www/philosophy rms-interview-edinburgh.html

[Pavel Kharitonov]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev>       13/10/15 07:01:02

Modified files:
        philosophy     : rms-interview-edinburgh.html 

Log message:
        s/non[- ]free/nonfree/; update to boilerplate 1.75

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/rms-interview-edinburgh.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11

Patches:
Index: rms-interview-edinburgh.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/rms-interview-edinburgh.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- rms-interview-edinburgh.html        28 Feb 2013 17:09:43 -0000      1.10
+++ rms-interview-edinburgh.html        15 Oct 2013 07:00:56 -0000      1.11
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<title>Interview with Richard Stallman, Edinburgh, 2004</title>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+<title>Interview with Richard Stallman, Edinburgh, 2004
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/rms-interview-edinburgh.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
 <h2>Interview with Richard Stallman, Edinburgh, 2004</h2>
@@ -27,7 +29,7 @@
 were participating in, was morally sickening.  And I decided that I
 was going to try to create once again a community of cooperation.  I
 realized that, what I could get out of a life of participation in the
-competition to subjugate each other, which is what non free software
+competition to subjugate each other, which is what nonfree software
 is, all I could get out of that was money and I would have a life that
 I would hate.
 </dd>
@@ -64,14 +66,14 @@
 software, whether those developers be corporations or individuals or
 universities or what.  
 <span class="gnun-split"></span>The users shouldn't be kept divided and
-helpless.  And that's what non-free software does; It keeps the users
+helpless.  And that's what nonfree software does; It keeps the users
 divided and helpless.  Divided because you are forbidden to share
 copies with anyone else and helpless because you don't get the source
 code.  So you can't even tell what the program does, let alone change
 it.  So there is definitely a relationship.  We are working against
 domination by software developers, many of those software developers
 are corporations.  And some large corporations exert a form of
-domination through non free software.
+domination through nonfree software.
 </dd>
 
 <dt>
@@ -84,16 +86,16 @@
 </dt>
 
 <dd>
-At the moment I would not go quite so far as to say that non free
+At the moment I would not go quite so far as to say that nonfree
 software couldn't be usable by opposition movements, because many of
-them are using it.  It is not ethical to use non free software.
+them are using it.  It is not ethical to use nonfree software.
 Because&hellip; At least it is not ethical to use authorized copies.
 But it is not a good thing to use any copies.  You see to use
 authorized copies, you have to agree not to share with other people
 and to agree to that is an unethical act in itself, which we should
 reject.  And that is the basic reason why I started the free software
 movement.  I wanted to make it easy to reject the unethical act of
-agreeing to the license of a non free program.  
+agreeing to the license of a nonfree program.  
 <span class="gnun-split"></span>If you are using an
 unauthorized copy then you haven't agreed to that.  You haven't
 committed that unethical act.  But you are still&hellip; you are
@@ -141,18 +143,18 @@
 freedom, gradually and encroach on freedom and you have a
 vulnerability.  And what we see is that many of the corporate
 developers and distributors of free software put it in a package
-together with some non free user subjugating software and so they say
+together with some nonfree user subjugating software and so they say
 the user subjugating software is a bonus, that it enhances the system.
 And if you haven't learnt to value freedom, you won't see any reason
 to disbelieve them.  
 <span class="gnun-split"></span>But this is not a new problem and it is not
 limited to large corporations.  All of the commercial distributors of
 the GNU/Linux system going back something like 7 or 8 years, have made
-a practice of including non free software in their distributions, and
+a practice of including nonfree software in their distributions, and
 this is something I have been trying to push against in various ways,
 without much success.  But, in fact, even the non commercial
 distributors of the GNU+Linux operating system have been including and
-distributing non free software, and the sad thing was, that of all the
+distributing nonfree software, and the sad thing was, that of all the
 many distributions, until recently there was none, that I could
 recommend.  Now I know of one, that I can recommend, its called
 &ldquo;Ututo-e&rdquo;, it comes from Argentina.  I hope that very soon
@@ -167,7 +169,7 @@
 <dd>
 The Open Source Movement was founded specifically to discard the
 ethical foundation of the free software movement.  The Free Software
-movement starts from an ethical judgment, that non free software is
+movement starts from an ethical judgment, that nonfree software is
 anti-social, it is wrong treatment of other people.  And I reached
 this conclusion before I started developing the GNU system.  I
 developed the GNU system specifically to create an alternative to an
@@ -326,45 +328,65 @@
 <dt>Okay thanks very much.</dt>
 </dl>
 
-</div>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
 <div id="footer">
 
-<p>
-Please send FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to 
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+<p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.
 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> 
-the FSF.
-<br />
-Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
 
-<p>
-Please see the 
-<a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting
-translations of this article.
-</p>
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
 
-<p>
-Copyright &copy; 2004 Richard M. Stallman
-</p>
-<p>
-This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see <a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+        README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2004 Richard M. Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/02/28 17:09:43 $
+$Date: 2013/10/15 07:00:56 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>