www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy words-to-avoid.es.html po/words-...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy words-to-avoid.es.html po/words-...
Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 08:58:20 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     13/05/05 08:58:20

Modified files:
        philosophy     : words-to-avoid.es.html 
        philosophy/po  : words-to-avoid.es-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.64&r2=1.65
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31

Patches:
Index: words-to-avoid.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.64
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -b -r1.64 -r1.65
--- words-to-avoid.es.html      2 May 2013 13:41:53 -0000       1.64
+++ words-to-avoid.es.html      5 May 2013 08:58:19 -0000       1.65
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@
 
 <h4 id="Theft">«Robo»</h4>
 <p>
-Los apologistas del copyright usan frecuentemente palabras como «robado» y
+Los apologistas del copyright usan frecuentemente palabras como «robo» y
 «hurto» para referirse a la violación del copyright. Es una farsa, pero
 esperan que usted lo tome como una verdad objetiva.</p>
 <p>
@@ -711,6 +711,10 @@
 copyright. Los apologistas del copyright están apelando a las autoridades y
 malinterpretando lo que la misma autoridad dice.</p>
 <p>
+Para rebatir, indique el siguiente <a
+href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/may/04/harper-lee-kill-mockingbird-copyright";>ejemplo
+real</a> de un presunto robo del copyright.</p>
+<p>
 La copia no autorizada está prohibida bajo la ley de copyright en muchas
 circunstancias (¡no en todas!), pero el hecho de que esté prohibido no hace
 que sea una cosa mala. En general las leyes no definen lo que es bueno o lo
@@ -818,7 +822,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización: 
 
-$Date: 2013/05/02 13:41:53 $
+$Date: 2013/05/05 08:58:19 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html        2 May 2013 13:41:54 -0000       1.30
+++ po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html        5 May 2013 08:58:19 -0000       1.31
@@ -746,6 +746,10 @@
 copyright apologists are making an appeal to authority&mdash;and
 misrepresenting what authority says.</p>
 <p>
+To refute them, you can point to this
+<a 
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/may/04/harper-lee-kill-mockingbird-copyright";>
+real example</a> of alleged copyright theft.</p>
+<p>
 Unauthorized copying is forbidden by copyright law in many
 circumstances (not all!), but being forbidden doesn't make it wrong.
 In general, laws don't define right and wrong.  Laws, at their best,
@@ -825,7 +829,7 @@
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/05/02 13:41:54 $
+$Date: 2013/05/05 08:58:19 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]