate to publish in a newspaper.  Don't
+tell a company such as Facebook anything about your friends that they
+might not wish to publish in a newspaper.  Better yet, don't be one
+of Facebook's users at all.</p>
+
+<p>Never give any web site your entire list of email or phone
+contacts.  Keep your own data; don't store your data in a company's
+&ldquo;convenient&rdquo; server.  It's safe, however, to entrust a
+data backup to a commercial service, provided you encrypted the data,
+including the file names, with free software on your own computer
+before uploading it.</p>
+
+<p>For privacy's sake, you must avoid nonfree software since, as a
+consequence of giving others control of your computing, it
+is <a href="/philosophy/proprietary-surveillance.html"> likely to spy
+on you </a>.
+Avoid <a href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html">
+service as a software substitute </a>; as well as giving others
+control of your computing, it requires you to hand over all the
+pertinent data to the server.</p>
+
+<p>However, even the most rigorous self-protection is insufficient to
+protect your privacy on or from systems that don't belong to you.
+When we communicate with others or move around the city, our
+privacy depends on the practices of society.</p>
+
 <h3>We Must Design Every System for Privacy</h3>
 
 <p>If we don't want a total surveillance society, we must consider
@@ -245,9 +275,10 @@
 payments&mdash;anonymous for the payer, that is.  (We don't want the
 payee to dodge taxes.)  <a
 href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/05/lets-cut-through-the-bitcoin-hype/";>
-Bitcoin is not anonymous</a>, but technology for <a
+Bitcoin is not anonymous</a>, though there are efforts to develop
+ways to pay anonymously with Bitcoin.  However, technology for <a
 href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/emoney_pr.html";> digital
-cash was first developed 25 years ago</a>; we need only suitable
+cash was first developed in the 1980s</a>; we need only suitable
 business arrangements, and for the state not to obstruct them.</p>
 
 <p>A further threat from sites' collection of personal data is that
@@ -456,7 +487,7 @@
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/01/03 10:58:47 $
+$Date: 2014/01/20 23:28:33 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it.po  20 Jan 2014 23:15:34 -0000      1.12
+++ po/surveillance-vs-democracy.it.po  20 Jan 2014 23:28:33 -0000      1.13
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-19 05:25+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -574,26 +573,7 @@
 "le “politiche sulla privacy” sono più una scusa per violare la privacy 
che "
 "un impegno a rispettarla."
 
-# | We could correct both problems by adopting a system of anonymous
-# | payments&mdash;anonymous for the payer, that is.  (We don't want the payee
-# | to dodge taxes.)  <a
-# | 
href=\"http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/05/lets-cut-through-the-bitcoin-hype/\";>
-# | Bitcoin is not anonymous</a>, [-but-] {+though there are efforts to
-# | develop ways to pay anonymously with Bitcoin.  However,+} technology for
-# | <a href=\"http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/emoney_pr.html\";>
-# | digital cash was first developed [-25 years ago</a>;-] {+in the
-# | 1980s</a>;+} we need only suitable business arrangements, and for the
-# | state not to obstruct them.
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "We could correct both problems by adopting a system of anonymous "
-#| "payments&mdash;anonymous for the payer, that is.  (We don't want the "
-#| "payee to dodge taxes.)  <a href=\"http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/05/";
-#| "lets-cut-through-the-bitcoin-hype/\"> Bitcoin is not anonymous</a>, but "
-#| "technology for <a href=\"http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/";
-#| "emoney_pr.html\"> digital cash was first developed 25 years ago</a>; we "
-#| "need only suitable business arrangements, and for the state not to "
-#| "obstruct them."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "We could correct both problems by adopting a system of anonymous "
 "payments&mdash;anonymous for the payer, that is.  (We don't want the payee "