www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy selling.de.html selling.hr.html ...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy selling.de.html selling.hr.html ...
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:59:04 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     13/11/29 22:59:04

Modified files:
        philosophy     : selling.de.html selling.hr.html 
Added files:
        philosophy/po  : selling.hr-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.de.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.hr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1

Patches:
Index: selling.de.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.de.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- selling.de.html     15 Apr 2012 15:56:37 -0000      1.7
+++ selling.de.html     29 Nov 2013 22:59:03 -0000      1.8
@@ -4,6 +4,13 @@
   <title>Freie Software verkaufen - GNU-Projekt - Free Software
   Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.de.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.de.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.de.po</a>' -->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-09-30" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.de.html" -->
 <div id="outdated">
 <p>Bei diesem Werk bzw. Inhalt handelt es sich um eine Übersetzung aus dem
 Englischen. Nachträgliche Änderungen bzw. Ergänzungen sind möglicherweise
@@ -222,7 +229,7 @@
 <p>Übersetzung: Andreas K. Foerster, 2006.</p>
 
 <!-- hhmts start -->
-$Date: 2012/04/15 15:56:37 $ $Author: joeko $
+$Date: 2013/11/29 22:59:03 $ $Author: gnun $
 <!-- hhmts end -->
 (keine inhaltliche Überarbeitung)</p>
 </div>

Index: selling.hr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.hr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- selling.hr.html     31 Aug 2013 20:12:37 -0000      1.5
+++ selling.hr.html     29 Nov 2013 22:59:04 -0000      1.6
@@ -10,6 +10,13 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.hr.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.hr.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.hr.po</a>' -->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-09-30" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.hr.html" -->
 <h2>Prodaja slobodnog softvera</h2>
 
 <p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html"> </a> Dostupna su i </em>
@@ -252,7 +259,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Zadnji put promijenjeno:
 
-$Date: 2013/08/31 20:12:37 $
+$Date: 2013/11/29 22:59:04 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/selling.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/selling.hr-diff.html
diff -N po/selling.hr-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/selling.hr-diff.html     29 Nov 2013 22:59:04 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/selling.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Selling Free Software
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Selling Free Software&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html"&gt;Some 
views on the
+ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
+GPL&lt;/a&gt; are also available.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
+should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
+you should charge as little as possible &mdash; just enough to cover
+the cost.  This is a misunderstanding.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html"&gt;free software&lt;/a&gt;
+to charge as much as they wish or can.  If this seems surprising to
+you, please read on.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+The word &ldquo;free&rdquo; has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
+either to freedom or to price.  When we speak of &ldquo;free software&rdquo;,
+we're talking about freedom, not price.  (Think of &ldquo;free speech&rdquo;,
+not &ldquo;free beer&rdquo;.)  Specifically, it means that a user is free to 
run
+the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or
+without changes.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
+substantial price.  Often the same program is available in both ways
+from different places.  The program is free regardless of the price,
+because users have freedom in using it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware"&gt;Nonfree 
programs&lt;/a&gt;
+are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
+a copy at no charge.  That doesn't make it free software, though.
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because users don't have
+freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make
+the software
+free, or even closer to free.  So if you are redistributing copies of free
+software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and &lt;em&gt;make
+some money&lt;/em&gt;.  Redistributing free software is a good and
+legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
+from it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
+ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community.  For a
+distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to free 
software development projects or to the
+&lt;a href="/fsf/fsf.html"&gt;Free Software Foundation&lt;/a&gt;.  This way 
you can
+advance the world of free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+&lt;strong&gt;Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
+funds for development.  Don't waste it!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra.  If you
+charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
+development.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+
+&lt;h3&gt;Will a higher distribution price hurt some users?&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
+software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money.  With
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware"&gt;proprietary
+software&lt;/a&gt;, a high price does exactly that &mdash; but free software
+is different.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
+and there are many ways to get it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
+proprietary program without paying the standard price.  If this price
+is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+With free software, users don't &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; to pay the
+distribution fee in order to use the software.  They can copy the
+program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
+has network access.  Or several users can join together, split the
+price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software.  A high
+CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+
+&lt;h3&gt;Will a higher distribution price discourage use of free 
software?&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Another common concern is for the popularity of free software.  People
+think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
+users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+This is true for proprietary software &mdash; but free software is
+different.  With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
+service has less effect on popularity.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
+mainly by &lt;em&gt;how much free software can do&lt;/em&gt;, and how easy it
+is to use.  Many users do not make freedom their priority; they
+may continue to use proprietary software if
+free software can't do all the jobs they want done.  Thus, if we want
+to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
+&lt;em&gt;develop more free software&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
+&lt;a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist"&gt;free 
software&lt;/a&gt;
+or
+&lt;a href="/doc/doc.html"&gt;manuals&lt;/a&gt; yourself.  But if you do
+distribution rather than writing, the best way you can help is by
+raising funds for others to write them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+
+&lt;h3&gt;The term &ldquo;selling software&rdquo; can be confusing 
too&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Strictly speaking, &ldquo;selling&rdquo; means trading goods for
+money.  Selling a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we
+encourage it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+However, when people think of
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware"&gt;&ldquo;selling 
software&rdquo;&lt;/a&gt;,
+they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
+software proprietary rather than free.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
+article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
+&ldquo;selling software&rdquo; and choose some other wording instead.
+For example, you could say &ldquo;distributing free software for a
+fee&rdquo;&mdash;that is unambiguous.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+
+&lt;h3&gt;High or low fees, and the GNU GPL&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Except for one special situation, the
+&lt;a href="/copyleft/gpl.html"&gt;GNU General Public License&lt;/a&gt; (GNU 
GPL)
+has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a
+copy of free software.  You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or
+a billion dollars.  It's up to you, and the marketplace, so don't
+complain to us if nobody wants to pay a billion dollars for a
+copy.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
+without the corresponding complete source code.  Those who do this are
+required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
+Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
+a fee too large for anyone to pay&mdash;such as a billion
+dollars&mdash;and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
+concealing it.  So <span class="removed"><del><strong>in</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;a 
href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6"&gt;in</em></ins></span> this case we
+have to limit the <span class="removed"><del><strong>fee</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>fee&lt;/a&gt;</em></ins></span> for source in 
order
+to ensure the user's freedom.  In ordinary situations, however, there
+is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
+limit them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line stated in the GNU
+GPL plead for permission, saying that they &ldquo;won't charge
+money for the GNU software&rdquo; or such like.  That won't get them anywhere
+with us.  Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
+defending freedom.  When we defend users' freedom, we are not
+distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
+charged.  Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, 2013
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2013/11/29 22:59:04 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]